2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十六（B篇）

2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十六（B篇）及答案详解 学校:___________姓名：___________班级：___________考号：___________ 一.（2026·陕西延安·二模） The sky over Damascus was no longer blue; it had turned a heavy, choking grey, mirroring the dust that covered everything. It was early 2026, and the conflict, once distant rumors, had exploded into a fire that seemed to have no end. News spoke of missiles flying between Iran, Israel, and American bases in Syria, but for ten-year-old Amir, the war was not about countries or politics. It was about the silence that followed the explosions. Amir sat in the corner of the ruined basement, holding a small, broken radio. His father, a teacher who now spent his days digging for water, had told him to listen for the “all clear” signal. But the radio only produced static, a harsh sound like dry leaves crushing underfoot. Outside, the city was a maze of broken walls and fear. Neighbors who once shared bread now hid behind closed doors, terrified that a single mistake could bring the roof down. Suddenly, a soft knock came from the heavy iron door. Amir’s heart jumped. In this time of terror, a knock usually meant danger. His mother signaled him to stay quiet, her eyes wide with worry. But the knocking continued, gentle and rhythmic. Slowly, his father moved to the door and opened it just a crack. Standing there was David, a boy from the other side of the street. David’s family was from a different background, and in normal times, they rarely spoke. Today, David’s face was pale, and he held a small bag tightly. “My house is gone,” he whispered, his voice shaking. “The fire took it all. Can we... can we share your space?” The room fell silent. The war had taught them to trust no one. Borders were drawn not just on maps, but in people’s hearts. Yet, looking at the trembling boy, Amir’s father saw not an enemy, but a child just like his son. The anger that the news had planted in their minds began to melt away, replaced by a deeper, older truth. “We have little,” his father said softly, opening the door wide. “But we have enough to share.” As David stepped inside, the grey sky outside seemed less heavy. The war might continue to rage across the region, destroying cities and changing borders, but in that small, dark basement, something powerful had happened. Two families, divided by geography and fear, had chosen humanity over hate. It was a small victory, perhaps, but in the long night of war, even a single candle can guide the way home. 1．What does the “silence that followed the explosions” represent for Amir? A．The moment when the radio finally started working clearly. B．The peaceful time when neighbors came out to play together. C．The terrifying pause that made him realize the reality of the war. D．The signal that the American bases had stopped the fighting. 2．Why did Amir’s family feel hesitant when they heard the knock at the door? A．They thought it was the police coming to arrest them. B．They were afraid that the visitor might bring danger or trouble. C．They did not want to share their limited water with strangers. D．They believed the knocking was just a trick played by the radio. 3．What does the underlined word “trembling” in Paragraph 4 most likely mean? A．Shaking because of cold or fear. B．Moving quickly to run away. C．Speaking in a very loud voice. D．Smiling with great happiness. 4．What is the author’s attitude towards the relationship between the two families at the end of the story? A．Critical and disappointed. B．Doubtful and worried. C．Hopeful and appreciative. D．Indifferent and neutral. 二. （2026·陕西延安·二模） The diagnosis did not arrive with a thunderclap but seeped into Elias’s consciousness like an insidious ink stain, blurring the vibrant contours of his seventeen years into a monochrome landscape of dread. In the small, conservative town of Oakhaven, HIV was not merely a virus; it was a social leprosy, a silent verdict that promised ostracization from the very community that had nurtured him. Doors that once swung open now remained firmly shut; whispers in the school corridors mutated into a deafening, deliberate silence whenever he passed. Then there was Julian. Julian, whose own blood carried the same invisible burden, did not offer the hollow platitudes of “everything will be fine” that adults so clumsily wielded. Instead, he enacted a quiet, stubborn rebellion against the prevailing tide of ignorance. While others maintained a sanitized distance, treating Elias as if his mere presence were airborne contagion, Julian closed the gap. He would sit on the edge of Elias’s bed, the mattress dipping under his weight, discussing everything from the absurdity of calculus to the melancholic beauty of autumn leaves, deliberately ignoring the elephantine presence of the virus lurking in their shared biology. Their friendship became a clandestine sanctuary. In the sterile silence of the hospital waiting room, where the air smelled perpetually of antiseptic and despair, they constructed a universe of their own. They played chess on a battered board, the clicking of pieces serving as a rhythmic defiance against the ticking clock of their mortality. “Checkmate,” Julian would declare, a faint smile playing on his lips, his eyes bright with a ferocity that belied his gaunt, medication-wasted frame. It was in these moments that the virus seemed to shrink, reduced from a monstrous predator to a manageable nuisance, dwarfed by the sheer magnitude of their shared resolve. The turning point arrived not through a miraculous cure, but through a public act of vulnerability. During the town hall meeting intended to discuss “community health safety” — a euphemism for containing the “threat” — Julian requested the microphone. Trembling, yet rooted to the spot like an ancient oak weathering a storm, he spoke not of statistics, but of Elias. He recounted late-night conversations that stitched their souls together, of laughter shared in the face of adversity, and of a bond that refused to be severed by biology. “We are not our diagnosis,” Julian’s voice cracked, then steadied, ringing through the auditorium. “We are the sum of our courage.” The silence that followed was different this time. It was not the silence of fear, but of profound reflection. Slowly, tentatively, applause began, swelling into a roar that seemed to shake the very foundations of the prejudice that had held them captive. Elias, watching from the wings, felt a warmth spread through his chest, a sensation far more potent than any antiretroviral regimen. The virus remained, a silent tenant in their bodies, but it no longer held the lease on their lives. They had not conquered the disease in a biological sense — the battle was ongoing, arduous, and uncertain — but they had vanquished the shadow it cast over their spirits. In the economy of the human heart, their friendship was the only currency that mattered, buying them a future that medicine alone could never promise. 5．What does the author imply by describing the diagnosis as an “insidious ink stain” in the first paragraph? A．The medical report was written in ink that accidentally spilled on Elias’s belongings. B．The impact of the disease was gradual, subtle, and psychologically corrupting. C．The hospital staff made a mistake in recording the test results due to negligence. D．Elias tried to hide the diagnosis by covering the document with dark ink. 6．How did Julian’s approach to supporting Elias differ from that of the adults in the town? A．Julian focused on finding experimental cures, while adults focused on prayer. B．Julian avoided mentioning the disease entirely, whereas adults discussed it openly. C．Julian offered realistic companionship and normalcy, while adults offered empty reassurances and isolation. D．Julian publicly revealed their status immediately, while adults kept it a secret to protect them. 7．What is the symbolic significance of the chess game described in the third paragraph? A．It represents the strategic planning required to hide their medical conditions from the public. B．It serves as a metaphor for their intellectual superiority over the ignorant townspeople. C．It illustrates a structured activity where they assert control and defiance amidst the chaos of illness. D．It shows how they killed time while waiting for the arrival of new medications. 8．Which of the following best summarizes the main idea of the passage? A．Medical advancements have successfully turned HIV into a minor inconvenience for teenagers. B．True friendship can dismantle social stigma and restore human dignity even when a biological cure is absent. C．Public speaking is the most effective method for curing the psychological trauma associated with chronic diseases. D．The education system in small towns plays a crucial role in spreading awareness about infectious diseases. 三. （2026·河北·一模） After retiring from professional soccer in 2013, Amir Lowery returned home and began coaching at a youth club. He knew that the city’s immigrant (移民) communities included many soccer enthusiasts, but girls and boys from such communities were nowhere to be seen on the costly club circuit. Two years later, Lowery co-founded the Open Goal Project to help talented young players who could not afford club fees. The program supports about 500 children who play on eight free club teams, in a mini- league, and at summer camps. Beyond soccer skills, participants learn nutrition, financial knowledge, and receive academic and college guidance. Joining his first soccer program at age 4, Lowery played for youth clubs and his parents sacrificed time, money and energy to transport him to games and tournaments. He had a social network of people who backed his passion and really wanted to see him succeed. That foundation helped him earn a full scholarship to Wake Forest University, where he captained the men’s team before joining Major LeagueSoccer. The Open Goal Project operates on an annual budget of roughly $700,000. Local officials — say the families it serves would otherwise have no access to high — level soccer. Lowery also hopes the program will broaden the soccer talent pool, and argues that rising costs — often near $1,000 a year per child — preclude many skilled players. Removing financial barriers, he believes, would reveal much untapped talent. On a sunny afternoon, Lowery leads a practice on a field, where dozens of kids train and parents sit in chairs, watching proudly. Loach Precious Ogu, once an early Open Goal Project participant, understands how priceless such sense of belonging is. Feeling out of place in a wealthy suburban club shaped her belief in the Open Goal Project’s mission. As practice ends and the children walk off the field, it’s clear they leave with more than ball skills. 9．Why was the Open Goal Project established? A．To lower fees of the soccer club. B．To inspire talented soccer players globally. C．To equip children with multi-skills. D．To fire soccer dreams of gifted poor kids. 10．What is paragraph 2 mainly about? A．The influence of sports. B．Lowery’s achievements. C．The value of assistance. D．Lowery’s love for soccer. 11．What does the underlined word “preclude” in paragraph 3 mean? A．Transform. B．Prevent. C．Rejuvenate. D．Disappoint. 12．Which aspect of the project matters most to Precious Ogu? A．It forms closer family bonds. B．It thinks highly of welfare services. C．It opens the path to the future. D．It creates a harmonious atmosphere. 四. （25-26高三下·河北沧州·月考） Ruchita Sahukari, born with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) (脆骨症), is now pursuing journalism at IIMC from a wheelchair, challenging the odds against her. Despite social cruelty and schools refusing admission, her parents’ powerful backing kept her hope alive. Until 18, she was excluded from basic schooling and felt depressed. At 18, Ruchita’s life changed when she joined Amrithavarshini, an NGO in Kerala. There, she met others with OI and made friends who inspired her. To bridge the academic gap, she completed the Bachelor Preparatory Programme at IGNOU in 2021 and earned a BA in English Literature in 2023. She then desired to become a journalist and set her sights on IIMC． Getting into IIMC’s Eastern Regional Campus was one victory; moving around inside it freely was another. In India, where few educational institutions are fully accessible, Ruchita’s arrival motivated the campus to change. The administration built ramps (斜坡), constructed a special room in the ladies’ hostel, and allowed her mother to stay on campus to assist her. “Supporting Ruchita is a reflection of our core values. Removing barriers nurtures dignity, courage, and the right to dream,” says Dr Anand K Pradhan, Regional Director of IIMC Dhenkanal. Her classmates also created a supportive ecosystem, helping her pursue her dreams. Ruchita has already published stories, covering often overlooked topics. Her most challenging assignment was the 2025 Bihar elections coverage, but her friends supported her. "They make me feel like nothing is impossible," she says. This year, Ruchita received the Rare Star Award from ORDI for her advocacy work. She dreams of becoming an advocacy journalist, highlighting policy gaps and accessibility failures. Her message to parents raising children with disabilities is direct: Parents have the responsibility to educate themselves and empower their child. You must trust and empower your child instead of leaving them weak. Change within the family, within the home, is the stepping stone towards bringing social change. 13．What kept Ruchita’s hope alive when she faced difficulties? A．Her own strong will. B．The help from her friends. C．Her parents’strong support. D．The assistance from the NGO. 14．What did Ruchita do at the age of 18? A．She joined an NGO in Kerala. B．She completed a BA degree. C．She started to pursue journalism. D．She published some stories. 15．What do we know about IIMC’s Eastern Regional Campus before Ruchita’s arrival? A．It offered no journalism courses. B．It refused disabled students’ admission. C．It let parents stay on campus to assist students. D．It lacked full accessibility for disabled students. 16．Which of the following can best describe Ruchita? A．Pessimistic and self-centered. B．Positive and strong-willed. C．Ambitious and noble-minded. D．Creative and warm-hearted. 五. （2026·广东深圳·一模） This summer I came face-to-face with three deep-rooted fears: heights, bears, and ageing. Two friends joined me on a four-day wilderness getaway, and since we were all in our seventies, we decided we’d better go while we still could. Our adventure began with a scary drive up a winding mountain road. On one hike, I found myself hanging onto a wire on a bridge made of two partly rotten (腐烂的) logs, suspended high above rushing rapids. I would never have attempted it without our guide ahead, mouthing encouraging words. Fixing my eyes on her boots, I inched along the shaky logs. Somehow, I made it across, flooded with a rush of intense excitement and huge relief. Later, after spotting bear tracks, we were told to make loud noises, which soon became a game once the tension faded. Until suddenly, time stood still. We had just crossed a stream when the guide whispered, “There’s a bear.” I looked up in disbelief and saw not one, but two, about ten meters above us— the brown mother in front, her cub behind. Though scared speechless, I couldn’t help noticing how beautiful they looked in their natural setting. I wondered if it would be my last memory. As they started towards us, we recovered enough to shout and wave our hiking poles. Taken aback, they stopped, and then slowly turned away. Another fear was overcome! On our final morning, after a quiet, thoughtful walk through the forest, we were asked to bring back a “meaningful” stick, rock, and leaf to share what would “stick” with us, what “rocked,” and what we would “leaf” behind. The bond of friendship would stick with me. Women supporting one another truly rocked. And I hoped to leave some fears behind. Our guide ended by expressing her admiration, praising not only our fitness but also our positive attitude, and saying she hoped to be like us in another thirty or forty years. Those unexpected words warmed my heart and eased my fear of being “over the hill.” Being valued for what we had accomplished felt like winning an Olympic medal — even if just for participation. 17．How did the author cross the bridge? A．By taking mindful steps. B．By rushing across it bravely. C．By using her sense of direction. D．By having the guide drag her over. 18．Why did the bears leave? A．They were attracted by the natural setting. B．They were afraid of the noise of the rapids. C．They were surprised at the group’s actions. D．They were threatened by the guide’s rocks. 19．Why did the guide ask them for a stick, rock, and leaf? A．To pick up some souvenirs. B．To reflect on the journey. C．To symbolize their teamwork. D．To check their observation skills. 20．What does the underlined phrase “over the hill” in the last paragraph mean? A．Past the peak of youth. B．Too high to go down. C．Out of place in society. D．Beyond physical limits. 六. （2026·安徽合肥·模拟预测） In 1998, British adventurer Karl Bushby looked down a road in Chile and set a goal: walk all the way home to Hull, England — without using a single form of transport, which was audacious. What he didn’t know then was that the journey he thought would take eight years would stretch into a remarkable 27-year trek (跋涉) across continents, oceans and history. Now, after walking 36,000 miles, surviving the attack of polar bears, swimming across seas, and navigating countless visa setbacks, the 56-year-old adventurer is finally on the home stretch. Bushby began his adventure in Punta Arenas, Chile, trekking north through South and North America, eventually reaching Alaska. In 2006, he attempted one of the most dangerous legs of the journey: crossing the frozen Bering Strait into Siberia. Armed with a gun to scare off polar bears and forced to leap between moving blocks of ice, he achieved what few people on Earth have ever done. His challenges didn’t stop there. Last year, when he couldn’t safely travel through a European country, he took on a new challenge — swimming across the Caspian Sea. With a support team and co-swimmer Angela Maxwell, Bushby spent 31 days completing the 179-mile crossing, swimming a total of 132 hours. After reaching Azerbaijan, he continued through Turkey, and now stands less than 2,000 miles from home. He hopes to recenter Europe this summer and walk into Hull by September 2026. Returning home after nearly three decades, he admits, will feel unrealistic. He left when he was 29. He will return at 58. He says reuniting with family will mean “getting to know each other again”. Bushby walks an average of 30km a day and rests wherever he can find shelter. His mission, called the Goliath Expedition, has outlasted five UK prime ministers, a global health incident, and numerous wars — but his spirit remains as strong as it was in 1998. And the world is cheering him on as he enters the final chapter of one of the most extraordinary human endurance journeys ever attempted. 21．What does the underlined word “audacious” in paragraph 1 probably mean? A．Common. B．Meaningless. C．Ambitious. D．Practical. 22．Why did Bushby swim across the Caspian Sea? A．To set a new world record. B．To avoid the potential risk. C．To shorten the distance. D．To test his physical limits. 23．What does Bushby mean by saying “getting to know each other again”? A．It is awkward to see his family. B．It is too long since he left home. C．He feels regretful for traveling. D．He wants to accompany his family more. 24．What does the Goliath Expedition symbolize? A．The power of spirit. B．The need for recognition. C．The meaning of exploration. D．The importance of adaptation. 试卷第1页，共3页 试卷第1页，共3页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 《2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十六（B篇）及答案详解》参考答案 题号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 答案 C B A C B C C B D C 题号 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 答案 B D C A D B A C B A 题号 21 22 23 24 答案 C B B A 一. 1．C 2．B 3．A 4．C 【难度】0.75 【导语】本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述了战争中，Amir一家在地下室避难时，接纳了失去家园的David，展现了战争中人性的光辉。 1．细节理解题。根据第一段中的“News spoke of missiles flying between Iran, Israel, and American bases in Syria, but for ten-year-old Amir, the war was not about countries or politics. It was about the silence that followed the explosions.(新闻报道称，伊朗、以色列和叙利亚境内的美军基地之间导弹交火，但对十岁的Amir来说，战争与国家或政治无关。它是爆炸之后的寂静)”以及第二段描述的爆炸后城市的废墟、人们的恐惧可知，爆炸后的寂静对Amir来说，是让他意识到战争现实的可怕停顿。故选C项。 2．细节理解题。根据第三段中的“In this time of terror, a knock usually meant danger. His mother signaled him to stay quiet, her eyes wide with worry.(在这个恐怖的时代，敲门声通常意味着危险。他的母亲示意他保持安静，眼睛因担忧而睁得大大的)”可知，Amir一家听到敲门声时犹豫，是因为他们害怕访客可能带来危险或麻烦。故选B项。 3．词句猜测题。根据第四段中的“Today, David’s face was pale, and he held a small bag tightly. “My house is gone,” he whispered, his voice shaking. “The fire took it all. Can we... can we share your space?”(今天，David脸色苍白，紧紧攥着一个小袋子。“我的房子没了，”他低声说，声音在颤抖。“大火把一切都烧光了。我们能……我们能分享你的地方吗？”)”可知，David的房子被大火烧毁，他非常害怕，因此猜测trembling意为“因恐惧而颤抖”。故选A项。 4．推理判断题。根据最后一段中的“As David stepped inside, the grey sky outside seemed less heavy.(当David走进来的时候，外面灰暗的天空似乎不那么沉重了)”以及“Two families, divided by geography and fear, had chosen humanity over hate. It was a small victory, perhaps, but in the long night of war, even a single candle can guide the way home.(两个因地理和恐惧而分裂的家庭，选择了人性而非仇恨。也许这是一场小小的胜利，但在战争的漫漫长夜中，即使是一支蜡烛也能指引回家的路)”可推断，作者对两个家庭之间的关系持充满希望和赞赏的态度。故选C项。 二. 5．B 6．C 7．C 8．B 【难度】0.67 【导语】本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述了两个患HIV少年用友情战胜社会偏见的经历。 5．推理判断题。根据第一段中“The diagnosis did not arrive with a thunderclap but seeped into Elias’s consciousness like an insidious ink stain, blurring the vibrant contours of his seventeen years into a monochrome landscape of dread.(诊断结果并非如晴天霹雳般降临，而是像阴险的墨渍般渗入埃利亚斯的意识，将他十七年鲜活的轮廓模糊成一片单调的恐惧之景。)”可知，作者将诊断描述为“阴险的墨渍”意味着疾病的影响是逐渐的、微妙的，并且在心理上具有腐蚀性。故选B。 6．细节理解题。根据第二段中“Julian, whose own blood carried the same invisible burden, did not offer the hollow platitudes of “everything will be fine” that adults so clumsily wielded. Instead, he enacted a quiet, stubborn rebellion against the prevailing tide of ignorance. While others maintained a sanitized distance, treating Elias as if his mere presence were airborne contagion, Julian closed the gap.(朱利安自己的血液中也承载着同样的无形负担，但他没有像成年人那样笨拙地抛出“一切都会好起来”的空洞套话。相反，他以一种安静、固执的方式反抗着普遍存在的无知潮流。当其他人保持一种净化的距离，把埃利亚斯当作空气传播的传染病一样对待时，朱利安却缩短了这种距离。)”可知，朱利安通过提供实际的陪伴和正常感来支持埃利亚斯，而成年人则提供空洞的安慰和孤立。故选C。 7．推理判断题。根据第三段中“They played chess on a battered board, the clicking of pieces serving as a rhythmic defiance against the ticking clock of their mortality. “Checkmate,” Julian would declare, a faint smile playing on his lips, his eyes bright with a ferocity that belied his gaunt, medication-wasted frame. It was in these moments that the virus seemed to shrink, reduced from a monstrous predator to a manageable nuisance, dwarfed by the sheer magnitude of their shared resolve.(他们在一块破旧的棋盘上下棋，棋子的点击声是对他们生命时钟滴答作响的有节奏的反抗。朱利安会宣布“将军”，嘴角挂着淡淡的微笑，眼中闪烁着凶狠的光芒，与他那瘦削、被药物消耗殆尽的身躯形成鲜明对比。正是在这些时刻，病毒似乎缩小了，从一个可怕的捕食者变成了一个可以控制的麻烦，在他们共同的决心面前显得微不足道。)”可知，下棋象征着他们在混乱的疾病中通过结构化的活动来主张控制和反抗。故选C。 8．主旨大意题。通读全文，根据最后一段中“The virus remained, a silent tenant in their bodies, but it no longer held the lease on their lives. They had not conquered the disease in a biological sense—the battle was ongoing, arduous, and uncertain—but they had vanquished the shadow it cast over their spirits. In the economy of the human heart, their friendship was the only currency that mattered, buying them a future that medicine alone could never promise.(病毒仍然存在，是他们体内的无声租客，但它不再掌控他们的生活。他们并没有在生物学意义上战胜疾病——这场战斗还在继续，艰苦且不确定——但他们已经战胜了疾病投在他们精神上的阴影。在人类心灵的算计中，他们的友谊是唯一重要的货币，为他们买来了医学永远无法承诺的未来。)”可知，文章主要讲述了真正的友谊可以消除社会污名，即使在缺乏生物治愈的情况下也能恢复人的尊严。故选B。 三. 9．D 10．C 11．B 12．D 【难度】0.87 【导语】本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述了Lowery创立Open Goal Project，助力贫困孩子实现足球梦想并促进其全面发展。 9．推理判断题。根据第一段中“Two years later, Lowery co-founded the Open Goal Project to help talented young players who could not afford club fees.(两年后，Lowery与人共同创立了Open Goal Project，以帮助那些负担不起俱乐部费用的有才华的年轻球员。)”可知，Open Goal Project的建立是为了点燃有天赋的贫困孩子的足球梦想。故选D。 10．主旨大意题。根据第二段中“He had a social network of people who backed his passion and really wanted to see him succeed. That foundation helped him earn a full scholarship to Wake Forest University, where he captained the men's team before joining Major League Soccer.(他有一个社交网络，那里的人都支持他的热情，并真心希望看到他成功。这个基础帮助他获得了维克森林大学的全额奖学金，在那里他担任男子足球队队长，然后加入了美国职业足球大联盟。)”可知，本段主要讲述了Lowery在别人的帮助下取得成功的故事，强调了帮助的价值。故选C。 11．词句猜测题。根据第三段中“Local officials — say the families it serves would otherwise have no access to high — level soccer. Lowery also hopes the program will broaden the soccer talent pool, and argues that rising costs — often near $1,000 a year per child — preclude many skilled players.(当地官员表示，否则，它所服务的家庭将无法接触到高水平的足球。Lowery还希望这个项目能扩大足球人才库，并指出不断上涨的费用——通常每年每个孩子近1000美元——preclude许多有技术的球员。)”可知，此处指不断上涨的费用阻止了许多有技术的球员加入，故preclude意为“阻止”。故选B。 12．推理判断题。根据最后一段中“Loach Precious Ogu, once an early Open Goal Project participant, understands how priceless such sense of belonging is. Feeling out of place in a wealthy suburban club shaped her belief in the Open Goal Project’s mission. As practice ends and the children walk off the field, it’s clear they leave with more than ball skills.(Loach Precious Ogu曾经是Open Goal Project的早期参与者，她明白这种归属感是多么的无价。在富裕的郊区俱乐部感到格格不入，这让她更加坚信Open Goal Project的使命。随着训练结束，孩子们走出场地，很明显，他们带走的不仅仅是球技。)”可知，该项目为孩子们创造了一个和谐的氛围，让Precious Ogu有了归属感，这对她来说是最重要的。故选D。 四. 13．C 14．A 15．D 16．B 【难度】0.71 【导语】本文是一篇记叙文。文章讲述了身患脆骨症的鲁奇塔在父母支持、各方帮助下克服重重困难进入印度媒体学院学习，还获奖并发表作品，她呼吁父母教育并赋能孩子。 13．细节理解题。根据第一段“Despite social cruelty and schools refusing admission, her parents’ powerful backing kept her hope alive.(尽管社会充满歧视，学校也拒绝录取她，但她父母强有力的支持让她心中的希望得以延续)”可知，面对社会的残酷和学校拒绝录取，是父母的大力支持让鲁奇塔保持希望。故选C。 14．细节理解题。根据第二段“At 18, Ruchita’s life changed when she joined Amrithavarshini, an NGO in Kerala.(18岁那年，鲁奇塔的人生发生了转变，她加入了喀拉拉邦的一家非政府组织——阿姆里塔瓦尔什尼)”可知，18岁时鲁奇塔加入了喀拉拉邦的一个非政府组织。故选A。 15．推理判断题。根据第三段“In India, where few educational institutions are fully accessible, Ruchita’s arrival motivated the campus to change. The administration built ramps (斜坡), constructed a special room in the ladies’ hostel, and allowed her mother to stay on campus to assist her.(在印度，由于很少有教育机构能够对所有人开放，鲁奇塔的到来促使学校做出了改变。学校管理层修建了斜坡，还在女生宿舍里增设了一个专用房间，并允许她的母亲留在学校里协助她)”可推知，在鲁奇塔到来之前，该校园它没有为残疾学生提供充分的便利。故选D。 16．推理判断题。根据第一段“Ruchita Sahukari, born with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) (骨脆症), is now pursuing journalism at IIMC from a wheelchair, challenging the odds against her.(鲁奇塔·萨胡卡里出生时就患有骨脆症（OI），如今她坐在轮椅上在印度国际传媒学院攻读新闻学，勇敢地挑战着命运的重重阻碍)”及下文可知，文章描述了鲁奇塔如何克服天生的残疾、被学校拒收等巨大困难，在家人、朋友和机构的支持下，坚持追求教育，最终考入大学并开始新闻事业，致力于为弱势群体发声。她的整个历程充满了挑战，但她始终展现出积极面对的态度和坚定的意志。由此推知，最能描述她的品质是“积极而意志坚定”。故选B。 五. 17．A 18．C 19．B 20．A 【难度】0.7 【导语】本文是一篇记叙文。文章讲述了作者与两位年过七旬的朋友的四天荒野探险经历。 17．细节理解题。根据第三段的句子“Fixing my eyes on her boots, I inched along the shaky logs.(我盯着她的靴子，小心翼翼地沿着摇晃的圆木慢慢挪动。)”可知，作者盯着向导的靴子，小心翼翼地一步步走过摇晃的圆木桥。故选A项。 18．细节理解题。根据第六段的句子“As they started towards us, we recovered enough to shout and wave our hiking poles. Taken aback, they stopped, and then slowly turned away.(当它们开始向我们走来时，我们缓过神来，大声呼喊并挥舞登山杖。它们吃了一惊，停了下来，然后慢慢转身离开。)”可知，熊被作者一行人的呼喊和挥杖动作吓到，因此转身离开。故选C项。 19．推理判断题。根据倒数第二段的句子“On our final morning, after a quiet, thoughtful walk through the forest, we were asked to bring back a “meaningful” stick, rock, and leaf to share what would “stick” with us, what “rocked,” and what we would “leaf” behind.(在我们旅行的最后一个早晨，我们在森林里安静而沉思地走了一段之后，被要求带回一根“有意义的”木棍、岩石和树叶来分享哪些会“留存”在我们心中，哪些“震撼”了我们，以及我们愿意“放下”什么)”可知，向导通过这些自然物品引导大家反思旅程中的收获与感悟。故选B项。 20．词句猜测题。根据最后一段的语境，向导称赞她们的健康和积极态度，并表示希望自己三四十年后也能像她们一样。这些意外的话语温暖了作者的心，缓解了她对“over the hill”的恐惧。结合前文提到的“we were all in our seventies(我们都七十多岁了)”以及“ageing(变老)”这一主题，“over the hill”指的是已过青春巅峰、年老体衰的状态。故选A项。 六. 21．C 22．B 23．B 24．A 【难度】0.45 【导语】本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述了英国冒险家卡尔·布什比从1998年开始，计划徒步从智利返回英国故乡，历经27年、跨越3.6万英里，克服无数艰难险阻，如今即将完成这一非凡壮举的故事。 21．词句猜测题。根据第一段中“In 1998, British adventurer Karl Bushby looked down a road in Chile and set a goal: walk all the way home to Hull, England — without using a single form of transport, which was audacious. (1998年，英国冒险家卡尔·布什比望着智利的一条路，定下了一个目标：不使用任何交通工具，一路步行回到英格兰的赫尔——这可谓audacious)”以及后文描述他花费27年、行走3.6万英里可知，这个目标非常大胆、有雄心。故划线词audacious意为“雄心勃勃的”，与“Ambitious”同义。故选C项。 22．细节理解题。根据第三段中“Last year, when he couldn’t safely travel through a European country, he took on a new challenge — swimming across the Caspian Sea. (去年，当他无法安全穿越某个欧洲国家时，他接受了一项新的挑战——游泳横渡里海)”可知，布什比游泳横渡里海是为了避免穿越某国可能带来的安全风险。故选B项。 23．推理判断题。根据第四段中“Returning home after nearly three decades, he admits, will feel unrealistic. (他承认，在近三十年后回家，会感觉不真实)”和“He left when he was 29. He will return at 58. He says reuniting with family will mean “getting to know each other again”.(他29岁时离开，归来时已58岁。他说与家人重逢意味着“重新认识彼此”)”可推知，他说“getting to know each other again”的意思是自己离开家的时间太长了，重逢意味着要重新了解彼此。故选B项。 24．推理判断题。根据最后一段中“His mission, called the Goliath Expedition, has outlasted five UK prime ministers, a global health incident, and numerous wars — but his spirit remains as strong as it was in 1998. (他的使命被称为“歌利亚远征”，它历经了五位英国首相、一次全球卫生事件和无数次战争——但他的精神仍与1998年时一样坚强)”以及全文描述他克服的种种困难可知，“歌利亚远征”象征着精神的力量。故选A项。 答案第1页，共2页 答案第1页，共2页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $