2026年高考阅读理解 · 推理判断题专项突破 课件-2027届高三英语一轮复习专项

该高中英语高考复习课件聚焦阅读理解推理判断题，依据高考评价体系分析近五年全国卷考情，明确题量从4题增至6题、占比达46.7%的命题趋势，归纳隐含推断、意图推断等四大题型，构建“定位-推导-排除”的答题逻辑，对接语言能力与思维品质考查要求。 课件亮点在于“真题精讲+技巧建模”，如2026新高考I卷真题解析中，通过“抓关键词-逻辑链推导-干扰项排除”三步法突破隐含推断，培养学生分析与推断的思维品质。特设易错类型分析（如过度推断、无中生有），帮助学生掌握得分技巧，教师可据此实施针对性复习，提升备考效率。

高考阅读理解 · 推理判断题专项突破 —— 读透字里行间的秘密 适用对象：高三年级（一轮复习夯实基础 / 二轮专题提升解题思维） 1.7.2013 ‹#› 一、什么是推理判断题 推理判断题是高考英语阅读理解的核心考查题型，它要求考生突破文章的字面表层信息，结合文本细节、逻辑关联与语境线索，通过归纳、演绎、分析等思维过程，推断出作者未直接明示的隐含意义、深层观点、情感态度或文章的发展走向。这类题型侧重考查对文本的深度解读能力与逻辑推理素养，是拉开阅读理解得分差距的关键题型。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 考情分析——推理判断题 01 定义与核心解题原则 定义：基于文章字面信息，通过逻辑分析推断作者未明说的隐含义、观点或写作意图。 原则：“只推一步，拒绝主观发挥”，所有推断必须有文本线索支撑。 02 近五年全国I卷考查趋势 题量攀升：从2022年的4题增至2026年的6题，占比由30.8%升至46.7%，权重逐年增加。 分值占比：平均占阅读总分的1/3以上，是新高考考查的绝对核心题型。 03 题型价值与备考策略 是拉开分数档次的“分水岭”，需重点训练对细节、语气、逻辑关系的敏锐捕捉，切忌脱离文本过度引申。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 二、四大类型概览 1.7.2013 ‹#› 题型 设问方式 考查说明 infer / suggest / imply / indicate 弦外之音，结合语境进行逻辑推理， Why does the author mention...? What is the purpose of...? 分析作者举例、引用或叙述的深层目的 What is the author’s attitude/tone? 捕捉情感色彩词汇，判断作者对论述话题的情感倾向与评价 Where would this passage appear? 通过文章的主题、语言风格、用词特征以及信息呈现方式来推断 隐含推断 意图推断 观点态度推断 文章出处推断 1.7.2013 ‹#› 三、类型①——隐含意义推断 挖掘字里行间的深层逻辑与意图 1.7.2013 ‹#› 考情分析——隐含意义推断 01 设问特征：捕捉“言外之意”的信号 ▶ 常见句式： What can be inferred from...? What does the author suggest about...? What is implied in the text? ▶ 标志：题干包含 等关键词 infer suggest imply indicate conclude 1.7.2013 ‹#› 考情分析——隐含意义推断 02 解题三步法 1.抓题干关键词，锁定原文位置； 题干问“What can be inferred about Kevin from the passage?” 关键词是 回到原文，找到 ，答案就在附近。 找到关键词后，看： 关键词所在的句子（最重要）：前一句 ，后一句 2.逻辑推导：拆解原文信息； 3.逐项排除：原文有直接说吗？原文能找到依据吗？是不是把原文的某个词意思变了？ 名词(人/物)、专有名词、数字 Kevin 所有出现“Kevin”的句子 看背景 看结果或解释； 避免选项先行； 有：细节题 不能：主观臆断 是：断章取义 1.7.2013 ‹#› 干扰类型 特征 出现在哪一步 排除方法 选项内容原文直接复现，无需推断 第3步 对照选项时 选项内容很合理，但原文根本没提 第2步 判断逻辑关系时 原文说”没吃早饭”，选项说”没钱吃饭” 第2步 做一步推导时 原文说“reduce”，选项说“will eliminate” 第3步 对照选项时 字面意思 无中生有 过度推断 曲解原意 问自己:这是原文直接说的，还是推出来的？ 回原文找依据， 找不到就排除 只推一步， 不跨级联想 把选项放回原文，看意思对不对 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型①·例1（2026新高考I卷C篇） 原文：Oaks and sweetgums produce isoprene, which interacts rapidly with nitrogen oxides to form ground-level ozone — a major factor in many breathing problems. 题目：What does the new study imply regarding oaks and sweetgums? A. Affect other trees’ growth B. Absorb less carbon than expected C. Harm people’s health indirectly D. Raise local temperature slowly 答案：C | 逻辑推导：释放物→生成臭氧→引发呼吸问题（间接致病） 干扰项：A/B/D均为原文未提及的“无中生有”。 imply 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型① · 2026新高考I卷C篇 真题再现 “We could plant any trees we want to, if we just rethink our car-centric lifestyle,” she said. Q: What would Auyeung probably advocate? A. Reducing car use in daily life. B. Providing animals with new habitats. C. Controlling population growth. D. Doing more research on the problem. 💡 解题逻辑拆解： 1. 定位：锁定Auyeung的核心表述“rethink car-centric lifestyle”； 2. 推断：“反思汽车主导”即倡导“减少汽车使用”； 3. 排除：B/C/D均无原文依据，属主观臆断。 言外之意：少开车 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型①·例3（2025新高考II卷·改编） 原文关键句：“Suddenly it occurred to me that he did not even know how to use a dictionary. It took him a few tries to find the word in question.” 解析切入点：抓住“did not even know how to use”（根本不会用）和“took a few tries”（反复尝试）这两个细节，是解题的关键钥匙。 逻辑链推导： “完全不会使用词典” + “找单词尝试了好几次” → 直接指向“这是他第一次接触/使用纸质词典”。这是唯一符合原文细节的合理推断。 题目：What can be inferred about Kevin from the passage? A. He had never used a paper dictionary before. B. He disliked reading novels. C. He preferred electronic devices. D. He was not interested in new words. 正确答案：A 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型①·例3（2025新高考II卷·改编） 原文关键句：“Suddenly it occurred to me that he did not even know how to use a dictionary. It took him a few tries to find the word in question.” 解析切入点：抓住“did not even know how to use”（根本不会用）和“took a few tries”（反复尝试）这两个细节，是解题的关键钥匙。 题目：What can be inferred about Kevin from the passage? A. He had never used a paper dictionary before.（正确：细节支撑的推断） B. He disliked reading novels.（错误：无中生有，原文未提及） C. He preferred electronic devices.（错误：过度推断，无依据支持“偏好”） D. He was not interested in new words.（错误：与“主动查词”的细节矛盾） 判断BCD的错误原因 1.7.2013 ‹#› 四、类型②——写作意图推断 1.7.2013 ‹#› 题型突破——写作意图推断 01 典型设问 · 直击考点 ▶ Why does the author mention... in the passage? ▶ The author uses the example of... to show that... ▶ What is the purpose of writing the last paragraph? 02 解题三步 · 逻辑为王 1.定位：快速锁定文中的例子、引用或特殊细节； 2.溯源：向前文找观点句（紧邻的上句/上段）； 3.辨析：区分“论据（表象）”与“论点（本质）”，切忌就事论事。 例子永远 为观点服务 1.7.2013 ‹#› 题型突破——写作意图推断 开头技巧： 提出问题/现象 简介背景 论证技巧： 比喻/拟人 引语/数据 举实例 化抽象为具体，生动易懂 阐释主旨，拒绝空洞 引出主题，引发读者关注 增强说服力，佐证观点 为下文展开做铺垫 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型②·例1（2026新高考I卷C篇）——引用意图分析 “We’re all for planting more trees... But if we’re not careful, we could make air quality worse.”—— Roisin Commane (研究合著者) Q: Why does the author cite Roisin Commane’s words? A. 仅表明科学家对植树的支持态度 B. 呈现对该问题的客观平衡观点 C. 证明植树行为对环境有害 D. 批评城市规划者的不当决策 【答案：B】解析：引用内容包含“支持种树”和“需注意空气质量风险”两层含义，体现了“利与弊”的辩证视角，旨在展示客观平衡的观点。 以偏概全（忽略后半句） 曲解原意（并非说树木有害，而是需谨慎） 无中生有（文中未提及城市规划者） 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型②·例2——说明文中的举例论证 核心考点：说明文举例旨在解释抽象原理，将科学现象具体化，帮助读者理解逻辑。 原文："Oaks and sweetgums... produce isoprene... to form ground-level ozone — a major factor in breathing problems." Q: The author uses the example of oaks to ______. A. explain how trees worsen air quality B. prove trees are totally harmful to health C. introduce a new category of trees D. show why cities favor planting them 解释原理 解析：例子直接佐证“树木排放物形成臭氧影响呼吸”的原理，对应A选项对空气质量恶化机制的解释。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型②·例3——记叙文中的举例 规律：记叙文常通过具体事例分享经历或引发共鸣，举例多作为论据，用以支撑文中的核心现象或观点。 原文：When Sonja Detrinidad opened her online shop... Her success is just one example of increased time at home leading to an explosion in plant purchases. Q: Why does the author mention Sonja Detrinidad? A. To show online business is highly profitable B. To illustrate the trend of increased plant purchases 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型②·例3——记叙文中的举例 规律：记叙文常通过具体事例分享经历或引发共鸣，举例多作为论据，用以支撑文中的核心现象或观点。 原文：When Sonja Detrinidad opened her online shop... Her success is just one example of increased time at home leading to an explosion in plant purchases. 事例解读：Sonja的网店成功并非偶然，它是 引发植物 这 一社会现象的 ，是用来佐证观点的具体论据。 Q: Why does the author mention Sonja Detrinidad? A. To show online business is highly profitable B. To illustrate the trend of increased plant purchases (正确答案) 居家时间增加 购买热潮 典型缩影 1.7.2013 ‹#› 五、类型③——观点态度推断 1.7.2013 ‹#› 考情分析——观点态度推断 01 典型设问方式：识别题干标志 ① What is the author’s attitude towards the...? ② How does the author feel about the issue of...? 02 核心解题四步法：抓线索定倾向 1. 抓情感词：圈出 （如 critical, concerned），直接映射态度； 2. 品措辞：分析描述性词汇的 ，正向表赞同，负向表否定； 3. 析论据：通过作者选取的 ，反推其立场倾向； 4. 盯转折： 等词后往往是作者真实观点的核心所在。 核心抓手：情感词 / 逻辑转折 / 论据倾向 形容词、副词 褒贬色彩 例证、引用的观点 However / But / Yet 1.7.2013 ‹#› 倾向分类 核心词汇速记 语义特征 判断贴士 正面肯定 supportive, optimistic, appreciative, concerned, approval, positive 积极/支持/赞赏/期待 抓情感词 负面批判 critical, pessimistic, negative, dismissive, doubtful, skeptical,suspicious 消极/质疑/否定/批评 辨否定词 中性/干扰 neutral, objective, factual, impartial, indifferent, ambiguous 客观/无态度/极端/模棱两可 排绝对项 💡 语境为王 勿因“环保/科技”等话题直接选Positive，需结合原文实际语气判断。 ⚠️ 警惕极端 含all, never, completely等绝对词的选项通常为干扰项，大概率不选。 🔑 关注转折 But/However后常隐藏真实态度，注意隐性否定与委婉表达的词汇。 1.7.2013 ‹#› appreciative concerned approval critical dismissive skeptical neutral objective impartial indifferent suspicious ambiguous 漠不关心的 模棱两可的 公正的，不偏袒的 批判的；挑剔的 欣赏的；感激的 不予理会的；轻蔑的 中立的 持怀疑态度的 客观的，不带偏见的 关切的；担忧的 赞同，认可 持怀疑态度的 1‑e，2‑j，3‑k，4‑d，5‑f，6‑h， 7‑g，8‑i，9‑c，10‑a，11‑l，12‑b 请将左右匹配 1.7.2013 ‹#› appreciative → 欣赏的；感激的 concerned → 关切的；担忧的 approval → 赞同，认可 critical → 批判的；挑剔的 dismissive → 不予理会的；轻蔑的 skeptical → 持怀疑态度的 neutral → 中立的 objective → 客观的 impartial → 公正的，不偏袒的 indifferent → 漠不关心的 suspicious → 可疑的 ambiguous → 模棱两可的 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型③·例题（2026新高考I卷C篇） 【原文节选】“We‘re all for planting more trees... But if we’re not careful, we could make air quality worse.” —— Roisin Commane 【题目】Which of the following may Commane suggest based on their study? A. Cutting down the isoprene-producing trees. B. Suspending tree-planting for decades. C. Changing the species of trees in new plantings. D. Removing isoprene from existing trees. 【答案】C 【逻辑剖析】： 1. 定位态度：支持种树但警惕风险；2. 合理引申：优化而非停止/砍伐； 极端 极端 无中生有 1.7.2013 ‹#› 六、类型④——文章出处推断 1.7.2013 ‹#› 题型解密——文章出处推断 01 典型设问方式 ① Where is the text probably taken from? ② In which section of a newspaper may this text appear? ③ Who are the intended readers of the passage? 02 解题核心逻辑 锁定“文本特征词” + 体会“作者语气”。关注文中特定人群称呼（如teenagers/parents）、专业术语或营销类表述，精准匹配载体属性。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 题型解密——文章出处推断 03 文体·关键词·出处 速查 🔬 科普说明：study / research → 科学杂志 (Science Magazine) ✍️ 个人叙事：I / my story → 自传/博客 (Blog/Autobiography) 📰 新闻报道：reported / announced → 报纸 (Newspaper) 📢 广告宣传：discount / contact → 广告栏 (Advertisement) ✈️ 旅游指南：attractions / tips → 旅游手册 (Travel Guide) have a try 1.7.2013 ‹#› The new study, published in Nature, shows that exposure to green spaces for at least two hours per week is linked to better mental health. The researchers analyzed data from over 10,000 participants across five countries. According to a recent announcement by the city government, the new metro line will be open to the public on September 15. The project, which cost $2.5 billion, is expected to ease traffic congestion in the downtown area significantly. I still remember the day my grandmother gave me her old camera. It was heavy and scratched, but through its lens, I discovered the beauty of ordinary moments—a leaf falling, a child laughing, a streetlamp flickering to life at dusk. science magazine Newspaper blog/autobiography 判断出处 1.7.2013 ‹#› 判断出处 Visitors to Kyoto should not miss the Fushimi Inari Shrine, famous for its thousands of red torii gates. The best time to visit is early morning, when the crowds are thin and the light is perfect for photography. Don't miss this chance! Our 4-day all-inclusive island getaway is now at 40% off—only $599 per person. Book before August 31 and receive a free snorkeling tour. Call 800-555-0199 now to reserve your spot! That night I discovered something new: a quiet, powerful way to open doors. It’s not about what you have or don‘t have. It’s about the choices you make every single day—no matter how small. I believe each of us has the power to shape our own future. travel guide advertisement speech/talk 1.7.2013 ‹#› 类型④·例题：2025新高考II卷B篇（改编） 【原文节选】Growing up in the countryside, I had little experience driving in the city. One day, I got lost... That experience taught me that even when we lose our way, life always guides us back to where we belong. 【题目设问】The text is most probably taken from ______. A. A science report B. A travel brochure C. A personal blog D. A speech 【解题核心逻辑】 结尾的感悟升华是个人叙事文体的典型特征； 1.7.2013 ‹#› 七、文体对应——写作意图题 分类总结 1.7.2013 ‹#› 文体 写作意图 典型例题逻辑 核心特点 通过具体事例佐证论点，旨在证明观点的正确性与普适性。 引用权威科学家的话语 → 呈现客观、平衡的学术观点，支撑文章的核心主张。 逻辑严密 观点先行，论据支撑 将抽象的科学原理或自然现象具体化、通俗化，帮助读者理解。 列举橡树生长的实例 → 解释树木如何通过释放化学物质恶化城市空气质量。 事理清晰 解释为主，科学证据 分享个人经历或讲述故事，引发读者共鸣，折射社会现象或人生感悟。 讲述Sonja的居家种植故事 → 以小见大，反映疫情期间全球植物热潮现象。 情感共鸣 故事为主，引人入胜 议论文 说明文 记叙文 1.7.2013 ‹#› 八、常考文体 易错类型分析 1.7.2013 ‹#› 常考文体——易错类型分析 01 人物特写类新闻：重情感，轻时效 特征：聚焦个人经历与内心世界，不以事件时效性为核心。 典型误区：看见“新闻报道”就选报纸，忽略其核心是“人”而非“事”。 02 科普说明文 VS 普通新闻报道：理性VS事实 科普文：使用专业术语，逻辑严密，侧重原理解释； 新闻文：多用日常通俗词汇，侧重事件的陈述。 典型误区：看见数据和研究就以为在“报道新闻”，忽略其核心是“解释原理”而非“陈述事件”。 03 回忆录/自传：第一视角，感悟升华 特征：第一人称“I”叙述个人经历，文末升华感悟。 典型误区：只关注“故事”本身，忽略作者传递的情感与思想。 1.7.2013 ‹#› Tina’s hands trembled as she placed her homemade bread on the counter. Three years ago, she was a homeless single mother. Now, her bakery feeds 200 people every Saturday—for free. “I just want to give back what I once received,” she said softly. 问：这段话最可能出自哪里？ A. A news report about a local event B. A science magazine C. A biography column in a newspaper D. A travel brochure A fire broke out on the third floor of a downtown apartment building at around 2 a.m. on Tuesday. Firefighters arrived within ten minutes and rescued all 12 residents. No injuries were reported. The cause of the fire is still under investigation. 新闻报道（事实事件，强时效） 1.7.2013 ‹#› 看以下两个标题，哪个更像新闻报道？ A. From Homeless to Hero: The Tina Story B. Downtown Fire: 12 Rescued, No Injuries Reported 答案：B。 A是人物特写标题（名字+故事弧光）， B是新闻报道标题（事件+核心事实）。 1.7.2013 ‹#› Photosynthesis is the process by which green plants convert light energy into chemical energy. Chlorophyll absorbs sunlight and combines carbon dioxide with water to produce glucose and oxygen. Without this process, most life on Earth would not exist. 问：这段话最可能出自哪里？ A. A science textbook B. A daily newspaper C. A personal blog D. A travel guide 1.7.2013 ‹#› I grew up in a tiny village with no library. The only books I had were three worn-out novels my uncle left behind. I read them over and over. Years later, I built a library for my own village. Because every child deserves a door to a bigger world. 问：这段话最可能出自哪里？ A. A news report B. A memoir C. A scientific paper D. An advertisement 1.7.2013 ‹#› 推理判断题·核心口诀 隐含推断： 透过文字表面挖掘“言外之意”，捕捉细节背后的逻辑暗示与深层含义； 写作意图： 例子本身非重点，核心是找到其支撑的前文观点，例子为观点服务； 观点态度： 紧盯情感褒贬词与情态动词，以此作为判断作者立场与倾向的关键依据； 解题铁律： 先定位原文区间 → 提取关键线索 → 适度“推一步”→ 逐一对比选项； 1.7.2013 ‹#› 推理判断题｜ 高考得分关键 只推一步 · 不主观发挥 01 熟知四类题型 细节推理 / 观点态度 写作意图 / 篇章逻辑 精准定位，知推理方向 02 严守解题步骤 立足原文找依据， 推导有理有据 结合语境分析隐含意， 严禁脱离文本猜测 03 规避主观误区 忌代入个人经验常识 忌过度推断 警惕看似合理的干扰项 1.7.2013 ‹#› 九、quiz：每道10分，共100分 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第1题：隐含意义推断（2026·浙江卷·真题） The first experiment involved 174 college students who were led to believe they were testing a strength-enhancing drink described as either natural or synthetic. When asked to choose between the two options before repeating a strength test, an overwhelming 84% selected the natural-labeled drink, despite both being identical water samples. 题目：What can be inferred from the first experiment? A. Students preferred drinks that tasted better. B. The label influenced students’ choices more than the actual content. C. Students were able to tell the difference between the two drinks. D. The experiment confirmed that natural drinks enhance strength. 两种饮料实际上是“identicals”，但84%选择了“natural”标签的饮品。这说明标签的影响力超过了实际内容。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第2题：隐含意义推断（2026新高考Ⅰ卷C篇·改编） “We didn‘t make a big deal of that,” said Novem Auyeung, a Parks Department senior scientist. She said trees should not be viewed as the enemy. “We could plant any trees we want to, if we just rethink our car-centric lifestyle.” 题目：What can be inferred about Auyeung’s attitude toward the problem? A. She believes the problem is caused by cars, not trees. B. She thinks oak trees should be cut down immediately. C. She believes the issue has been fully solved. D. She is not concerned about air quality. 她说“if we just rethink our car-centric lifestyle”， 暗示问题的根源在于汽车使用，而非树木本身。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第3题：隐含意义推断（2026浙江1月卷·改编） In his first year as a doctor, he saw over 200 patients with completely preventable conditions. A lack of basic health education, he realized, was causing more harm than any disease. Most of his patients simply didn‘t know how to take care of themselves. 题目：What can be inferred about the patients? A. They were unable to afford medical treatment. B. They lacked knowledge about health. C. They refused to follow the doctor’s advice. D. They had serious genetic diseases. 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第4题：隐含意义推断（2026全国甲卷·改编） The villagers had always believed the old tree was cursed. No one dared to touch it. When a young scientist came to study it, she found it was actually a rare species that could purify the local water source. The villagers’ fear had protected it for centuries. 题目：What can be inferred from the passage? A. The scientist convinced the villagers to cut down the tree. B. The villagers’ fear had an unexpected benefit. C. The tree was dangerous to the villagers. D. The scientist was afraid of the tree. 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第5题：写作意图推断（2026新高考Ⅱ卷·改编） We usually think in very concrete terms when doing something on a screen. It‘s becoming much rarer to zone out and just let the mind wander. Admiring the beauty of art may be the ideal way to initiate the abstract cognitive processes. 题目：Why does the author mention “letting the mind wander”? A. To show that it is a waste of time. B. To highlight the value of abstract thinking. C. To encourage people to stop using screens. D. To explain how to appreciate art. to不定式表目的 用“letting the mind wander”引出对抽象思维价值的强调 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第6题：观点态度推断（2026全国乙卷·改编） Many people argue that social media is destroying real conversation. But Dr. Chen, a communication expert, holds a different view. “Social media reveals who we really are,” she says. “It doesn’t change us; it just shows us more clearly.” 题目：What is Dr. Chen‘s attitude toward social media? A. Critical B. Neutral C. Supportive D. Doubtful 用词带有正面倾向，表明她持支持态度 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第7题：观点态度推断（2026新高考Ⅱ卷·原创） The campaign was widely praised by environmental groups, but its actual impact on carbon emissions has been minimal. While the intention is admirable, the money could have been better spent on more effective solutions. 题目：What is the author‘s attitude toward the campaign? A. Fully supportive B. Critical C. Neutral D. Admiring 作者说“impact has been minimal”和“money could have been better spent”，明显持批评态度。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第8题：文章出处推断（2026新高考Ⅰ卷C篇·改编） According to a study published in the Journal of Environmental Science, urban trees can significantly reduce summer temperatures. However, researchers warn that choosing the wrong tree species may worsen air quality in hot weather. 题目：Where would this passage most likely appear? A. A newspaper B. A science magazine C. A travel guide D. A personal blog 新闻报道用词更通俗 文中出现“study”“Journal of Environmental Science”“researchers”等学术词汇，说明是科学类文章，最可能出自科学杂志。 个人博客更口语化 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第9题：文章出处推断（2026全国乙卷·改编） I remember the day my grandfather taught me to fish. He didn‘t say much. He just showed me how to hold the rod, how to feel the tug. Years later, I realize he was teaching me patience, not fishing. 题目：Where would this passage most likely appear? A. A science report B. A personal memoir C. A news article D. A travel brochure 大量使用第一人称“I”，讲述个人记忆和感悟，属于个人回忆录。 1.7.2013 ‹#› 第10题：隐含意义推断（2026浙江1月卷·改编） Emily had spent years building her reputation as a reliable journalist. When the scandal broke, no one believed she was involved. Her colleagues defended her without hesitation. Their trust, however, was not based on evidence—it was based on years of shared work. 题目：What can be inferred about Emily’s colleagues? A. They had evidence proving her innocence. B. They trusted her because of their long experience with her. C. They doubted her at first. D. They were also involved in the scandal. 关键句: Their trust...was based on years of shared work 1.7.2013 ‹#› $