2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十四（D篇）

2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十四（D篇）及答案详解 学校:___________姓名：___________班级：___________考号：___________ 一.（2026·江苏·二模） A girl who turns up to school dressed head-to-toe in pink will probably pass unnoticed. If a boy does the same, he will inevitably face stares. Even the most non-traditional parent would think twice about exposing their son to that. Children start paying attention to gender differences much earlier than some parents realize, according to psychologist Christia Brown, “Society emphasizes that gender is important really early in a kid’s life,” she says. “We label it a lot in our language — we use gender as nouns all the time. So we frequently say ‘oh, there’s that girl’ or ‘come on boys, let’s go get in the car.’” Research suggests children’s recognition of gender is more due to adults pointing it out than any inborn awareness of it. Gendered toys credit certain types of skills and strengths to one gender or the other. So, when a child only plays with toys marketed for their gender, they learn a certain set of skills but do not engage as much in other types of learning. This can lead to imbalanced development in boys and girls as they grow older. The biggest concern around buying gendered toys is that they can impact how children see themselves. Gendered representation imposes (强加于) society’s ideas of what they should like and do instead of letting them choose for themselves what their interests and hobbies are. This can have influence on what that child decides to study in school and ultimately choose as a career. Many retailers have made real progress over the last few years, dropping gender labels in stores and online — a new research shows a 70% decrease in the use of online gender navigation options since 2012 — but there’s still work to do to challenge the stereotyped (老一套的) ways that toys are often packaged and promoted. Researchers hope that one day, toys will stop being broken up by gender and will instead be categorized by type, like puzzle toys, dolls or children’s bikes. There would still be dress-up dolls and monster toy trucks in that world, but instead of being just pink or blue, they would come in every color of the rainbow. Toy choices should be based on kids’ personal interests, and not on their gender. 1．What does Christia Brown say about gender differences? A．They are probably unnoticed. B．They are socially constructed. C．They are biologically determined. D．They are universally acknowledged. 2．What aspects of children are negatively affected by gendered toys? A．Their academic performance. B．Their interpersonal relationship. C．Their behaviours and attitudes. D．Their physical strength and fitness. 3．What should we put efforts to change? A．How the toys are marketed. B．Where the toys are sold. C．When the toys are rolled out. D．Who the toys are targeted at. 4．What do the researchers expect of future toys? A．They should be colourful. B．They should be gender-neutral. C．They should cater to kids’ tastes. D．They should cover wider categories. 二.（2026·云南红河·三模） A decade ago, the dashboard (仪表盘) was a symphony of buttons and knobs — physical, easy to use, and largely distraction-free. Today, it has changed into a glowing glass screen. What once required a twist or a press now demands a glance, a slide, and often, a second try. Touchscreens promised elegance and simplicity. They replaced messy controls with clean design, allowing manufacturers to cut costs and software engineers to shine. Yet, what delights designers may imperil drivers. Studies show that touchscreen-based controls take longer to operate than traditional ones. Adjusting the temperature, changing the radio, or finding navigation options now demands precious seconds of distracted attention — at highway speeds, that’s hundreds of meters driven blind. The risks are no longer hypothetical. In Sweden, safety researchers found that interacting with a modern touchscreen can be twice as distracting as using physical controls. In Britain, police have begun to treat touchscreen misuse like texting while driving. Carmakers defend their glassy creations. They argue that voice assistants and steering-wheel shortcuts reduce risk. Tesla, whose minimalist interiors (内饰) helped popularize the trend, claims that over-the-air updates make cars safer and more adaptable. Yet, voice recognition is unreliable, and submenus hidden beneath layers of icons are no substitute for muscle memory. When drivers must look down to switch a function, safety becomes an app update away. Regulators, too, are waking up. The European Union has begun examining driver-distraction standards for multimedia systems. Some Japanese manufacturers, sensing consumer exhaustion, are reintroducing physical buttons for climate and audio. The pendulum (钟摆) may be swinging back from digital purity toward practical design. The broader irony is that technology designed to simplify has instead complicated. A century of automotive evolution reduced driving to instinct. Now, cars demand the same divided attention as phones. The modern driver navigates not only roads but also menus, icons, and alerts. Perhaps the ultimate luxury in future vehicles will not be bigger screens or smarter assistants — but fewer distractions. As automakers race toward automation, they may rediscover an ancient virtue: safety begins not with more technology, but with less to touch. 5．Why does the author describe the dashboard as “a symphony of buttons and knobs”? A．To stress the special skill required to operate it. B．To emphasize the visual appeal of older dashboards. C．To illustrate how the various controls worked in harmony. D．To criticize the complexity of traditional vehicle interiors. 6．What can be inferred from Paragraph 4? A．Relying on digital systems puts safety at risk. B．Software updates can instantly remove driving risks. C．Carmakers are actively using updates to reduce accidents. D．Drivers can download safety software as easily as phone apps. 7．How may the future vehicle be designed? A．Physical controls will definitely replace touchscreens. B．Voice assistants will take over car controls in five years. C．Design will combine digital and physical safety features. D．Screens will grow in size until they cover entire dashboards. 8．Which of the following is the best title for the passage? A．The Hidden Cost of In-Car Touchscreens. B．The Unstoppable Rise of the Digital Dashboard. C．Voice Assistants: The Future of Driving Interaction. D．From Buttons to Screens: A History of Car Interior Design. 三. （25-26高三上·湖南长沙·月考） While AI-driven technologies have revolutionized professional workflows and academic research in recent years, authoritative surveys reveal a disturbing loss of core qualities among young professionals — particularly in logical reasoning, independent problem-solving, and critical judgment of information. A growing number of young adults admit they depend on AI to draft proposals or confirm conclusions, so they rarely take part in the careful mental work needed to develop these basic skills. Clara Bennett and Oliver Hale, technology analysts at The Economist, analyze this contradiction in their latest feature “AI’s Convenience Trap: Trading Skill for Efficiency”. They argue that the smooth use of AI in daily work and study has created a “skill decline” phenomenon, urging societies to keep a balance between making use of technological progress and protecting necessary human abilities. Over the past decade, AI-powered writing assistants, data analysis software, and decision-support programs have spread through workplaces, universities, and even basic education. A small number of far-sighted institutions have taken action: most notably, several Ivy League universities in the US started a“Human-Centric Learning” activity in 2021,requiring that students finish core coursework without AI help, with AI only allowed for improving work after it is drafted. They stressed that AI should support not replace mental development, as passive dependence weakens in-depth learning. Similar changes have been tried in top Chinese universities, though on a small scale. Despite these separate efforts, the whole situation remains largely unchanged: AI’s efficiency benefits continue to cause uncontrolled over-reliance. Statistical data from the OECD(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) shows that the percentage of young graduates unable to solve open-ended problems — those needing creative thinking rather than fixed answers — has risen sharply by 37% over the past five years. Employers in all fields complain that new workers often lack the ability to solve sudden errors or adjust to unexpected challenges, linking the gap to over-reliance on AI’s ready-made solutions. We spend billions on advancing Al to make productivity more efficient, yet we often ignore the long-term social costs. Do we fully understand what is lost when critical thinking and careful analysis are set aside for immediate technological solutions? Bennett and Hale’s opinion is well-timed: it is necessary to re-examine our relationship with AI, making sure that human potential is developed rather than reduced. 9．What phenomenon is highlighted in paragraph 1? A．The misuse of AI in academic fields. B．Young adults' over-reliance on AI tools. C．Declining thinking capacities of young working people. D．The impact of AI-driven technologies on workflows. 10．What is the core. requirement of the “Human-Centric Learning” activity? A．Training students to use AI tools critically. B．Prioritizing human thinking over AI assistance. C．Raising the efficiency of coursework completion. D．Mastering basic operation of mainstream AI tools. 11．What can be inferred about the reforms mentioned in paragraph 3? A．They lack long-term sustainable effects. B．They proved to be effective in top universities. C．They have greatly cut down dependence on AI. D．They have not addressed the problem on a large scale. 12．Which one is the most suitable title for the text? A．AI’s Negative Influence on Us B．Decline in Problem-Solving Skills C．Some Solutions to AI Dependency D．AI Overuse Causes Core Skill Decline 四. （25-26高三下·浙江·开学考试） This is depressing: people are using AI to solve escape room puzzles and cheat at trivia nights. It’s like going into a corn maze (迷宫) and just wanting a straight line to the end. Surely, that is the definition of wrecking your own fun. I’m puzzled how anyone could enjoy using a large language model (LLM) to sound “clever” or participate in any AI-hacked hobby. It doesn’t matter much, I suppose — this isn’t AI as existential threat. But it matters for fun — let the bots take our work, but not our joy! I wouldn’t tell anyone how to enjoy themselves — I’m no expert on fun, and would definitely end up sounding like an AI-generated Substack if I did (hug a tree, speak to a stranger, laugh with loved ones). But I have been thinking what makes me feel most vividly alive and I’m aiming to do more of it — my individual fightback against the “impersonal universal”. The first one is singing. I expect AI to search through musical classics to compose great songs, but it can’t produce the entertainment of my small choir composed of very particular humans. We’re not the most polished singers, but listening to one another and trying to blend (融合) our voices gives me an intense sense of connection. Occasionally, everything comes together and we produce a few seconds of surprising beauty. When it doesn’t, it’s fun anyway. I also get a fair amount of joy from people — I say this as a lifelong introvert (内向的人). When I try to identify my most reliable source of pleasure, it’s wandering round a strange city looking at its inhabitants. What are people wearing, eating, talking about; what annoys them; what kind of dogs do they have? It’s an all-you-can-eat human buffet. That’s the secret for me: AI can explain what we are as a whole, but it blends all our colours to a muddy brown; it can’t capture the joy of the absolutely particular. 13．What does the underlined word “wrecking” in the first paragraph mean? A．Ruining. B．Creating. C．Enjoying. D．Spreading 14．Which of the following would the author disapprove of? A．Following AI-generated suggestions. B．Encouraging others to enjoy themselves. C．Taking advantage of AI in the workplace. D．Making use of AI in recreational activities. 15．What is the problem of AI-generated music? A．It is impersonal. B．It is unoriginal. C．It is serious. D．It is complex. 16．What does the author imply in the last paragraph? A．AI is less intelligent than humans. B．True joy lies in individual uniqueness. C．Particularity is the key to improving AI. D．The whole is more than the sum of its parts. 五. （2026·湖北武汉·一模） Have you ever obeyed the suggestions of a digital writing assistant to replace a word or restructure a sentence? Before the appearance of digital tools, you’d probably have turned to a dictionary for the same assistance. Dictionaries enable us to write not with fail-safe convenience but with originality and a point of view. While AI assistants produce phrases and statements so writers don’t have to think them up, dictionaries provide us with the knowledge to use language ourselves in expressive and potentially infinite (无穷的) ways. They place choice and authority literally in human hands, forcing us to discover how we want to explain ourselves and our ideas to the world. The abundance of digital writing assistants gives greater urgency to debates about what a dictionary should be. In 1946, George Orwell described good writing as “picking out words for the sake of their meaning,” a practice that dictionaries facilitate while digital writing programs stifle. Writers consulting a dictionary make a choice, while writers guided by an app have their choices made for them. The digital-native approach delivers hands-off, derivative (衍生的) communication. The other requires leafing through pages without knowing exactly where you’ll end up. Without dictionaries to provide us with a guide to English’s potential, writing that way is nearly impossible. Our ability to express ourselves is critical — it helps us define who we are. Dictionaries aid us in achieving this: They categorize our unique ways of thinking through language. I’m a Canadian; my feeling of pride in my native land is enhanced by small verbal Canadianisms like “eaves trough” or “serviette”, which are well-documented in dictionaries but rarely used by AI chatbots, for the most part. As digital writing extends deeper into our lives and minds, we need dictionaries more than ever. Abandoning dictionaries and embracing mechanized writing would weaken our capacity for collective identity quite as much as the ability to express ourselves. 17．What might be a distinct feature of dictionaries according to the author? A．They promise fail-safe phrases. B．They possess academic authority. C．They facilitate creative writing. D．They provide ready-made expressions. 18．What does the underlined word “stifle” in paragraph 3 probably mean? A．Favor. B．Revise. C．Observe. D．Discourage. 19．Why does the author mention “eaves trough” and “serviette” in paragraph 4? A．To show how AI aids us in expressing. B．To indicate the weakness of dictionaries. C．To celebrate the diversity of Canadian English. D．To illustrate how language use affects identity. 20．What can be a suitable title for the text? A．Why Keep Your Dictionary? B．How to Deal with Digital Writing? C．Who Uses Writing Assistants? D．What to Expect from Dictionaries? 六. （25-26高三下·陕西·月考） In an age when digital assistants complete our sentences before we fully form them, it is easy to believe that printed dictionaries have outlived their usefulness. Yet they remain essential, because no tool better reminds us that language is not simply corrected — it is crafted. Before spell-check and AI, students and writers turned to dictionaries not only to check meanings but also to explore usage examples and word histories. A student drafting an essay, for instance, might look up “charge” and discover it can mean “accuse” “rush forward” or “fill with energy”. Choosing among these possibilities required thought, and that process often shaped the writer’s ideas. An AI assistant, by contrast, may simply replace the word with the most common option, leaving little room for personal intention. Dictionaries have also played a guiding role in English. Johnson’s and Webster’s dictionaries, widely used by schools and publishers, helped establish spelling and meaning at times when regional dialects differed sharply. Even today, when dictionary makers update entries to reflect new expressions such as “ghosting” or “finsta”, they rely on everyday speakers for evidence. This back-and-forth — public use influencing dictionaries, dictionaries influencing public use — keeps language both flexible and shared. But this balance is weakening. As online communication takes over daily life, formal English ebbs. Casual abbreviations, emojis, and speech-like sentences now appear in emails and even workplace reports. For many young people, writing “Sounds good!!” reads more confident than a polished, formal sentence. The shift is understandable, yet it raises a question: If algorithms (算法) increasingly finish our sentences, do we still learn how to shape them ourselves? AI writing tools offer clean, quick suggestions, but they rely on fixed patterns. As George Orwell once warned, such ready-made phrasing can “think our thoughts” for us. When writers accept every suggestion, originality slowly disappears. Dictionaries, by contrast, push us to explore options and make deliberate choices. Our ability to express ourselves shapes who we are. Losing the dictionary would mean losing not only a reference book, but a way of thinking — one that keeps language creative, thoughtful, and deeply human. 21．What does the example of “charge” show? A．Word histories are stressed a lot in dictionaries. B．AI assistants are more efficient than printed dictionaries. C．Printed dictionaries help users gain deeper insight into words. D．Students struggle to choose the right meaning of certain words. 22．What does the underlined word “ebbs” in paragraph 4 probably mean? A．Withdraws. B．Arises. C．Improves. D．Stabilizes. 23．What can be inferred from paragraph 5? A．No convenience comes without a cost. B．AI tools contribute much to creative works. C．Dictionaries provide more fixed word choices than AI tools. D．George Orwell encouraged the use of existing writing patterns. 24．Which of the following can be the best title for the text? A．The History of English Dictionaries B．AI Assistants Threaten Language Creativity C．The Necessity of Formal English in Digital Age D．Printed Dictionaries Are Still Essential in Digital Times 试卷第1页，共3页 试卷第1页，共3页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 《2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十四（D篇）及答案详解》参考答案 题号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 答案 B C A B C A C A C B 题号 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 答案 D D A D A B C D D A 题号 21 22 23 24 答案 C A A D 一. 1．B 2．C 3．A 4．B 【难度】0.73 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要讲述了性别化玩具对儿童发展的负面影响及未来玩具应去性别化的期望。 1．细节理解题。根据第二段中“Research suggests children’s recognition of gender is more due to adults pointing it out than any inborn awareness of it.(研究表明，孩子对性别的认知更多源于成年人的刻意强调，而非天生就有这种意识)”可知，Christia Brown认为性别差异是社会构建的。故选B。 2．推理判断题。根据第四段“The biggest concern around buying gendered toys is that they can impact how children see themselves. Gendered representation imposes (强加于) society’s ideas of what they should like and do instead of letting them choose for themselves what their interests and hobbies are. This can have influence on what that child decides to study in school and ultimately choose as a career.(购买性别化玩具最大的担忧是，它们会影响孩子对自己的看法。性别化的表现强加了社会对他们应该喜欢和做什么的看法，而不是让他们自己选择自己的兴趣爱好。这可能会影响孩子在学校选择学习的内容，并最终影响他们选择的职业)”可知，性别化玩具对孩子的行为和态度产生负面影响。故选C。 3．细节理解题。根据第五段中“but there’s still work to do to challenge the stereotyped (老一套的) ways that toys are often packaged and promoted.(但是，要挑战玩具通常的包装和推广方式中的刻板印象，仍有许多工作要做)”可知，我们应该努力改变玩具的营销方式。故选A。 4．细节理解题。根据最后一段中“Researchers hope that one day, toys will stop being broken up by gender and will instead be categorized by type, like puzzle toys, dolls or children’s bikes.(研究人员希望有一天，玩具不再按性别分类，而是按类型分类，比如拼图玩具、娃娃或儿童自行车)”可知，研究人员期望未来的玩具应该是性别中立的。故选B。 二. 5．C 6．A 7．C 8．A 【难度】0.53 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要讨论了汽车中控台从物理按钮向触摸屏转变所带来的安全问题，指出触摸屏分散驾驶员注意力，并呼吁回归更安全的实用设计。 5．推理判断题。根据第一段中“A decade ago, the dashboard (仪表盘) was a symphony of buttons and knobs — physical, easy to use, and largely distraction-free. (十年前，仪表盘是按钮和旋钮的“交响乐”——物理的、易于使用，并且基本不会分散注意力)”可知，作者用“交响乐”比喻传统仪表盘是为了说明各种控制装置协调配合、和谐统一。故选C项。 6．推理判断题。根据第四段中“Carmakers defend their glassy creations. They argue that voice assistants and steering-wheel shortcuts reduce risk. (汽车制造商为其玻璃屏幕设计辩护。他们声称语音助手和方向盘快捷键能降低风险)”和“Yet, voice recognition is unreliable, and submenus hidden beneath layers of icons are no substitute for muscle memory. When drivers must look down to switch a function, safety becomes an app update away. (然而，语音识别并不可靠，隐藏在层层图标下的子菜单也无法替代肌肉记忆。当司机必须低头操作某个功能时，安全就变得遥不可及，仿佛只是一个应用更新的距离)”可推知，依赖数字系统会带来安全风险。故选A项。 7．推理判断题。根据第五段中“The European Union has begun examining driver-distraction standards for multimedia systems. Some Japanese manufacturers, sensing consumer exhaustion, are reintroducing physical buttons for climate and audio. (欧盟已经开始审查多媒体系统的驾驶员分心标准。一些日本制造商察觉到消费者的疲惫，正在重新引入用于空调和音响的物理按钮)”以及最后一段中“Perhaps the ultimate luxury in future vehicles will not be bigger screens or smarter assistants — but fewer distractions. As automakers race toward automation, they may rediscover an ancient virtue: safety begins not with more technology, but with less to touch. (也许未来汽车的终极奢华将不是更大的屏幕或更智能的助手——而是更少的干扰。随着汽车制造商竞相迈向自动化，他们可能会重新发现一个古老的真理：安全不是源于更多技术，而是源于更少需要触摸的东西)”可知，当前制造商正在重新引入物理按钮，并且作者预测未来设计应减少干扰、降低对触摸操作的依赖。这表明未来的汽车设计将结合数字与物理安全特性。故选C项。 8．主旨大意题。通读全文，结合第二段中“Studies show that touchscreen-based controls take longer to operate than traditional ones. (研究表明，基于触摸屏的控制操作时间比传统控制更长)”、第三段中“In Sweden, safety researchers found that interacting with a modern touchscreen can be twice as distracting as using physical controls. (在瑞典，安全研究人员发现，操作现代触摸屏的分散注意力程度是使用物理控件的两倍)”以及最后一段中“As automakers race toward automation, they may rediscover an ancient virtue: safety begins not with more technology, but with less to touch. (随着汽车制造商竞相迈向自动化，他们可能会重新发现一个古老的真理：安全不是源于更多技术，而是源于更少需要触摸的东西)”可知，本文主要揭示了车内触摸屏带来的安全隐患这一隐性成本。故A项“The Hidden Cost of In-Car Touchscreens (车内触摸屏的隐性成本)”能概括文章内容，最适合做文章标题。故选A项。 三. 9．C 10．B 11．D 12．D 【难度】0.69 【导语】这是一篇议论文。文章主要探讨了人工智能（AI）的广泛使用对年轻专业人士核心能力的影响，指出过度依赖AI导致逻辑推理、独立解决问题和信息批判性判断等能力下降，并提及了一些应对措施及其局限性。 9．细节理解题。根据第一段“While AI-driven technologies have revolutionized professional workflows and academic research in recent years, authoritative surveys reveal a disturbing loss of core qualities among young professionals — particularly in logical reasoning, independent problem-solving, and critical judgment of information.(近年来，尽管人工智能驱动的技术彻底改变了专业工作流程和学术研究，但权威调查显示，年轻专业人士的核心素质出现了令人不安的丧失，尤其是在逻辑推理、独立解决问题和信息批判性判断方面。)”可知，第一段强调了年轻劳动者的思维能力下降。故选C。 10．细节理解题。根据第三段“They stressed that AI should support not replace mental development, as passive dependence weakens in-depth learning.(他们强调，人工智能应该支持而不是取代思维发展，因为被动依赖会削弱深度学习。)”可知，“以人为本的学习”活动的核心要求是优先考虑人类思维而非人工智能辅助。故选B。 11．推理判断题。根据第四段“Despite these separate efforts, the whole situation remains largely unchanged: AI’s efficiency benefits continue to cause uncontrolled over-reliance.(尽管做出了这些单独的努力，但整个情况基本上没有改变：人工智能的效率优势继续导致不受控制的过度依赖。)”可知，这些改革并没有大规模地解决问题。故选D。 12．主旨大意题。文章主要讨论了人工智能的过度使用导致年轻专业人士的核心能力下降，如逻辑推理、独立解决问题和信息批判性判断等，并指出尽管有一些改革措施，但问题仍未得到大规模解决。因此，选项D“人工智能的过度使用导致核心技能下降”最能概括文章的主题。故选D。 四. 13．A 14．D 15．A 16．B 【难度】0.61 【导语】本文是一篇议论文，作者对人们利用人工智能破解密室谜题、参与趣味活动的行为表示不解，认为这破坏了娱乐的本质，夺走了人们的快乐。作者指出人工智能虽能完成工作、创作作品，却无法复制人类在社交和娱乐中感受到的独特联结与专属快乐，真正的快乐源于人与人之间具体、独特的相处与体验。 13．词句猜测题。根据第一段“people are using AI to solve escape room puzzles and cheat at trivia nights. It’s like going into a corn maze (迷宫) and just wanting a straight line to the end.(人们利用人工智能破解密室逃脱谜题，在知识问答之夜作弊，这就像走进玉米迷宫却只想走一条直达终点的直线)”及后文“Surely, that is the definition of wrecking your own fun.(毫无疑问，这简直就是在wrecking自己的乐趣)”可知，利用人工智能破解密室、答题作弊相当于直接走捷径，这是在破坏自己的乐趣, “wrecking”意为“破坏”。故选A。 14．推理判断题。根据第二段“But it matters for fun — let the bots take our work, but not our joy! (但这对乐趣来说至关重要——让机器人接手我们的工作，但不要夺走我们的快乐!)”可知，作者反对在娱乐活动中利用人工智能。故选D。 15．推理判断题。根据第三段“I expect AI to search through musical classics to compose great songs, but it can’t produce the entertainment of my small choir composed of very particular humans.(我期待人工智能能够从音乐经典作品中汲取灵感，创作出优秀的歌曲，但它无法带来我那由一群独具特色的人类成员组成的小小合唱团所带来的那种娱乐体验)”及最后一段“AI can explain what we are as a whole, but it blends all our colours to a muddy brown; it can’t capture the joy of the absolutely particular.(人工智能可以从整体上解释我们是什么，却把所有色彩都混成了浑浊的棕色；它无法捕捉独一无二的个体所带来的乐趣)”可知，人工智能创作的音乐缺乏人情味，没有独特的情感联结。故选A。 16．推理判断题。根据最后一段“AI can explain what we are as a whole, but it blends all our colours to a muddy brown; it can’t capture the joy of the absolutely particular.(人工智能可以从整体上解释我们是什么，却把所有色彩都混成了浑浊的棕色；它无法捕捉独一无二的个体所带来的乐趣)”可知，作者暗示真正的快乐存在于个体的独特性之中。故选B。 五. 17．C 18．D 19．D 20．A 【难度】0.65 【导语】这是一篇议论文。文章通过对比数字写作助手和字典指出，在数字写作普及的当下，字典对保留写作原创性、塑造身份认同有不可替代的作用，最后点明我们比以往更需要字典。 17．细节理解题。根据第二段中“Dictionaries enable us to write not with fail-safe convenience but with originality and a point of view.(词典让我们写作时并非依靠万无一失的便捷，而是能够展现独特性和观点)”可知，字典能帮助我们写出有原创性的内容。故选C。 18．词句猜测题。根据划线词前“a practice that dictionaries facilitate(字典促进这种做法)”和“while”表示的对比关系可知，stifle和facilitate含义相反，即“抑制、阻碍”，选项中discourage“阻拦、使气馁”意思一致。故选D。 19．推理判断题。第四段开头“Our ability to express ourselves is critical — it helps us define who we are. Dictionaries aid us in achieving this: They categorize our unique ways of thinking through language.(我们表达自我的能力至关重要——它帮助我们定义自己是谁。词典有助于我们实现这一目标：它们通过语言将我们独特的思维方式进行分类)”点明观点：表达自我的能力帮助我们定义自身身份，字典能帮我们保留独有的语言表达。下文“I’m a Canadian; my feeling of pride in my native land is enhanced by small verbal Canadianisms like “eaves trough” or “serviette”, which are well-documented in dictionaries but rarely used by AI chatbots, for the most part.(我是加拿大人；我对祖国的自豪感因一些小小的加拿大式词汇而得到增强，比如“檐沟”或“餐巾纸”，这些词汇在词典中有详细记载，但在大多数情况下，人工智能聊天机器人很少使用它们)”作者举这两个加拿大特有的词汇，是为了说明：这类特有语言能增强本土身份认同感，即语言使用会影响个人/群体身份。故选D。 20．主旨大意题。根据全文内容，结合最后一段“As digital writing extends deeper into our lives and minds, we need dictionaries more than ever. Abandoning dictionaries and embracing mechanized writing would weaken our capacity for collective identity quite as much as the ability to express ourselves.(随着数字写作深入我们的生活和思维，我们对词典的需求比以往任何时候都更加迫切。放弃词典而转向机械化写作，将同等程度地削弱我们建立集体认同的能力和表达自我的能力)”可知，全文对比数字写作助手和字典，层层论述：在数字写作普及的当下，字典对保留写作原创性、塑造身份认同有不可替代的作用，结尾点明我们比以往更需要字典。由此可知，A项“为什么要保留字典？”适合作本文标题。故选A。 六. 21．C 22．A 23．A 24．D 【难度】0.68 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章反驳了数字时代纸质词典已无用的观点，阐述了纸质词典在帮助使用者深入理解词汇、推动独立思考、引导英语发展以及保持语言原创性等方面的重要价值，指出其在数字时代依然不可或缺，是一种能让语言保持创造性和人文性的思维方式。 21．细节理解题。根据第二段“Before spell-check and AI, students and writers turned to dictionaries not only to check meanings but also to explore usage examples and word histories. A student drafting an essay, for instance, might look up “charge” and discover it can mean “accuse” “rush forward” or “fill with energy”. Choosing among these possibilities required thought, and that process often shaped the writer’s ideas. (在没有拼写检查和人工智能技术之前，学生和作者会借助词典不仅来查询词义，还会去探究用法示例和单词的起源。比如，一个正在撰写论文的学生可能会查“charge”这个词，从而发现它有“指控”“向前冲”或“充满活力”等不同的意思。在这些选项中做出选择需要思考，而这个过程往往会影响作者的想法)”可知，作者举charge的例子，是为了说明使用者查阅纸质词典能发现单词的多种含义，在选择含义的过程中需要主动思考，这个过程还能塑造创作思路，这体现出纸质词典能帮助使用者对单词形成更深入的理解。故选C项。 22．词句猜测题。根据第四段“As online communication takes over daily life, formal English ebbs. Casual abbreviations, emojis, and speech-like sentences now appear in emails and even workplace reports. (随着网络交流占据日常生活，正式英语ebbs。随意的缩写、表情符号和口语化句子如今出现在电子邮件甚至工作报告中)”可知，在线交流占据日常生活，随意的缩写、表情符号等非正式表达出现在各类文本中，年轻人更倾向于使用这类非正式表达，由此可推知，正式英语的使用在逐渐减少、衰退，ebb在此处意为“衰退、逐渐消失”，与withdraw含义相近。故选A项。 23．推理判断题。根据第五段“AI writing tools offer clean, quick suggestions, but they rely on fixed patterns. As George Orwell once warned, such ready-made phrasing can “think our thoughts” for us. When writers accept every suggestion, originality slowly disappears. (人工智能写作工具提供简洁快速的建议，但它们依赖于固定的模式。正如乔治·奥威尔曾经警告的那样，这种现成的措辞可以为我们“思考我们的想法”。当作家接受每一个建议时，原创性就会慢慢消失)”可推知，AI带来的便利是有代价的，带来便利的同时也让人们失去原创性，即没有免费的便利。故选A项。 24．主旨大意题。根据第一段“In an age when digital assistants complete our sentences before we fully form them, it is easy to believe that printed dictionaries have outlived their usefulness. Yet they remain essential, because no tool better reminds us that language is not simply corrected — it is crafted. (在一个数字助手能在我们完整表达想法之前就补全句子的时代，人们很容易认为印刷词典已经没用了。然而，它们仍然至关重要，因为没有任何工具能更好地提醒我们，语言不是简单的纠正，而是精心设计的)”以及文章内容可知，文章主要说明在数字时代印刷词典依然必不可少，所以“印刷词典在数字时代仍然至关重要”适合作为文章标题。故选D项。 答案第1页，共2页 答案第1页，共2页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $