2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练二十（D篇）

2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练二十（D篇）及答案详解 学校:___________姓名：___________班级：___________考号：___________ 一. （2026·河南南阳·模拟） The dystopian (反乌托邦的) novels of the last century were mostly filled with terrifying visions of the rise of technology — a type of which we are still to tire. But I’d like to see a dystopia in which humans of the 2020s are thrown into a world equipped only with the technology of a few decades ago. The repetitive chore. The boring assembly-line (流水线) job. The command of a thousand paper forms to fill out by hand, post and file. Some people worry the skills being lost to information technology; map reading, handwriting, and so on. A second concern is that automation is making our lives less healthy, and more artificial. And then there’s the big one: the worry that tech is replacing us at work, and will do so in ways that will make us less fulfilled and less equal. These fears deserve a challenge now and then. For example, the second worry — that technology is leading us into an un-human, artificial, unhealthy kind of life, away from the lives we were “meant” to lead. The historian Yuval Noah Harari has theorized that the process of making life “unnatural” started much earlier, at the dawn of farming. Farming forced our bodies into tending fields and drawing water long distances, work we were not meant for, which took an effect on our spines and feet. Later, the rise of writing, numbers and the need to record large amounts of information forced our brains into unnatural patterns. There are some jobs that robots will never be able to do as well: work that involves comforting, understanding and communicating with other humans, work that requires creative thinking. Perhaps these jobs will get a deserved improvement in pay and status. A report showed that “heritage” jobs such as stonemasonry (石匠) and wool grading are making a comeback among the young: as finance and service jobs become less certain, they seek careers with meaning and cultural connection. Tech dystopias tend to assume humankind will somehow be run over by tech, as if it were some natural disasters over which we had no control. That’s a fiction we should resist. 1．What does the author want to read in a dystopia novel? A．No boring jobs exist in a world. B．Humans lead a balanced life. C．Technology controls human life. D．Most things are done mechanically. 2．How does the author challenge the second worry? A．By giving examples. B．By analyzing facts. C．By making an inference. D．By presenting cause and effect. 3．What does the recovery of heritage jobs prove? A．Robots can’t do some jobs. B．People tend to be realistic. C．These jobs offer a higher pay. D．They carry a meaning of history. 4．What is the author’s attitude towards tech dystopias? A．Tolerant. B．Appreciative. C．Disapproving. D．Doubtful. 二. （2026·江西九江·一模） Do others agree with you? Do they remember events the same way you do? We often assume others share our perspectives, but how accurate is this assumption? More importantly, how can we foster shared understanding? A critical issue lies in our poor ability to judge whether others hold similar memories, beliefs, and opinions with us. Actually, this is rooted in a psychological bias known as the False Consensus (共识) Effect: We assume that others agree with us more than they actually do. In a recent study, researchers tested how repetition influences people’s sense of consensus. Participants were given trivial (琐碎的) statements, some true, some false. When certain statements were repeated, people assumed more others knew and believed them, compared to statements heard only once. This effect has substantial real-world consequences. For instance, most people accept that human activities like burning fossil fuels contribute to climate change and support government actions to address it. Yet, many people hold false beliefs about the consensus, underestimating public support for climate change actions, largely because they have been constantly exposed to statements questioning climate change and other misinformation. This exposure leads them to believe that many others are skeptical about it. To counter the False Consensus Effect, openly voicing objections matters. People hear repeated statements but rarely encounter corrections or opposing views. Without these corrections, individuals may assume that the repeated statements are widely accepted, mistaking silence for agreement. But a correction can serve to break this false consensus. Sometimes, asking questions, whether in person or online, works better than arguing directly. Even seeing questions about a claim on social media can make people less certain that it is universally accepted. Breaking the False Consensus Effect is crucial. When people encounter an idea repeatedly, they assume others believe it, which in turn influences their own belief. Simply challenging the idea can break this cycle. Therefore, don’t stay silent against false claims — speak up. 5．What is the False Consensus Effect? A．The ignorance of public opinions. B．The rejection of corrections from others. C．The overestimation of others’ agreement. D．The repetition of claims to persuade others. 6．What’s the purpose of the example given in paragraph 3? A．To illustrate the cause of global warming. B．To highlight public distrust of climate policies. C．To present scientific evidence on climate issues. D．To show misinformation’s impact on public views. 7．What does the underlined word “counter” in paragraph 4 mean? A．Ignore. B．Support. C．Repeat. D．Oppose. 8．What is recommended to reduce the False Consensus Effect? A．Expressing disagreement and questioning. B．Minimizing exposure to controversial issues. C．Remaining silent to maintain social harmony. D．Repeating correct claims more than false ones. 三. （2026·福建·一模） From taking quick shots for social media with a smartphone to patiently waiting for the perfect street moment with a film camera, photography has become part of everyday life. However, there is a common misunderstanding that mobile photography, compared to film photography, reduces creation to a shallow form of photographic note-taking rather than true art. This belief misses a core fact: these two media represent different ways of seeing and creating. Psychology research offers insights into this. Professor Robert Epstein from Harvard University’s Visual Cognition Lab notes, “When we take photos with a phone, our brain is in a ‘rapid capture’ mode; whereas with a film camera, it enters a ‘deliberate composition’ state.” Functional MRI (核磁共振) studies have shown that when using a smartphone, areas of the brain linked to quick decision-making are more active. In contrast, when using a film camera, the networks related to sense of beauty and precise hand control show stronger connectivity. Photography educator David Yorke explains: “With a film camera, you must think through everything before taking the picture — composition, exposure, timing. This forces you to slow down and truly learn to ‘see’.” However, it does not mean that mobile photography cannot produce true art. An experiment in a journal of visual research found that mobile users take an average of 15 times more photos per day than film users. This frequent practice enhances their ability to capture fleeting (转瞬即逝的) moments. Documentary photographer Marina Chen shares this view: “Smartphones have made photography accessible to everyone. Sometimes, the energy in these moments is more valuable than carefully arranged shots.” A truly mature photographer understands that artistic vision requires both: the quick response to the present and the discipline to compose with care. Mobile photography and film photography do not replace each other. Together, they enrich our visual expression and expand our capacity to see the world with clarity and imagination. 9．What is a common misunderstanding about mobile photography? A．It lacks artistic depth. B．It departs from daily life. C．It misses digital creativity. D．It blocks factual recording. 10．What can we learn about film and mobile photography from paragraph 2? A．They need professional insight. B．They depend on instant capture. C．They involve distinct mental processes. D．They reflect different controlling behaviors. 11．What ability does film photography develop according to David Yorke? A．Visual sensitivity. B．Mindful observation. C．Decisive response. D．Emotional engagement. 12．What is the best title for the text? A．The Brain Science Behind Photography B．Beyond the Shallow, Reclaiming the Art C．A Scientific Guide to Better Photography D．Two Modes of Imaging, One Art of Creating 四. （2026·湖南邵阳·一模） For years, cities worldwide have been enthusiastically replacing traditional streetlights with LED systems promoted as “smart lighting”. Officials praise their energy efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced safety. However, a growing body of research suggests that the benefits of this transition are not as clear-cut as they seem, and the potential negative impacts on human health and the environment are often overlooked. The primary selling point of these systems is their remarkable energy efficiency, which can reduce a city’s electricity consumption for public lighting by 50% or more. This translates into significant financial savings and a reduction in carbon emissions. Yet, this focus on efficiency has overshadowed critical discussions about light quality. Many LED systems emit a high proportion of blue-rich white light, which is known to suppress melatonin (褪黑激素) production at night, disrupting sleep cycles in humans and animals. The ecological consequences are equally concerning, as excessive artificial light, particularly blue light, can confuse nocturnal wildlife. Furthermore, the “smart” features that allow for remote dimming or motion-sensor-based activation raise complex social questions. While intended to improve energy use, they can lead to uneven lighting distribution. A study found that motion-sensor lights in quieter, low-traffic areas often remained dim for longer periods, potentially creating perceived safety issues and raising concerns about justice in access to public infrastructure. The promise of enhanced safety is also debated, as overly harsh lighting can create sharp contrasts, actually reducing overall visibility. Real-world implementation faces challenges beyond technology. The initial investment is high, and the projected long-term benefits require careful evaluation. More importantly, the management of these multi-functional systems can be complex.  Issues of “multiple management” may arise when different departments are responsible for various functions integrated into a single pole, leading to coordination difficulties. The challenge, therefore, is not to reject the technology outright, but to adopt a more skillful approach. This involves prioritizing warmer-color LEDs, implementing strategic dimming schedules that balance safety and environmental needs, and conducting thorough community impact assessments before large-scale installations. True intelligence in urban lighting lies not in the sophistication of the technology alone, but in its thoughtful integration into the complex fabric of city life. 13．What is the main purpose of the first paragraph? A．To explain LED technical principles. B．To question the advantages of smart lighting. C．To list government financial benefits. D．To predict the future of urban lighting. 14．What does the underlined word “overshadowed” in paragraph 2 most probably mean? A．Shone. B．Strengthened. C．Dominated. D．Concealed. 15．What can be inferred from paragraph 3 about motion-sensor lights? A．They can solve energy waste successfully. B．They may cause accessible infrastructure injustice. C．They can work best in busy areas. D．They have safety benefits. 16．Which of the following is the best title for the passage? A．Unstoppable Rise of Smart Lighting. B．LED: A Revolution in Urban Planning. C．Smart Lighting: A Critical Re- examination. D．How Smart Lighting Improves Safety. 五. （2026·重庆·一模） Planting trees alone won’t stop global warming, and nature-based climate solutions are not a licence to keep emitting (排放). That’s the underlying message of a paper published last fall in Nature by a group of climate scientists. Increasingly, Weaver, one of the scientists says, fossil (化石) fuel companies and major polluters are buying carbon credits to offset (抵消) their greenhouse gas emissions — but this reflects a faulty understanding of what it will take to achieve net-zero emissions and stop runaway warming. Weaver discusses the backwards logic of offsets. Nature-based climate solutions and carbon offsets distract from what we know is the problem: the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. They go up, and we need them to come down. The best thing to do is stop letting them go up in the first place. But we also have to get them down — permanently, not attached to a tree. Claiming “I’m not going to cut down that tree over there if you give me money” is not a carbon offset. It’s like me saying to you, “Please give me $10, 000; otherwise, I’m going to go to my car dealer and buy a big, gas-heavy SUV.” It’s just silly. The problem with our current understanding of net zero is that it doesn't reflect the time periods involved. When we burn fossil carbon, really what we’re doing is taking ancient forests that died and became coal over tens of millions of years — at high pressures deep under the Earth's surface — and we’re putting that up in the atmosphere in just a few decades and expecting a tree to grow and somehow be an offset. A tree lives for 100 years and then dies and gives the carbon back to the atmosphere. That’s why we refer to geological (地质的) net zero. It means that emissions from fossil fuels must be balanced by carbon that is permanently sequestered in geological reserves, whether it be through carbon capture and storage or direct air capture and storage. 17．What is the idea of the group of scientists? A．Planting trees is the best way to stop global warming. B．Nature-based climate solutions really work very well. C．Buying carbon credits is effective net-zero emissions. D．The logic of offsets, maybe imperfect, is to be discussed. 18．How does the writer explain not cutting down a tree for money as a silly idea in para.3? A．By definition. B．By comparison. C．By analysis. D．By description. 19．What is the problem when people try to understand net zero? A．They turn a blind eye to the relevant durations. B．They overemphasize the direct air capture ability. C．They overestimate the number of trees needed. D．They fail to consider the geological reserve ability. 20．What does the underlined word “sequestered” in the last paragraph mean? A．Released. B．Produced. C．Stored. D．Destroyed. 六. （2026·安徽淮北·一模） For years, we told young people the future was theirs if they learned to code. Schools focused more on technical training, while humanities (人文) courses were gradually reduced. As a result, many students were prepared mainly for technical tasks rather than broader learning. Now AI writes the code, studies the data, and answers questions once given to new workers. But the real challenge lies not in the work itself, but in how students are being prepared for it. When AI takes over many entry-level tasks, fewer chances are left for balanced early development. Rather than a breakdown, this change marks a correction. The jobs that remain need qualities that AI cannot fully provide, including judgment, empathy, ways of thinking. Machines can process information, but humans still decide what matters. Experience was once earned through doing real tasks or understanding how others feel in a situation. But if AI takes over tasks that once shaped these human qualities, they must be developed through intentional education. That means education should focus on helping students think more deeply and make thoughtful judgments. While automation accelerates, the humanities shrink. In the U.S., the share of humanities degrees has fallen from 17 percent in the 1960s to under 9 percent today. Once seen as progress, this change now looks shortsighted. Caring about others, explaining ideas clearly, understanding different cultures, and solving problems in creative ways have become especially important at work. These abilities are formed in literature, history, sociology, and philosophy. In a world where AI can answer almost anything, the real value lies in knowing what to ask, how to frame it, and why it matters. To prepare for a world where machines can do many tasks but not the deeper thinking, we must build a strong base again — one that encourages long-term thinking rather than short-term efficiency. Humanities should return to the center of education, not as a return to the past, but as a necessary balance in the age of AI. We optimized a generation for technical efficiency, and efficiency became ordinary. Now we must cultivate what cannot be automated, those that make us human. 21．What is the author mainly concerned in the first paragraph? A．Universities adjusting their teaching programs. B．Young people having no access to digital tools. C．Students’ preparation becoming more one-sided. D．Entry-level work remaining unchanged for years. 22．What do the remaining jobs require? A．Long working hours. B．Physical strength and speed. C．Human emotions and thoughts. D．Basic computer technologies. 23．What should education help people learn to do? A．Use more advanced AI-assisted tools. B．Look at the long run and think more deeply. C．Rebuild their memories of knowledge. D．Know how to ask AI to handle everything. 24．What can be a suitable title for the text? A．Why Humanities Still matter in the Age of AI B．Is AI a Big Threat to Our Traditional Education C．How Technology Will Replace Entry-Level Jobs D．The Decline of Philosophy in Modern Universities 试卷第1页，共3页 试卷第1页，共3页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 《2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练二十（D篇）及答案详解》参考答案 题号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 答案 D A A C C D D A A C 题号 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 答案 B D B D B C D B A C 题号 21 22 23 24 答案 C C B A 一. 1．D 2．A 3．A 4．C 【难度】0.65 【导语】这是一篇议论文。作者设想一个只有旧科技的反乌托邦世界，反驳人们对科技的担忧，认为有些工作机器人无法替代，传统职业正在回归，且不认同人类会被科技碾压的观点。 1．细节理解题。根据第一段“But I’d like to see a dystopia in which humans of the 2020s are thrown into a world equipped only with the technology of a few decades ago. The repetitive chore. The boring assembly-line (流水线) job.(但我想看到这样一种反乌托邦：2020年代的人类被扔进一个只拥有几十年前技术的世界。 重复乏味的杂务，枯燥无聊的流水线工作)”可知，作者在反乌托邦小说中希望读到大多数事情都是按照机械程序进行的。故选D。 2．推理判断题。根据第三段“For example, the second worry — that technology is leading us into an un-human, artificial, unhealthy kind of life, away from the lives we were “meant” to lead. The historian Yuval Noah Harari has theorized that the process of making life “unnatural” started much earlier, at the dawn of farming. Farming forced our bodies into tending fields and drawing water long distances, work we were not meant for, which took an effect on our spines and feet. Later, the rise of writing, numbers and the need to record large amounts of information forced our brains into unnatural patterns.(例如，第二个担忧是：科技正将我们引向一种不人性化、人造且不健康的生存方式，偏离了我们原本“应拥有的”生活轨迹。历史学家尤瓦尔·诺亚·哈拉里提出，让生活“变得非自然”的过程早在农业时代就已开始。农业迫使我们的身体从事耕种农田和长途取水的工作，而这些工作并非我们本应从事的，这对我们的脊椎和双脚产生了影响。随后，文字的出现、数字的使用以及记录大量信息的需求，又迫使我们的大脑形成了非自然的模式)”可知，作者通过举例说明反驳第二种担忧。故选A。 3．细节理解题。根据倒数第二段“There are some jobs that robots will never be able to do as well: work that involves comforting, understanding and communicating with other humans, work that requires creative thinking. Perhaps these jobs will get a deserved improvement in pay and status. A report showed that “heritage” jobs such as stonemasonry (石匠) and wool grading are making a comeback among the young: as finance and service jobs become less certain, they seek careers with meaning and cultural connection.(有些工作机器人永远无法做得像人类那样出色：比如那些需要与他人进行安抚、理解及交流的工作，以及那些需要创造性思维的工作。或许这些工作在未来会获得应有的薪资和地位提升。一份报告显示，“传统”职业，如石匠和羊毛分级工作，在年轻人中正重新受到青睐：因为金融和服务业的工作变得不太稳定，他们开始寻求具有意义和文化关联的职业)”可知，遗产行业岗位的恢复证明了机器人无法胜任某些工作。故选A。 4．推理判断题。根据最后一段“Tech dystopias tend to assume humankind will somehow be run over by tech, as if it were some natural disasters over which we had no control. That’s a fiction we should resist.(科技反乌托邦作品往往认为人类终将被科技所“碾压”，仿佛这是某种我们无法控制的自然灾难。这种说法纯属虚构，我们应当予以抵制)”可知，作者对科技反乌托邦题材作品持不赞成态度。故选C。 二. 5．C 6．D 7．D 8．A 【难度】0.65 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要介绍虚假共识效应的定义、相关研究，以及它在现实中的影响，并给出应对这种效应的建议。 5．细节理解题。根据第二段中的“Actually, this is rooted in a psychological bias known as the False Consensus (共识) Effect: We assume that others agree with us more than they actually do.(事实上，这源于一种被称为虚假共识效应的心理偏见：我们认为别人比实际上更同意我们的观点)”可知，虚假共识效应指的是我们高估了别人对自己观点的认同程度。故选C项。 6．推理判断题。根据第三段中的“Yet, many people hold false beliefs about the consensus, underestimating public support for climate change actions, largely because they have been constantly exposed to statements questioning climate change and other misinformation. This exposure leads them to believe that many others are skeptical about it.(然而，许多人对这种共识持有错误的看法，低估了公众对气候变化行动的支持，这主要是因为他们不断接触到质疑气候变化的言论和其他错误信息。这种接触让他们认为，许多其他人也对此持怀疑态度)”可知，该段举例是为了说明错误信息会影响公众的看法，导致人们产生虚假共识。故选D项。 7．词句猜测题。根据第四段中的“People hear repeated statements but rarely encounter corrections or opposing views. Without these corrections, individuals may assume that the repeated statements are widely accepted, mistaking silence for agreement. But a correction can serve to break this false consensus.(人们听到重复的陈述，但很少遇到纠正或反对的观点。没有这些纠正，个人可能会认为重复的陈述被广泛接受，将沉默误认为是同意。但一次纠正可以打破这种虚假共识)”可知，后文介绍的是打破虚假共识效应的方法，由此猜测划线词counter意为“反对、应对”，与oppose意思相近。故选D项。 8．细节理解题。根据第四段中的“To counter the False Consensus Effect, openly voicing objections matters.(为了应对虚假共识效应，公开表达反对意见很重要)”以及“Sometimes, asking questions, whether in person or online, works better than arguing directly.(有时，无论是当面还是在网上提问，都比直接争论效果更好)”可知，文章建议通过表达不同意见和提问来减少虚假共识效应。故选A项。 三. 9．A 10．C 11．B 12．D 【难度】0.65 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。主要驳斥手机摄影缺乏艺术深度的误解，阐述其与胶片摄影的不同创作逻辑及共同的艺术价值。 9．细节理解题。根据第一段中的“However, there is a common misunderstanding that mobile photography, compared to film photography, reduces creation to a shallow form of photographic note-taking rather than true art.(然而，有一种普遍的误解，认为与胶片摄影相比，手机摄影将创作简化为一种肤浅的摄影笔记形式，而非真正的艺术。)”可知，人们对手机摄影的常见误解是它缺乏艺术深度。故选A项。 10．推理判断题。根据第二段中的“When we take photos with a phone, our brain is in a‘rapid capture’mode; whereas with a film camera, it enters a‘deliberate composition’state. Functional MRI (核磁共振) studies have shown that when using a smartphone, areas of the brain linked to quick decision-making are more active. In contrast, when using a film camera, the networks related to sense of beauty and precise hand control show stronger connectivity.(当我们用手机拍照时，大脑处于‘快速捕捉’模式；而用胶片相机时，大脑会进入‘刻意构图’状态。功能磁共振成像（FMRI）研究表明，使用智能手机拍照时，大脑中与快速决策相关的区域更为活跃。相比之下，使用胶片相机时，与美感及精准手部控制相关的神经网络连接性更强。)”可知，手机摄影和胶片摄影涉及截然不同的心理过程。故选C项。 11．细节理解题。根据第三段中的“With a film camera, you must think through everything before taking the picture — composition, exposure, timing. This forces you to slow down and truly learn to ‘see’.(用胶片相机拍照时，你必须在按下快门前进⾏周全考虑——构图、曝光、时机。这迫使你放慢脚步，真正学会‘观察’。)”可知，David Yorke认为胶片摄影能培养专注的观察力。故选B项。 12．主旨大意题。通读全文，文章开篇驳斥对手机摄影的误解，接着通过科学研究和专家观点分析两者的创作差异（手机摄影的快速捕捉 vs 胶片摄影的刻意构图），最后总结两者并非相互替代，而是共同丰富艺术表达。D项“两种成像模式，一种创作艺术”既涵盖核心对比，又点明共同的艺术本质，契合最佳标题。故选D项。 四. 13．B 14．D 15．B 16．C 【难度】0.65 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。主要说明了全球多地用LED智能路灯替代传统路灯，其节能省钱，但蓝光危害健康与生态，智能功能还引发安全、公平及管理难题，应科学审慎推广。 13．推理判断题。根据第一段“For years, cities worldwide have been enthusiastically replacing traditional streetlights with LED systems promoted as “smart lighting”. Officials praise their energy efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced safety. However, a growing body of research suggests that the benefits of this transition are not as clear-cut as they seem, and the potential negative impacts on human health and the environment are often overlooked.(多年来，世界各地的城市都在积极地将传统的路灯替换为被称为“智能照明”的LED系统。官员们称赞其能源效率高、成本降低以及安全性提高。然而，越来越多的研究表明，这种转变所带来的好处并不像看起来那么明确，而且对人类健康和环境的潜在负面影响往往被忽视了)”可知，第一段的主要目的是对智能照明的优势提出质疑。故选B。 14．词句猜测题。根据划线词上文“Yet, this focus on efficiency has overshadowed critical discussions about light quality.(然而，这种对效率的过分关注却overshadowed了有关光线质量的深入讨论)”以及后文“Many LED systems emit a high proportion of blue-rich white light, which is known to suppress melatonin (褪黑激素) production at night, disrupting sleep cycles in humans and animals. The ecological consequences are equally concerning, as excessive artificial light, particularly blue light, can confuse nocturnal wildlife.(许多LED系统所发出的光线中蓝光成分占比很高，而蓝光已被证实会在夜间抑制褪黑激素的分泌，从而扰乱人类和动物的睡眠周期。其对生态系统的负面影响同样令人担忧，因为过量的人造光（尤其是蓝光）会干扰夜行性野生动物的作息)”可知，前半部分强调效率是主要关注点，后半部分指出这导致了对光质量关键讨论的忽视。因此，“overshadowed”在此意为“使显得不重要”或“掩盖”，与“concealed”含义最接近。故选D。 15．推理判断题。根据第三段“A study found that motion-sensor lights in quieter, low-traffic areas often remained dim for longer periods, potentially creating perceived safety issues and raising concerns about justice in access to public infrastructure.(一项研究发现，在较为安静、交通流量较小的区域，运动感应灯通常会长时间保持较暗的状态，这可能会导致人们感受到安全隐患，并引发对公共基础设施使用公平性的担忧)”可知，其应用可能导致公共资源分配不公。故选B。 16．主旨大意题。根据第一段“For years, cities worldwide have been enthusiastically replacing traditional streetlights with LED systems promoted as “smart lighting”. Officials praise their energy efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced safety. However, a growing body of research suggests that the benefits of this transition are not as clear-cut as they seem, and the potential negative impacts on human health and the environment are often overlooked.(多年来，世界各地的城市都在积极地将传统的路灯替换为被称为“智能照明”的LED系统。官员们称赞其能源效率高、成本降低以及安全性提高。然而，越来越多的研究表明，这种转变所带来的好处并不像看起来那么明确，而且对人类健康和环境的潜在负面影响往往被忽视了)”结合全文并非单纯赞扬或否定智能照明，而是通过系统分析其优势、隐患和挑战，最终呼吁一种更细致、更具反思性的整合方式。故C选项“智能城市照明：一次深入的重新审视”最符合文章标题。故选C。 五. 17．D 18．B 19．A 20．C 【难度】0.65 【导语】本文是一篇议论文，主要论述了科学家认为仅靠植树不能阻止全球变暖，碳抵消逻辑存在问题，应实现地质净零。 17．细节理解题。根据第二段“Increasingly, Weaver, one of the scientists says, fossil (化石) fuel companies and major polluters are buying carbon credits to offset (抵消) their greenhouse gas emissions — but this reflects a faulty understanding of what it will take to achieve net-zero emissions and stop runaway warming. Weaver discusses the backwards logic of offsets.(其中一位科学家韦弗表示，化石燃料公司和主要污染者越来越多地购买碳信用额来抵消其温室气体排放，但这反映出他们对实现净零排放和阻止全球变暖失控所需付出的努力存在误解。韦弗讨论了抵消的逆逻辑)”可知，科学家们认为碳抵消的逻辑有待讨论，也许并不完美。故选D。 18．推理判断题。根据第三段中“It’s like me saying to you, “Please give me $10, 000; otherwise, I’m going to go to my car dealer and buy a big, gas-heavy SUV.” It’s just silly.(这就像我对你说：“给我1万美元；否则，我就去汽车经销商那里买一辆大型、高油耗的SUV。”这太愚蠢了)”可知，作者通过比较来解释不砍树换钱是个愚蠢的想法。故选B。 19．细节理解题。根据最后一段中“The problem with our current understanding of net zero is that it doesn’t reflect the time periods involved.(我们目前对净零的理解存在的问题是，它没有反映所涉及的时间段)”可知，人们在试图理解净零时存在的问题是他们忽视了相关的时间段。故选A。 20．词句猜测题。根据最后一段中“It means that emissions from fossil fuels must be balanced by carbon that is permanently sequestered in geological reserves, whether it be through carbon capture and storage or direct air capture and storage.(这意味着化石燃料的排放必须通过永久_____在地质储备中的碳来平衡，无论是通过碳捕获和储存还是直接空气捕获和储存)”可知，碳捕获和储存或直接空气捕获和储存都是为了将碳储存起来，因此可以推断出“sequestered”在此处的意思是“储存”。故选C。 六. 21．C 22．C 23．B 24．A 【难度】0.65 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要论述了在人工智能时代，技术培训主导教育、人文课程萎缩的现状，强调人文科学对培养人类核心特质的重要性，呼吁人文科学回归教育中心。 21．细节理解题。根据第一段中的“For years, we told young people the future was theirs if they learned to code. Schools focused more on technical training, while humanities (人文) courses were gradually reduced. As a result, many students were prepared mainly for technical tasks rather than broader learning. Now AI writes the code, studies the data, and answers questions once given to new workers. But the real challenge lies not in the work itself, but in how students are being prepared for it. When AI takes over many entry-level tasks, fewer chances are left for balanced early development.(多年来，我们告诉年轻人，只要学会编程，未来就属于他们。学校更注重技术培训，而人文课程则逐渐减少。结果，许多学生主要为技术任务做准备，而不是更广泛的学习。现在，人工智能会编写代码、研究数据，并回答曾经交给新员工的问题。但真正的挑战不在于工作本身，而在于学生如何为工作做准备。当人工智能接管许多入门级任务时，学生早期均衡发展的机会就更少了)”可知，第一段核心围绕学校重技术、轻人文的教育现状，导致学生准备工作变得片面，缺乏均衡发展，这是作者主要担忧的问题。故选C项。 22．细节理解题。根据第二段中的“The jobs that remain need qualities that AI cannot fully provide, including judgment, empathy, ways of thinking. Machines can process information, but humans still decide what matters.(剩下的工作需要人工智能无法完全提供的特质，包括判断力、同理心和思维方式。机器可以处理信息，但人类仍然决定什么是重要的)”可知，剩余工作所需的是人类特有的情感和思维相关的特质。故选C项。 23．细节理解题。根据第二段中的“That means education should focus on helping students think more deeply and make thoughtful judgments.(这意味着教育应该专注于帮助学生更深入地思考，并做出深思熟虑的判断)”以及第四段中的“To prepare for a world where machines can do many tasks but not the deeper thinking, we must build a strong base again — one that encourages long-term thinking rather than short-term efficiency.(为了应对一个机器可以完成许多任务但无法进行深度思考的世界，我们必须重新建立一个坚实的基础——一个鼓励长期思考而非短期效率的基础)”可知，教育应帮助人们学会长远考虑并深入思考。故选B项。 24．主旨大意题。通读全文可知，文章开篇指出重技术、轻人文的教育现状及问题，随后强调人文科学对培养人类核心特质的重要性，最后呼吁人文科学回归教育中心，核心是阐述人工智能时代人文科学仍具重要意义。由此可知，A项“Why Humanities Still matter in the Age of AI(人工智能时代人文科学为何依然重要)”适合作本文标题。故选A项。 答案第1页，共2页 答案第1页，共2页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $