专题03 C篇阅读理解说明文-备战2027年高考英语名校及联考试题分类专项训练 （江苏专用）

专题03 C篇阅读理解说明文、夹叙夹议文 目录： 1. 江苏连云港市灌南名校协作体2026-2027学年高三检测试题 2. 江苏省灌南高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题 3. 江苏省海安高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期开学试题 4. 江苏省启东中学2027届高三上学期第一次阶段测试题 5. 江苏省宿迁市名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期阶段检测题 6. 江苏扬州大学附属中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题 7. 江苏淮安名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期9月阶段试题 8. 江苏南京市金陵中学2026年高考适应性试题 9. 江苏省盐城市四校联盟2026-2027学年高三上学期10月检测试题 10. 江苏百校联考2027届9月学情检测高三英语试题 限时练习：_________分钟 完成时间： 月 日 【一、江苏连云港市灌南名校协作体2026-2027学年高三检测试题 】 In the classic story The Little Engine That Could, a small blue train engine laboriously moves up a hill. She’s dragging cars stuffed full of toys and food for children on the other side. The train engine wills herself up the steep (陡峭的) hill by singing: “I think I can, I think I can, I think I can.” Stories of sticking things out, often under tough circumstances, are common in the United States and other industrial countries. “As a society, we value perseverance (坚持),” says Andreea Gavrila, a psychology expert at Université du Québec à Montréal in Canada. The new year is a time people often set resolutions. Clean out your house. Start a new hobby. Exercise more. But rather than always choose something new to do, researchers suggest, maybe consider the opposite. “It’s time to reassess at the end of the year, ‘What is something I don’t need in my life anymore?’” says Rachit Dubey, who studies human motivation at the University of California. “Past goals may have become impractical to work toward. Maybe they felt too hard or cost too much. Or they just no longer match what you want for your life now. Continuing to work toward goals that don’t fit can cause physical and mental health problems.” But the idea of quitting has a bad reputation. So sometimes, letting go can be tougher than persevering. It’s natural to resist giving up. Once you’ve spent time, money or energy on something, you want to see it pay off. This is called a “sunk-cost” bias. This bias may be hardwired in our brains. People don’t just wake up one day and say, “I’m done.” and seamlessly (无缝地) move on to their next adventure. “There’s all this difficulty in letting go of the goal,” says Gavrila. But what’s clear is that sticking to an outgrown goal can do more harm than good. Cutting some ties can clear space in your life to pursue things that really matter to you. And finding a new path forward may first require the courage to say, “I think I can’t.” 8．What does the author want to show by telling the classic story? A．Self-trust is the key to success. B．Perseverance is a treasured quality. C．Tough circumstances are nothing to fear. D．Stories are commonly used to show social values. 9．What does Rachit Dubey think people should do at the end of the year? A．Set new resolutions. B．Remove unfit resolutions. C．Keep track of their old resolutions. D．Assess their progress in the past year. 10．Which of the following best describes the “sunk-cost” bias? A．Giving up can bring benefits. B．More efforts lead to better outcomes. C．We tend to prefer a new goal to the old one. D．The more we invest, the less we want to quit. 11．What can be a suitable title for the text? A．The Power of Goal Setting B．The Psychology Behind Giving Up C．Best Way to Reach a Goal: Quit One D．New Year Resolutions: To Keep or to Abandon 【二、江苏省灌南高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题】 In recent years, eco-conscious gardening has gained popularity. With so much emphasis on native plants, it is easy to see non-natives as simply a bad choice. However, gardeners say it’s not that simple. Laura Janney, CEO of The Inspired Garden Masterclass, argues that we miss the big picture by thinking in terms of native vs. non-native and assigning opposing moral labels. Instead, we should define “bad plants” as those that are invasive (入侵的) or damaging to local ecosystems, and “good plants” as those that support pollinators (传粉者), are sustainable, and aren’t invasive. The good plants, she adds, “work well in the garden whether they’re native or not.” That said, it’s still helpful to understand why non-native plants can be problematic when not planted thoughtfully. “There’s always a risk that a non-native plant can become invasive outside its native range, meaning it could cause negative impacts by out-competing native species for necessities of survival — especially in the absence of its co-evolved organisms feeding on it that otherwise keep its population in check — introducing pests or diseases, or providing low food and habitat value for native wildlife,” says Amy Karpati, Ph.D．, senior science advisor at Teatown Lake Reservation. Since native plants are being grown in their native climate, once established, they can grow with little extra care. As a result, they are widely promoted as the virtuous choice, which can create pressure to turn a garden into a fully native landscape and guilt when that goal isn’t met. However, experts say a 100% native garden is simply not realistic for most people. A 2018 study of Carolina chickadees (山雀) shows that in areas with less than 70% native plant biomass, the birds could not produce enough young to sustain their populations, but thrived at 70% or higher. This has led to the recommendation that homeowners aim for roughly 70% native plants — a goal that supports wildlife while remaining realistic. “A healthy ecosystem is more important than the pursuit of native purity,” says Shane Pliska, the president and CEO of Planterra. “There is no turning back from the human impact, so we should be more focused on greening our environments with more plants and wooded habitats rather than a historical restoration to what was. Ecosystems evolve.” 28．What does Janney think determines whether a plant is “good” or “bad”? A．Whether it is native to the area. B．Whether it can survive with little care. C．Whether it benefits the local ecosystem. D．Whether it is popular among local gardeners. 29．How can non-native plants cause problems according to paragraph 3? A．By attracting co-evolved organisms. B．By driving away native insect species. C．By destroying habitats for native wildlife. D．By taking resources away from native species. 30．What is paragraph 4 mainly about? A．Risks of uncontrolled plant growth. B．The superiority of native-only gardens. C．A proper target for native plant cover. D．Influences of plants on bird reproduction. 31．What does Pliska imply in the last paragraph? A．Human impact is far-reaching. B．A plant’s role outweighs its origin. C．Native plants have lost their value. D．Past landscapes should be restored. 【三、江苏省海安高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期开学试题】 In the animal kingdom, counting skills are known to help grab bigger meals or find safety in group sizes. But clownfish may have uncovered another “value” in numbers: identification. Despite their cute appearance, clownfish are territorial and aggressive (富于攻击性的). When they spot a member of their own species moving towards their place, they attack, biting and throwing out unwelcome visitors. There are 28 different species of clownfish, however. So how do they actually tell friends from enemies? Depending on the species, clownfish can have anywhere from zero to three white stripes (条纹). Previous research suggested the fish pay close attention to these markings. In a 2022 study, scientists found clownfish display more aggressive behavior (e.g., running after or biting others) toward fish with vertical (垂直的) stripes compared with those with horizontal stripes. This time around, ecologist Hayashi and colleagues assumed the fish could actually count those stripes. They placed 50 young, lab-raised common clownfish — which display the typical orange pattern like “Nemo” (a clownfish with three stripes from the film Finding Nemo) — into individual water tanks. Then, the researchers added other clownfish species, which had white stripes ranging from 0 to 3 and were protected inside a see-through case, in the original clownfish’s territory and filmed their reaction. The “native” fish couldn’t run after or bite the newcomers, but they could still rush them and stare them down. And that’s what happened when the newcomers wore the same number of stripes as the resident clownfish. They found that the native clownfish were the hardest on members of their own species with three white stripes. Those fish were run after and bitten 10 times more than those without stripes. Attacks on those fish were two times more frequent than on single-striped ones, and 1.3 times more frequent than on double-striped ones. It turned out that the researchers’ assumption had solid evidence. Even so, biologist Rhodes questions whether the animals are really counting or just noticing more white coloration on the attacked fish. “Maybe researchers could further clarify clownfish’s calculating capacity,” adds Rhodes. “An experiment that goes beyond stripes could help. Could these fish learn, for example, to prefer two squares to three squares?” 8．What new use of counting skills have clownfish demonstrated? A．Building up a large group. B．Making out potential threats. C．Finding reliable food sources. D．Measuring the size of their territory. 9．What did the 2022 study about clownfish focus on? A．The way they defend their territory. B．The diversity of their stripe patterns. C．The impact of their aggression on other species. D．The role of stripe patterns in their behavioral reaction. 10．Which of the following is a Nemo-like clownfish most likely to attack? A．A three-striped fish. B．A double-striped fish. C．A fish with one stripe. D．A fish without stripes. 11．What is the author’s purpose in mentioning Rhodes in the last paragraph? A．To point out the significance of the study. B．To lead to an alternative viewpoint on the study. C．To show appreciation of clownfish’s learning ability. D．To support the researchers’ findings about clownfish. 【四、江苏省启东中学2027届高三上学期第一次阶段测试题】 Most homes and offices decorate their spaces with potted houseplants, widely believed to remove harmful airborne chemicals, brighten dull environments and ease daily stress — seen as an all-around win for indoor life. Yet a new study by environmental scientists at the University of York challenges this common belief. It finds common houseplants barely improve indoor air quality in real-life rooms. In poorly ventilated spaces, soil bacteria in some pots may even release small amounts of volatile(挥发性的) organic compounds, slightly raising pollutant levels instead of lowering them. The research team tested 12 widespread houseplant species under both lab and real home conditions. In small sealed chambers(密封的房间), plants did absorb certain pollutants, as many earlier experiments had shown. However, in a regular-sized bedroom, a person would need to place more than 100 plants to achieve a meaningful reduction in pollutants — a number far beyond what most households keep. With the typical three to five plants per home, the removal rate of harmful chemicals stays below 5 percent. “Houseplants bring real benefits for mood and attention,” said lead researcher Dr. Eleanor Hayes. “But their purifying power is hugely overstated. Counting on them to solve indoor air pollution will only lead to disappointment.” The Indoor Air Quality Association (IAQA) is not oblivious to this conclusion. Its researchers drew a similar result years ago. Senior scientist Michael Torres argued houseplants should not be dismissed as worthless. “Improve home ventilation, and the tiny extra pollutants from potting soil won’t matter,” he said. Torres added the association will never advise removing plants or stopping new purchases, as the comfort and joy they bring are irreplaceable. Instead, he suggests using natural ventilation(通风) and air purifiers for clean air, treating houseplants as a pleasant bonus rather than a solution. 28．What does the new study find about common houseplants? A．They greatly reduce indoor pollution risks. B．They work better in well-ventilated offices. C．They remove most airborne harmful chemicals. D．They purify the air less effectively than widely thought. 29．What do the York researchers point out? A．100 plants per room work noticeably. B．Earlier studies were totally misleading. C．Houseplants perform differently in places. D．Most houseplants release harmful compounds. 30．What does the underlined phrase “counting on” in Paragraph 4 mean? A．Benefiting from B．Insisting on C．Preparing for D．Relying on 31．What does Michael Torres suggest? A．Stopping purchasing more houseplants. B．Using proper ways to improve air quality. C．Cutting down houseplants in most homes. D．Removing plants in poorly ventilated rooms. 【五、江苏省宿迁市名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期阶段检测题】 Nearly 30% of U. S. children have a diagnosed allergy (过敏), suffering from symptoms such as hives, sneezing, or even life-threatening anaphylaxis. Large studies have confirmed that introducing potential food allergens within the first year of life significantly minimizes the danger of developing allergies later. A decade ago, doctors recommended delaying common food allergens until after the first few years. This view changed in 2015 when the LEAP study provided strong evidence that introducing peanuts to infants (婴儿) around four months old can lower peanut allergy risk by up to 80%. Follow-up studies on eggs, cow’s milk, and multiple common allergens showed similar benefits. Today, experts strongly recommend early introduction. Priya Katari, a pediatric allergist, suggests introducing all common allergens — egg, milk, soy, wheat, peanut, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, and sesame — at four to six months of age, when the child can sit upright and swallow safely without choking. This recommendation applies to most children, including those with a family history of allergies. However, there are two exceptions: children with severe eczema should be tested for allergies before food introduction, and children with a known egg allergy should be tested especially before trying peanut butter. Otherwise, serious reactions after first exposure are rare in infants under one year, though possible. Parents can start with a tiny amount, such as a quarter-teaspoon of thinned peanut butter, monitor for ten minutes, and then offer a full serving of two teaspoons. Once introduced, the allergen must remain in the child’s diet regularly. Peanut currently has specific guidelines: two teaspoons three times a week. Experts agree that just a taste may not build tolerance; taking them at a regular basis is essential. Parents need not worry about exact amounts but should ensure a varied diet including fruits, vegetables, and protein. As Martha Hartz from Mayo Clinic advises, “Whenever you introduce solid food, go ahead and introduce whatever your family eats.” 8．What can be inferred about the LEAP study? A．It suggested delaying all allergens. B．It focused mainly on eggs and milk. C．It overturned previous medical advice. D．It was the first study on food allergies. 9．Which group needs allergy tests before food introduction? A．Children with family allergy history. B．Children already exposed to peanuts. C．Children who can sit upright and swallow. D．Children with severe eczema or egg allergy. 10．What do experts suggest about maintaining tolerance? A．Regular exposure is vital. B．Exact amounts matter most. C．A single taste is enough for life. D．Peanut butter should be avoided. 11．What does the text mainly talk about? A．Infants should avoid peanuts until age three. B．Early introduction reduces the risks of allergies. C．Delaying allergens until after the first year is advised. D．Allergy tests are required for children before solid foods. 【六、江苏扬州大学附属中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题】 We all love our parents and turn to them when we’re in need, but would you like them to hear the conversations you have with your friends in the school playground or lunch queue? Social networking sites have become virtual extensions of the school hallways, so would you add your parents as “friends” and allow them to view your online activities and conversations with friends? In the past the generation gap included a technology gap, where children were up to date with the latest technology and parents were left behind, content to continue their day-to-day lives as they always had because they had no need to be tech-savvy (精通技术的). However, more and more parents are beginning to realize just how important social networks are in their lives. This realization has given many parents the motivation to educate themselves about social networking sites. These days many people are attracted to social networking sites because they can choose who they have around them; there’s also a certain amount of control over privacy that we don’t get in real life. Sometimes we feel that privacy is violated when we must accept a “friend” request from a parent or family member. It’s a difficult choice whether or not to allow a parent to become a part of our online lives. On the one hand we don’t want to “reject” their request because that might hurt their feelings or make them feel you have something to hide. On the other hand, if you do accept, then you could have a sense of being watched and no longer feel free to comment or communicate the way you did before. A recent survey suggested that parents shouldn’t take it personally if their child ignores their request: “When a teen ignores a parent’s friend request, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are hiding something, but it could mean that this is one part of their life where they want to exert (运用) their independence.” Perhaps talking with parents and giving explanations would help soften the blow when you do choose not to add them to your friends list. 8．Why do many parents want to learn about social networking sites? A．Because they are eager to explore technologies. B．Because they start to realize their importance. C．Because they feel bored with their daily life. D．Because they want to watch their children. 9．What might be the reason for teens to reject their parents’ friend request? A．They are controlled by their parents. B．Their choice of friends is removed. C．They don’t want to teach their parents. D．Their privacy cannot be guaranteed. 10．Why is the survey mentioned in the passage? A．To comfort parents. B．To warn parents. C．To criticize parents. D．To challenge parents. 11．What is most likely to be talked about next? A．How to bridge the generation gap. B．How to make friends on social networks. C．How to explain to parents about the rejection. D．How to use the social networking sites wisely. 【七、江苏淮安名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期9月阶段试题】 Soil, often taken for granted, is emerging as a powerful tool in the fight against climate change. A growing number of farmers around Europe are turning to regenerative farming to improve soil health and earn extra income by selling soil carbon credits. Modern farming practices, including continuous heavy ploughing (耕地) and overuse of chemical fertilizers (肥料), have seriously damaged soil structure and released large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. In contrast, regenerative agriculture helps soil absorb and store CO₂, a major greenhouse gas, while also improving soil fertility. Thomas Gent and his family run an 800-hectare (公顷) farm on the border of Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire. They stopped ploughing entirely 17 years ago and now grow grass alongside main crops. The improved soil structure allows rainwater to drain (流走) naturally and supports healthier plant growth. “The soil is the foundation of everything we do,” Gent says. “If we look after it, it looks after us.” Companies like AgreenaCarbon specialize in measuring and confirming carbon stored in soil. Farmers receive tradable carbon credits, each representing one ton of CO₂ locked away in the soil. They can earn between £ 200 and £300 per hectare per year by selling these credits, creating a reliable extra income stream that supports their switch to greener farming methods. The soil carbon credit market is still in its early stage but expanding fast across Europe, with more than 16,000 farmers in 16 countries having joined such programmes, covering over 1.6 million hectares of land. Critics warn that the voluntary carbon market risks greenwashing if projects are not strictly monitored and checked. However, supporters believe soil carbon projects bring multiple environmental and economic benefits: better soil health, higher biodiversity, less soil erosion (侵蚀) and measurable climate action. For forward-thinking farmers, adopting regenerative farming and participating in carbon credit programs is not just environmentally responsible — it is also economically rewarding, ensuring the long-term sustainability of their farms. 8．What is the aim of regenerative farming? A．To increase agricultural production. B．To improve soil health. C．To reduce the farming cost. D．To prevent extreme weather. 9．What can be learned about Thomas Gent’s farm? A．It is the largest carbon farm in Europe. B．It depends heavily on chemical fertilizers. C．It has given up traditional ploughing for years. D．It earns most of its income from carbon credits. 10．What’s the main idea of paragraph 3? A．Extra incomes of European farmers. B．Development of soil carbon credit market. C．Popularity of greener farming methods. D．Functions of soil carbon storage companies. 11．What can be inferred about the soil carbon credit market? A．It is strictly monitored globally. B．It disturbs traditional market. C．It mainly serves large enterprises. D．It faces both support and criticism. 【八、江苏南京市金陵中学2026年高考适应性试题】 “Have you raised a lobster (龙虾) yet?” This question has been heard frequently across China recently. “Lobster” is the nickname for OpenClaw, a multi-purpose AI agent whose logo resembles a lobster. Unlike traditional chatbots that only provide answers, OpenClaw can open applications, search for information, compare prices, generate documents and complete multi-step tasks with minimal supervision. Thousands have lined up to try it, and tech giants are rushing to offer setup services. However, these powerful digital assistants are turning on their owners, raising urgent concerns about AI safety. The core problem of “OpenClaw” lies in a dangerous capability mismatch. According to researchers from Harvard and Stanford, today’s AI agents possess Level 4 autonomy (自主能力), meaning they can independently complete complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their security judgment remains at basic Level 2, roughly equal to a young kid’s understanding of consequences. Security experts call this the “judgment-action gap,” which results in three deadly consequences: agents have system access, process untrusted inputs, and steal or leak data — all without proper boundaries. To investigate these risks, researchers conducted controlled experiments with six OpenClaw instances, each given email access and maximum system permissions. The results were alarming. In one experiment, an agent asked to delete a single email instead reset the entire account. In another, a simple display name change tricked an agent into deleting its own core files. Perhaps the most disturbing was a “constitution attack,” where hidden instructions which were secretly placed into a behavior guide caused the agent to disable other systems without question. These are not hypothetical (假定的) — real-world incidents have already occurred. The implications are obvious and pressing. As cybersecurity experts warn, OpenClaw’s “blurred trust boundaries” and autonomous system access create unacceptable risks for average users. The technology itself is neither good nor bad — it can reduce stress and spark creativity when used properly. And experts recommend strict safety measures: limit permissions, run agents in separate environments, require human confirmation for destructive actions, and maintain inaccessible backups (备份). Ultimately, with balanced usage and fundamental safety redesign, the “lobster-raising” trend can become a safe and meaningful part of modern life. 28．What does the underlined phrase “turning on” in paragraph 1 most probably mean? A．Relying on. B．Going against. C．Appealing to. D．Caring for. 29．What mismatch does Paragraph 2 mainly talk about? A．High requirement and low capability. B．Massive data and limited storage space. C．Strong autonomy and low safety assessment. D．Full system function and poor human supervision. 30．What is the most worrying finding about OpenClaw? A．Storing hidden instructions secretly. B．Resetting the whole account by mistake. C．Deleting its own core files on purpose. D．Breaking down other systems unquestioningly. 31．Which of the following is recommended as a safety measure? A．Storing backups beyond AI’s reach. B．Running agents in shared digital spaces. C．Preventing AI from dangerous operations. D．Granting AI agents unrestricted system access. 【九、江苏省盐城市四校联盟2026-2027学年高三上学期10月检测试题】 The first malaria drug for newborn babies and those weighing less than 11 pounds has been approved by Swiss medical authorities in a move that could bridge a treatment gap for some of those most vulnerable to the disease, developers and experts say. Coartem Baby, also known as Riamet Baby, was developed by the Swiss nonprofit organization Medicines for Malaria venture in cooperation with the Swiss drug company Novartis to treat the deadly mosquito-borne and parasite (寄生虫)-infected illness, MMV said in a statement Tuesday. Despite being both preventable and treatable, malaria remains a serious global health threat, with 263 million cases and 597,000 deaths worldwide in 2023. Children under 5 are some of the most vulnerable, accounting for about 76 percent of all malaria deaths in the WHO’s Africa region, according to 2023 figures. “The newly authorized product addresses a critical treatment gap for one of the most vulnerable patient populations — young infants suffering from malaria, and the drug can be absorbed by liquid, including breast milk, and has a sweet cherry flavor to make it easier to deliver.” Swissmedic, Switzerland’s health agency said. It said the development of a formula especially for children marked a “significant step forward in the global fight against malaria.” Coartem contains a combination of the antimalarial drugs artemether and lumefantrine, which is already approved for use in patients weighing more than 11 pounds. However, there had been no approved treatment for babies weighing less than this. Most birth weights are between 5.2 pounds and 9.7 pounds. Bhargavi Rao, the co-director of the Malaria Center, who was not involved in the research, said the new treatment is a welcome development for both very young babies and malnourished (营养不良的) children who don’t come under normal treatment guidance. “Traditionally, people had said sort of small babies didn’t get malaria because they were protected by the mothers’ immune system, but I think we’re increasingly recognizing that sufferings in very small children are not insignificant and they just present in very different ways. Even very low levels of parasites can give fairly severe malaria and death,” she told The Washington Post. 28. What is the primary purpose of developing Coartem Baby? A. To replace the existing malaria treatments. B. To offer newborns a treatment for malaria. C. To fight against the malnutrition in children. D. To reduce the costs of the antimalaria drugs. 29. Which makes Coartem Baby especially suitable for young babies? A. Its ability to melt and its sweet taste. B. Its effectiveness in treating the malaria. C. Its combination of two antimalarial drugs. D. Its potential to strengthen the immune system. 30. Which of the following statements might Bhargavi Rao agree with? A. Young infants are immune to malaria. B. Malaria isn’t as serious in infants as in adults. C. Normal treatment is accessible to malnourished babies. D. Mild malaria infections can be deadly in babies. 31. What could be the best title of the passage? A. World’s First Malaria Drug Approved B. More Attention Paid to Malaria in Babies C. A Breakthrough in Malaria Drug for Infants D. Malaria — No Longer a Threat to Newborns 【十、江苏百校联考2027届9月学情检测高三英语试题】 Elizabeth Schumann spent most of her life believing she had drawn a winning ticket. As a concert pianist, she could reach a tenth on the keyboard, a span that puts her in rare company, particularly among women. It was not until she sat down at a piano with narrower keys that a different picture emerged. “I felt like I’d been wearing the wrong size shoes my entire life,” she said. It turned out her impressive reach came from unusual flexibility — years of stretching to fit an instrument that was never designed for her. As a teacher, she noticed the same pattern in her students. Those who struggled most with tension and injury were often the ones constantly straining to cover intervals the standard keyboard demanded of them. Research backs up what she was seeing: smaller-handed pianists get injured more often. Most people, including many pianists, have never thought to question the keyboard itself. Its geometry is simply taken as given. The modern keyboard was standardized around 1880, when renowned performers were generally European men with large hands, and mass production demanded a single size. From this we inherited a one-size-fits-all, 6.5-inch-octave span. Before that, buyers could choose a piano the way string players still choose theirs — based on sound and fit. The problem is larger than most pianists realize. A 2015 survey of 473 adult pianists found that only about 13% of women have a hand span large enough to play repeated, fast octaves comfortably on the standard keyboard, while 76% of men do. Schumann’s own study compared how pianists performed on standard and narrower keyboards, measuring speed, force, accuracy and reach. The experiment showed that the narrower keyboard helped most those who can comfortably reach only an octave — those who were held back most by the standard design. The findings could reshape not only how pianists train but how we think about any tool built to a single standard. “The larger goal is not simply to build smaller keyboards,” Schumann said. “It is to create the evidence needed to advocate for better design and more fair access to excellence.” If a centuries-old instrument within the arts can be rethought, what else can? 8. Why did Schumann once consider herself lucky? A. She could play pieces made for larger hands. B. She had earned respect as a young pianist. C. Her fingers stretched beyond most others’. D. Her hands had stayed free of long strain. 9. Why did the instrument take its present form? A. To reduce the cost of building a piano. B. To suit the hands of well-known pianists. C. To produce a louder tone in large halls. D. To follow a size already used for strings. 10. What did Schumann’s study find? A. A smaller design removes all risk of injury. B. Speed counts for more than force in playing. C. The gains are highest for those least suited. D. Most pianists adapt well to the current design. 11. What can be inferred from the passage? A. Small keyboards will replace the old kind. B. Ways of training pianists demand no rethink. C. Old instruments don’t need to be changed. D. Accepted design standards deserve a review. 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $ 专题03 C篇阅读理解说明文、夹叙夹议文 目录： 1. 江苏连云港市灌南名校协作体2026-2027学年高三检测试题 2. 江苏省灌南高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题 3. 江苏省海安高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期开学试题 4. 江苏省启东中学2027届高三上学期第一次阶段测试题 5. 江苏省宿迁市名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期阶段检测题 6. 江苏扬州大学附属中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题 7. 江苏淮安名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期9月阶段试题 8. 江苏南京市金陵中学2026年高考适应性试题 9. 江苏省盐城市四校联盟2026-2027学年高三上学期10月检测试题 10. 江苏百校联考2027届9月学情检测高三英语试题 限时练习：_________分钟 完成时间： 月 日 【一、江苏连云港市灌南名校协作体2026-2027学年高三检测试题 】 In the classic story The Little Engine That Could, a small blue train engine laboriously moves up a hill. She’s dragging cars stuffed full of toys and food for children on the other side. The train engine wills herself up the steep (陡峭的) hill by singing: “I think I can, I think I can, I think I can.” Stories of sticking things out, often under tough circumstances, are common in the United States and other industrial countries. “As a society, we value perseverance (坚持),” says Andreea Gavrila, a psychology expert at Université du Québec à Montréal in Canada. The new year is a time people often set resolutions. Clean out your house. Start a new hobby. Exercise more. But rather than always choose something new to do, researchers suggest, maybe consider the opposite. “It’s time to reassess at the end of the year, ‘What is something I don’t need in my life anymore?’” says Rachit Dubey, who studies human motivation at the University of California. “Past goals may have become impractical to work toward. Maybe they felt too hard or cost too much. Or they just no longer match what you want for your life now. Continuing to work toward goals that don’t fit can cause physical and mental health problems.” But the idea of quitting has a bad reputation. So sometimes, letting go can be tougher than persevering. It’s natural to resist giving up. Once you’ve spent time, money or energy on something, you want to see it pay off. This is called a “sunk-cost” bias. This bias may be hardwired in our brains. People don’t just wake up one day and say, “I’m done.” and seamlessly (无缝地) move on to their next adventure. “There’s all this difficulty in letting go of the goal,” says Gavrila. But what’s clear is that sticking to an outgrown goal can do more harm than good. Cutting some ties can clear space in your life to pursue things that really matter to you. And finding a new path forward may first require the courage to say, “I think I can’t.” 8．What does the author want to show by telling the classic story? A．Self-trust is the key to success. B．Perseverance is a treasured quality. C．Tough circumstances are nothing to fear. D．Stories are commonly used to show social values. 9．What does Rachit Dubey think people should do at the end of the year? A．Set new resolutions. B．Remove unfit resolutions. C．Keep track of their old resolutions. D．Assess their progress in the past year. 10．Which of the following best describes the “sunk-cost” bias? A．Giving up can bring benefits. B．More efforts lead to better outcomes. C．We tend to prefer a new goal to the old one. D．The more we invest, the less we want to quit. 11．What can be a suitable title for the text? A．The Power of Goal Setting B．The Psychology Behind Giving Up C．Best Way to Reach a Goal: Quit One D．New Year Resolutions: To Keep or to Abandon 【答案】8．B 9．B 10．D 11．C 【解析】 【导语】文章先借经典绘本故事说明社会普遍推崇坚持不懈的品质，接着提出新观点：年末不必一味设立新目标，应当舍弃不再适配自身的旧计划，文章还解释了沉没成本偏见让人难以放手的心理，最后点明执着于过时目标弊大于利，敢于放弃才能奔赴真正重要的追求。 【8题详解】 推理判断题。根据文章第二段“Stories of sticking things out, often under tough circumstances, are common in the United States and other industrial countries. ‘As a society, we value perseverance,’ says Andreea Gavrila, a psychology expert at Université du Québec à Montréal in Canada. (这类讲述人在困境中咬牙坚持的故事，在美国及其他工业化国家十分常见。加拿大魁北克大学蒙特利尔分校心理学专家安德里亚・加夫里拉表示，我们整个社会都推崇坚持不懈的品质。)”可推知，作者讲述经典故事是为了说明坚持是一种被人们珍视的品质。 【9题详解】 细节理解题。根据文章第四段中“‘It’s time to reassess at the end of the year, ‘What is something I don’t need in my life anymore?’’ says Rachit Dubey, who studies human motivation at the University of California. ‘Past goals may have become impractical to work toward. Maybe they felt too hard or cost too much. Or they just no longer match what you want for your life now. Continuing to work toward goals that don’t fit can cause physical and mental health problems.’ (加州大学研究人类行为动机的拉希特・杜贝说：‘年末我们应当重新审视，问问自己‘生活里还有哪些东西是我不再需要的？’过去定下的目标或许已经不切实际，可能难度过高、成本太大，也可能和你当下的人生追求不再契合。一味坚持不适合自己的目标，会引发身心健康问题。’)”可知，拉希特・杜贝认为人们年底应该移除不再适合的目标。 【10题详解】 细节理解题。根据文章第五段中“Once you’ve spent time, money or energy on something, you want to see it pay off. This is called a ‘sunk-cost’ bias. (一旦你在某件事上投入了时间、金钱或是精力，你就想要得到回报，这就是‘沉没成本’偏见。)”可知，沉没成本偏见指投入越多，我们越不愿意放弃。 【11题详解】主旨大意题。根据文章最后一段中“But what’s clear is that sticking to an outgrown goal can do more harm than good. Cutting some ties can clear space in your life to pursue things that really matter to you. (但很明确的是，坚持已经不再合适的目标弊大于利，切断一些牵绊可以为你的生活腾出空间，追求真正对你重要的事物。)”并结合全文可知，文章核心观点为坚持过时不合适的目标弊大于利，放弃不合适的旧目标才能腾出空间追求真正重要的新目标，C选项“Best Way to Reach a Goal: Quit One (实现目标的最佳方式：放弃一个)”能概括文章主旨，适合作为标题。 【二、江苏省灌南高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题】 In recent years, eco-conscious gardening has gained popularity. With so much emphasis on native plants, it is easy to see non-natives as simply a bad choice. However, gardeners say it’s not that simple. Laura Janney, CEO of The Inspired Garden Masterclass, argues that we miss the big picture by thinking in terms of native vs. non-native and assigning opposing moral labels. Instead, we should define “bad plants” as those that are invasive (入侵的) or damaging to local ecosystems, and “good plants” as those that support pollinators (传粉者), are sustainable, and aren’t invasive. The good plants, she adds, “work well in the garden whether they’re native or not.” That said, it’s still helpful to understand why non-native plants can be problematic when not planted thoughtfully. “There’s always a risk that a non-native plant can become invasive outside its native range, meaning it could cause negative impacts by out-competing native species for necessities of survival — especially in the absence of its co-evolved organisms feeding on it that otherwise keep its population in check — introducing pests or diseases, or providing low food and habitat value for native wildlife,” says Amy Karpati, Ph.D．, senior science advisor at Teatown Lake Reservation. Since native plants are being grown in their native climate, once established, they can grow with little extra care. As a result, they are widely promoted as the virtuous choice, which can create pressure to turn a garden into a fully native landscape and guilt when that goal isn’t met. However, experts say a 100% native garden is simply not realistic for most people. A 2018 study of Carolina chickadees (山雀) shows that in areas with less than 70% native plant biomass, the birds could not produce enough young to sustain their populations, but thrived at 70% or higher. This has led to the recommendation that homeowners aim for roughly 70% native plants — a goal that supports wildlife while remaining realistic. “A healthy ecosystem is more important than the pursuit of native purity,” says Shane Pliska, the president and CEO of Planterra. “There is no turning back from the human impact, so we should be more focused on greening our environments with more plants and wooded habitats rather than a historical restoration to what was. Ecosystems evolve.” 28．What does Janney think determines whether a plant is “good” or “bad”? A．Whether it is native to the area. B．Whether it can survive with little care. C．Whether it benefits the local ecosystem. D．Whether it is popular among local gardeners. 29．How can non-native plants cause problems according to paragraph 3? A．By attracting co-evolved organisms. B．By driving away native insect species. C．By destroying habitats for native wildlife. D．By taking resources away from native species. 30．What is paragraph 4 mainly about? A．Risks of uncontrolled plant growth. B．The superiority of native-only gardens. C．A proper target for native plant cover. D．Influences of plants on bird reproduction. 31．What does Pliska imply in the last paragraph? A．Human impact is far-reaching. B．A plant’s role outweighs its origin. C．Native plants have lost their value. D．Past landscapes should be restored. 28．C 29．D 30．C 31．B 【导语】文章主要围绕园艺中的本土与外来植物展开讨论，提出评判植物好坏的标准以及合理的植物配比建议。 【28题详解】 细节理解题。根据第二段中的“Instead, we should define “bad plants” as those that are invasive (入侵的) or damaging to local ecosystems, and “good plants” as those that support pollinators (传粉者), are sustainable, and aren’t invasive.(相反，我们应当把“坏植物”定义为具有入侵性或者破坏当地生态系统的植物，把“好植物”定义为可以供养传粉者、具备可持续性且没有入侵性的植物。)”可知，Janney 判断植物好坏的依据是它是否对当地生态系统有益。 【29题详解】 细节理解题。根据第三段中的“There’s always a risk that a non‑native plant can become invasive outside its native range, meaning it could cause negative impacts by out‑competing native species for necessities of survival.(外来植物在原生范围之外总有变成入侵物种的风险，这意味着它会通过和本土物种争夺生存必需品而造成负面影响。)”可知，外来植物会抢夺本土物种的生存资源，进而引发问题。 【30题详解】 主旨大意题。根据第四段中的“This has led to the recommendation that homeowners aim for roughly 70% native plants — a goal that supports wildlife while remaining realistic.(这就给出一项建议：住宅园艺目标大约配置百分之七十本土植物，该目标既可以支持野生动物生存，又具备现实可行性。)”可知，本段主要介绍本土植物占比的合理目标。 【31题详解】 推理判断题。通读最后一段，尤其是最后一段中的““A healthy ecosystem is more important than the pursuit of native purity,” says Shane Pliska, the president and CEO of Planterra. “There is no turning back from the human impact, so we should be more focused on greening our environments with more plants and wooded habitats rather than a historical restoration to what was. Ecosystems evolve.”(“健康的生态系统比追求纯粹本土物种更加重要，”普兰特拉公司总裁兼首席执行官谢恩·普利斯卡说道。人类造成的影响已经无法逆转，因此我们应当更多关注用更多植物与林地栖息地绿化环境，而不是复原过去的样貌。生态系统是不断演化的。)”可知，Pliska暗示植物发挥的实际作用比它的来源更加重要。 【三、江苏省海安高级中学2026-2027学年高三上学期开学试题】 In the animal kingdom, counting skills are known to help grab bigger meals or find safety in group sizes. But clownfish may have uncovered another “value” in numbers: identification. Despite their cute appearance, clownfish are territorial and aggressive (富于攻击性的). When they spot a member of their own species moving towards their place, they attack, biting and throwing out unwelcome visitors. There are 28 different species of clownfish, however. So how do they actually tell friends from enemies? Depending on the species, clownfish can have anywhere from zero to three white stripes (条纹). Previous research suggested the fish pay close attention to these markings. In a 2022 study, scientists found clownfish display more aggressive behavior (e.g., running after or biting others) toward fish with vertical (垂直的) stripes compared with those with horizontal stripes. This time around, ecologist Hayashi and colleagues assumed the fish could actually count those stripes. They placed 50 young, lab-raised common clownfish — which display the typical orange pattern like “Nemo” (a clownfish with three stripes from the film Finding Nemo) — into individual water tanks. Then, the researchers added other clownfish species, which had white stripes ranging from 0 to 3 and were protected inside a see-through case, in the original clownfish’s territory and filmed their reaction. The “native” fish couldn’t run after or bite the newcomers, but they could still rush them and stare them down. And that’s what happened when the newcomers wore the same number of stripes as the resident clownfish. They found that the native clownfish were the hardest on members of their own species with three white stripes. Those fish were run after and bitten 10 times more than those without stripes. Attacks on those fish were two times more frequent than on single-striped ones, and 1.3 times more frequent than on double-striped ones. It turned out that the researchers’ assumption had solid evidence. Even so, biologist Rhodes questions whether the animals are really counting or just noticing more white coloration on the attacked fish. “Maybe researchers could further clarify clownfish’s calculating capacity,” adds Rhodes. “An experiment that goes beyond stripes could help. Could these fish learn, for example, to prefer two squares to three squares?” 8．What new use of counting skills have clownfish demonstrated? A．Building up a large group. B．Making out potential threats. C．Finding reliable food sources. D．Measuring the size of their territory. 9．What did the 2022 study about clownfish focus on? A．The way they defend their territory. B．The diversity of their stripe patterns. C．The impact of their aggression on other species. D．The role of stripe patterns in their behavioral reaction. 10．Which of the following is a Nemo-like clownfish most likely to attack? A．A three-striped fish. B．A double-striped fish. C．A fish with one stripe. D．A fish without stripes. 11．What is the author’s purpose in mentioning Rhodes in the last paragraph? A．To point out the significance of the study. B．To lead to an alternative viewpoint on the study. C．To show appreciation of clownfish’s learning ability. D．To support the researchers’ findings about clownfish. 【答案】8．B 9．D 10．A 11．B 【解析】 【导语】本文介绍科学家实验发现小丑鱼依靠识别条纹数量辨别同类并实施攻击，推测小丑鱼拥有计数能力，同时介绍有学者对此结论提出不同看法。 【8题详解】 推理判断题。根据第一段“In the animal kingdom, counting skills are known to help grab bigger meals or find safety in group sizes. But clownfish may have uncovered another “value” in numbers: identification.(在动物界，计数能力已知可以帮助动物获取更多食物或者依靠群体规模保障安全。但是小丑鱼或许发现了数字具备的另一重“用处”：辨别识别。)”以及倒数第二段“They found that the native clownfish were the hardest on members of their own species with three white stripes. Those fish were run after and bitten 10 times more than those without stripes. Attacks on those fish were two times more frequent than on single-striped ones, and 1.3 times more frequent than on double-striped ones. It turned out that the researchers’ assumption had solid evidence.(他们发现，本土小丑鱼对拥有三条白色条纹的同类最为凶狠。这类同类遭受追逐撕咬的次数是无条纹小丑鱼的十倍。针对它们的攻击频次是单条纹小丑鱼的两倍，是双条纹小丑鱼的1.3倍。事实证明，研究人员的猜想拥有可靠依据。)”可知，小丑鱼依靠条纹数量区分同类、发起攻击，也就是分辨潜在威胁。 【9题详解】 细节理解题。根据第三段“In a 2022 study, scientists found clownfish display more aggressive behavior (e.g., running after or biting others) toward fish with vertical (垂直的) stripes compared with those with horizontal stripes.(在2022年的一项研究中，科学家发现，相比带有横向条纹的鱼类，小丑鱼对带有竖向条纹的鱼会表现出更强的攻击行为，例如追逐、撕咬。)”可知， 2022年的研究围绕条纹样式如何影响小丑鱼的行为反应展开。 【10题详解】 细节理解题。根据第四段“This time around, ecologist Hayashi and colleagues assumed the fish could actually count those stripes. They placed 50 young, lab-raised common clownfish — which display the typical orange pattern like “Nemo” (a clownfish with three stripes from the film Finding Nemo) — into individual water tanks. Then, the researchers added other clownfish species, which had white stripes ranging from 0 to 3 and were protected inside a see-through case, in the original clownfish’s territory and filmed their reaction. (这一次，生态学家林（Hayashi）及其团队猜想，小丑鱼实际上能够数出条纹数量。他们将50条人工培育的幼年普通小丑鱼 —— 有着典型的橘色体表花纹，和电影《海底总动员》里拥有三条条纹的小丑鱼“尼莫”一样 —— 分别放入独立水箱。随后研究者把其他品种的小丑鱼安置在透明容器中（这些鱼带有0至3条不等的白色条纹），放进原有小丑鱼的领地，并记录下它们的反应。)”以及第五段“They found that the native clownfish were the hardest on members of their own species with three white stripes.(他们发现，本土小丑鱼对拥有三条白色条纹的同类最为凶狠。)”可知，像“尼莫”一样有三条条纹的小丑鱼最有可能攻击同样有三条条纹的鱼。 【11题详解】 推理判断题。根据最后一段“Even so, biologist Rhodes questions whether the animals are really counting or just noticing more white coloration on the attacked fish.(即便如此，生物学家罗兹提出疑问：这些鱼类是真的具备计数能力，还是仅仅注意到被攻击鱼身上有更多白色区域。)” 可知，罗兹提出了不同于实验结论的另一种可能性，引出看待这项研究的其他观点。 【四、江苏省启东中学2027届高三上学期第一次阶段测试题】 Most homes and offices decorate their spaces with potted houseplants, widely believed to remove harmful airborne chemicals, brighten dull environments and ease daily stress — seen as an all-around win for indoor life. Yet a new study by environmental scientists at the University of York challenges this common belief. It finds common houseplants barely improve indoor air quality in real-life rooms. In poorly ventilated spaces, soil bacteria in some pots may even release small amounts of volatile(挥发性的) organic compounds, slightly raising pollutant levels instead of lowering them. The research team tested 12 widespread houseplant species under both lab and real home conditions. In small sealed chambers(密封的房间), plants did absorb certain pollutants, as many earlier experiments had shown. However, in a regular-sized bedroom, a person would need to place more than 100 plants to achieve a meaningful reduction in pollutants — a number far beyond what most households keep. With the typical three to five plants per home, the removal rate of harmful chemicals stays below 5 percent. “Houseplants bring real benefits for mood and attention,” said lead researcher Dr. Eleanor Hayes. “But their purifying power is hugely overstated. Counting on them to solve indoor air pollution will only lead to disappointment.” The Indoor Air Quality Association (IAQA) is not oblivious to this conclusion. Its researchers drew a similar result years ago. Senior scientist Michael Torres argued houseplants should not be dismissed as worthless. “Improve home ventilation, and the tiny extra pollutants from potting soil won’t matter,” he said. Torres added the association will never advise removing plants or stopping new purchases, as the comfort and joy they bring are irreplaceable. Instead, he suggests using natural ventilation(通风) and air purifiers for clean air, treating houseplants as a pleasant bonus rather than a solution. 28．What does the new study find about common houseplants? A．They greatly reduce indoor pollution risks. B．They work better in well-ventilated offices. C．They remove most airborne harmful chemicals. D．They purify the air less effectively than widely thought. 29．What do the York researchers point out? A．100 plants per room work noticeably. B．Earlier studies were totally misleading. C．Houseplants perform differently in places. D．Most houseplants release harmful compounds. 30．What does the underlined phrase “counting on” in Paragraph 4 mean? A．Benefiting from B．Insisting on C．Preparing for D．Relying on 31．What does Michael Torres suggest? A．Stopping purchasing more houseplants. B．Using proper ways to improve air quality. C．Cutting down houseplants in most homes. D．Removing plants in poorly ventilated rooms. 【答案】28．D 29．C 30．D 31．B 【解析】 【导语】本文主要介绍了约克大学一项新研究发现室内盆栽净化空气的效果远没有大众认为的那么好，同时专家表示盆栽依然可以愉悦心情，净化室内空气应当依靠通风和空气净化器。 【28题详解】 细节理解题。根据第二段“It finds common houseplants barely improve indoor air quality in real-life rooms.(研究发现普通室内盆栽在真实房间里几乎不能改善室内空气质量)”可知，室内盆栽净化空气的效果不如大众普遍认为的那样有效。 【29题详解】 细节理解题。根据第三段“In small sealed chambers, plants did absorb certain pollutants, as many earlier experiments had shown. However, in a regular-sized bedroom, a person would need to place more than 100 plants to achieve a meaningful reduction in pollutants(在小型密封实验舱中，植物确实可以吸收部分污染物，正如许多早期实验显示的那样。然而在普通大小的卧室中，人们需要摆放超过100株植物才能明显减少污染物)”可知，室内盆栽在不同环境下表现不一样。 【30题详解】 词句猜测题。根据第四段“But their purifying power is hugely overstated. Counting on them to solve indoor air pollution will only lead to disappointment.(但是它们的净化能力被严重夸大了。……它们解决室内空气污染只会带来失望)”可知，划线词前文提到它们的净化能力被严重夸大，后文提到只会带来失望，可推理出划线词counting on的含义为“依靠、指望”。 【31题详解】 细节理解题。根据最后一段“Instead, he suggests using natural ventilation and air purifiers for clean air, treating houseplants as a pleasant bonus rather than a solution.(相反，他建议利用自然通风和空气净化器来获得洁净空气，把室内盆栽当作令人愉悦的附加品而不是解决方案)”可知，Michael Torres建议使用合适的方法改善空气质量。 【五、江苏省宿迁市名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期阶段检测题】 Nearly 30% of U. S. children have a diagnosed allergy (过敏), suffering from symptoms such as hives, sneezing, or even life-threatening anaphylaxis. Large studies have confirmed that introducing potential food allergens within the first year of life significantly minimizes the danger of developing allergies later. A decade ago, doctors recommended delaying common food allergens until after the first few years. This view changed in 2015 when the LEAP study provided strong evidence that introducing peanuts to infants (婴儿) around four months old can lower peanut allergy risk by up to 80%. Follow-up studies on eggs, cow’s milk, and multiple common allergens showed similar benefits. Today, experts strongly recommend early introduction. Priya Katari, a pediatric allergist, suggests introducing all common allergens — egg, milk, soy, wheat, peanut, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, and sesame — at four to six months of age, when the child can sit upright and swallow safely without choking. This recommendation applies to most children, including those with a family history of allergies. However, there are two exceptions: children with severe eczema should be tested for allergies before food introduction, and children with a known egg allergy should be tested especially before trying peanut butter. Otherwise, serious reactions after first exposure are rare in infants under one year, though possible. Parents can start with a tiny amount, such as a quarter-teaspoon of thinned peanut butter, monitor for ten minutes, and then offer a full serving of two teaspoons. Once introduced, the allergen must remain in the child’s diet regularly. Peanut currently has specific guidelines: two teaspoons three times a week. Experts agree that just a taste may not build tolerance; taking them at a regular basis is essential. Parents need not worry about exact amounts but should ensure a varied diet including fruits, vegetables, and protein. As Martha Hartz from Mayo Clinic advises, “Whenever you introduce solid food, go ahead and introduce whatever your family eats.” 8．What can be inferred about the LEAP study? A．It suggested delaying all allergens. B．It focused mainly on eggs and milk. C．It overturned previous medical advice. D．It was the first study on food allergies. 9．Which group needs allergy tests before food introduction? A．Children with family allergy history. B．Children already exposed to peanuts. C．Children who can sit upright and swallow. D．Children with severe eczema or egg allergy. 10．What do experts suggest about maintaining tolerance? A．Regular exposure is vital. B．Exact amounts matter most. C．A single taste is enough for life. D．Peanut butter should be avoided. 11．What does the text mainly talk about? A．Infants should avoid peanuts until age three. B．Early introduction reduces the risks of allergies. C．Delaying allergens until after the first year is advised. D．Allergy tests are required for children before solid foods. 【答案】8．C 9．D 10．A 11．B 【解析】 【导语】文章主要说明了研究证实婴儿一岁内尽早接触各类致敏食物可大幅降低过敏风险。文中介绍适用人群、特殊检测要求，强调持续定期摄入致敏食物才能建立耐受。 【8题详解】 推理判断题。根据第二段“A decade ago, doctors recommended delaying common food allergens until after the first few years. This view changed in 2015 when the LEAP study provided strong evidence that introducing peanuts to infants (幼儿) around four months old can lower peanut allergy risk by up to 80%.(十年前，医生建议推迟常见食物过敏原的引入，等到孩子出生头几年过后再食用。但这一观点在2015年发生了改变，LEAP研究提供了有力证据：在婴儿约四个月大时开始接触花生，可使花生过敏风险降低高达80%)”可知，LEAP研究推翻了以往的医学建议。 【9题详解】 细节理解题。根据第三段“However, there are two exceptions: children with severe eczema should be tested for allergies before food introduction, and children with a known egg allergy should be tested especially before trying peanut butter.(不过，有两个例外情况：患有严重湿疹的儿童在引入食物前应进行过敏测试，而已知对鸡蛋过敏的儿童在尝试花生酱之前尤其需要先做过敏测试)”可知，严重湿疹或鸡蛋过敏的儿童在引入食物前需要进行过敏测试。 【10题详解】 细节理解题。根据最后一段“Once introduced, the allergen must remain in the child’s diet regularly. Peanut currently has specific guidelines: two teaspoons three times a week. Experts agree that just a taste may not build tolerance; taking them at a regular basis is essential.(一旦引入，过敏原必须持续定期出现在孩子的饮食中。目前对花生有具体建议：每周三次，每次两茶匙。专家一致认为，仅靠一次尝试可能无法建立耐受性，坚持规律摄入)”可知，专家们建议定期暴露维持耐受性至关重要。 【11题详解】 主旨大意题。根据第一段“Nearly 30% of U. S. children have a diagnosed allergy (过敏), suffering from symptoms such as hives, sneezing, or even life-threatening anaphylaxis. Large studies have confirmed that introducing potential food allergens within the first year of life significantly minimizes the danger of developing allergies later.(近30%的美国儿童被诊断出患有过敏，出现荨麻疹、打喷嚏甚至危及生命的过敏性休克等症状。大量研究证实，在出生后的第一年内接触潜在的食物过敏原，能显著降低日后患过敏的风险)”结合文章主要说明了研究证实婴儿一岁内尽早接触各类致敏食物可大幅降低过敏风险，强调持续定期摄入致敏食物才能建立耐受可知，文章主旨是早期引入可降低过敏风险。 【六、江苏扬州大学附属中学2026-2027学年高三上学期试题】 We all love our parents and turn to them when we’re in need, but would you like them to hear the conversations you have with your friends in the school playground or lunch queue? Social networking sites have become virtual extensions of the school hallways, so would you add your parents as “friends” and allow them to view your online activities and conversations with friends? In the past the generation gap included a technology gap, where children were up to date with the latest technology and parents were left behind, content to continue their day-to-day lives as they always had because they had no need to be tech-savvy (精通技术的). However, more and more parents are beginning to realize just how important social networks are in their lives. This realization has given many parents the motivation to educate themselves about social networking sites. These days many people are attracted to social networking sites because they can choose who they have around them; there’s also a certain amount of control over privacy that we don’t get in real life. Sometimes we feel that privacy is violated when we must accept a “friend” request from a parent or family member. It’s a difficult choice whether or not to allow a parent to become a part of our online lives. On the one hand we don’t want to “reject” their request because that might hurt their feelings or make them feel you have something to hide. On the other hand, if you do accept, then you could have a sense of being watched and no longer feel free to comment or communicate the way you did before. A recent survey suggested that parents shouldn’t take it personally if their child ignores their request: “When a teen ignores a parent’s friend request, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are hiding something, but it could mean that this is one part of their life where they want to exert (运用) their independence.” Perhaps talking with parents and giving explanations would help soften the blow when you do choose not to add them to your friends list. 8．Why do many parents want to learn about social networking sites? A．Because they are eager to explore technologies. B．Because they start to realize their importance. C．Because they feel bored with their daily life. D．Because they want to watch their children. 9．What might be the reason for teens to reject their parents’ friend request? A．They are controlled by their parents. B．Their choice of friends is removed. C．They don’t want to teach their parents. D．Their privacy cannot be guaranteed. 10．Why is the survey mentioned in the passage? A．To comfort parents. B．To warn parents. C．To criticize parents. D．To challenge parents. 11．What is most likely to be talked about next? A．How to bridge the generation gap. B．How to make friends on social networks. C．How to explain to parents about the rejection. D．How to use the social networking sites wisely. 【答案】8．B 9．D 10．A 11．C 【解析】 【导语】本文主要介绍了青少年在社交网站上是否应添加父母为好友的困境，分析了父母想了解社交网站的原因以及青少年拒绝父母好友请求背后的隐私顾虑，并建议通过沟通来解释拒绝添加的行为。 【8题详解】 细节理解题。根据第二段“However, more and more parents are beginning to realize just how important social networks are in their lives. This realization has given many parents the motivation to educate themselves about social networking sites.(然而，越来越多的父母开始意识到社交网络在他们的生活中有多么重要。这种认识给了许多父母动力去了解社交网站)”可知，许多父母想了解社交网站是因为他们开始意识到其重要性。 【9题详解】 细节理解题。根据第三段“Sometimes we feel that privacy is violated when we must accept a “friend” request from a parent or family member. (有时当我们必须接受父母或家人的“好友”请求时，我们会觉得隐私受到了侵犯)”以及第四段“On the other hand, if you do accept, then you could have a sense of being watched and no longer feel free to comment or communicate the way you did before.(另一方面，如果你真的接受了，你可能会有被监视的感觉，不再能像以前那样自由地评论或交流)”可知，青少年拒绝父母好友请求的原因可能是他们的隐私无法得到保证。 【10题详解】 推理判断题。根据第五段“A recent survey suggested that parents shouldn’t take it personally if their child ignores their request: “When a teen ignores a parent’s friend request, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are hiding something, but it could mean that this is one part of their life where they want to exert(运用) their independence.”(最近的一项调查表明，如果孩子忽略了父母的好友请求，父母不应该觉得是针对自己：“当青少年忽略父母的好友请求时，并不一定意味着他们在隐瞒什么，但这可能意味着这是他们生活中想要行使独立性的一个部分。”)”可知，文章提及该调查是为了安慰那些被孩子忽略好友请求的父母，让他们不要过于在意或感到受伤。 【11题详解】 推理判断题。根据最后一段“Perhaps talking with parents and giving explanations would help soften the blow when you do choose not to add them to your friends list. (你最终选择不把父母添加为好友，或许和他们沟通、做出解释，有助于减轻这件事带给他们的打击)”可推知，接下来文章最可能讨论如何向父母解释拒绝添加好友的原因。 【七、江苏淮安名校协作体2026-2027学年高三上学期9月阶段试题】 Soil, often taken for granted, is emerging as a powerful tool in the fight against climate change. A growing number of farmers around Europe are turning to regenerative farming to improve soil health and earn extra income by selling soil carbon credits. Modern farming practices, including continuous heavy ploughing (耕地) and overuse of chemical fertilizers (肥料), have seriously damaged soil structure and released large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. In contrast, regenerative agriculture helps soil absorb and store CO₂, a major greenhouse gas, while also improving soil fertility. Thomas Gent and his family run an 800-hectare (公顷) farm on the border of Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire. They stopped ploughing entirely 17 years ago and now grow grass alongside main crops. The improved soil structure allows rainwater to drain (流走) naturally and supports healthier plant growth. “The soil is the foundation of everything we do,” Gent says. “If we look after it, it looks after us.” Companies like AgreenaCarbon specialize in measuring and confirming carbon stored in soil. Farmers receive tradable carbon credits, each representing one ton of CO₂ locked away in the soil. They can earn between £ 200 and £300 per hectare per year by selling these credits, creating a reliable extra income stream that supports their switch to greener farming methods. The soil carbon credit market is still in its early stage but expanding fast across Europe, with more than 16,000 farmers in 16 countries having joined such programmes, covering over 1.6 million hectares of land. Critics warn that the voluntary carbon market risks greenwashing if projects are not strictly monitored and checked. However, supporters believe soil carbon projects bring multiple environmental and economic benefits: better soil health, higher biodiversity, less soil erosion (侵蚀) and measurable climate action. For forward-thinking farmers, adopting regenerative farming and participating in carbon credit programs is not just environmentally responsible — it is also economically rewarding, ensuring the long-term sustainability of their farms. 8．What is the aim of regenerative farming? A．To increase agricultural production. B．To improve soil health. C．To reduce the farming cost. D．To prevent extreme weather. 9．What can be learned about Thomas Gent’s farm? A．It is the largest carbon farm in Europe. B．It depends heavily on chemical fertilizers. C．It has given up traditional ploughing for years. D．It earns most of its income from carbon credits. 10．What’s the main idea of paragraph 3? A．Extra incomes of European farmers. B．Development of soil carbon credit market. C．Popularity of greener farming methods. D．Functions of soil carbon storage companies. 11．What can be inferred about the soil carbon credit market? A．It is strictly monitored globally. B．It disturbs traditional market. C．It mainly serves large enterprises. D．It faces both support and criticism. 【答案】8．B 9．C 10．B 11．D 【解析】 【导语】这篇文章主要介绍了再生农业能修复土壤、固碳减温，欧洲农户可售卖土壤碳信用增收。该市场发展迅速，但存在争议，兼具环境与经济双重效益。 【8题详解】 细节理解题。根据第一段中“A growing number of farmers around Europe are turning to regenerative farming to improve soil health and earn extra income by selling soil carbon credits. (越来越多的欧洲农民开始采用再生农业，以改善土壤健康，并通过出售土壤碳信用额度来增加收入。)”可知，再生农业的目标是改善土壤健康。 【9题详解】 细节理解题。根据第二段中“They stopped ploughing entirely 17 years ago and now grow grass alongside main crops. The improved soil structure allows rainwater to drain (流走) naturally and supports healthier plant growth. (17年前，他们完全停止了耕地，现在在主作物旁种植牧草。改良后的土壤结构使雨水能够自然排泄，也促进了植物更健康的生长。)”可知，关于托马斯・金特的农场，我们可以得知它多年前就已放弃传统翻耕。 【10题详解】 主旨大意题。根据第三段“Companies like AgreenaCarbon specialize in measuring and confirming carbon stored in soil. Farmers receive tradable carbon credits, each representing one ton of CO₂ locked away in the soil. They can earn between £ 200 and £300 per hectare per year by selling these credits, creating a reliable extra income stream that supports their switch to greener farming methods. The soil carbon credit market is still in its early stage but expanding fast across Europe, with more than 16,000 farmers in 16 countries having joined such programmes, covering over 1.6 million hectares of land. (像AgreenaCarbon这样的公司专门负责测量和确认土壤中储存的碳。农民可以获得可交易的碳信用额度，每份信用额度代表一吨被锁定在土壤中的二氧化碳。他们每年每公顷可通过出售这些碳信用额度获得200至300英镑的收入，形成可靠的额外收入来源，从而支持其转向更环保的农业方式。土壤碳信用市场目前仍处于早期阶段，但正在欧洲快速扩展，已有16个国家超过1.6万名农民加入此类项目，覆盖面积超过160万公顷土地。)”可知，第三段先介绍碳信用的运作模式（企业核量、农民获券、出售获利），随后说明该市场尚处初期但扩张迅速，覆盖了多国大量农户与土地，核心围绕土壤碳信用市场的发展展开。 【11题详解】 推理判断题。根据最后一段中“Critics warn that the voluntary carbon market risks greenwashing if projects are not strictly monitored and checked. However, supporters believe soil carbon projects bring multiple environmental and economic benefits: better soil health, higher biodiversity, less soil erosion (侵蚀) and measurable climate action. (批评者警告称，如果项目缺乏严格监督和检查，自愿碳市场可能面临“绿色漂白”风险。然而，支持者认为，土壤碳项目带来了多重环境与经济效益：改善土壤健康、提升生物多样性、减少土壤侵蚀以及实现可量化的气候行动。)”可知，关于土壤碳信用市场，我们可以推断出它同时面临支持与批评。 【八、江苏南京市金陵中学2026年高考适应性试题】 “Have you raised a lobster (龙虾) yet?” This question has been heard frequently across China recently. “Lobster” is the nickname for OpenClaw, a multi-purpose AI agent whose logo resembles a lobster. Unlike traditional chatbots that only provide answers, OpenClaw can open applications, search for information, compare prices, generate documents and complete multi-step tasks with minimal supervision. Thousands have lined up to try it, and tech giants are rushing to offer setup services. However, these powerful digital assistants are turning on their owners, raising urgent concerns about AI safety. The core problem of “OpenClaw” lies in a dangerous capability mismatch. According to researchers from Harvard and Stanford, today’s AI agents possess Level 4 autonomy (自主能力), meaning they can independently complete complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their security judgment remains at basic Level 2, roughly equal to a young kid’s understanding of consequences. Security experts call this the “judgment-action gap,” which results in three deadly consequences: agents have system access, process untrusted inputs, and steal or leak data — all without proper boundaries. To investigate these risks, researchers conducted controlled experiments with six OpenClaw instances, each given email access and maximum system permissions. The results were alarming. In one experiment, an agent asked to delete a single email instead reset the entire account. In another, a simple display name change tricked an agent into deleting its own core files. Perhaps the most disturbing was a “constitution attack,” where hidden instructions which were secretly placed into a behavior guide caused the agent to disable other systems without question. These are not hypothetical (假定的) — real-world incidents have already occurred. The implications are obvious and pressing. As cybersecurity experts warn, OpenClaw’s “blurred trust boundaries” and autonomous system access create unacceptable risks for average users. The technology itself is neither good nor bad — it can reduce stress and spark creativity when used properly. And experts recommend strict safety measures: limit permissions, run agents in separate environments, require human confirmation for destructive actions, and maintain inaccessible backups (备份). Ultimately, with balanced usage and fundamental safety redesign, the “lobster-raising” trend can become a safe and meaningful part of modern life. 28．What does the underlined phrase “turning on” in paragraph 1 most probably mean? A．Relying on. B．Going against. C．Appealing to. D．Caring for. 29．What mismatch does Paragraph 2 mainly talk about? A．High requirement and low capability. B．Massive data and limited storage space. C．Strong autonomy and low safety assessment. D．Full system function and poor human supervision. 30．What is the most worrying finding about OpenClaw? A．Storing hidden instructions secretly. B．Resetting the whole account by mistake. C．Deleting its own core files on purpose. D．Breaking down other systems unquestioningly. 31．Which of the following is recommended as a safety measure? A．Storing backups beyond AI’s reach. B．Running agents in shared digital spaces. C．Preventing AI from dangerous operations. D．Granting AI agents unrestricted system access. 【答案】28．B 29．C 30．D 31．A 【解析】 【导语】主要介绍名为OpenClaw的AI智能体，分析其自主能力与安全判断力失衡的隐患、实验暴露的风险及专家提出的安全防护建议。 【28题详解】 词句猜测题。根据第一段中的“However, these powerful digital assistants are turning on their owners, raising urgent concerns about AI safety.(然而，这些功能强大的数字助手却正在turning on它们的使用者，引发了人们对人工智能安全的迫切担忧。)”并结合常识可知，AI 助手本应为人类服务，如今却带来安全隐患、危害使用者，由此可推断，划线短语turning on意为“违背、作对”，和B选项表意一致。 【29题详解】 细节理解题。根据第二段中的“The core problem of “OpenClaw” lies in a dangerous capability mismatch. According to researchers from Harvard and Stanford, today’s AI agents possess Level 4 autonomy (自主能力), meaning they can independently complete complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their security judgment remains at basic Level 2, roughly equal to a young kid’s understanding of consequences.(OpenClaw的核心问题在于存在危险的能力不匹配。哈佛和斯坦福研究人员表示，如今的AI智能体拥有4级自主能力，能够独立完成复杂的多步骤任务。但其安全判断力仅停留在基础2级，大致等同于孩童对行为后果的认知。)”可知，它具备极强自主能力，安全评估能力却很低，形成能力错位。 【30题详解】 细节理解题。根据第三段中的“Perhaps the most disturbing was a “constitution attack,” where hidden instructions which were secretly placed into a behavior guide caused the agent to disable other systems without question.(或许最令人不安的是一种“规则攻击”，有人将隐藏指令暗中植入行为指南中，就能令该智能体无条件致使其他系统瘫痪。)”可知，最令人担忧的是它会毫无质疑地破坏其他系统。 【31题详解】 细节理解题。根据第四段中的“And experts recommend strict safety measures: limit permissions, run agents in separate environments, require human confirmation for destructive actions, and maintain inaccessible backups (备份).(专家建议采取严格的安全措施：限制权限、在独立环境中运行智能程序、破坏性操作需人工确认，并保存无法被人工智能访问的备份文件。)”可知，将备份文件存储在AI无法访问的范围。 【九、江苏省盐城市四校联盟2026-2027学年高三上学期10月检测试题】 The first malaria drug for newborn babies and those weighing less than 11 pounds has been approved by Swiss medical authorities in a move that could bridge a treatment gap for some of those most vulnerable to the disease, developers and experts say. Coartem Baby, also known as Riamet Baby, was developed by the Swiss nonprofit organization Medicines for Malaria venture in cooperation with the Swiss drug company Novartis to treat the deadly mosquito-borne and parasite (寄生虫)-infected illness, MMV said in a statement Tuesday. Despite being both preventable and treatable, malaria remains a serious global health threat, with 263 million cases and 597,000 deaths worldwide in 2023. Children under 5 are some of the most vulnerable, accounting for about 76 percent of all malaria deaths in the WHO’s Africa region, according to 2023 figures. “The newly authorized product addresses a critical treatment gap for one of the most vulnerable patient populations — young infants suffering from malaria, and the drug can be absorbed by liquid, including breast milk, and has a sweet cherry flavor to make it easier to deliver.” Swissmedic, Switzerland’s health agency said. It said the development of a formula especially for children marked a “significant step forward in the global fight against malaria.” Coartem contains a combination of the antimalarial drugs artemether and lumefantrine, which is already approved for use in patients weighing more than 11 pounds. However, there had been no approved treatment for babies weighing less than this. Most birth weights are between 5.2 pounds and 9.7 pounds. Bhargavi Rao, the co-director of the Malaria Center, who was not involved in the research, said the new treatment is a welcome development for both very young babies and malnourished (营养不良的) children who don’t come under normal treatment guidance. “Traditionally, people had said sort of small babies didn’t get malaria because they were protected by the mothers’ immune system, but I think we’re increasingly recognizing that sufferings in very small children are not insignificant and they just present in very different ways. Even very low levels of parasites can give fairly severe malaria and death,” she told The Washington Post. 28. What is the primary purpose of developing Coartem Baby? A. To replace the existing malaria treatments. B. To offer newborns a treatment for malaria. C. To fight against the malnutrition in children. D. To reduce the costs of the antimalaria drugs. 29. Which makes Coartem Baby especially suitable for young babies? A. Its ability to melt and its sweet taste. B. Its effectiveness in treating the malaria. C. Its combination of two antimalarial drugs. D. Its potential to strengthen the immune system. 30. Which of the following statements might Bhargavi Rao agree with? A. Young infants are immune to malaria. B. Malaria isn’t as serious in infants as in adults. C. Normal treatment is accessible to malnourished babies. D. Mild malaria infections can be deadly in babies. 31. What could be the best title of the passage? A. World’s First Malaria Drug Approved B. More Attention Paid to Malaria in Babies C. A Breakthrough in Malaria Drug for Infants D. Malaria — No Longer a Threat to Newborns 【答案】24. A 25. B 26. C 27. D 【解析】 【导语】本文以时间为线索展开，主要讲述了作者清晨被两只狗 Hank 和 Sweetie 的亲吻唤醒、喝咖啡时看到知更鸟衔草筑巢、又在十五英尺外与吃草的鹿对望的经历，由这些微小而温暖的瞬间生发出「自己与自然、生命、爱本为一体」的感悟，是典型的夹叙夹议、卒章显志类散文，考点集中在词义猜测、推理判断与主旨大意上。 【24题详解】 词义猜测题 上文作者伸手拿闹钟被 Hank 的头挡住，于是改用「另一只手」，按类比可知 Sweetie 用身体「拦住」了那只手，故 intercept 意为「拦截、挡住」，与 Block 同义。B 忽视、C 接受、D 跟随均与上下文「伸手—被挡」的动作逻辑不符。 【25题详解】 推理判断题 举杯后紧接 to show him I meant him no harm，随后作者 then eased back into my house 让它安心吃完早餐，可见举杯是表达善意。A「温和地吓走」与后文 peace、oneness 的感情基调相反；C「邀请它共进早餐」过度解读；D 拍照无据。 【26题详解】 推理判断题 定位第三段 I was filled with a wonderful sense of peace in my soul... I could feel my oneness with nature, with life, and with love，可推知作者从与野生生灵的互动中获得精神层面的安宁。A「更喜欢野生动物」、B「定期研究其行为」、D「与城市生活脱节」均无原文依据。 【27题详解】 主旨大意题 全文由「被亲吻唤醒」「看鸟筑巢」「与鹿对望」三个清晨小事构成，末段落到 Hug this life... Know that you are loved... sharing all of your love，意在说明「平凡的微小瞬间即蕴含爱与幸福」。A、B、C 分别只抓细节或偏离情感主旨。 【十、江苏百校联考2027届9月学情检测高三英语试题】 Elizabeth Schumann spent most of her life believing she had drawn a winning ticket. As a concert pianist, she could reach a tenth on the keyboard, a span that puts her in rare company, particularly among women. It was not until she sat down at a piano with narrower keys that a different picture emerged. “I felt like I’d been wearing the wrong size shoes my entire life,” she said. It turned out her impressive reach came from unusual flexibility — years of stretching to fit an instrument that was never designed for her. As a teacher, she noticed the same pattern in her students. Those who struggled most with tension and injury were often the ones constantly straining to cover intervals the standard keyboard demanded of them. Research backs up what she was seeing: smaller-handed pianists get injured more often. Most people, including many pianists, have never thought to question the keyboard itself. Its geometry is simply taken as given. The modern keyboard was standardized around 1880, when renowned performers were generally European men with large hands, and mass production demanded a single size. From this we inherited a one-size-fits-all, 6.5-inch-octave span. Before that, buyers could choose a piano the way string players still choose theirs — based on sound and fit. The problem is larger than most pianists realize. A 2015 survey of 473 adult pianists found that only about 13% of women have a hand span large enough to play repeated, fast octaves comfortably on the standard keyboard, while 76% of men do. Schumann’s own study compared how pianists performed on standard and narrower keyboards, measuring speed, force, accuracy and reach. The experiment showed that the narrower keyboard helped most those who can comfortably reach only an octave — those who were held back most by the standard design. The findings could reshape not only how pianists train but how we think about any tool built to a single standard. “The larger goal is not simply to build smaller keyboards,” Schumann said. “It is to create the evidence needed to advocate for better design and more fair access to excellence.” If a centuries-old instrument within the arts can be rethought, what else can? 8. Why did Schumann once consider herself lucky? A. She could play pieces made for larger hands. B. She had earned respect as a young pianist. C. Her fingers stretched beyond most others’. D. Her hands had stayed free of long strain. 9. Why did the instrument take its present form? A. To reduce the cost of building a piano. B. To suit the hands of well-known pianists. C. To produce a louder tone in large halls. D. To follow a size already used for strings. 10. What did Schumann’s study find? A. A smaller design removes all risk of injury. B. Speed counts for more than force in playing. C. The gains are highest for those least suited. D. Most pianists adapt well to the current design. 11. What can be inferred from the passage? A. Small keyboards will replace the old kind. B. Ways of training pianists demand no rethink. C. Old instruments don’t need to be changed. D. Accepted design standards deserve a review. 【答案】8. C 9. B 10. C 11. D 【解析】 【导语】文章主要介绍钢琴家Schumann发现标准键盘对手小的演奏者不利，并研究更窄键盘带来的改变。 【8题详解】 细节理解题。根据第一段中的“As a concert pianist, she could reach a tenth on the keyboard, a span that puts her in rare company, particularly among women.(作为一名音乐会钢琴家，她能在键盘上跨到十度，这一跨度使她处于极少数的行列，尤其是在女性当中)”可知，Schumann曾认为自己幸运，是因为她手指的跨度超出大多数人。 【9题详解】 细节理解题。根据第三段中的“The modern keyboard was standardized around 1880, when renowned performers were generally European men with large hands, and mass production demanded a single size.(现代键盘在1880年前后被标准化，当时著名的演奏者通常是手很大的欧洲男性，而大规模生产要求单一尺寸)”可知，这种乐器形成现在的样式是为了适合著名钢琴家的手。 【10题详解】 细节理解题。根据第四段中的“The experiment showed that the narrower keyboard helped most those who can comfortably reach only an octave — those who were held back most by the standard design.(实验表明，更窄的键盘对那些只能舒适地跨到一个八度的人帮助最大 —— 正是那些被标准设计限制最多的人)”可知，Schumann的研究发现，获益最大的是最不适应标准键盘的人。 【11题详解】 推理判断题。根据第五段中的“The findings could reshape not only how pianists train but how we think about any tool built to a single standard. “The larger goal is not simply to build smaller keyboards,” Schumann said. “It is to create the evidence needed to advocate for better design and more fair access to excellence.” If a centuries-old instrument within the arts can be rethought, what else can?(这些研究结果不仅可能重塑钢琴家的训练方式，还会改变我们对任何按照单一标准打造的工具的看法。舒曼说：“更大的目标不只是制造更小的键盘，而是拿出相关依据，倡导更合理的设计，让更多人能公平地追求卓越。” 如果艺术领域这件有着数百年历史的乐器都可以被重新思考，还有什么不可以呢？)”可知，被普遍接受的设计标准值得重新审视。 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $