Unit 6 Focusing on culture学案 2026-2027学年沪教版八年级英语上册

Unit 6 Wisdom counts 文化探究课学案 2026-2027学年沪教版八年级英语上册 Class Name Date 教材定位 第94至95页 建议课时 40分钟 本课聚焦 解释草船借箭中的策略,比较两个古代故事并审视人物视角。 完成标志 用证据解释智慧,从另一人物视角写一段合乎情境的讲述。 一 一个耐人寻味的标题 4分钟 Read the title Arrows borrowed from an enemy. If you borrow a book, you normally return it. Do you expect Zhuge Liang to return the arrows? Why might the writer use borrowed? My prediction: 词语支架 jealous 妒忌的;straw 稻草;arrow 箭;fog 雾;strategy 为达到目的而安排的策略。 二 给不可能的任务找办法 8分钟 Read the story on p. 94. Complete the notes with key words. Question Notes from the story What task did Zhou Yu set? Make arrows within days. What did Zhuge Liang promise? Bring the arrows in days. What did he prepare on the third morning? boats filled with . What could Cao Cao’s soldiers hear and see? Hear: . See clearly? . How did the plan end? He collected arrows. Complete the cause-and-result chain with phrases from the text. Thick fog Cao Cao’s soldiers could not . Drums and shouting they thought . Cao Cao ordered them to shoot the boats . Which link would probably break if the morning were clear? Explain briefly. 三 证据够不够 8分钟 Mark T if the statement is directly told, I if it is a reasonable inference, and U if it is unsupported. Explain the strongest clue for ONE answer. 1. Zhou Yu wanted Zhuge Liang to fail. 2. Zhuge Liang understood how Cao Cao might react to a possible attack. 3. The text proves that Zhuge Liang used a weather instrument to predict the fog. 4. Because the text says he did nothing for two days, we know he did no thinking. Item . My clue and explanation: Look again at borrowed. What really happened? Choose the best explanation. A Cao Cao agreed to lend the arrows. B Zhuge Liang made the enemy supply arrows through a clever plan. C Zhou Yu bought the arrows and gave them to Zhuge Liang. 四 比较故事中的智慧 8分钟 Compare this story with The night of the horse. Use actions rather than only “clever”. Feature The Trojan Horse Borrowing arrows Problem Could not capture Troy. Useful object or condition What the other side misunderstood Result A shared feature: Both stories A meaningful difference: Can two stories tell us what all Chinese people or all Greek people are like? Why / Why not? 五 换一个人物讲故事 9分钟 You are one of Cao Cao’s soldiers. Tell your family what happened in 60–80 words. Describe what you heard, saw, did and felt. Do not give yourself knowledge you did not have then. Plan first: sound first thought action later surprise Useful language At first, we thought … / We could not see … / We were ordered to … / Later, we heard … / I felt … because … You may continue this opening: “Early that morning, loud noises woke us up.” Partner check [ ] The soldier’s viewpoint is clear. [ ] Two story details support it. [ ] Feelings fit the situation. [ ] The ending does not add impossible knowledge. 六 文化理解离堂条 3分钟 1. Complete: I admire because . However, being wise also means . 2. The story comes from Romance of the Three Kingdoms, a novel. Can this passage alone prove that every event happened exactly this way? Give one reason. 课后选做 Recommend one other ancient story to an international visitor in 50–60 words. Explain its problem, one clever action and one lesson; do not assume that the visitor knows the names. 参考答案与文本探究 一与二 从标题到因果 一 读前允许多种预测。读后应理解:borrowed带有幽默意味;曹操没有同意出借,故事也没有写归还。诸葛亮设法让对方提供了箭。 二 100,000;ten;three;20;straw men;drums and shouting / loud sounds;No;more than 100,000。问题与承诺有意形成反差:十天已经困难,诸葛亮却答应三天。 因果链 see through the fog / see the boats clearly;they were under attack;were soon full of arrows。每一步都应与下一步相连,不能只罗列物品。 反事实问题示例:Without the fog, Cao Cao’s soldiers might see the straw men and the boats more clearly. They might not shoot in the same way. 用might / may保留推测余地;不能断言晴天一定失败。 三 事实与推断 1. T。第一部分直接写明Zhou Yu was jealous and wanted him to fail。 2. I。诸葛亮让士兵制造声音,接着曹军以为遭到攻击并射箭;这一系列行动支持他预判反应的解释。 3. U。文中没有提到天气仪器,不能自行补充并说“课文证明”。 4. U。“did nothing”是叙述中的表面概括,不能推出他完全没有观察、思考或准备。 标题选择B。A把计策误读为双方同意的借用;C在文中没有依据。 四 比较表参考 维度 特洛伊木马 草船借箭 Problem Could not capture the city. Needed 100,000 arrows in three days. Object or condition A wooden horse; wheels; night. Boats, straw men, fog and sounds. Mistaken belief The Greeks had left; the horse was harmless. A real attack was coming through the fog. Result The Greeks entered and captured Troy. Zhuge Liang collected more than 100,000 arrows. 参考答案与文化表达 四 从比较走向理解 共同点示例:Both stories show people solving difficult problems by understanding what their opponents may think. 两篇都有难题、策略、误判和出人意料的结果。 差异示例:The Greeks hide soldiers to get inside a city, while Zhuge Liang makes the enemy send arrows towards his boats. 或比较目标:占领城池与获取物资。区别应来自故事,不应概括为某一民族“天生更聪明”。 概括边界:No. They are two particular stories about particular characters. They cannot represent everyone in a culture. 可用中文补充:欣赏文化作品,同时避免把人物特征当作整个群体的固定特征。 五 曹军士兵讲述示例 Early that morning, loud noises woke us up. We heard drums and shouting from the river, but the fog was too thick to see clearly. We thought an attack was coming. Cao Cao ordered us to shoot, so we sent arrows towards the sounds. Later, someone shouted, “Thank you for your arrows!” I felt confused and worried. Were we helping the enemy instead of stopping them? 此例中的心理描写是合乎情境的文学补写。士兵听到致谢后产生怀疑,却没有声称亲眼看到诸葛亮的全部准备、周瑜的嫉妒或箭的最终总数。可写“I later learnt …”,但需明确那是后来获知的信息。 评价维度 标准 视角 2分 以士兵身份连贯讲述1分;不过度补入他当时不知道的信息1分。 依据 2分 两处准确情节各1分,如浓雾、鼓声、奉命射箭、对方致谢。 表达 2分 顺序与因果清楚1分;加入合乎情境的感受或疑问1分。 六 开放判断 1. 示例:I admire Zhuge Liang because he turned a difficult task into a plan. However, being wise also means thinking about the effects of our choices on others. 有理由即可,不要求所有学生喜欢同一人物。 2. No. It is a story from a novel, so we need other sources to check what really happened. 文学故事可供理解价值观与人物形象,但不能单独证明所有历史细节。 Unit 6 | 学科网(北京)股份有限公司 $