内容正文:
阶段性综合二 必修一 Unit 3~4(语篇综合练)
(建议用时:40分钟)
完形填空
人与社会:姐妹参加青少年关系研究,在冲突解决中理解支持、倾听与成长。
阅读 A
人与社会:校园“家庭与友谊周”活动信息与选择。
阅读 B
人与社会:共享用餐与幸福感、社会联结之间的关系。
阅读 C
人与社会:长期网络友谊的维系方式、困难与真实价值。
阅读七选五
人与社会:朋友发生争执后,如何真诚道歉并修复关系。
一、完形填空【最新热点·改编题】
When Maya and her elder sister, Lila, arrived at a university laboratory, they expected to answer a few 1. ________ questions and go home. Instead, the researchers asked them to solve a puzzle together while cameras recorded their conversation. The study focused on how siblings support one another when they face 2. ________.
At first, the task seemed simple. But when Maya suggested a different method, Lila quickly 3. ________ it and continued with her own plan. Maya fell silent. The atmosphere became tense, and neither sister made 4. ________. A researcher then invited them to pause and try again, not by deciding who was right, but by explaining what each person needed.
Lila took a breath and 5. ________ the problem differently. She admitted that she had been impatient and asked Maya to explain her idea. Maya was still 6. ________, but her sister’s apology made it easier to speak. The new plan 7. ________ both ideas, and within minutes they completed the puzzle.
Afterwards, the sisters watched part of the video. Lila noticed how her raised voice had caused Maya to 8. ________ from the discussion. Maya, meanwhile, realised that staying silent had not helped Lila understand her feelings. They agreed to use a simple 9. ________ at home: when an argument grew heated, each would listen for one minute before replying.
The researcher explained that sibling relationships contain both competition and 10. ________. Arguments are not always harmful; what matters is whether family members can repair them. Supportive siblings may have a positive 11. ________ on teenagers facing stress because they provide someone familiar who understands the family’s history.
On the way home, Maya said the laboratory had not given them a perfect solution. Lila agreed. But it had shown them that respect was not the absence of disagreement. It was the 12. ________ to stay calm, the 13. ________ to listen and the courage to keep trying. Their relationship had not suddenly become easy, yet both sisters felt more 14. ________ about dealing with the next conflict. They had entered the study as competitors and left it as a stronger 15. ________.
1.A. ordinary B. appointed C. bitter D. limited
2.A. comfort B. adventure C. conflict D. fortune
3.A. admired B. ignored C. maintained D. delivered
4.A. career B. atmosphere C. gap D. progress
5.A. approached B. postponed C. judged D. acquired
6.A. calm B. generous C. anxious D. professional
7.A. postponed B. combined C. delivered D. assumed
8.A. turn away B. turn up C. settle for D. make up
9.A. scene B. option C. rule D. site
10.A. destiny B. support C. competition D. distance
11.A. style B. career C. court D. impact
12.A. humour B. authority C. willingness D. fortune
13.A. patience B. wealth C. generation D. atmosphere
14.A. ashamed B. confident C. ordinary D. unusual
15.A. media B. court C. site D. team
二、阅读理解
A【原创题】
Westbridge Senior High: Family & Friendship Week
Activity
Time & Place
What You Will Do
Notes
Family Story Studio
Mon 16:10–17:10
Library 2
Turn a family memory into a one-page story with photos or drawings.
Bring one object or photo connected with the memory.
Sibling Challenge Lab
Tue 16:00–17:00
Room 305
Complete communication games and reflect on how disagreements are settled.
Students without siblings may attend with a cousin or close friend.
Friendship Soup Workshop
Wed 12:30–13:00
Canteen Corner
Create a “recipe” for friendship using words such as trust and patience.
No registration. Materials are provided.
Twenty-Year Letter Project
Fri 15:50–16:40
Writing Centre
Write a letter to a friend to be opened at a future reunion.
Register online by Thursday. Letters will be stored by the school.
1.A student who wants to join an activity at lunchtime should choose ________.
A. Family Story Studio B. Sibling Challenge Lab C. Friendship Soup Workshop D. Twenty-Year Letter Project
2.What should a participant bring to Family Story Studio?
A. A musical instrument. B. A family-related object or photo. C. A completed letter. D. A list of friendship words.
3.Which activity requires advance registration?
A. Family Story Studio. B. Sibling Challenge Lab. C. Friendship Soup Workshop. D. Twenty-Year Letter Project.
4.What do all four activities mainly encourage?
A. Competition between families. B. Reflection and communication through practical tasks. C. Preparation for academic examinations. D. Use of expensive digital equipment.
B【最新热点·改编题】
Why Sharing a Meal May Matter More Than We Think
In many homes, eating together is treated as a pleasant tradition rather than something connected with serious research. The 2025 World Happiness Report, however, examined shared meals across countries and found a strong link with well-being. People who ate more meals with others tended to report greater life satisfaction, more positive emotions and fewer negative feelings.
The pattern appeared across age groups, cultures and income levels. In some analyses, meal sharing predicted happiness about as strongly as employment or income. Researchers do not claim that a meal itself magically creates happiness. People with supportive families and active friendships may already have more opportunities to eat together. Still, shared meals provide a useful window into the quality of social life because they combine time, attention and conversation.
The benefits do not require a perfect family dinner. A quick breakfast with a parent, a school lunch with friends or a neighbourhood meal can all create connection. During a meal, people often exchange small updates that might not seem important enough for a formal conversation. Over time, these ordinary details help friends and relatives notice changes in mood, celebrate progress and offer support before a problem becomes serious.
The report also warns against turning shared meals into another source of pressure. A daily dinner that leaves one person exhausted or forces everyone into conflict may not improve well-being. Some experts therefore suggest aiming for one or two intentionally connected meals each week. The central idea is not the food, the table or the number of dishes. It is the experience of being present with other people and feeling that there is time to listen.
1.What is the main finding discussed in the passage?
A. Shared meals are linked with stronger well-being. B. Expensive meals produce the greatest happiness. C. Income has no relationship with life satisfaction. D. People should eat every meal with family members.
2.Why may shared meals be a useful indicator of social life?
A. They always include healthy food. B. They bring together time, attention and conversation. C. They are measured more easily than income. D. They prevent every family disagreement.
3.What can be inferred from paragraph 3?
A. Small everyday conversations can strengthen relationships. B. Formal conversations are unnecessary in families. C. School lunches are more valuable than family dinners. D. People notice emotions only while eating.
4.What does the author suggest in the last paragraph?
A. Make every meal a compulsory family event. B. Focus on meaningful connection rather than perfect arrangements. C. Avoid eating with people who disagree. D. Prepare more dishes to improve the atmosphere.
C【最新热点·改编题】
When a Close Friend Lives Inside a Screen
Online-only friendships are often described as weak or temporary. Yet a 2025 study based on interviews with twenty-five people found relationships that had lasted for years and survived changes in apps, schools, jobs and countries. The researchers asked participants not only how they communicated, but also what made the friendships feel real.
The strongest friendships were built around repeated ordinary activities. Friends studied together on video calls, watched the same film while messaging, shared photos from a daily walk or sent voice notes during the trip to school. These small routines created a sense of shared life. When a platform closed or became unpopular, close friends exchanged other contact details and moved together rather than losing track of one another.
Distance still created difficulties. Different time zones limited conversation, and online friends could not always provide practical help during illness or an emergency. Some participants also faced doubt from relatives who assumed that a person they had never met could not be a true friend. Such reactions sometimes made the friendship feel invisible, even when it offered important emotional support.
The researchers argue that online friendship should not be judged only by whether people have met face to face. Trust, honesty, mutual effort and the ability to repair misunderstandings matter in every form of friendship. At the same time, the study does not say that every online contact is safe or meaningful. Users still need to protect personal information and notice whether support is balanced. Technology can create an opportunity for friendship, but the quality of the relationship depends on what people do with that opportunity.
1.What made the online friendships in the study feel real?
A. Using the newest platform. B. Sharing repeated everyday activities. C. Avoiding all personal information. D. Communicating only through video.
2.Why does the author mention platforms closing?
A. To show that strong friendships can move beyond one app. B. To prove that digital companies are unreliable. C. To suggest users should keep only one account. D. To explain why online friends usually separate.
3.What difficulty is NOT mentioned?
A. Time differences. B. Lack of practical help in emergencies. C. Doubt from family members. D. Competition for academic awards.
4.Which statement best reflects the author’s view?
A. Online friendship is always equal to face-to-face friendship. B. Online friendship is unreal until people meet. C. Technology provides a possibility, but relationship quality depends on behaviour. D. Personal information should be shared freely with online friends.
三、七选五【原创题】
An argument does not have to end a friendship. In fact, learning to repair a disagreement can make two people understand each other better. 1. ________ The following steps can help.
Pause before responding. When emotions are strong, people tend to defend themselves instead of listening. Give yourself time to calm down, but do not disappear without explanation. 2. ________
Take responsibility for your part. A useful apology is specific. Rather than saying “Sorry if you were upset,” explain what you did and why it may have caused harm. 3. ________
Listen to the other person’s experience. You may remember the event differently, but friendship does not require identical memories. Ask questions and avoid interrupting. 4. ________
Agree on a small next step. Repair does not always happen in one conversation. You might decide to meet again, change a habit or give each other a little more time. 5. ________ A relationship becomes stronger when both people repeatedly show that the agreement matters.
A. This shows that you respect the friendship even while taking a break. B. A perfect apology should make the other person forgive you immediately. C. What matters most is not avoiding every conflict but dealing with it honestly. D. Following through is as important as making the plan. E. Try to understand the feeling behind the words, not only the facts. F. It is also helpful to explain how you will act differently next time. G. Friends should never discuss a disagreement more than once.
2 / 11
学科网(北京)股份有限公司
$
阶段性综合二 必修一 Unit 3~4(语篇综合练)
(建议用时:40分钟)
完形填空
人与社会:姐妹参加青少年关系研究,在冲突解决中理解支持、倾听与成长。
阅读 A
人与社会:校园“家庭与友谊周”活动信息与选择。
阅读 B
人与社会:共享用餐与幸福感、社会联结之间的关系。
阅读 C
人与社会:长期网络友谊的维系方式、困难与真实价值。
阅读七选五
人与社会:朋友发生争执后,如何真诚道歉并修复关系。
一、完形填空【最新热点·改编题】
When Maya and her elder sister, Lila, arrived at a university laboratory, they expected to answer a few 1. ________ questions and go home. Instead, the researchers asked them to solve a puzzle together while cameras recorded their conversation. The study focused on how siblings support one another when they face 2. ________.
At first, the task seemed simple. But when Maya suggested a different method, Lila quickly 3. ________ it and continued with her own plan. Maya fell silent. The atmosphere became tense, and neither sister made 4. ________. A researcher then invited them to pause and try again, not by deciding who was right, but by explaining what each person needed.
Lila took a breath and 5. ________ the problem differently. She admitted that she had been impatient and asked Maya to explain her idea. Maya was still 6. ________, but her sister’s apology made it easier to speak. The new plan 7. ________ both ideas, and within minutes they completed the puzzle.
Afterwards, the sisters watched part of the video. Lila noticed how her raised voice had caused Maya to 8. ________ from the discussion. Maya, meanwhile, realised that staying silent had not helped Lila understand her feelings. They agreed to use a simple 9. ________ at home: when an argument grew heated, each would listen for one minute before replying.
The researcher explained that sibling relationships contain both competition and 10. ________. Arguments are not always harmful; what matters is whether family members can repair them. Supportive siblings may have a positive 11. ________ on teenagers facing stress because they provide someone familiar who understands the family’s history.
On the way home, Maya said the laboratory had not given them a perfect solution. Lila agreed. But it had shown them that respect was not the absence of disagreement. It was the 12. ________ to stay calm, the 13. ________ to listen and the courage to keep trying. Their relationship had not suddenly become easy, yet both sisters felt more 14. ________ about dealing with the next conflict. They had entered the study as competitors and left it as a stronger 15. ________.
1.A. ordinary B. appointed C. bitter D. limited
2.A. comfort B. adventure C. conflict D. fortune
3.A. admired B. ignored C. maintained D. delivered
4.A. career B. atmosphere C. gap D. progress
5.A. approached B. postponed C. judged D. acquired
6.A. calm B. generous C. anxious D. professional
7.A. postponed B. combined C. delivered D. assumed
8.A. turn away B. turn up C. settle for D. make up
9.A. scene B. option C. rule D. site
10.A. destiny B. support C. competition D. distance
11.A. style B. career C. court D. impact
12.A. humour B. authority C. willingness D. fortune
13.A. patience B. wealth C. generation D. atmosphere
14.A. ashamed B. confident C. ordinary D. unusual
15.A. media B. court C. site D. team
【答案】1. A 2. C 3. B 4. D 5. A 6. C 7. B 8. A 9. C 10. B 11. D 12. C 13. A 14. B 15. D
【导语】本文是一篇记叙文。姐妹参加一项关于青少年手足关系的研究,在共同解决任务的过程中学会倾听、道歉和修复冲突。
【详解】1. ordinary questions 表示“普通问题”,与后文出乎意料的实验任务形成对比。
【详解】2. 研究关注姐妹面对 conflict“冲突”时如何相互支持。
【详解】3. Lila 没有听取建议,而是 ignored“忽视”了它。
【详解】4. make progress 意为“取得进展”,紧张气氛使任务停滞。
【详解】5. approach a problem differently 表示“以不同方式处理问题”。
【详解】6. Maya 仍感到 anxious“焦虑不安”,但道歉帮助她开口。
【详解】7. combined both ideas 表示新方案融合了两个人的想法。
【详解】8. turn away from the discussion 表示“退出或回避讨论”。
【详解】9. a simple rule 指姐妹共同制定的一条沟通规则。
【详解】10. 兄弟姐妹关系既有竞争也有 support“支持”。
【详解】11. have a positive impact on... 为固定搭配。
【详解】12. the willingness to do sth. 表示“愿意做某事的意愿”。
【详解】13. 修复冲突需要 patience“耐心”。
【详解】14. 对处理下一次冲突更有信心,confident 符合语境。
【详解】15. 姐妹作为一个更强的 team 离开实验室,概括合作结果。
二、阅读理解
A【原创题】
Westbridge Senior High: Family & Friendship Week
Activity
Time & Place
What You Will Do
Notes
Family Story Studio
Mon 16:10–17:10
Library 2
Turn a family memory into a one-page story with photos or drawings.
Bring one object or photo connected with the memory.
Sibling Challenge Lab
Tue 16:00–17:00
Room 305
Complete communication games and reflect on how disagreements are settled.
Students without siblings may attend with a cousin or close friend.
Friendship Soup Workshop
Wed 12:30–13:00
Canteen Corner
Create a “recipe” for friendship using words such as trust and patience.
No registration. Materials are provided.
Twenty-Year Letter Project
Fri 15:50–16:40
Writing Centre
Write a letter to a friend to be opened at a future reunion.
Register online by Thursday. Letters will be stored by the school.
1.A student who wants to join an activity at lunchtime should choose ________.
A. Family Story Studio B. Sibling Challenge Lab C. Friendship Soup Workshop D. Twenty-Year Letter Project
【答案】C
【详解】细节理解题。Friendship Soup Workshop 的时间为 12:30–13:00,属于午餐时间。
2.What should a participant bring to Family Story Studio?
A. A musical instrument. B. A family-related object or photo. C. A completed letter. D. A list of friendship words.
【答案】B
【详解】细节理解题。Notes 中要求带一件与家庭记忆有关的物品或照片。
3.Which activity requires advance registration?
A. Family Story Studio. B. Sibling Challenge Lab. C. Friendship Soup Workshop. D. Twenty-Year Letter Project.
【答案】D
【详解】细节理解题。Twenty-Year Letter Project 要求周四前在线注册。
4.What do all four activities mainly encourage?
A. Competition between families. B. Reflection and communication through practical tasks. C. Preparation for academic examinations. D. Use of expensive digital equipment.
【答案】B
【详解】推理判断题。四项活动均通过故事、游戏、关键词和书信促进反思与沟通。
B【最新热点·改编题】
Why Sharing a Meal May Matter More Than We Think
In many homes, eating together is treated as a pleasant tradition rather than something connected with serious research. The 2025 World Happiness Report, however, examined shared meals across countries and found a strong link with well-being. People who ate more meals with others tended to report greater life satisfaction, more positive emotions and fewer negative feelings.
The pattern appeared across age groups, cultures and income levels. In some analyses, meal sharing predicted happiness about as strongly as employment or income. Researchers do not claim that a meal itself magically creates happiness. People with supportive families and active friendships may already have more opportunities to eat together. Still, shared meals provide a useful window into the quality of social life because they combine time, attention and conversation.
The benefits do not require a perfect family dinner. A quick breakfast with a parent, a school lunch with friends or a neighbourhood meal can all create connection. During a meal, people often exchange small updates that might not seem important enough for a formal conversation. Over time, these ordinary details help friends and relatives notice changes in mood, celebrate progress and offer support before a problem becomes serious.
The report also warns against turning shared meals into another source of pressure. A daily dinner that leaves one person exhausted or forces everyone into conflict may not improve well-being. Some experts therefore suggest aiming for one or two intentionally connected meals each week. The central idea is not the food, the table or the number of dishes. It is the experience of being present with other people and feeling that there is time to listen.
1.What is the main finding discussed in the passage?
A. Shared meals are linked with stronger well-being. B. Expensive meals produce the greatest happiness. C. Income has no relationship with life satisfaction. D. People should eat every meal with family members.
【答案】A
【详解】主旨大意题。文章围绕“共享用餐与更高幸福感和社会联结相关”展开。
2.Why may shared meals be a useful indicator of social life?
A. They always include healthy food. B. They bring together time, attention and conversation. C. They are measured more easily than income. D. They prevent every family disagreement.
【答案】B
【详解】细节理解题。第二段指出共享用餐结合了时间、关注和交流。
3.What can be inferred from paragraph 3?
A. Small everyday conversations can strengthen relationships. B. Formal conversations are unnecessary in families. C. School lunches are more valuable than family dinners. D. People notice emotions only while eating.
【答案】A
【详解】推理判断题。普通的日常交流长期积累,有助于理解和支持彼此。
4.What does the author suggest in the last paragraph?
A. Make every meal a compulsory family event. B. Focus on meaningful connection rather than perfect arrangements. C. Avoid eating with people who disagree. D. Prepare more dishes to improve the atmosphere.
【答案】B
【详解】推理判断题。最后一段强调不要增加压力,关键是有意识的陪伴和倾听。
C【最新热点·改编题】
When a Close Friend Lives Inside a Screen
Online-only friendships are often described as weak or temporary. Yet a 2025 study based on interviews with twenty-five people found relationships that had lasted for years and survived changes in apps, schools, jobs and countries. The researchers asked participants not only how they communicated, but also what made the friendships feel real.
The strongest friendships were built around repeated ordinary activities. Friends studied together on video calls, watched the same film while messaging, shared photos from a daily walk or sent voice notes during the trip to school. These small routines created a sense of shared life. When a platform closed or became unpopular, close friends exchanged other contact details and moved together rather than losing track of one another.
Distance still created difficulties. Different time zones limited conversation, and online friends could not always provide practical help during illness or an emergency. Some participants also faced doubt from relatives who assumed that a person they had never met could not be a true friend. Such reactions sometimes made the friendship feel invisible, even when it offered important emotional support.
The researchers argue that online friendship should not be judged only by whether people have met face to face. Trust, honesty, mutual effort and the ability to repair misunderstandings matter in every form of friendship. At the same time, the study does not say that every online contact is safe or meaningful. Users still need to protect personal information and notice whether support is balanced. Technology can create an opportunity for friendship, but the quality of the relationship depends on what people do with that opportunity.
1.What made the online friendships in the study feel real?
A. Using the newest platform. B. Sharing repeated everyday activities. C. Avoiding all personal information. D. Communicating only through video.
【答案】B
【详解】细节理解题。第二段强调共同学习、看电影和语音留言等重复的日常活动。
2.Why does the author mention platforms closing?
A. To show that strong friendships can move beyond one app. B. To prove that digital companies are unreliable. C. To suggest users should keep only one account. D. To explain why online friends usually separate.
【答案】A
【详解】写作意图题。平台变化但朋友交换联系方式并一起转移,说明关系不依赖单一应用。
3.What difficulty is NOT mentioned?
A. Time differences. B. Lack of practical help in emergencies. C. Doubt from family members. D. Competition for academic awards.
【答案】D
【详解】细节理解题。前三项均在第三段出现,学业奖项竞争未提及。
4.Which statement best reflects the author’s view?
A. Online friendship is always equal to face-to-face friendship. B. Online friendship is unreal until people meet. C. Technology provides a possibility, but relationship quality depends on behaviour. D. Personal information should be shared freely with online friends.
【答案】C
【详解】观点态度题。末段明确指出技术提供机会,关系质量取决于信任、努力和安全意识。
三、七选五【原创题】
An argument does not have to end a friendship. In fact, learning to repair a disagreement can make two people understand each other better. 1. ________ The following steps can help.
Pause before responding. When emotions are strong, people tend to defend themselves instead of listening. Give yourself time to calm down, but do not disappear without explanation. 2. ________
Take responsibility for your part. A useful apology is specific. Rather than saying “Sorry if you were upset,” explain what you did and why it may have caused harm. 3. ________
Listen to the other person’s experience. You may remember the event differently, but friendship does not require identical memories. Ask questions and avoid interrupting. 4. ________
Agree on a small next step. Repair does not always happen in one conversation. You might decide to meet again, change a habit or give each other a little more time. 5. ________ A relationship becomes stronger when both people repeatedly show that the agreement matters.
A. This shows that you respect the friendship even while taking a break. B. A perfect apology should make the other person forgive you immediately. C. What matters most is not avoiding every conflict but dealing with it honestly. D. Following through is as important as making the plan. E. Try to understand the feeling behind the words, not only the facts. F. It is also helpful to explain how you will act differently next time. G. Friends should never discuss a disagreement more than once.
【答案】1. C 2. A 3. F 4. E 5. D
【详解】1. 空后引出修复争执的方法,C 承接“争执并不必然结束友谊”并概括核心观点。 【详解】2. 本段强调暂停但不要无故消失,A 说明告知对方体现尊重。 【详解】3. F 与“具体道歉”衔接,补充说明未来如何改变。 【详解】4. E 呼应倾听对方经历,强调理解言语背后的感受。 【详解】5. D 与下一句“反复表明协议重要”衔接,强调落实约定。
2 / 11
学科网(北京)股份有限公司
$