阅读理解33-北京市部分地区近两年（2024-2025）高二英语期末真题汇编

1 阅读理解-阅读单选33 试题基本信息 。题型：阅读理解-阅读单选（4题，全文约460词) 核心知识点：说明文、人工智能 ·考查重点：细节理解、词义猜测、推理判断、主旨大意 材料剖析 ·文章结构线索：介绍A1聊天机器人在心理健康护理中的优势（可及性、匿名性）→转折 指出其局限性（情感支持不足、隐私问题、过度依赖风险）→总结机遇与局限 ·感情发展线索：客观阐述优势→理性分析局限→平衡观点 阅读理解短文 One of the primary benefits of AI chatbots in mental health care is their enhanced accessi- bility and ability to provide immediate support.Traditional mental health services often require appointments,which can involve long waiting periods.In contrast,AI chatbots are always on standby 24/7,offering instant support regardless of the time or location.This constant availability can be especially beneficial during moments of crisis,providing users with immediate assistance and resources. AI chatbots also have a global reach,making mental health support accessible to individuals in remote or underserved areas.According to the World Health Organization,there is a signifi- cant shortage of mental health professionals,particularly in low-and middle-income countries.AI chatbots can help bridge this gap by offering support to those without access to mental health care. Mental health discredit remains a significant barrier to seeking help.Many individuals avoid reaching out to mental health professionals due to fear of judgment or embarrassment.AI chatbots offer a private and anonymous (space for users to express their feelings and thoughts without fear of judgment.This anonymity can encourage more individuals to seek help and engage in conversations about their mental health,potentially leading to earlier intervention and better outcomes. Research supports the concept that anonymity provided by chatbots can reduce discredit.A study by Smith and Anderson found that individuals are more likely to discuss private issues when they feel their identity is protected.This can be particularly important for vulnerable populations who may be hesitant to seek help from human therapists due to social or cultural discredit. Despite their advantages;Al chatbots have notable limitations,particularly their ability to provide delicate emotional support.Mental health issues are complex and deeply personal,often 2 requiring a level of empathy and understanding that AI currently cannot copy.While chatbots can offer essential support and information,they lack the emotional intelligence to fully grasp the user's delicate emotions and experiences.This can result in responses that may seem generic or inappropriate,failing to effectively meet the user's needs. Privacy and data security concerns are another significant challenge.Users share sensitive and personal information with these applications,and there is always a risk that this data could be hacked.Data leaks or misuse of information could have severe consequences for users,potentially worsening their mental health issues. Lastly,there is a risk that individuals may become overly reliant on chatbots for their mental health needs,potentially neglecting the importance of seeking professional help.Chatbots are not equipped to diagnose or treat severe mental health conditions,and relying only on them could lead to missed diagnoses and inadequate treatment. 题目选项列表 31.What makes AI chatbots different from traditional mental health services? A.They can offer more professional advice. B.They are always available for their users. C.They can reduce discussing the sensitive issues. D.They contribute to the development of mental health professionals. 32.What does the word "vulnerable"underlined in Paragraph 4 most probably mean? A.High-risk. B.Careful. C.Serious. D.Sensitive. 33.What can be inferred about mental health care? A.AI chatbots can fully grasp the user's emotions. B.Chatbot users should be concerned about privacy and data security. C.Mental health professionals will be replaced by chatbots in the future. D.Traditional mental health services make users likely to share their real feelings. 34.Which would be the best title for the passage? A.The Future of Mental Health Care:AI Chatbots. B.Traditional Mental Health Services vs.AI Chatbots. C.Overcoming Mental Health Discredit with AI Chatbots. D.AI Chatbots for Mental Health:Opportunities and Limitations. 3 核心词汇详解 1.accessibility 核心词性 名词(.，高频核心)：可及性：易接近性（指某物容易到达或获取的特性）： 可使用性（指设施等对所有人包括残障人士的适用性） 常用搭配：enhanced accessibility(增强的可及性)、accessibility to resources (资源的可获取性) 形容词(adj,核心)：accessible(可到达的；易使用的；易懂的) 例：The information is easily accessible online.(信息在线易于获取) 词性转换 形容词：accessible(核心)、动词：access(获取；进入；使用) 例：access the internet(上网) 高频搭配 名词：physical accessibility(物理可及性)、digital accessibility(数字可及 性) 形容词：easily accessible(易于获取的)、accessible location(交通便利的位 置) 易混辨析 accessibility vs access:前者是名词，侧重“可及的特性或状态”；后者作 名词时侧重“进入或使用的权利/机会”，作动词时表示“实际获取或使用” 的动作 2. anonymity 核心词性 名词(n,高频核心)：匿名；匿名状态（指不透露身份的情况） 常用搭配：protect anonymity(保护匿名性)、ensure anonymity(确保匿名) 形容词(adj.,核心)：anonymous(匿名的；无名的) 例：an anonymous letter(匿名信) 词性转换 形容词：anonymous(核心)、副词：anonymously(匿名地) 例：contribute anonymously(匿名投稿) 高频搭配 名词：lack of anonymity(缺乏匿名性)、anonymity online(在线匿名) 形容词：remain anonymous(保持匿名)、anonymous donor(匿名捐赠者) 易混辨析 anonymity vs privacy:前者侧重“身份不被知晓”；后者侧重“个人生活 或信息不被公开的权利”，范围更广，涵盖个人空间、数据等方面 3.empathy 核心词性 名词(n,高频核心)：共情；同理心（指理解并分享他人情感的能力） 常用搭配：show empathy(表现出同理心)、lack of empathy(缺乏同理心) 形容词(adj.,核心)：empathetic(有共情能力的；体谅人的) 例：be empathetic to others(体谅他人) 词性转换 形容词：empathetic(核心)、动词：empathize(有同感；产生共鸣) 例：empathize with sb.'ssituation（对某人的处境感同身受) 高频搭配 名词：emotional empathy(情感共情)、cognitive empathy(认知共情) 动词：empathize with(与…共情)、find it hard to empathize(难以产生 共鸣) 易混辨析 empathy vs sympathy:前者侧重“设身处地理解他人情感，感同身受”； 后者侧重“对他人不幸表示同情，情感上的支持”，程度较浅 4.consequences 核心词性 名词(n,高频核心)：后果；结果（尤指重要或不良的结果） 常用搭配：severe consequences(严重后果)、unintended consequences(意 外后果) 形容词(adj.,延伸)：consequential(重要的：有深远影响的) 例：a consequential decision(重大决定) 词性转换 形容词：consequential(核心)、动词：无直接动词形式，相关动词为result in/lead to(导致后果) 例：The action could result in serious consequences.(该行动可能导致严重 后果) 高频搭配 名词：face consequences(承担后果)、result in consequences(导致后果) 易混辨析 consequences vs results::前者侧重“由行为或事件引发的间接或长远结 果，常含负面意味”；后者侧重“直接的、客观的结果或成果”，中性词，可 用于好的或坏的结果 5 5.vulnerable 核心词性 形容词(adj,高频核心)：脆弱的；易受伤害的；易受影响的 常用搭配：vulnerable populations(弱势群体)、vulnerable to attack(易受 攻击) 名词(n,核心)：vulnerability(脆弱性；易受伤害的特质) 例：social vulnerabilit(社会脆弱性) 词性转换 名词：vulnerability(核心)副词：vulnerably(脆弱地；易受伤害地) 例：feel vulnerable(感到脆弱) 高频搭配 形容词：vulnerable to disease(易患病)、emotionally vulnerable(情感脆 弱) 名词：reduce vulnerability(降低脆弱性)、vulnerability to stress(易受压 力影响) 易混辨析 vulnerable vs weak:前者侧重“因某种原因（如处境、身体状况）容易受 到伤害或攻击”；后者侧重“体力、能力等方面的虚弱，缺乏力量” 6.misuse 核心词性 动词(V,高频核心)：误用；滥用（指不正确或不恰当地使用某物） 名词(.，高频核心)：误用；滥用（误用的行为或事例） 常用搭配：misuse power(滥用权力)、misuse information(误用信息) 例：the misuse of technology(技术的滥用) 词性转换 形容词：misused(被误用的) 例：misused words(误用的词语) 高频搭配 动词：misuse resources(滥用资源)、misuse funds(滥用资金) 名词：prevent misuse(防止误用)、misuse of authority(滥用职权) 易混辨析 misuse vs abuse:前者侧重“使用方式不正确或不合目的”；后者侧重“恶 意、过度地使用，常含伤害性”，程度更重，如child abuse(虐待儿童) 6 7.diagnose 核心词性 动词(v,高频核心)：诊断（疾病）；判断（问题） 常用搭配：diagnose a disease(诊断疾病)、diagnose the problem(判断问 题所在) 名词(n.,核心)：diagnosis(诊断；诊断结果) 例：medical diagnosis(医学诊断) 词性转换 名词：diagnosis(核心)、形容词：diagnostic(诊断的；判断的) 例：diagnostic test(诊断性测试) 高频搭配 动词：diagnose sb.with sth.(诊断某人患有某病)、diagnose early(早期诊 断) 名词：early diagnosis(早期诊断)、accurate diagnosis(准确诊断) 易混辨析 diagnose vs identify:前者特指“医学上的诊断或对复杂问题的判断”；后 者侧重“识别、认出某人或某物”，范围更广，可用于人、物、问题等 8.inadequate 核心词性 形容词(adj,高频核心)：不充分的；不足的；不胜任的 常用搭配：inadequate resources(资源不足)、inadequate response(不充分 的回应) 名词(n.,核心)：inadequacy(不足；inadequacy(指数量或能力上的欠 缺) 例：the inadequacy of the system（系统的不完善) 词性转换 名词：inadequacy(核心)、副词：inadequately(不充分地) 例：inadequately prepared(准备不足) 高频搭配 形容词：inadequate for sth.(对某事来说不足够)、inadequate support(支 持不足) 名词：feelings of inadequacy(能力不足感)、inadequacy of funds(资金不 足) 易混辨析 inadequate vs insufficient:前者侧重“在质量、能力或适用性上不足，无 法满足需求”；后者侧重“在数量上不够，无法达到所需程度” 9.intervention 核心词性 名词(，高频核心)：干预；介入；干预措施（指为改变局势而采取的行动） 常用搭配：early intervention(早期干预)、government intervention(政府 干预) 动词(v.,核心)：intervene(干预；介入) 例：intervene in a conflict(干预冲突) 词性转换 动词：intervene(核心)、形容词：interventional(干预的) 例：interventional therapy(介入治疗) 高频搭配 名词：crisis intervention(危机干预)、humanitarian intervention(人道主 义干预) 动词：intervene to prevent(干预以防止)、intervene directly（直接干预) 易混辨析 intervention vs interference:前者中性或褒义，指“为改善情况而介入”； 后者常含贬义，指“不必要的干涉” 答案与逐题解析 正确答案：31-34BABD 31.B (They are always available for their users. 考点：细节理解题 语境逻辑：第一段明确指出传统心理健康服务需要预约且等待时间长，而AI聊天机器人“always on standby24/7,offering instant support regardless of the time or location”,这是两者的核心 区别。 选项辨析：A项“更专业的建议”文中未提及；C项“减少讨论敏感问题”与原文“encourage more individuals to seek help”矛盾：D项“促进心理健康专家发展”无依据。只有B项“随 时为用户可用”符合原文描述。 32.A (High-risk.) 考点：词义猜测题 语境逻辑：第四段提到“vulnerable populations who may be hesitant to seek help from human therapists due to social or cultural discredit”,即因社会或文化污名而犹豫求助的群体，这类群 体面临更高的求助障碍，属于“高风险”群体。 选项辨析：B项“谨慎的”、C项“严重的”、D项“敏感的”均不符合“因污名而难以获得帮 助”的语境，“vulnerable”在此处意为“易受伤害的、高风险的”，A项最贴切。 33.B(Chatbot users should be concerned about privacy and data security. 考点：推理判断题 语境逻辑：第五段明确指出“Privacy and data security concerns are another significant chal- lege”,用户需分享敏感信息，存在数据被黑客攻击的风险，因此可推断用户应关注隐私和数据 安全。 选项辨析：A项与原文“lack the emotional intelligence to fully grasp the user's delicate emo- tios”矛盾；C项“AI将取代专家”文中无依据，且提到AI不能诊断或治疗严重疾病；D项 8 “传统服务让用户更愿分享真实感受”与原文“many individuals avoid reaching out due to fear of judgment”相反。只有B项符合原文推断。 34.D (AI Chatbots for Mental Health:Opportunities and Limitations.) 考点：主旨大意题 语境逻辑：文章前半部分阐述A虹聊天机器人在心理健康护理中的优势（可及性、匿名性等），后 半部分指出其局限性（情感支持不足、隐私问题、过度依赖风险），故标题需涵盖“机遇与局限” 两方面。 选项辨析：A项仅强调“未来”，未提局限：B项“传统与AI对比”非核心，文章重点是A虹本 身的优劣势：C项“克服污名”仅为优势之一，片面。D项“AI聊天机器人用于心理健康：机 遇与局限”全面概括文章内容。