专题06 类型结构利用策略（全国通用）2026年高考英语阅读理解突破策略及押题

专题06.类型结构利用策略 策略分析 在阅读理解的过程中，我们可以根据不同文体（如记叙文、议论文、说明文、应用文等）的常见结构特点，快速把握文章框架、逻辑脉络和作者观点，从而更精准地定位信息、理解主旨和推断态度的阅读方法。该策略是高三英语阅读理解总复习的重要内容，有助于提升答题效率和准确率。 策略介绍 策略一：识别文体结构，把握主旨方向 【策略简述】 先判断语篇类型，如议论文通常“提出论点—论证—结论”，说明文多为“总—分—总”，记叙文以时间或事件推进。把握结构后，快速定位观点句、主题句。 【阅读语段】 “The freezing Northeast hasn’t been a terribly fun place to spend time this winter, so when the chance came for a weekend to Sarasota, Florida, my bags were packed before you could say ‘sunshine.’” Question: What did the author think of her winter life in New York? 【策略运用】首句即体现作者对东北冬天生活的否定态度，选“boring”类答案。作者用情感色彩强烈的形容词“freezing”“terribly fun”直接传递态度。 策略二：抓首尾句与转折词，锁定作者态度 【策略简述】 作者观点常在首段或尾段明确，转折词（however, but, yet）后往往是真实态度。 【阅读语段】 “Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain, the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous.” Question: What is the author’s attitude toward Navajas’ studies? 【策略运用】尾段“although... yet...”结构，后文强调巨大影响，故作者态度为支持、赞同（approving）。 策略三：关注情感词与主观表达 【策略简述】 关注形容词、副词、情态动词等带有感情色彩的词，如“wonderfully, unfortunately, skeptical, optimistic”等，判断作者或人物的态度。 【阅读语段】 “He makes philosophical thought an appealing exercise that improves the quality of our experiences, and he does so with plenty of humor.” Question: What does the author think of Weiner’s book? 【策略运用】情感词“appealing”“humor”体现正面、幽默、轻松的态度，答案为“humorous and straightforward”。 策略四：对比观点与事实，辨别立场 【策略简述】 文章若引用他人观点，作者可能赞同、反对或中立。注意区分“作者观点”与“引用观点”。 【阅读语段】 “Some people say that the internet will create a global village, but the reality is that we cannot keep relationships with more than a limited number of people.” Question: What is the author’s attitude toward the internet? 【策略运用】作者用“but”转折，否定“global village”的幻想，表达质疑、谨慎态度。 策略五：归纳全文主旨，判断整体态度 【策略简述】 全文主旨句通常在首段或尾段，或反复出现的关键词，可帮助判断整体倾向。 【阅读语段】 “The connection between people and plants has long been the subject of scientific research. Recent studies have found positive effects. A study... discovered that greener areas of the city experienced less crime. In another, employees were shown to be 15% more productive when their workplaces were decorated with houseplants.” Question: What is the first paragraph mainly about? 【策略运用】首句为总起，后文用例子说明“green plants benefits”，故答案为“Benefits from green plants”。 策略六：利用例证说明观点 【策略简述】 “for example, for instance”等举例后往往是对前面观点的阐释，理解例子要联系前文观点句。 【阅读语段】 “A study conducted in Youngstown, Ohio, for example, discovered that greener areas of the city experienced less crime.” Question: The example in paragraph shows that... 【策略运用】例证支持前文“green plants bring benefits”，答案常为“plants improve urban environment”。 策略七：识别客观中立表达 【策略简述】 如文章既写正面也写负面，或无明确评价，常为“objective”或“neutral”。 【阅读语段】 “Some argue that quantum computing will change the world, while others warn it may be overhyped. The truth remains to be seen.” Question: What is the author’s attitude toward quantum computing? 【策略运用】作者正反都陈述，未表态，态度为客观（objective）。 策略八：关注引语与数据 【策略简述】 引号内、数字、调查结果常是态度或观点依据，要重点分析。 【阅读语段】 “‘The existence of a living system is not about the use of anything,’ Alan says. ‘Some people ask me, “So what’s the worth of artificial life?” Do you ever think, “What is the worth of your grandmother?”’” Question: What is Alan Smith’s attitude toward ALife? 【策略运用】引语体现强烈支持、辩护，作者也倾向支持，答案为supportive。 突破演练 1 The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded for machine learning development and the Chemistry Nobel was for protein structure prediction via AI. Some said the physics prize wasn’t really physics. “AI is coming for science, too,” the New York Times concluded. With powerful large language models, AIs can generate various outputs and even make Nobel-winning discoveries. But have AIs really taken over science? To begin with, the physics prize went to Hinton and John Hopfield, a physicist, who discovered how the physical dynamics of a network can encode memory. Hopfield came up with a vivid comparison: a ball, rolling across a bumpy landscape, will often “remember” to return to the same lowest valley. Hinton’s work extended Hopfield’s model. In short, the Physics Nobel was awarded for fundamental research about the physical principles of information, not the broad umbrella of “AI” and its applications. Meanwhile, the Chemistry Nobel was awarded to biochemist David Baker and DeepMind researchers Demis Hassabis and John Jumper. Baker first developed software to design novel protein structures from scratch. Yet by 2018, of the roughly 200 million proteins cataloged in all genetic databases, only about 150,000 had confirmed structures. Then Hassabis and Jumper introduced AlphaFold, which provided accurate folding structures for the rest. But even so, the AI has failed to predict defects in proteins. It’s not a catholicon for every problem in protein folding, but rather an excellent tool. Many of these tools have disappeared into their uses. We rarely pause to consider the transistor (晶体管) (for which the 1956 physics prize was awarded) when we use electronics containing them by the billions. Some powerful machine-learning features are already on this path. The neural networks that provide accurate language translation or song recommendations in popular consumer software programs are simply part of the service. In science, as in so many other domains, this trend suggests that when AI tools become commonplace, they will fade into the background, too. Still a reasonable concern might be that such automation threatens the efforts of human scientists. As AI becomes essential to further scientific progress, will any prizes recognize work truly free of AI? AI can revolutionize science. It has already helped us see proteins with previously unimaginable clarity. Soon AIs may dream up new molecules for batteries. In short, they may do many things, some of which previously seemed impossible. But they have a crucial limitation tied to something wonderful about science: its empirical dependence on the real world, which cannot be overcome by computation alone. Science also needs experimenters — human experts driven to study the universe, and who will ask questions an AI cannot. Physics — its core ethos (精神特质) is “that the world is understandable” in quantitative, predictive terms only by careful experiment and observation. That real world still exists for future scientists to study, whether aided by AI or not. 1．Regarding the Nobel Prize in Physics, the author might think ______. A．it should have been awarded to more physicists B．it aims to encourage physicists to engage in AI research C．it is a recognition of the broad applications of AI in physics D．it is justified for its focus on physical principles of information 2．What was the primary achievement of Demis Hassabis and John Jumper? A．They developed software to design novel protein structures from scratch. B．They provided precise folding structures for all proteins. C．They found correct folding structures for the majority of proteins via AI. D．They discovered a new method to encode memory in networks. 3．What does the word “catholicon” underlined in Paragraph 3 probably mean? A．A final solution. B．A big improvement. C．A complete cure-all. D．A common obstacle. 4．What can we learn from this passage? A．AI tools are restricted to specific scientific branches. B．AI tools will become less noticeable once widely used. C．AI will overcome its dependence on real-world experience. D．AI poses a threat to traditional methods of scientific inquiry. 5．What would be the best title for this passage? A．AI and Science: Revolution or Evolution? B．Is AI Coming to End Scientific Exploration? C．Al and Science: A New Era of Collaboration? D．Is AI Dominant in Nobel-Winning Discoveries? 2 For all programmers and processor industry participants, the RISC-V website is almost a must-visit as an open standard. Instruction Set Architecture, which is defined as the design of a computer from the programmer’s perspective, enabling a new era of processor innovation through open cooperation. Unlike X86 and ARM, which are owned by certain enterprises, RISC-V is an open one, allowing anybody to download its instructions handbook and use it. Maybe that is why some US lawmakers are targeting RISC-V. Republican Senator Marco Rubio and Democratic Senator Mark Warner have reportedly been urging US President Joe Biden to take action regarding RISC-V, because, they fear that Chinese companies might make use of the open-source platform to improve their chips (芯片) technology. Maybe the legislators (立法者) do not realize that by targeting RISC-V they are targeting not only a company or a platform but the idea of openness itself. Being a US company. RISC-V has a global membership, with a number of Chinese and US enterprises as members. It has for long been known as an open-minded institution promoting technological cooperation despite the political tensions, and the US lawmakers targeting it seem to be closing one of the last channels of technology communication between China and their nation. By doing so they are harming the United States’ own interests and its technological leadership in the world. Open source is a good computing tool that benefits those who share programs as well as those who learn from it. The Android smartphone system, for example, has developed largely because Google decided to make it an open-source system, which attracted worldwide smartphone businesses to adopt its standard. The US lawmakers might next target GitHub, or, some day, even forbid programmers from accessing the Internet. That will only lead to the US losing its technological edge, never to get it back again. 1．What is RISC-V according to the passage? A．A website for programmers. B．A computer design standard. C．An open-source platform. D．A US chips company. 2．The first paragraph serves as a (n) ________. A．argument B．background C．proof D．connection 3．What does the author mainly emphasize about US targeting RISC-V? A．Fairness. B．Interests. C．Cooperation. D．Openness. 4．Which can be inferred from the passage? A．RISC-V enables processor innovation through open cooperation. B．US lawmakers are targeting RISC-V for the technology safety concern. C．The example of Android demonstrates the benefits of technological openness. D．GitHub and the Internet are the next target US will focus on to safeguard its leadership. 3 Human’s appetite for sand could increase 45 percent within four decades, according to researchers who say unchecked consumption risks environmental damage and shortages of a key material for urban expansion. Growing demand for building sand — which is used to make concrete, glass and other vital construction materials – has already seen the rise of sand pirates (盗贼) , with dozens of islands disappearing in Indonesia as a result of casual mining. Xiaoyang Zhong at Leiden University and his colleagues have calculated that global building sand demand will jump from 3.2 billion tonnes a year in 2020 to 4.6 billion tonnes by 2060. The figure is based on a central situation of future population rises and economic growth, and modelled using estimates of concrete and glass consumption, and the floor area needed in buildings.But there is no reliable estimate for remaining sand reserves, so it is unclear if the world can bear such a big increase. “Sand, and the sand crisis (危机), has been overlooked, creating severe environmental and social consequences. If we don’t act now, we may not have enough sand to develop our cities,” says Zhong. However, Zhong’s team found that about half the projected consumption in 2060 could be avoided if countries take a suit of measures, including extending the lifetime of buildings, reusing concrete, creating more lightweight building designs and using other materials, such as wooden frames. According to the model, the single biggest reduction in sand use could come from more efficient (有效的) use of space: distributing less floor space per person in buildings, sharing offices, and so on. “It’s hard to say how realistic these measures are. But we want this to happen,” says Zhong. The research only looked at sand used for glass and concrete in buildings, so is an underestimate of total future demand. Granular data on sand consumption for the 26 world regions studied is also lacking, and not detailed enough for country-level breakdowns. Failure to act will add existing environmental pressures on reserves of sand in lakes and rivers first, but absolute shortages shouldn't be overlooked, says Zhong. “It would be very questionable if this growing demand could be met,” he says. 1．What may cause the environmental and social effects according to Zhong? A．Sand reserves are not enough. B．The sand crisis is overestimated. C．Sand crisis isn’t paid much attention to. D．The construction industry is lack of sand. 2．How can we reduce the sand use most efficiently according to the study? A．By reusing he building materials. B．By lengthening the building’s lifetime. C．By making use of space more wisely. D．By preventing sand use completely. 3．What ‘s the shortcoming of the research? A．It only studied the sand use in 26 areas. B．It didn’t show the detailed data on sand use. C．It didn’t take realistic measures on sand use. D．It overlooked the total sand need in the future. 4．What does Zhong concern most about the sand crisis? A．How we will take action to stop it. B．Why its shortages are overlooked in most countries. C．Whether the increasing sand need may be satisfied. D．What damage the environmental pressures do to rivers. 4 For millions of years, Arctic sea ice has expanded and shrunk in a rhythmic dance with the summer sun. Humans evolved in this icy world, and civilization relied on it for climatic, ecological and political stability. But now the world comes ever closer to a future without ice. The National Snow and Ice Data Center reported that 2019’s minimum arctic sea ice extent was the second lowest on record. Arctic summers could become mostly ice-free in 30 years, and possibly sooner if current trends continue. As the northern sea ice declines, the world must unite to preserve what remains of the Arctic. Although most people have never seen the sea ice, its effects are never far away. By reflecting sunlight, Arctic ice acts as Earth’s air conditioner. Once dark water replaces brilliant ice, Earth could warm substantially, equivalent to the warming caused by the additional release of a trillion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere and declining sea ice threatens wildlife, from the polar bear to algae that grow beneath the sea ice, supporting the large amount of marine life. To avoid the consequences the scientific community should advocate not just for lowering greenhouse gas emissions, but also for protecting the Arctic from exploitation. The Antarctic shows the way. In the 1950s, countries raced to claim the Antarctic continent for resources and military installations. Enter the scientists. The 1957-1958 International Geophysical Year brought together scientists from competing countries to study Antarctica, and countries temporarily suspended their territorial disputes (争议). In 1959, 12 countries signed the Antarctic Treaty to preserve the continent for peaceful scientific discovery rather than territorial and military gain. Sixty years later, we must now save the Arctic. A new Marine Arctic Peace Sanctuary (MAPS) Treaty would protect the Arctic Ocean as a scientific preserve for peaceful purposes only. Similar to Antarctica, MAPS would prohibit resource exploitation, commercial fishing and shipping, and military exercises. So far, only 2 non-Arctic countries have signed MAPS; 97 more need to sign on to enact it into law. Scientists can help—just as they did for the Antarctic—by giving statements of support, asking scientific organizations to endorse (支持) the treaty, communicating the importance of protecting the arctic to the public and policy-makers, and above all, by convincing national leaders to sign the treaty. In particular, Arctic nations must agree that recognizing the arctic as an international preserve is better than fighting over it. In 2018, these countries successfully negotiated a 16-year moratorium on commercial fishing in the Arctic high seas, demonstrating that such agreements are possible. Humans have only ever lived in a world topped by ice. Can we now work together to protect Arctic ecosystems, keep the northern peace, and allow the sea ice to return? 1．What can be inferred from the passage? A．wildlife relies on sea ice for food and water. B．The Arctic would be ice-free in 30 years. C．Sea ice slows down the global warming. D．The melting of sea ice releases CO2. 2．The Antarctic is mentioned in the passage in order to ________. A．remind readers of the past of the Antarctic B．propose a feasible approach for the Arctic C．stress the importance of preserving sea ice D．recall how the Antarctic Treaty came into being 3．The word “moratorium” (in paragraph 4) is closest in meaning to ________. A．battle B．ban C．memo D．protection 4．Which of the following might be the best title of the passage? A．Antarctic: a Successful Comeback? B．Sea Ice and Global Warming C．Arctic: the Earth’s Future D．Life Without Ice? 5 The recent economic crisis should have resulted in a crisis in economics itself — specifically, in the dominant ideas about how economies work. The leading macroeconomic (宏观经济的) model failed not only to predict the crisis, but also claimed such a crisis couldn’t happen in markets where people made logical decisions. Policies based on this model helped create the very conditions for the collapse. For years, I’ve challenged this standard model by developing theories where individuals acting with clear judgment interact with imperfect and incomplete information. The results have been damaging for much of the conventional wisdom. For example, with Bruce Greenwald, I showed that Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” often failed to guide markets efficiently — not because it was hidden, but because it wasn’t there at all. Markets don’t function well when information is incomplete or unevenly shared, which is almost always the case. Working with Sanford Grossman, I argued that financial markets can’t be fully efficient in passing information from informed to uninformed participants. If they were, people would have no reason to seek out new information. And with Andrew Weiss, I demonstrated why credit rationing — where some borrowers are denied loans despite willingness to pay higher interest — is common. Lately, I’ve been exploring how these microeconomic (微观经济的) findings apply to macroeconomic issues like GDP, unemployment, and policies for economic stability. The financial crisis, along with the failure of policy efforts to restore full employment or restart lending, makes this research more urgent than ever. Building a new economic framework is a huge challenge. Fortunately, important pieces are already in place. One comes from studying market failures caused by imperfect information. Another is behavioral economics, which examines how real human behavior doesn’t match the predictions of traditional models. Old economic ideas tend to stay, even after being disproven, simply because their supporters stick around. But change is possible. At Columbia, we expose students to a variety of approaches. Many now question outdated theories and ask why they should spend time learning models that clearly don’t match reality. This gives me hope. Institutions like the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) are helping by offering resources and platforms that support this shift. With enough support, a better economic model may finally become reality. 1．What does the writer imply about Adam Smith’s theory of the “invisible hand”? A．It might hold true in markets that are heavily regulated. B．It is misleading as it’s based on rare real-world conditions. C．It remains influential despite offering limited practical value. D．It can be helpful for understanding certain market developments. 2．Which of the following reflects one of the author’s findings? A．Markets work well when people make logical decisions. B．Credit rationing disappears when interest rates increase. C．Financial markets cannot pass information to everyone. D．Most markets function efficiently with strong competition. 3．What can be inferred about the author’s attitude toward the economic education at Columbia? A．He believes students show little interest in theoretical economics. B．He thinks students need a better understanding of old economic ideas. C．He is worried that students are questioning popular economic models. D．He feels optimistic as students explore new economic perspectives. 4．What is the main idea of the passage? A．Traditional economic theories need to be revised to reflect how markets function. B．Behavioral economics has become the primary focus of teaching in top universities. C．Credit rationing is a factor in understanding how financial systems respond to crises. D．Economic crises cannot be fully explained by individuals’ poor financial choices alone. 6 Now controversial new technologies promise parents even more control over their embryos (胚胎) . Today, a lot of those “designer babies” are teenagers. And some families are discovering that things don’t always work out as planned; The kids feel like walking science experiments; the parents are disappointed in how their children turned out. Fertility (生育) businesses are selling a chance of domestic welfare, and these families feel cheated. People who have children this way often place too much importance on genes while ignoring the environment. It’s like, “This is what our family is going to look like. We’re going to pick a kid, and this is how we're going to put it together,” It’s like a project or building a company. People don’t always realize they are creating a human being and not a piece of furniture. They tend to get what they want and don’t hear “no” a lot. So when their kid shows up and isn't the way that they want, what happens? Usually, it’s a disaster. In these homes, a high value gets placed on achievement. I think the way these kids are created sends the message: “You’re not good enough. You need to achieve.” When the kids struggle, it’s especially devastating. The child grows up feeling very different, knowing they were an experiment but not getting the proper support or acceptance they need to grow. In my work, I help parents accept: This is the child you have. I help them make abstract concepts more concrete. Sometimes just explaining “you and your child are not the same person” does the trick. And I help kids accept the reality of their parents. Or say a teenager doesn’t feel loved. I might need to clarify to them that “love” is not a tangible feeling, like getting kicked. It means someone feels fondness toward you like you feel fondness toward candies or toys. Trying to control your child is a recipe for disaster. The kid is going to rebel (反抗) . I don’t know if anyone’s making sure parents understand that they can’t test-drive a child and then return it. You probably can predict stocks, but human behavior has far too many variables. 1．What does the author stress regarding “designer babies” in paragraph 1? A．The high expectations from their parents. B．The psychological impact on their families. C．The intentional cheating from fertility businesses. D．The moral issues surrounding genetic engineering. 2．What is a common problem for families with “designer babies”? A．The children often rebel against their parents. B．The parents are too focused on genetic perfection. C．The children feel like they are science experiments. D．The parents are unable to afford to raise their children. 3．What does the underlined word “devastating” in paragraph 3 mean? A．Confusing. B．Doubtful. C．Challenging. D．Harmful. 4．What is the author’s suggestion for parents of “designer babies”? A．Invest more in genetic research. B．Accept their children as they are. C．Focus more on their children’s achievements. D．Seek professional help to shape their children. 7 In modern society, people often measure life value through material achievements: high salaries, prestigious job titles, or luxurious possessions. However, ancient philosophers like Socrates argued that “the unexamined life is not worth living,” suggesting true value lies in continuous self-reflection and intellectual growth. Recent studies reveal an intriguing paradox: individuals who prioritize personal fulfillment over external validation report 37% higher life satisfaction. Take Dr. Maya Lin for an example: she was a scientist who abandoned a lucrative corporate career to research renewable energy in rural communities. Though her income dropped significantly, she described her work as “a daily discovery of purpose.” This aligns with psychologist Abraham Maslow’s theory that self-actualization — not basic needs — defines peak human experiences. Cultural perspectives further complicate this discussion. In Eastern traditions, Confucianism emphasizes contributing to societal harmony. A 2024 survey showed 68% of Japanese youth view “fulfilling family duties” as central to life value, contrasting with Western emphasis on individualism. Yet Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous words —“Life’s most urgent question is: what are you doing for others?” — bridge this gap, proposing that personal growth and social responsibility are inseparable. Ultimately, defining life value requires balancing three elements: self-awareness, contribution to others, and adaptability in changing circumstances. As technology accelerates societal shifts, the ability to redefine one’s purpose may become humanity’s greatest wealth. 1．What is the main topic discussed in the passage? A．Various perspectives on life value. B．Cultural differences in educational systems. C．Historical views on wealth accumulation. D．Psychological theories of happiness. 2．According to the author, what brings genuine fulfillment? A．High social status. B．Luxurious possessions. C．Self-awareness and purpose. D．Technological advancements. 3．Why does the author mention Martin Luther King Jr.? A．To contrast Eastern and Western values. B．To demonstrate universal aspects of life value. C．To criticize materialistic lifestyles. D．To explain Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. 4．The word “aligns” most likely means __________. A．Conflicts B．measures C．complicates D．agrees 5．Which statement would the author most likely agree with? A．Adaptability enhances life’s meaningfulness. B．Social media popularity reflects true self-worth. C．Life value should be measured by material achievements levels. D．Traditional values are outdated in modern society. 8 For centuries, what makes human creativity so precious is not only the final products it yields, but also the effort behind their creation. But in a world where AI can generate anything with the click of a button, how do we distinguish what truly matters? How does human-made art survives? Throughout history, the most famous works of art, literature, and music have carried a sense of labor, dedication, and mastery. We don’t just admire the end product; we admire how it came to be. Masterpieces like Van Gogh’s “Starry Night” sustain not simply for their artistic beauty, but for the human stories they carry. They remind us that art is not just about beauty or skill — it is about intention, persistence, and what makes us human. As AI floods the world with instant beauty, we’re entering an era of “aesthetic inflation”, where perfectly composed images, poetic style, and movie-like storytelling are available to anyone, instantly and at no cost. This makes us think about when beauty is effortless and endless, does human creations still have value? But human imperfection isn’t a weakness — it’s part of who we are, shaping our understanding of humanity. Our struggles, mistakes, and limitations aren’t just difficulties to overcome — they’re part of what gives life meaning. In this light, AI’s ability to create perfect art feels almost unnatural—a rejection of the struggle that gives creativity its weight. It may achieve technical perfection — but at the cost of the original energy that makes art stir feelings within people. Even at its most impressive, AI-generated art often feels empty. It has no real emotions or experiences, and no clear creator, failing to create unexpected surprises and arouse shared emotion with audience. Therefore, to preserve meaning, selection and context become more crucial. As AI can produce endless content, the human elements like context, narrative and the reasoning behind art become the true value source. Also, AI can be a creative collaborator rather than a replacement, refining ideas while keeping human imperfection and feeling, and acting as an amplifier (放大镜) of human vision. 1．Why do masterpieces like “Starry Night” remain valuable in the AI era? A．They represent unique human characteristics. B．They showcase brilliant artistic creation skill. C．They are created through long production processes. D．They contain human emotional depth and creative effort. 2．Why does the author mention “aesthetic inflation” in paragraph 3? A．To demonstrate AI’s efficiency in art creation. B．To prove that AI-generated art is more affordable. C．To criticize the overuse of technology in art creation. D．To stress the devaluation of beauty due to mass production. 3．How does the author develop the argument in the passage? A．By giving examples. B．By giving definitions. C．By making comparisons. D．By making classifications. 4．What is a suitable title for the text? A．A Guide to Perfect Art with AI B．How to Create Art in the Age of AI C．Why Human Art Still Matters in the AI Age D．A New Revolution in Art Creation brought by AI 9 I watch documentaries, not movies. I read history books, not fiction. I use every free moment to accomplish one of the tasks on my never-ending checklist, and I am completely filled with thoughts of productivity. An hour sleeping is an hour wasted. And like the rest of 21st century America, I like it. But this fixation (固恋) on productivity is increasingly destroying character and transforming men into robots. New York Times columnist David Brooks warned American University students of this cultural decline in a speech. “We cut off all things spiritual and emotional in a competitive urge to stand out”, he said, “The pressure to succeed professionally, to acquire skills, to do the things you need to do to succeed in an information age economy really became the overwhelming (难以应付的) pressure, and it sort of eclipses the thinking about character and morality.” Many students happily go to college, viewing it as a next step on their rise to professional achievement. Forcing as many success-building activities into their schedules as they can, they enjoy keeping busy with little sleep. “Today’s outstanding kids are likely to spend their afternoons and weekends shuttling from one skill-improving activity to the next,” Brooks wrote in an article, “We fear failure more than we desire success.” A century ago, college was about character building. Today, our characters are in decline. We are experts on economics, material things and professional skills. We fail to discuss and understand relationships, emotions and all things spiritual. Philosophers Karl Popper divided the world into two categories: Clocks and Clouds. Clock problems are those that can be taken apart, examined and solved through deductive reasoning (演绎推理). Clouds cannot be taken apart. Cloud problems represent whole systems that need to be understood in a different way. “When we have a Cloud problem, we try to turn into a Clock problem,” Brooks said. And in a reason-centered culture, adding titles to one’s resume becomes a trend. At American University, 85 percent of seniors (and 89 percent of business majors) graduate with at least one practical experience which is often helpful to a student’s future career, but can sometimes draw focus away from academics. To prevent the death of man’s character, Brooks urges rediscovering our human matures through falling in love. And by love he means love for a task, job, or another person. “Synchronicity (同步性) is key to happiness,” he said. Rather than crazily increasing our long lists of accomplishments, we need to lose ourselves in what we do, and success will come on its own. 1．From Paragraph 1, we can learn that people ________. A．are controlled by time B．are keen on reading books C．are eager to achieve more D．are changing their characters 2．According to Brooks’ warning, what is the ultimate consequence of emphasizing professional success? A．A society driven by emotional intelligence. B．A stronger focus on academic excellence. C．A loss of moral and spiritual depth in individuals. D．An increase in collaborative problem-solving skills. 3．Paragraph 4 is mainly developed by ________. A．making comparisons B．following the time order C．giving examples D．analyzing causes 4．The last paragraph mainly tells us that ________. A．love is more important than focus B．the focus on human natures counts C．more work contributes to happiness D．success comes from devotion to work. 5．The purpose of this passage is to ________. A．raise awareness to character building B．stress the importance of productivity C．warn about the pressure to seek success D．criticize students’ desire for achievements 10 A growing number of companies are building humanoid robots, and these mechanical look-alikes are starting to appear in car factories and delivery places. Some businesses even promise robots for home use. Yet one big question still has no answer: Why bother? Why make a robot in a human shape when it could take any imaginable form? The usual answer is that humanoid robots could, in principle, handle any physical jobs a person can. But that “in principle” is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If you’ve watched videos of these robots, you’ll get it — they’re often clumsy, awkward machines. Sure, the technology helping them stand and move has come a long way, but they’re still not as quick or graceful as humans. Meanwhile, robots built for a single job — like an arm shifting goods between conveyor belts (传送带) — are now commonplace. Designed with one purpose, they do it really well, unlike humanoid robots, which aim to do everything but often master nothing. Another argument is that a human shape makes it easier for people to work with or control robots. This holds some water, especially since many of these machines still need skilled human operators. Companies often avoid admitting this, calling it a short-term phase, but the dream of fully independent, AI-powered humanoid robots — ones that match or beat human workers — remains a long shot. For now, what we’ve got are human-shaped shells guided by people behind the scenes. When Elon Musk introduced Tesla’s Optimus robot in 2021, he proudly claimed it could teach, babysit, walk dogs, fetch groceries, or pour drinks. Yet those robots weren’t AI-driven, and each was controlled by a hidden human. Notice a pattern? These tasks—low-wage, service-oriented jobs — suggest that, for now, humanoid robots just mask human effort with a shiny surface. Some remote-controlled robots serve real purposes, like in deep-sea exploration. But those machines aren’t shaped like humans — they look like capsules or small vehicles, and they work just fine. The idea that robots must be human-shaped is a failure of imagination. Yes, humanoid robots look impressive. They remind us of the fantasies in science fictions where machines handle all difficult tasks. But today, they are mostly marketing tools, masking human labor. And a robot that doesn’t truly improve life is missing the point. 1．What does the underlined phrase “holds some water” mean in paragraph 3? A．Provides sufficient evidence. B．Makes much sense. C．Is partly reasonable. D．Is widely accepted. 2．Why does the author mention Tesla’s Optimus robot? A．To prove humanoid robots are better. B．To highlight its impressive technology. C．To show it can replace human workers. D．To suggest it is in the charge of humans. 3．What is the author’s attitude toward humanoid robots? A．Skeptical. B．Optimistic. C．Neutral. D．Cautious. 4．What is the best title for the passage? A．When Humanoid Robots Miss Potential B．How Humanoid Robots Miss Goals C．What Humanoid Robots Lack Now D．Why Humanoid Robots Fall Short 11 Do teenagers need to relax? Increasingly not just parents are seeking a break from work and family pressures but adolescents too, coping with “intense schooling and sports programmes”. So much so that the Global Wellness Summit identifies teen wellness as a trend for 2025 with the industry focusing on teenagers’ emotional intelligence, resilience, and how to survive in a digital world through resorts, retreats, and mental wellness apps. Rina Raphael, author of The Gospel of Wellness, tells me wellness—physical and mental health—has replaced the once-dominant fashion and beauty industries. McKinsey reports that Gen Z outspends older consumers on mindfulness-related wellness products such as meditation classes, mindfulness apps, and therapy sessions, even seeking preventive solutions to ageing-related health issues. One of the problems the wellness sector aims to address is mental health. Blame for the mental health crisis has been laid on smartphones. But apps also offer a solution. Many, like Chill Panda and HappiMe are on the UK’s CAMHS (child and adolescent mental health services) website and in demand. A study in The Lancet concluded bans or restrictions at school don’t lead to “better mental wellbeing in adolescents.” Parents have a role too. An intensive parenting often leaves children without examples of parents socialising or pursuing passions. There’s nothing bad about forming healthy habits. But is the wellness industry responding to—or contributing to—the pressures young people face? Think about the new toy package Mattel released five years ago: Wellness Barbie—a more glowing and relaxed version of Barbie and a product in training children to become consumers of wellness. And those baby massage classes dressed up as a wellbeing treatment to improve the infants’ mood and physical health struck me as ridiculous. What’s a baby got to worry about? The idea that experiences bought by parents and offered by the wellness industry solve adolescent anxiety seems unpromising at best. As Raphael points out, the problem with wellness is “it’s very much tied to productivity, aesthetics (美学) and consumerism. It adds a pressure that you have to be working on yourself.” But I can’t see it ending. After all, as Ronald Purser, author of McMindfulness, told me: “You can never be too well; that’s why it’s a massive growth industry”. 1．What could be counted as a wellness activity? A．Aiming for top grades nonstop. B．Practicing mindfulness using an app. C．Checking social media for attention. D．Skipping meals to manage body shape. 2．What is a possible reason for teen mental health issues? A．A demand for services. B．A passion for sports. C．A ban on mental health. D．A lack of role models. 3．What would Rina Raphael agree with most? A．The fashion and beauty industries matter more to Gen Z. B．Teenagers are pressured to consume wellness products. C．Wellness Barbie assists children’s adaptation. D．Baby massage classes are not effective as expected. 4．What’s author’s attitude towards the wellness industry? A．Hopeful. B．Calm. C．Critical. D．Pessimistic. 12 When you’re driving around the same block, keeping searching, because there’s nowhere to park your car, any suggestion that America devotes too much space to parking might seem foolish. But consider this: in a typical year, the country builds more three-car garages than one-bedroom apartments. Even the crowded cities reserve lots of street space to store private vehicles. And local laws across the country require house and apartment builders to provide off-street parking, whether residents need it. Step back to assess the result: it’s obvious that more square footage is devoted to parking each car than to housing each person. That Americans like driving is hardly news, but all the above talking isn’t finding fault with cars. The complaint is about parking — or, more to the point, about everything we have given up for it. Over the years, cities and towns have torn down grand old structures to make way for it. All those 9-foot-by-18-foot rectangles of asphalt (柏油路) haven’t only damaged the environment or these once-valued architectural styles, but also upset the crucial social goal of housing affordability. This misplaced priority has put the country in a bind. For decades, even as rents rocketed and climate change worsened, the prevalence (盛行) of parking spaces discouraged anyone from noticing their social impact. But the parking space has been eating up our living space for sure, with or without our knowledge. Here an optimist may give the excuse that some of the country’s largest cities have no choice but to renegotiate the relationship among people, cars, and parking spaces. However, parking space’s conquering the city in the 20th century was already so complete that, in the 21st, people need to recognize that the rules have to change, and that the constant promotion of parking spaces is already weakening cities and crowding out other needs. Some of the most consequential social problems are the ones hiding in plain sight, but parking isn’t even hiding. It’s just everywhere — for us to take seriously. 1．In which section can we most probably read this passage? A．Travel. B．Features. C．Front page. D．Public welfare. 2．The underlined phrase in paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to _______. A．lead the country to trouble B．discourage residents from buying cars C．annoy the local residents D．weaken the country’s overall strength 3．What can we imply about parking space’s role in the 20th century cities? A．It failed to meet the growing parking demands. B．It completely dominated urban planning priorities. C．It was a necessary renegotiation by the city government. D．It unexpectedly brought about problems to people’s daily life. 4．What can be concluded from the passage? A．America should continue expanding parking though it is harmful. B．Cities in the 21st century should absolutely stop building more garages. C．Excessive parking space is damaging the society so it should be limited. D．Housing and other problems are not as urgent as insufficient parking space. 原创精品资源学科网独家享有版权，侵权必究！1 学科网（北京）股份有限公司1 / 1 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $ 专题06.类型结构利用策略 策略分析 在阅读理解的过程中，我们可以根据不同文体（如记叙文、议论文、说明文、应用文等）的常见结构特点，快速把握文章框架、逻辑脉络和作者观点，从而更精准地定位信息、理解主旨和推断态度的阅读方法。该策略是高三英语阅读理解总复习的重要内容，有助于提升答题效率和准确率。 策略介绍 策略一：识别文体结构，把握主旨方向 【策略简述】 先判断语篇类型，如议论文通常“提出论点—论证—结论”，说明文多为“总—分—总”，记叙文以时间或事件推进。把握结构后，快速定位观点句、主题句。 【阅读语段】 “The freezing Northeast hasn’t been a terribly fun place to spend time this winter, so when the chance came for a weekend to Sarasota, Florida, my bags were packed before you could say ‘sunshine.’” Question: What did the author think of her winter life in New York? 【策略运用】首句即体现作者对东北冬天生活的否定态度，选“boring”类答案。作者用情感色彩强烈的形容词“freezing”“terribly fun”直接传递态度。 策略二：抓首尾句与转折词，锁定作者态度 【策略简述】 作者观点常在首段或尾段明确，转折词（however, but, yet）后往往是真实态度。 【阅读语段】 “Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain, the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous.” Question: What is the author’s attitude toward Navajas’ studies? 【策略运用】尾段“although... yet...”结构，后文强调巨大影响，故作者态度为支持、赞同（approving）。 策略三：关注情感词与主观表达 【策略简述】 关注形容词、副词、情态动词等带有感情色彩的词，如“wonderfully, unfortunately, skeptical, optimistic”等，判断作者或人物的态度。 【阅读语段】 “He makes philosophical thought an appealing exercise that improves the quality of our experiences, and he does so with plenty of humor.” Question: What does the author think of Weiner’s book? 【策略运用】情感词“appealing”“humor”体现正面、幽默、轻松的态度，答案为“humorous and straightforward”。 策略四：对比观点与事实，辨别立场 【策略简述】 文章若引用他人观点，作者可能赞同、反对或中立。注意区分“作者观点”与“引用观点”。 【阅读语段】 “Some people say that the internet will create a global village, but the reality is that we cannot keep relationships with more than a limited number of people.” Question: What is the author’s attitude toward the internet? 【策略运用】作者用“but”转折，否定“global village”的幻想，表达质疑、谨慎态度。 策略五：归纳全文主旨，判断整体态度 【策略简述】 全文主旨句通常在首段或尾段，或反复出现的关键词，可帮助判断整体倾向。 【阅读语段】 “The connection between people and plants has long been the subject of scientific research. Recent studies have found positive effects. A study... discovered that greener areas of the city experienced less crime. In another, employees were shown to be 15% more productive when their workplaces were decorated with houseplants.” Question: What is the first paragraph mainly about? 【策略运用】首句为总起，后文用例子说明“green plants benefits”，故答案为“Benefits from green plants”。 策略六：利用例证说明观点 【策略简述】 “for example, for instance”等举例后往往是对前面观点的阐释，理解例子要联系前文观点句。 【阅读语段】 “A study conducted in Youngstown, Ohio, for example, discovered that greener areas of the city experienced less crime.” Question: The example in paragraph shows that... 【策略运用】例证支持前文“green plants bring benefits”，答案常为“plants improve urban environment”。 策略七：识别客观中立表达 【策略简述】 如文章既写正面也写负面，或无明确评价，常为“objective”或“neutral”。 【阅读语段】 “Some argue that quantum computing will change the world, while others warn it may be overhyped. The truth remains to be seen.” Question: What is the author’s attitude toward quantum computing? 【策略运用】作者正反都陈述，未表态，态度为客观（objective）。 策略八：关注引语与数据 【策略简述】 引号内、数字、调查结果常是态度或观点依据，要重点分析。 【阅读语段】 “‘The existence of a living system is not about the use of anything,’ Alan says. ‘Some people ask me, “So what’s the worth of artificial life?” Do you ever think, “What is the worth of your grandmother?”’” Question: What is Alan Smith’s attitude toward ALife? 【策略运用】引语体现强烈支持、辩护，作者也倾向支持，答案为supportive。 突破演练 1 The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded for machine learning development and the Chemistry Nobel was for protein structure prediction via AI. Some said the physics prize wasn’t really physics. “AI is coming for science, too,” the New York Times concluded. With powerful large language models, AIs can generate various outputs and even make Nobel-winning discoveries. But have AIs really taken over science? To begin with, the physics prize went to Hinton and John Hopfield, a physicist, who discovered how the physical dynamics of a network can encode memory. Hopfield came up with a vivid comparison: a ball, rolling across a bumpy landscape, will often “remember” to return to the same lowest valley. Hinton’s work extended Hopfield’s model. In short, the Physics Nobel was awarded for fundamental research about the physical principles of information, not the broad umbrella of “AI” and its applications. Meanwhile, the Chemistry Nobel was awarded to biochemist David Baker and DeepMind researchers Demis Hassabis and John Jumper. Baker first developed software to design novel protein structures from scratch. Yet by 2018, of the roughly 200 million proteins cataloged in all genetic databases, only about 150,000 had confirmed structures. Then Hassabis and Jumper introduced AlphaFold, which provided accurate folding structures for the rest. But even so, the AI has failed to predict defects in proteins. It’s not a catholicon for every problem in protein folding, but rather an excellent tool. Many of these tools have disappeared into their uses. We rarely pause to consider the transistor (晶体管) (for which the 1956 physics prize was awarded) when we use electronics containing them by the billions. Some powerful machine-learning features are already on this path. The neural networks that provide accurate language translation or song recommendations in popular consumer software programs are simply part of the service. In science, as in so many other domains, this trend suggests that when AI tools become commonplace, they will fade into the background, too. Still a reasonable concern might be that such automation threatens the efforts of human scientists. As AI becomes essential to further scientific progress, will any prizes recognize work truly free of AI? AI can revolutionize science. It has already helped us see proteins with previously unimaginable clarity. Soon AIs may dream up new molecules for batteries. In short, they may do many things, some of which previously seemed impossible. But they have a crucial limitation tied to something wonderful about science: its empirical dependence on the real world, which cannot be overcome by computation alone. Science also needs experimenters — human experts driven to study the universe, and who will ask questions an AI cannot. Physics — its core ethos (精神特质) is “that the world is understandable” in quantitative, predictive terms only by careful experiment and observation. That real world still exists for future scientists to study, whether aided by AI or not. 1．Regarding the Nobel Prize in Physics, the author might think ______. A．it should have been awarded to more physicists B．it aims to encourage physicists to engage in AI research C．it is a recognition of the broad applications of AI in physics D．it is justified for its focus on physical principles of information 2．What was the primary achievement of Demis Hassabis and John Jumper? A．They developed software to design novel protein structures from scratch. B．They provided precise folding structures for all proteins. C．They found correct folding structures for the majority of proteins via AI. D．They discovered a new method to encode memory in networks. 3．What does the word “catholicon” underlined in Paragraph 3 probably mean? A．A final solution. B．A big improvement. C．A complete cure-all. D．A common obstacle. 4．What can we learn from this passage? A．AI tools are restricted to specific scientific branches. B．AI tools will become less noticeable once widely used. C．AI will overcome its dependence on real-world experience. D．AI poses a threat to traditional methods of scientific inquiry. 5．What would be the best title for this passage? A．AI and Science: Revolution or Evolution? B．Is AI Coming to End Scientific Exploration? C．Al and Science: A New Era of Collaboration? D．Is AI Dominant in Nobel-Winning Discoveries? 【答案】1．D 2．C 3．C 4．B 5．B 【解析】这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了2024年诺贝尔物理学奖和化学奖与AI的关系，以及AI在科学研究中的角色和局限性。 1．细节理解题。根据第二段“In short, the Physics Nobel was awarded for fundamental research about the physical principles of information, not the broad umbrella of “AI” and its applications.(简而言之，诺贝尔物理学奖授予了关于信息物理原理的基础研究，而不是“人工智能”及其应用的大保护伞)”可知，关于诺贝尔物理学奖，作者可能会认为它是合理的，因为它关注的是信息的物理原理。故选D。 2．细节理解题。根据第三段“Then Hassabis and Jumper introduced AlphaFold, which provided accurate folding structures for the rest.(随后，Hassabis和Jumper推出了AlphaFold，为其他蛋白质提供了精确的折叠结构)”可知，他们通过AI为大多数蛋白质找到了正确的折叠结构。故选C。 3．词句猜测题。根据第三段“But even so, the AI has failed to predict defects in proteins.(但即便如此，人工智能也未能预测蛋白质的缺陷)”以及划线单词句中“It’s not a…for every problem in protein folding, but rather an excellent tool.(它并不是解决蛋白质折叠中所有问题的……，而是一个很好的工具)”由此可知，此处为它并不是解决蛋白质折叠中所有问题的灵丹妙药。故可猜测划线单词catholicon为“灵丹妙药”的意思，和C选项A complete cure-all“包治百病”意思相近。故选C。 4．细节理解题。根据第四段“In science, as in so many other domains, this trend suggests that when AI tools become commonplace, they will fade into the background, too.(在科学领域，就像在许多其他领域一样，这一趋势表明，当人工智能工具变得司空见惯时，它们也会消失在背景中)”可知，我们能从文章中了解到人工智能工具一旦被广泛使用，将变得不那么引人注目。故选B。 5．主旨大意题。根据第一段中“With powerful large language models, AIs can generate various outputs and even make Nobel-winning discoveries. But have AIs really taken over science?(凭借强大的大型语言模型，人工智能可以产生各种输出，甚至可以获得诺贝尔奖的发现。但是人工智能真的接管了科学吗？)”和最后一段“Science also needs experimenters — human experts driven to study the universe, and who will ask questions an AI cannot. Physics — its core ethos (精神特质) is “that the world is understandable” in quantitative, predictive terms only by careful experiment and observation. That real world still exists for future scientists to study, whether aided by AI or not.(科学也需要实验者——被驱使去研究宇宙的人类专家，他们会提出人工智能无法提出的问题。物理学——它的核心精神是“世界是可以理解的”，只有通过仔细的实验和观察才能定量地预测世界。不管有没有人工智能的帮助，这个真实的世界仍然存在，等待着未来的科学家去研究)”以及文章主要说明了2024年诺贝尔物理学奖和化学奖与AI的关系，以及AI在科学研究中的角色和局限性。故这篇文章最好的标题是“人工智能将终结科学探索吗？”。故选B。 2 For all programmers and processor industry participants, the RISC-V website is almost a must-visit as an open standard. Instruction Set Architecture, which is defined as the design of a computer from the programmer’s perspective, enabling a new era of processor innovation through open cooperation. Unlike X86 and ARM, which are owned by certain enterprises, RISC-V is an open one, allowing anybody to download its instructions handbook and use it. Maybe that is why some US lawmakers are targeting RISC-V. Republican Senator Marco Rubio and Democratic Senator Mark Warner have reportedly been urging US President Joe Biden to take action regarding RISC-V, because, they fear that Chinese companies might make use of the open-source platform to improve their chips (芯片) technology. Maybe the legislators (立法者) do not realize that by targeting RISC-V they are targeting not only a company or a platform but the idea of openness itself. Being a US company. RISC-V has a global membership, with a number of Chinese and US enterprises as members. It has for long been known as an open-minded institution promoting technological cooperation despite the political tensions, and the US lawmakers targeting it seem to be closing one of the last channels of technology communication between China and their nation. By doing so they are harming the United States’ own interests and its technological leadership in the world. Open source is a good computing tool that benefits those who share programs as well as those who learn from it. The Android smartphone system, for example, has developed largely because Google decided to make it an open-source system, which attracted worldwide smartphone businesses to adopt its standard. The US lawmakers might next target GitHub, or, some day, even forbid programmers from accessing the Internet. That will only lead to the US losing its technological edge, never to get it back again. 1．What is RISC-V according to the passage? A．A website for programmers. B．A computer design standard. C．An open-source platform. D．A US chips company. 2．The first paragraph serves as a (n) ________. A．argument B．background C．proof D．connection 3．What does the author mainly emphasize about US targeting RISC-V? A．Fairness. B．Interests. C．Cooperation. D．Openness. 4．Which can be inferred from the passage? A．RISC-V enables processor innovation through open cooperation. B．US lawmakers are targeting RISC-V for the technology safety concern. C．The example of Android demonstrates the benefits of technological openness. D．GitHub and the Internet are the next target US will focus on to safeguard its leadership. 【答案】1．C 2．B 3．D 4．C 【解析】本文为一篇议论文，讨论美国意图关闭RISC-V这一开放平台来遏制中国芯片发展的行为影响了科研的开放性。 1．细节理解题。根据文章第一段“For all programmers and processor industry participants, the RISC-V website is almost a must-visit as an open standard. (对于所有程序员和处理器行业的参与者来说，RISC-V网站几乎是一个必须访问的开放标准。)”；第二段“Republican Senator Marco Rubio and Democratic Senator Mark Warner have reportedly been urging US President Joe Biden to take action regarding RISC-V, because, they fear that Chinese companies might make use of the open-source platform to improve their chips (芯片) technology. (据报道，共和党参议员马可·卢比奥和民主党参议员马克·华纳一直在敦促美国总统乔·拜登对RISC-V采取行动，因为他们担心中国公司可能会利用开源平台来改进他们的芯片技术。)”及第三段“Maybe the legislators do not realize that by targeting RISC-V they are targeting not only a company or a platform but the idea of openness itself. (也许立法者没有意识到，通过针对RISC-V，他们针对的不仅仅是一家公司或一个平台，而是开放的理念本身。)”可知，RISC-V不仅是美国的公司，还是开放的指令构建平台，它不仅限于一个网站和指令标准，也不是芯片公司，因此，它是一个开源平台。故选C。 2．推理判断题。根据文章第一段“For all programmers and processor industry participants, the RISC-V website is almost a must-visit as an open standard. Instruction Set Architecture, which is defined as the design of a computer from the programmer’s perspective, enabling a new era of processor innovation through open cooperation. (对于所有程序员和处理器行业的参与者来说，RISC-V网站几乎是一个必须访问的开放标准。指令集架构，它被定义为从程序员的角度设计计算机，通过开放合作实现处理器创新的新时代。)”可知，第一段介绍了RISC-V网站对程序员的研究的重要性，为了引入全文的背景知识。故选B。 3．细节理解题。根据文章第三段第一句“Maybe the legislators (立法者) do not realize that by targeting RISC-V they are targeting not only a company or a platform but the idea of openness itself. (也许立法者没有意识到，通过针对RISC-V，他们针对的不仅仅是一家公司或一个平台，而是开放的理念本身。)”讲美国针对RISC-V其实是针对开放性本身；第四段第二句“Open source is a good computing tool that benefits those who share programs as well as those who learn from it. (开源是一种很好的计算工具，对那些共享程序的人以及从中学习的人都有好处。)”说明科技开放性会惠及自身和其他人。由此可知，对于美国针对RISC-V，作者重点强调开放性。故选D。 4．推理判断题。根据文章倒数第二段“Open source is a good computing tool that benefits those who share programs as well as those who learn from it. The Android smartphone system, for example, has developed largely because Google decided to make it an open-source system, which attracted worldwide smartphone businesses to adopt its standard. (开源是一种很好的计算工具，对那些共享程序的人以及从中学习的人都有好处。例如，安卓智能手机系统的发展很大程度上是因为谷歌决定将其作为一个开源系统，吸引了全球智能手机企业采用其标准。)”可知，科技开放性对分享者和学习者都有好处，作者利用安卓系统的例子证明了这一点。故选C。 3 Human’s appetite for sand could increase 45 percent within four decades, according to researchers who say unchecked consumption risks environmental damage and shortages of a key material for urban expansion. Growing demand for building sand — which is used to make concrete, glass and other vital construction materials – has already seen the rise of sand pirates (盗贼) , with dozens of islands disappearing in Indonesia as a result of casual mining. Xiaoyang Zhong at Leiden University and his colleagues have calculated that global building sand demand will jump from 3.2 billion tonnes a year in 2020 to 4.6 billion tonnes by 2060. The figure is based on a central situation of future population rises and economic growth, and modelled using estimates of concrete and glass consumption, and the floor area needed in buildings.But there is no reliable estimate for remaining sand reserves, so it is unclear if the world can bear such a big increase. “Sand, and the sand crisis (危机), has been overlooked, creating severe environmental and social consequences. If we don’t act now, we may not have enough sand to develop our cities,” says Zhong. However, Zhong’s team found that about half the projected consumption in 2060 could be avoided if countries take a suit of measures, including extending the lifetime of buildings, reusing concrete, creating more lightweight building designs and using other materials, such as wooden frames. According to the model, the single biggest reduction in sand use could come from more efficient (有效的) use of space: distributing less floor space per person in buildings, sharing offices, and so on. “It’s hard to say how realistic these measures are. But we want this to happen,” says Zhong. The research only looked at sand used for glass and concrete in buildings, so is an underestimate of total future demand. Granular data on sand consumption for the 26 world regions studied is also lacking, and not detailed enough for country-level breakdowns. Failure to act will add existing environmental pressures on reserves of sand in lakes and rivers first, but absolute shortages shouldn't be overlooked, says Zhong. “It would be very questionable if this growing demand could be met,” he says. 1．What may cause the environmental and social effects according to Zhong? A．Sand reserves are not enough. B．The sand crisis is overestimated. C．Sand crisis isn’t paid much attention to. D．The construction industry is lack of sand. 2．How can we reduce the sand use most efficiently according to the study? A．By reusing he building materials. B．By lengthening the building’s lifetime. C．By making use of space more wisely. D．By preventing sand use completely. 3．What ‘s the shortcoming of the research? A．It only studied the sand use in 26 areas. B．It didn’t show the detailed data on sand use. C．It didn’t take realistic measures on sand use. D．It overlooked the total sand need in the future. 4．What does Zhong concern most about the sand crisis? A．How we will take action to stop it. B．Why its shortages are overlooked in most countries. C．Whether the increasing sand need may be satisfied. D．What damage the environmental pressures do to rivers. 【答案】1．C 2．C 3．D 4．C 【解析】本文是一篇说明文。研究人员称，人类对沙子的需求可能在未来40年飙升45%，他们认为不加节制的消费可能会破坏环境，并导致这种城市扩展的关键材料的短缺。 1．细节理解题。 根据第二段“Sand, and the sand crisis, has been overlooked, creating severe environmental and social consequences.”（沙子和沙子危机被忽视了，造成了严重的环境和社会后果）可知，是沙危机被忽视造成了严重的环境和社会后果，故选C。 2．细节理解题。根据第三段“the single biggest reduction in sand use could come from more efficient use of space”（更有效地利用空间可以最大程度地减少沙子的使用）可知，明智地利用空间能最大程度地减少沙子的使用量，故选C。 3．细节理解题。根据第四段“The research only looked at sand used for glass and concrete in buildings, so is an underestimate of total future demand.”（这项研究只关注了用于建筑玻璃和混凝土的沙子，因此低估了未来的总需求）可知，该研究的缺点是低估了未来沙子的总需求量，故选D。 4．推理判断题。根据最后一段Zhong说的话“It would be very questionable if this growing demand could be met”（这一不断增长的需求能否得到满足，将是一个非常值得怀疑的问题）可知，Zhong最担心的问题是沙子需求的激增能否能得到满足，故 选C。 4 For millions of years, Arctic sea ice has expanded and shrunk in a rhythmic dance with the summer sun. Humans evolved in this icy world, and civilization relied on it for climatic, ecological and political stability. But now the world comes ever closer to a future without ice. The National Snow and Ice Data Center reported that 2019’s minimum arctic sea ice extent was the second lowest on record. Arctic summers could become mostly ice-free in 30 years, and possibly sooner if current trends continue. As the northern sea ice declines, the world must unite to preserve what remains of the Arctic. Although most people have never seen the sea ice, its effects are never far away. By reflecting sunlight, Arctic ice acts as Earth’s air conditioner. Once dark water replaces brilliant ice, Earth could warm substantially, equivalent to the warming caused by the additional release of a trillion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere and declining sea ice threatens wildlife, from the polar bear to algae that grow beneath the sea ice, supporting the large amount of marine life. To avoid the consequences the scientific community should advocate not just for lowering greenhouse gas emissions, but also for protecting the Arctic from exploitation. The Antarctic shows the way. In the 1950s, countries raced to claim the Antarctic continent for resources and military installations. Enter the scientists. The 1957-1958 International Geophysical Year brought together scientists from competing countries to study Antarctica, and countries temporarily suspended their territorial disputes (争议). In 1959, 12 countries signed the Antarctic Treaty to preserve the continent for peaceful scientific discovery rather than territorial and military gain. Sixty years later, we must now save the Arctic. A new Marine Arctic Peace Sanctuary (MAPS) Treaty would protect the Arctic Ocean as a scientific preserve for peaceful purposes only. Similar to Antarctica, MAPS would prohibit resource exploitation, commercial fishing and shipping, and military exercises. So far, only 2 non-Arctic countries have signed MAPS; 97 more need to sign on to enact it into law. Scientists can help—just as they did for the Antarctic—by giving statements of support, asking scientific organizations to endorse (支持) the treaty, communicating the importance of protecting the arctic to the public and policy-makers, and above all, by convincing national leaders to sign the treaty. In particular, Arctic nations must agree that recognizing the arctic as an international preserve is better than fighting over it. In 2018, these countries successfully negotiated a 16-year moratorium on commercial fishing in the Arctic high seas, demonstrating that such agreements are possible. Humans have only ever lived in a world topped by ice. Can we now work together to protect Arctic ecosystems, keep the northern peace, and allow the sea ice to return? 1．What can be inferred from the passage? A．wildlife relies on sea ice for food and water. B．The Arctic would be ice-free in 30 years. C．Sea ice slows down the global warming. D．The melting of sea ice releases CO2. 2．The Antarctic is mentioned in the passage in order to ________. A．remind readers of the past of the Antarctic B．propose a feasible approach for the Arctic C．stress the importance of preserving sea ice D．recall how the Antarctic Treaty came into being 3．The word “moratorium” (in paragraph 4) is closest in meaning to ________. A．battle B．ban C．memo D．protection 4．Which of the following might be the best title of the passage? A．Antarctic: a Successful Comeback? B．Sea Ice and Global Warming C．Arctic: the Earth’s Future D．Life Without Ice? 【答案】1．C 2．B 3．B 4．D 【解析】这是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了北极的海冰在不断减少，如果不加以保护，未来将会出现基本无冰的现象，并指出了海冰的影响以及各国达成一致努力保护海冰。 1．推理判断题。根据第二段中“By reflecting sunlight, Arctic ice acts as Earth’s air conditioner. (通过反射阳光，北极冰起到了地球空调的作用)”可知，海冰减缓了全球变暖。故选C项。 2．推理判断题。根据第三段中“To avoid the consequences the scientific community should advocate not just for lowering greenhouse gas emissions, but also for protecting the Arctic from exploitation. The Antarctic shows the way. (为了避免这种后果，科学界不仅应该提倡降低温室气体排放，还应该提倡保护北极不被开发。南极就展示了这种办法)”可知，文中提到南极是为了展示一种保护北极可以效仿的方式。故选B项。 3．词义猜测题。根据倒数第二段中“In 2018, these countries successfully negotiated a 3-year moratorium on commercial fishing in the Arctic high seas, demonstrating that such agreements are possible. (2018年，这些国家通过谈判成功达成了在北极公海________商业捕鱼16年的协议，证明了此类协议是可能的)”由谈判成功，可知这些国家达成了在北极公海停止商业捕鱼16年的协议，moratorium意为“停止，禁止”，与ban意思最为接近。故选B项。 4．主旨大意题。根据第一段中“But now the world comes ever closer to a future without ice. The National Snow and Ice Data Center reported that 2019’s minimum arctic sea ice extent was the second lowest on record. Arctic summers could become mostly ice-free in 30 years, and possibly sooner if current trends continue. As the northern sea ice declines, the world must unite to preserve what remains of the Arctic. (但是现在世界越来越接近一个没有冰的未来。美国国家冰雪数据中心报告称，2019年北极海冰的最小范围是有记录以来第二低的。北极夏季将在30年内基本无冰，如果目前的趋势继续下去，时间可能会更早。随着北方海冰的减少，全世界必须团结起来保护北极的残余)”和最后一段中“Can we now work together to protect Arctic ecosystems, keep the northern peace, and allow the sea ice to return? (我们现在能共同努力保护北极生态系统，保持北极和平，让海冰恢复吗?)”可知，本文主要讲述了北极的海冰在不断减少，如果不加以保护，未来将会出现基本无冰的现象，并指出了海冰的影响以及各国达成一致努力保护海冰，因此本文的最佳标题选项D“没有冰的生活？”符合题意。故选D项。 5 The recent economic crisis should have resulted in a crisis in economics itself — specifically, in the dominant ideas about how economies work. The leading macroeconomic (宏观经济的) model failed not only to predict the crisis, but also claimed such a crisis couldn’t happen in markets where people made logical decisions. Policies based on this model helped create the very conditions for the collapse. For years, I’ve challenged this standard model by developing theories where individuals acting with clear judgment interact with imperfect and incomplete information. The results have been damaging for much of the conventional wisdom. For example, with Bruce Greenwald, I showed that Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” often failed to guide markets efficiently — not because it was hidden, but because it wasn’t there at all. Markets don’t function well when information is incomplete or unevenly shared, which is almost always the case. Working with Sanford Grossman, I argued that financial markets can’t be fully efficient in passing information from informed to uninformed participants. If they were, people would have no reason to seek out new information. And with Andrew Weiss, I demonstrated why credit rationing — where some borrowers are denied loans despite willingness to pay higher interest — is common. Lately, I’ve been exploring how these microeconomic (微观经济的) findings apply to macroeconomic issues like GDP, unemployment, and policies for economic stability. The financial crisis, along with the failure of policy efforts to restore full employment or restart lending, makes this research more urgent than ever. Building a new economic framework is a huge challenge. Fortunately, important pieces are already in place. One comes from studying market failures caused by imperfect information. Another is behavioral economics, which examines how real human behavior doesn’t match the predictions of traditional models. Old economic ideas tend to stay, even after being disproven, simply because their supporters stick around. But change is possible. At Columbia, we expose students to a variety of approaches. Many now question outdated theories and ask why they should spend time learning models that clearly don’t match reality. This gives me hope. Institutions like the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) are helping by offering resources and platforms that support this shift. With enough support, a better economic model may finally become reality. 1．What does the writer imply about Adam Smith’s theory of the “invisible hand”? A．It might hold true in markets that are heavily regulated. B．It is misleading as it’s based on rare real-world conditions. C．It remains influential despite offering limited practical value. D．It can be helpful for understanding certain market developments. 2．Which of the following reflects one of the author’s findings? A．Markets work well when people make logical decisions. B．Credit rationing disappears when interest rates increase. C．Financial markets cannot pass information to everyone. D．Most markets function efficiently with strong competition. 3．What can be inferred about the author’s attitude toward the economic education at Columbia? A．He believes students show little interest in theoretical economics. B．He thinks students need a better understanding of old economic ideas. C．He is worried that students are questioning popular economic models. D．He feels optimistic as students explore new economic perspectives. 4．What is the main idea of the passage? A．Traditional economic theories need to be revised to reflect how markets function. B．Behavioral economics has become the primary focus of teaching in top universities. C．Credit rationing is a factor in understanding how financial systems respond to crises. D．Economic crises cannot be fully explained by individuals’ poor financial choices alone. 【答案】1．B 2．C 3．D 4．A 【解析】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要讨论了当前经济学理论中存在的问题，特别是主流宏观经济学模型在预测和解释经济危机方面的失败。 1．推理判断题。根据文章第二段“For years, I’ve challenged this standard model by developing theories where individuals acting with clear judgment interact with imperfect and incomplete information. The results have been damaging for much of the conventional wisdom. For example, with Bruce Greenwald, I showed that Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” often failed to guide markets efficiently — not because it was hidden, but because it wasn’t there at all. Markets don’t function well when information is incomplete or unevenly shared, which is almost always the case. (多年来，我一直通过研究“个体在不完美、不完整信息中做出明确判断”的理论，挑战这一标准模型。研究结果对许多传统观点构成了冲击。例如，我与Bruce Greenwald的研究表明，Adam Smith的“看不见的手”常常无法有效引导市场——并非因为它“隐藏”了，而是因为它根本不存在。当信息不完整或分配不均时（这种情况几乎普遍存在），市场就无法良好运转。)”可知，“看不见的手”理论失效的核心原因是其依赖的“信息完整且均匀分布”的前提在现实中几乎不存在。因此，该理论基于罕见的理想条件，具有误导性。故选B。 2．细节理解题。根据文章第三段“Working with Sanford Grossman, I argued that financial markets can’t be fully efficient in passing information from informed to uninformed participants. (与Sanford Grossman合作时，我提出：金融市场无法完全有效地将信息从知情者传递给非知情者。)”可知，作者认为金融市场无法高效地将信息从知情者传递给非知情者，即无法将信息传递给所有人。故选C。 3．推理判断题。根据文章倒数第二段“At Columbia, we expose students to a variety of approaches. Many now question outdated theories and ask why they should spend time learning models that clearly don’t match reality. This gives me hope. (在哥伦比亚大学，我们让学生接触多种研究方法。许多学生现在开始质疑过时的理论，并追问为何要花时间学习明显与现实不符的模型。这给了我希望。)”可知，作者认为哥伦比亚大学让学生接触多种研究方法，学生开始质疑过时理论并反思传统模型的现实缺陷，而这一现象让作者感到充满希望，体现了作者对新教学方式及学生思维转变的乐观态度。故选D。 4．主旨大意题。根据文章内容可知，全文围绕主流经济模型的缺陷展开，指出其未能预测经济危机的原因在于假设前提（如完全信息、理性决策）脱离现实。作者通过微观经济研究（如信息不完整导致市场失灵、金融市场信息传递低效）论证传统理论的不足，并强调构建新经济框架的必要性。同时提到哥伦比亚大学的教学改革和新经济研究机构对变革的推动，核心主旨是传统经济理论需修正以反映市场真实运行机制。选项A“Traditional economic theories need to be revised to reflect how markets function. (传统经济理论需修订以反映市场运作。)”涵盖“批判旧理论”和“呼吁新框架”的全文核心，符合“信息不完整”、“行为经济学”等关键论述。故选A。 6 Now controversial new technologies promise parents even more control over their embryos (胚胎) . Today, a lot of those “designer babies” are teenagers. And some families are discovering that things don’t always work out as planned; The kids feel like walking science experiments; the parents are disappointed in how their children turned out. Fertility (生育) businesses are selling a chance of domestic welfare, and these families feel cheated. People who have children this way often place too much importance on genes while ignoring the environment. It’s like, “This is what our family is going to look like. We’re going to pick a kid, and this is how we're going to put it together,” It’s like a project or building a company. People don’t always realize they are creating a human being and not a piece of furniture. They tend to get what they want and don’t hear “no” a lot. So when their kid shows up and isn't the way that they want, what happens? Usually, it’s a disaster. In these homes, a high value gets placed on achievement. I think the way these kids are created sends the message: “You’re not good enough. You need to achieve.” When the kids struggle, it’s especially devastating. The child grows up feeling very different, knowing they were an experiment but not getting the proper support or acceptance they need to grow. In my work, I help parents accept: This is the child you have. I help them make abstract concepts more concrete. Sometimes just explaining “you and your child are not the same person” does the trick. And I help kids accept the reality of their parents. Or say a teenager doesn’t feel loved. I might need to clarify to them that “love” is not a tangible feeling, like getting kicked. It means someone feels fondness toward you like you feel fondness toward candies or toys. Trying to control your child is a recipe for disaster. The kid is going to rebel (反抗) . I don’t know if anyone’s making sure parents understand that they can’t test-drive a child and then return it. You probably can predict stocks, but human behavior has far too many variables. 1．What does the author stress regarding “designer babies” in paragraph 1? A．The high expectations from their parents. B．The psychological impact on their families. C．The intentional cheating from fertility businesses. D．The moral issues surrounding genetic engineering. 2．What is a common problem for families with “designer babies”? A．The children often rebel against their parents. B．The parents are too focused on genetic perfection. C．The children feel like they are science experiments. D．The parents are unable to afford to raise their children. 3．What does the underlined word “devastating” in paragraph 3 mean? A．Confusing. B．Doubtful. C．Challenging. D．Harmful. 4．What is the author’s suggestion for parents of “designer babies”? A．Invest more in genetic research. B．Accept their children as they are. C．Focus more on their children’s achievements. D．Seek professional help to shape their children. 【答案】1．B 2．B 3．D 4．B 【解析】这是一篇议论文。文章通过分析“设计婴儿”引发的家庭问题，探讨基因技术与家庭教育的伦理冲突，并提出倡导接纳孩子本真的观点。 1．细节理解题。根据第一段“And some families are discovering that things don’t always work out as planned; The kids feel like walking science experiments; the parents are disappointed in how their children turned out.(一些家庭发现事情并不总是按计划进行；孩子们感觉自己像行走的科学实验品；父母对孩子的成长感到失望)”可知，作者强调“设计婴儿”给家庭带来的心理影响，包括孩子的自我认知偏差和父母的失望情绪。故选B。 2．细节理解题。根据第二段“People who have children this way often place too much importance on genes while ignoring the environment.(通过这种方式生育孩子的人往往过于重视基因而忽视环境)”可知，这类家庭的共同问题是父母过于关注基因完美，将孩子视为可设计的“项目”而非独立个体。故选B。 3．词句猜测题。根据第三段 “ When the kids struggle, it’s especially devastating. The child grows up feeling very different, knowing they were an experiment but not getting the proper support or acceptance they need to grow.(当孩子们陷入困境时，这尤其devastating。孩子在成长过程中会感觉自己与他人截然不同，他们知道自己是实验的产物，却无法获得成长所需的适当支持或接纳)”可知，父母对成就的过度重视导致孩子在受挫时受到严重伤害，所以猜测devastating意为“毁灭性的、有害的”，与D项Harmful一致。故选D。 4．推理判断题。根据第四段“In my work, I help parents accept: This is the child you have. I help them make abstract concepts more concrete. Sometimes just explaining ‘you and your child are not the same person’ does the trick.(在我的工作中，我帮助父母接受一个事实：这就是你拥有的孩子。我帮助他们将抽象的概念变得更具体。有时，仅仅解释‘你和你的孩子不是同一个人’就能解决问题)”可推知，作者建议父母接受孩子的本真而非试图控制其基因或成长轨迹。故选B。 7 In modern society, people often measure life value through material achievements: high salaries, prestigious job titles, or luxurious possessions. However, ancient philosophers like Socrates argued that “the unexamined life is not worth living,” suggesting true value lies in continuous self-reflection and intellectual growth. Recent studies reveal an intriguing paradox: individuals who prioritize personal fulfillment over external validation report 37% higher life satisfaction. Take Dr. Maya Lin for an example: she was a scientist who abandoned a lucrative corporate career to research renewable energy in rural communities. Though her income dropped significantly, she described her work as “a daily discovery of purpose.” This aligns with psychologist Abraham Maslow’s theory that self-actualization — not basic needs — defines peak human experiences. Cultural perspectives further complicate this discussion. In Eastern traditions, Confucianism emphasizes contributing to societal harmony. A 2024 survey showed 68% of Japanese youth view “fulfilling family duties” as central to life value, contrasting with Western emphasis on individualism. Yet Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous words —“Life’s most urgent question is: what are you doing for others?” — bridge this gap, proposing that personal growth and social responsibility are inseparable. Ultimately, defining life value requires balancing three elements: self-awareness, contribution to others, and adaptability in changing circumstances. As technology accelerates societal shifts, the ability to redefine one’s purpose may become humanity’s greatest wealth. 1．What is the main topic discussed in the passage? A．Various perspectives on life value. B．Cultural differences in educational systems. C．Historical views on wealth accumulation. D．Psychological theories of happiness. 2．According to the author, what brings genuine fulfillment? A．High social status. B．Luxurious possessions. C．Self-awareness and purpose. D．Technological advancements. 3．Why does the author mention Martin Luther King Jr.? A．To contrast Eastern and Western values. B．To demonstrate universal aspects of life value. C．To criticize materialistic lifestyles. D．To explain Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. 4．The word “aligns” most likely means __________. A．Conflicts B．measures C．complicates D．agrees 5．Which statement would the author most likely agree with? A．Adaptability enhances life’s meaningfulness. B．Social media popularity reflects true self-worth. C．Life value should be measured by material achievements levels. D．Traditional values are outdated in modern society. 【答案】1．A 2．C 3．B 4．D 5．A 【解析】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要讨论了不同视角下的人生价值。 1．主旨大意题。根据第一段“In modern society, people often measure life value through material achievements: high salaries, prestigious job titles, or luxurious possessions. However, ancient philosophers like Socrates argued that “the unexamined life is not worth living,” suggesting true value lies in continuous self-reflection and intellectual growth. (在现代社会，人们常常通过物质成就来衡量人生价值：高薪、声望高的职位或奢侈的财产。然而，像苏格拉底这样的古代哲学家认为，“未经审视的人生不值得过”，这表明真正的价值在于不断的自我反思和智力成长。)”、第三段中“Cultural perspectives further complicate this discussion. (文化视角使这一讨论更加复杂。)”以及最后一段中“Ultimately, defining life value requires balancing three elements: self-awareness, contribution to others, and adaptability in changing circumstances. (最终，定义人生价值需要平衡三个要素：自我意识、对他人的贡献以及在变化环境中的适应能力。)”可知，文章主要讨论了关于人生价值的不同观点。故选A。 2．推理判断题。根据第二段中“Recent studies reveal an intriguing paradox: individuals who prioritize personal fulfillment over external validation report 37% higher life satisfaction. (最近的研究揭示了一个有趣的悖论：那些将个人成就感置于外部认可之上的人，其生活满意度要高出37%。)”以及“Though her income dropped significantly, she described her work as “a daily discovery of purpose.” (尽管收入大幅下降，但她将自己的工作描述为 “每天都在发现目标”。)”可知，作者认为自我意识和目标能带来真正的满足感。故选C。 3．推理判断题。根据第三段“Cultural perspectives further complicate this discussion. In Eastern traditions, Confucianism emphasizes contributing to societal harmony. A 2024 survey showed 68% of Japanese youth view “fulfilling family duties” as central to life value, contrasting with Western emphasis on individualism. Yet Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous words —“Life’s most urgent question is: what are you doing for others?” — bridge this gap, proposing that personal growth and social responsibility are inseparable. (文化视角使这一讨论更加复杂。在东方传统中，儒家思想强调为社会和谐做贡献。2024年的一项调查显示，68%的日本年轻人将“履行家庭责任”视为人生价值的核心，这与西方强调个人主义形成对比。然而，马丁・路德・金的名言——“生命最紧迫的问题是：你为他人做了什么？”—— 弥合了这一差距，提出个人成长与社会责任不可分割。)”可知，作者提到马丁·路德·金是为了展示人生价值的普遍方面。故选B。 4．词句猜测题。根据第二段中“Though her income dropped significantly, she described her work as “a daily discovery of purpose.” This aligns with psychologist Abraham Maslow’s theory that self-actualization—not basic needs—defines peak human experiences. (尽管收入大幅下降，但她将自己的工作描述为“每天都在发现目标”。这aligns心理学家亚伯拉罕·马斯洛的理论，即自我实现——而非基本需求——定义了人类的巅峰体验。)”可知，尽管收入大幅下降，但她将自己的工作描述为“每天都在发现目标”，这与心理学家亚伯拉罕・马斯洛的理论一致，所以aligns意为“符合”。与agrees意思相近。故选D。 5．推理判断题。根据最后一段中“Ultimately, defining life value requires balancing three elements: self-awareness, contribution to others, and adaptability in changing circumstances. As technology accelerates societal shifts, the ability to redefine one’s purpose may become humanity’s greatest wealth. (最终，定义人生价值需要平衡三个要素：自我认知、对他人的贡献，以及在变化环境中的适应能力。随着技术加速社会变革，重新定义个人目标的能力可能成为人类最宝贵的财富。)”可知，作者认为适应能力增强生活的意义。故选A。 8 For centuries, what makes human creativity so precious is not only the final products it yields, but also the effort behind their creation. But in a world where AI can generate anything with the click of a button, how do we distinguish what truly matters? How does human-made art survives? Throughout history, the most famous works of art, literature, and music have carried a sense of labor, dedication, and mastery. We don’t just admire the end product; we admire how it came to be. Masterpieces like Van Gogh’s “Starry Night” sustain not simply for their artistic beauty, but for the human stories they carry. They remind us that art is not just about beauty or skill — it is about intention, persistence, and what makes us human. As AI floods the world with instant beauty, we’re entering an era of “aesthetic inflation”, where perfectly composed images, poetic style, and movie-like storytelling are available to anyone, instantly and at no cost. This makes us think about when beauty is effortless and endless, does human creations still have value? But human imperfection isn’t a weakness — it’s part of who we are, shaping our understanding of humanity. Our struggles, mistakes, and limitations aren’t just difficulties to overcome — they’re part of what gives life meaning. In this light, AI’s ability to create perfect art feels almost unnatural—a rejection of the struggle that gives creativity its weight. It may achieve technical perfection — but at the cost of the original energy that makes art stir feelings within people. Even at its most impressive, AI-generated art often feels empty. It has no real emotions or experiences, and no clear creator, failing to create unexpected surprises and arouse shared emotion with audience. Therefore, to preserve meaning, selection and context become more crucial. As AI can produce endless content, the human elements like context, narrative and the reasoning behind art become the true value source. Also, AI can be a creative collaborator rather than a replacement, refining ideas while keeping human imperfection and feeling, and acting as an amplifier (放大镜) of human vision. 1．Why do masterpieces like “Starry Night” remain valuable in the AI era? A．They represent unique human characteristics. B．They showcase brilliant artistic creation skill. C．They are created through long production processes. D．They contain human emotional depth and creative effort. 2．Why does the author mention “aesthetic inflation” in paragraph 3? A．To demonstrate AI’s efficiency in art creation. B．To prove that AI-generated art is more affordable. C．To criticize the overuse of technology in art creation. D．To stress the devaluation of beauty due to mass production. 3．How does the author develop the argument in the passage? A．By giving examples. B．By giving definitions. C．By making comparisons. D．By making classifications. 4．What is a suitable title for the text? A．A Guide to Perfect Art with AI B．How to Create Art in the Age of AI C．Why Human Art Still Matters in the AI Age D．A New Revolution in Art Creation brought by AI 【答案】1．D 2．D 3．C 4．C 【解析】本文是一篇议论文。文章探讨了在人工智能时代，人类艺术如何存续，指出人类艺术因包含情感深度和创作努力而仍具价值，AI可作为创作伙伴。 1．细节理解题。根据第二段中“Masterpieces like Van Gogh’s “Starry Night” sustain not simply for their artistic beauty, but for the human stories they carry. They remind us that art is not just about beauty or skill — it is about intention, persistence, and what makes us human.(像梵高的《星夜》这样的杰作之所以经久不衰，不仅仅是因为它们的艺术之美，还因为它们承载着人类的故事。它们提醒我们，艺术不仅仅关乎美或技巧——它关乎意图、坚持以及使我们成为人类的东西)”可知，《星夜》等杰作在人工智能时代仍有价值是因为它们承载着人类的故事，包含人类的情感深度和创作努力。故选D项。 2．推理判断题。根据第三段中“As AI floods the world with instant beauty, we’re entering an era of “aesthetic inflation”, where perfectly composed images, poetic style, and movie like storytelling are available to anyone, instantly and at no cost. This makes us think about when beauty is effortless and endless, does human creations still have value?(随着人工智能用即时之美充斥世界，我们正在进入一个“审美通胀”的时代，在这个时代，完美构图的图像、诗意的风格和电影般的叙事任何人都可以即时免费获得。这让我们思考，当美来得轻而易举且无穷无尽时，人类的创作还有价值吗?)”可知，作者提到“审美通胀”是为了强调由于大规模生产导致美的贬值。故选D项。 3．推理判断题。根据第四段中“Our struggles, mistakes, and limitations aren’t just difficulties to overcome — they’re part of what gives life meaning. In this light, AI’s ability to create perfect art feels almost unnatural—a rejection of the struggle that gives creativity its weight. It may achieve technical perfection—but at the cost of the original energy that makes art stir feelings within people. Even at its most impressive, AI generated art often feels empty. It has no real emotions or experiences, and no clear creator, failing to create unexpected surprises and arouse shared emotion with audience.(我们的奋斗、错误和局限不仅仅是需要克服的困难——它们是赋予生命意义的一部分。从这个角度看，人工智能创造完美艺术的能力几乎显得不自然——它拒绝了赋予创造力以分量的奋斗。它可能实现技术上的完美，但却以牺牲那种能让艺术在人们心中激起情感的原始活力为代价。即使在最令人印象深刻的时候，人工智能生成的艺术也常常让人感觉空洞。它没有真实的情感或体验，也没有明确的创作者，无法创造出意想不到的惊喜，也无法引起观众的共鸣)”可知，文章将人类艺术和人工智能生成的艺术进行了对比，由此推知，作者是通过作比较来展开论述的。故选C项。 4．主旨大意题。通读全文，结合第一段中“But in a world where AI can generate anything with the click of a button, how do we distinguish what truly matters? How does human made art survives?(但在一个人工智能只需点击一下按钮就能生成任何东西的世界里，我们如何区分真正重要的东西呢?人类制作的艺术如何存续呢?)”和第二段中“They remind us that art is not just about beauty or skill — it is about intention, persistence, and what makes us human.(像它们提醒我们，艺术不仅仅关乎美或技巧——它关乎意图、坚持以及使我们成为人类的东西)”以及后文对人类艺术价值的阐述可知，本文主要探讨了在人工智能时代人类艺术为何仍然重要。故C项“Why Human Art Still Matters in the AI Age(为什么在人工智能时代人类艺术仍然重要)”能概括文章内容，最适合做文章标题。故选C项。 9 I watch documentaries, not movies. I read history books, not fiction. I use every free moment to accomplish one of the tasks on my never-ending checklist, and I am completely filled with thoughts of productivity. An hour sleeping is an hour wasted. And like the rest of 21st century America, I like it. But this fixation (固恋) on productivity is increasingly destroying character and transforming men into robots. New York Times columnist David Brooks warned American University students of this cultural decline in a speech. “We cut off all things spiritual and emotional in a competitive urge to stand out”, he said, “The pressure to succeed professionally, to acquire skills, to do the things you need to do to succeed in an information age economy really became the overwhelming (难以应付的) pressure, and it sort of eclipses the thinking about character and morality.” Many students happily go to college, viewing it as a next step on their rise to professional achievement. Forcing as many success-building activities into their schedules as they can, they enjoy keeping busy with little sleep. “Today’s outstanding kids are likely to spend their afternoons and weekends shuttling from one skill-improving activity to the next,” Brooks wrote in an article, “We fear failure more than we desire success.” A century ago, college was about character building. Today, our characters are in decline. We are experts on economics, material things and professional skills. We fail to discuss and understand relationships, emotions and all things spiritual. Philosophers Karl Popper divided the world into two categories: Clocks and Clouds. Clock problems are those that can be taken apart, examined and solved through deductive reasoning (演绎推理). Clouds cannot be taken apart. Cloud problems represent whole systems that need to be understood in a different way. “When we have a Cloud problem, we try to turn into a Clock problem,” Brooks said. And in a reason-centered culture, adding titles to one’s resume becomes a trend. At American University, 85 percent of seniors (and 89 percent of business majors) graduate with at least one practical experience which is often helpful to a student’s future career, but can sometimes draw focus away from academics. To prevent the death of man’s character, Brooks urges rediscovering our human matures through falling in love. And by love he means love for a task, job, or another person. “Synchronicity (同步性) is key to happiness,” he said. Rather than crazily increasing our long lists of accomplishments, we need to lose ourselves in what we do, and success will come on its own. 1．From Paragraph 1, we can learn that people ________. A．are controlled by time B．are keen on reading books C．are eager to achieve more D．are changing their characters 2．According to Brooks’ warning, what is the ultimate consequence of emphasizing professional success? A．A society driven by emotional intelligence. B．A stronger focus on academic excellence. C．A loss of moral and spiritual depth in individuals. D．An increase in collaborative problem-solving skills. 3．Paragraph 4 is mainly developed by ________. A．making comparisons B．following the time order C．giving examples D．analyzing causes 4．The last paragraph mainly tells us that ________. A．love is more important than focus B．the focus on human natures counts C．more work contributes to happiness D．success comes from devotion to work. 5．The purpose of this passage is to ________. A．raise awareness to character building B．stress the importance of productivity C．warn about the pressure to seek success D．criticize students’ desire for achievements 【答案】1．C 2．C 3．A 4．D 5．A 【解析】本文是一篇议论文，主要讨论了现代社会对生产力的过度重视导致人们性格的缺失，并通过Brooks的观点呼吁重视品格培养。 1．推理判断题。第一段中提到“I use every free moment to accomplish one of the tasks on my never - ending checklist, and I am completely filled with thoughts of productivity. An hour sleeping is an hour wasted(我利用每一个空闲的时间来完成我永无止境的清单上的一个任务，我完全充满了效率的想法。睡觉一小时就是浪费一小时)” 说明人们利用每一刻空闲时间去完成任务，认为睡觉是浪费时间。由此推知，人们渴望取得更多成就。故选C项。 2．细节理解题。根据第二段的句子“The pressure to succeed professionally, to acquire skills, to do the things you need to do to succeed in an information age economy really became the overwhelming (难以应付的) pressure, and it sort of eclipses the thinking about character and morality(在职业上取得成功的压力，获得技能的压力，在信息时代经济中取得成功所需要做的事情的压力，真的变成了压倒性的压力，它在某种程度上掩盖了对品格和道德的思考)”可知，强调职业成功的最终后果是个人在道德和精神层面的深度缺失。故选C项。 3．推理判断题。根据第四段的内容“A century ago, college was about character building. Today, our characters are in decline. We are experts on economics, material things and professional skills. We fail to discuss and understand relationships, emotions and all things spiritual. Philosophers Karl Popper divided the world into two categories: Clocks and Clouds. Clock problems are those that can be taken apart, examined and solved through deductive reasoning (演绎推理). Clouds cannot be taken apart. Cloud problems represent whole systems that need to be understood in a different way.(一个世纪前，大学教育的核心是品格塑造。如今，我们的品格却在衰退。我们精于经济学、物质财富与专业技能，却疏于探讨和理解人际关系、情感及一切精神层面的存在。哲学家卡尔·波普尔将世界划分为两类：钟表与云。钟表问题可被拆解、分析并通过演绎推理解决；而云无法被拆解——云问题代表需要以不同方式理解的完整系统)”可知，第4段通过对比“百年前大学教育注重品格培养”与“如今品格衰退”，并引入“Clocks vs. Clouds”的哲学分类，属于比较分析。故选A。 4．主旨大意题。最后一段提到“Rather than crazily increasing our long lists of accomplishments, we need to lose ourselves in what we do, and success will come on its own(与其疯狂地堆砌成就清单，不如全身心投入所做之事，成功自会水到渠成)” ，强调我们不应疯狂追求成就清单，而应投入到所做的事情中，成功会自然到来，即成功来自对工作的投入。故选D项。 5．推理判断题。通读全文，并结合第一段“But this fixation (固恋) on productivity is increasingly destroying character and transforming men into robots.(但这种对生产力的执着正日益摧毁人的性格，把人变成机器人)”，第四段“A century ago, college was about character building. Today, our characters are in decline. (一个世纪前，大学教育的核心是品格塑造。如今，我们的品格却在衰退)”和最后一段“(To prevent the death of man’s character, Brooks urges rediscovering our human matures through falling in love.为了防止人类性格的死亡，布鲁克斯敦促人们通过恋爱来重新发现人类的成熟)”可知，文章通过阐述现代社会人们对生产力的过度追求导致品格下降的现象，最后呼吁人们重新发现人性，投入工作，目的是唤起人们对品格培养的意识。故选A项。 10 A growing number of companies are building humanoid robots, and these mechanical look-alikes are starting to appear in car factories and delivery places. Some businesses even promise robots for home use. Yet one big question still has no answer: Why bother? Why make a robot in a human shape when it could take any imaginable form? The usual answer is that humanoid robots could, in principle, handle any physical jobs a person can. But that “in principle” is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If you’ve watched videos of these robots, you’ll get it — they’re often clumsy, awkward machines. Sure, the technology helping them stand and move has come a long way, but they’re still not as quick or graceful as humans. Meanwhile, robots built for a single job — like an arm shifting goods between conveyor belts (传送带) — are now commonplace. Designed with one purpose, they do it really well, unlike humanoid robots, which aim to do everything but often master nothing. Another argument is that a human shape makes it easier for people to work with or control robots. This holds some water, especially since many of these machines still need skilled human operators. Companies often avoid admitting this, calling it a short-term phase, but the dream of fully independent, AI-powered humanoid robots — ones that match or beat human workers — remains a long shot. For now, what we’ve got are human-shaped shells guided by people behind the scenes. When Elon Musk introduced Tesla’s Optimus robot in 2021, he proudly claimed it could teach, babysit, walk dogs, fetch groceries, or pour drinks. Yet those robots weren’t AI-driven, and each was controlled by a hidden human. Notice a pattern? These tasks—low-wage, service-oriented jobs — suggest that, for now, humanoid robots just mask human effort with a shiny surface. Some remote-controlled robots serve real purposes, like in deep-sea exploration. But those machines aren’t shaped like humans — they look like capsules or small vehicles, and they work just fine. The idea that robots must be human-shaped is a failure of imagination. Yes, humanoid robots look impressive. They remind us of the fantasies in science fictions where machines handle all difficult tasks. But today, they are mostly marketing tools, masking human labor. And a robot that doesn’t truly improve life is missing the point. 1．What does the underlined phrase “holds some water” mean in paragraph 3? A．Provides sufficient evidence. B．Makes much sense. C．Is partly reasonable. D．Is widely accepted. 2．Why does the author mention Tesla’s Optimus robot? A．To prove humanoid robots are better. B．To highlight its impressive technology. C．To show it can replace human workers. D．To suggest it is in the charge of humans. 3．What is the author’s attitude toward humanoid robots? A．Skeptical. B．Optimistic. C．Neutral. D．Cautious. 4．What is the best title for the passage? A．When Humanoid Robots Miss Potential B．How Humanoid Robots Miss Goals C．What Humanoid Robots Lack Now D．Why Humanoid Robots Fall Short 【答案】1．C 2．D 3．A 4．D 【解析】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要讨论了人形机器人存在的问题及缺陷。 1．词句猜测题。根据第三段中“Another argument is that a human shape makes it easier for people to work with or control robots.(另一种观点认为，人类的形态使人们更容易与机器人合作或控制机器人) ”以及划线单词所在的句子“especially since many of these machines still need skilled human operators.(尤其是考虑到许多这样的机器仍然需要熟练的人类操作员)”可知，另一种观点认为，人类的外形让人们更容易与机器人合作或控制机器人，特别是考虑到许多这样的机器仍然需要熟练的人类操作员，这有一定道理，因此，划线短语“holds some water”意思是“有一定道理”。故选C。 2．推理判断题。根据第三段中“When Elon Musk introduced Tesla’s Optimus robot in 2021, he proudly claimed it could teach, babysit, walk dogs, fetch groceries, or pour drinks. Yet those robots weren’t AI-driven, and each was controlled by a hidden human.(2021年，当埃隆·马斯克介绍特斯拉的Optimus机器人时，他自豪地宣称，它可以教学、照顾孩子、遛狗、取杂货或倒饮料。然而，这些机器人并不是人工智能驱动的，每个机器人都由一个隐藏的人控制)”可推知，作者提到特斯拉的Optimus机器人是为了表明它是由人类控制的。故选D。 3．推理判断题。根据最后一段“Yes, humanoid robots look impressive. They remind us of the fantasies in science fictions where machines handle all difficult tasks. But today, they are mostly marketing tools, masking human labor. And a robot that doesn’t truly improve life is missing the point.(是的，人形机器人看起来令人印象深刻。它们让我们想起科幻小说中的幻想，机器可以处理所有困难的任务。但在今天，它们大多是营销工具，掩盖了人类的劳动。一个不能真正改善生活的机器人是没有意义的)”可推知，作者对人形机器人持怀疑态度。故选A。 4．主旨大意题。根据第一段“A growing number of companies are building humanoid robots, and these mechanical look-alikes are starting to appear in car factories and delivery places. Some businesses even promise robots for home use. Yet one big question still has no answer: Why bother? Why make a robot in a human shape when it could take any imaginable form?(越来越多的公司正在制造人形机器人，这些机械外观相似的机器人开始出现在汽车工厂和送货地点。一些企业甚至承诺将机器人用于家庭。然而，一个大问题仍然没有答案：为什么要费心呢？既然机器人可以采取任何想象的形式，为什么还要把它做成人的形状呢？)”以及结合全文可知，本文主要讨论了人形机器人虽然看起来令人印象深刻，但目前大多只是营销工具，掩盖了人类的劳动，并没有真正改善生活。文章分析了人们制造人形机器人的原因，并指出其存在的问题。可知，D选项“为什么人形机器人达不到预期”最符合文章标题。故选D。 11 Do teenagers need to relax? Increasingly not just parents are seeking a break from work and family pressures but adolescents too, coping with “intense schooling and sports programmes”. So much so that the Global Wellness Summit identifies teen wellness as a trend for 2025 with the industry focusing on teenagers’ emotional intelligence, resilience, and how to survive in a digital world through resorts, retreats, and mental wellness apps. Rina Raphael, author of The Gospel of Wellness, tells me wellness—physical and mental health—has replaced the once-dominant fashion and beauty industries. McKinsey reports that Gen Z outspends older consumers on mindfulness-related wellness products such as meditation classes, mindfulness apps, and therapy sessions, even seeking preventive solutions to ageing-related health issues. One of the problems the wellness sector aims to address is mental health. Blame for the mental health crisis has been laid on smartphones. But apps also offer a solution. Many, like Chill Panda and HappiMe are on the UK’s CAMHS (child and adolescent mental health services) website and in demand. A study in The Lancet concluded bans or restrictions at school don’t lead to “better mental wellbeing in adolescents.” Parents have a role too. An intensive parenting often leaves children without examples of parents socialising or pursuing passions. There’s nothing bad about forming healthy habits. But is the wellness industry responding to—or contributing to—the pressures young people face? Think about the new toy package Mattel released five years ago: Wellness Barbie—a more glowing and relaxed version of Barbie and a product in training children to become consumers of wellness. And those baby massage classes dressed up as a wellbeing treatment to improve the infants’ mood and physical health struck me as ridiculous. What’s a baby got to worry about? The idea that experiences bought by parents and offered by the wellness industry solve adolescent anxiety seems unpromising at best. As Raphael points out, the problem with wellness is “it’s very much tied to productivity, aesthetics (美学) and consumerism. It adds a pressure that you have to be working on yourself.” But I can’t see it ending. After all, as Ronald Purser, author of McMindfulness, told me: “You can never be too well; that’s why it’s a massive growth industry”. 1．What could be counted as a wellness activity? A．Aiming for top grades nonstop. B．Practicing mindfulness using an app. C．Checking social media for attention. D．Skipping meals to manage body shape. 2．What is a possible reason for teen mental health issues? A．A demand for services. B．A passion for sports. C．A ban on mental health. D．A lack of role models. 3．What would Rina Raphael agree with most? A．The fashion and beauty industries matter more to Gen Z. B．Teenagers are pressured to consume wellness products. C．Wellness Barbie assists children’s adaptation. D．Baby massage classes are not effective as expected. 4．What’s author’s attitude towards the wellness industry? A．Hopeful. B．Calm. C．Critical. D．Pessimistic. 【答案】1．B 2．D 3．B 4．C 【解析】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要围绕青少年健康产业这一新兴现象，通过引用研究报告、专家观点和具体案例，分析了健康产业在应对青少年心理健康问题中的作用，同时也对其潜在的负面影响提出了质疑，突出理性思考、合理完善自我的核心价值引领。 1．细节理解题。根据第一段中“So much so that the Global Wellness Summit identifies teen wellness as a trend for 2025 with the industry focusing on teenagers’ emotional intelligence, resilience, and how to survive in a digital world through resorts, retreats, and mental wellness apps. (其受重视程度可见一斑——全球健康峰会已将青少年健康领域列为 2025 年的趋势热点，该行业正聚焦于提升青少年的情绪智力 (情商)、心理韧性，并致力于通过度假胜地、静修营地以及心理健康类应用程序等途径，助力青少年在数字化世界中更好地适应与成长)”、第二段中“McKinsey reports that Gen Z outspends older consumers on mindfulness-related wellness products such as meditation classes, mindfulness apps, and therapy sessions, even seeking preventive solutions to ageing-related health issues. (麦肯锡报告指出，Z世代在正念相关健康产品 (如冥想课程、正念应用程序和心理咨询疗程)上的消费支出超过年龄更大的消费群体，他们甚至会寻求针对衰老相关健康问题的预防性解决方案)”可知，使用正念应用程序属于健康养生活动，而其他选项如追求高分、检查社交媒体或节食减肥并不符合健康养生活动的定义。故选B。 2．推理判断题。根据第三段中“An intensive parenting often leaves children without examples of parents socialising or pursuing passions. (密集型育儿常常使孩子缺乏父母社交或追求兴趣爱好的榜样)”可知，作者提到青少年心理健康问题的一个可能原因是缺乏榜样。故选D。 3．推理判断题。根据第五段中“As Raphael points out, the problem with wellness is “it’s very much tied to productivity, aesthetics (美学) and consumerism. It adds a pressure that you have to be working on yourself.” (正如拉斐尔所指出的，健康产业的问题在于“它与生产力、美学以及消费主义紧密相连。这增添了一种压力，即你不得不一直致力于自我提升。”)”可知，Rina Raphael认为青少年面临消费健康产品的压力。故选B。 4．推理判断题。根据第四段中“And those baby massage classes dressed up as a wellbeing treatment to improve the infants’ mood and physical health struck me as ridiculous. What’s a baby got to worry about? (那些婴儿按摩课程伪装成一种健康治疗，以改善婴儿的情绪和身体健康，这让我觉得很荒谬。婴儿有什么好担心的？)”以及第五段中“It adds a pressure that you have to be working on yourself. (它增加了一种压力，让你觉得必须不断改善自己)”可知，作者对健康养生行业持批评态度。故选C。 12 When you’re driving around the same block, keeping searching, because there’s nowhere to park your car, any suggestion that America devotes too much space to parking might seem foolish. But consider this: in a typical year, the country builds more three-car garages than one-bedroom apartments. Even the crowded cities reserve lots of street space to store private vehicles. And local laws across the country require house and apartment builders to provide off-street parking, whether residents need it. Step back to assess the result: it’s obvious that more square footage is devoted to parking each car than to housing each person. That Americans like driving is hardly news, but all the above talking isn’t finding fault with cars. The complaint is about parking — or, more to the point, about everything we have given up for it. Over the years, cities and towns have torn down grand old structures to make way for it. All those 9-foot-by-18-foot rectangles of asphalt (柏油路) haven’t only damaged the environment or these once-valued architectural styles, but also upset the crucial social goal of housing affordability. This misplaced priority has put the country in a bind. For decades, even as rents rocketed and climate change worsened, the prevalence (盛行) of parking spaces discouraged anyone from noticing their social impact. But the parking space has been eating up our living space for sure, with or without our knowledge. Here an optimist may give the excuse that some of the country’s largest cities have no choice but to renegotiate the relationship among people, cars, and parking spaces. However, parking space’s conquering the city in the 20th century was already so complete that, in the 21st, people need to recognize that the rules have to change, and that the constant promotion of parking spaces is already weakening cities and crowding out other needs. Some of the most consequential social problems are the ones hiding in plain sight, but parking isn’t even hiding. It’s just everywhere — for us to take seriously. 1．In which section can we most probably read this passage? A．Travel. B．Features. C．Front page. D．Public welfare. 2．The underlined phrase in paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to _______. A．lead the country to trouble B．discourage residents from buying cars C．annoy the local residents D．weaken the country’s overall strength 3．What can we imply about parking space’s role in the 20th century cities? A．It failed to meet the growing parking demands. B．It completely dominated urban planning priorities. C．It was a necessary renegotiation by the city government. D．It unexpectedly brought about problems to people’s daily life. 4．What can be concluded from the passage? A．America should continue expanding parking though it is harmful. B．Cities in the 21st century should absolutely stop building more garages. C．Excessive parking space is damaging the society so it should be limited. D．Housing and other problems are not as urgent as insufficient parking space. 【答案】1．D 2．A 3．B 4．C 【解析】本文是一篇议论文。文章指出美国为停车分配了过多空间，这不仅破坏环境和建筑风格，还影响住房可负担性，呼吁改变规则，限制停车位。 1．推理判断题。通读全文，结合第二段中“The complaint is about parking — or, more to the point, about everything we have given up for it. All those 9 foot by 18 foot rectangles of asphalt haven’t only damaged the environment or these once valued architectural styles, but also upset the crucial social goal of housing affordability.(人们所抱怨的是停车问题——更确切地说，是我们为停车所放弃的一切。所有那些9英尺乘18英尺的柏油路面停车位，不仅破坏了环境和那些曾经备受珍视的建筑风格，还扰乱了住房可负担性这一至关重要的社会目标)”可推知，文章讨论了美国停车空间过多带来的一系列社会问题，如破坏环境、影响住房等，这与公共福利相关，所以文章最有可能出现在公共福利板块。故选D项。 2．词句猜测题。根据第二段中“All those 9 foot by 18 foot rectangles of asphalt haven’t only damaged the environment or these once valued architectural styles, but also upset the crucial social goal of housing affordability. This misplaced priority has put the country in a bind.(所有那些9英尺乘18英尺的柏油路面停车位，不仅破坏了环境和那些曾经备受珍视的建筑风格，还扰乱了住房可负担性这一至关重要的社会目标。这种错误的优先事项put the country in a bind)”的“damaged”、“upset”和“misplaced priority”可推知，过多的停车位带来了诸多问题，使国家陷入麻烦。所以“put the country in a bind”意思是“让国家陷入麻烦”，与“lead the country to trouble”同义。故选A项。 3．推理判断题。根据最后一段中“However, parking space’s conquering the city in the 20th century was already so complete that, in the 21st, people need to recognize that the rules have to change, and that the constant promotion of parking spaces is already weakening cities and crowding out other needs.(然而，停车位在20世纪对城市的“占领”已然如此彻底，以至于到了21世纪，人们需要认识到相关规则必须改变，而且持续增加停车位的做法已经在削弱城市的发展，还排挤了其他方面的需求)”可推知，在20世纪，停车位完全主导了城市规划的优先事项。故选B项。 4．推理判断题。根据第二段中“The complaint is about parking — or, more to the point, about everything we have given up for it. All those 9 foot by 18 foot rectangles of asphalt haven’t only damaged the environment or these once valued architectural styles, but also upset the crucial social goal of housing affordability.(人们所抱怨的是停车问题——更确切地说，是我们为停车所放弃的一切。所有那些9英尺乘18英尺的柏油路面停车位，不仅破坏了环境和那些曾经备受珍视的建筑风格，还扰乱了住房可负担性这一至关重要的社会目标)”和最后一段“However, parking space’s conquering the city in the 20th century was already so complete that, in the 21st, people need to recognize that the rules have to change, and that the constant promotion of parking spaces is already weakening cities and crowding out other needs. Some of the most consequential social problems are the ones hiding in plain sight, but parking isn’t even hiding. It’s just everywhere — for us to take seriously.(然而，停车位在20世纪对城市的“占领”已然如此彻底，以至于到了21世纪，人们需要认识到相关规则必须改变，而且持续增加停车位的做法已经在削弱城市的发展，还排挤了其他方面的需求。一些最重要的社会问题隐藏在人们的视线中，但停车甚至没有隐藏。它无处不在，值得我们认真对待)”可推知，过多的停车位正在损害社会，应该加以限制。故选C项。 原创精品资源学科网独家享有版权，侵权必究！1 学科网（北京）股份有限公司1 / 1 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $