内容正文:
外刊阅读
Step 1: Reading
When you’re caught between ‘yes’ and ‘no,’ here’s why ‘maybe’ isn’t the way to go
当你在“去”与“不去”之间犹豫时,“再说吧”不是好答案
词数:430
改编自:对话
Article
Main idea
Getting a concert ticket is exciting—until your friend answers your invitation with a single word: “Maybe.” Suddenly your joy turns into anxiety. You cancel other plans, refresh your phone, and wait. By the time the friend finally says “No,” the only thing left is disappointment.
以“maybe”回复邀请引发焦虑与失望,引出话题。
As a consumer psychologist, I have spent ten years studying how people make social choices. Our new research shows that “maybe” is not neutral; it quietly damages relationships. In five experiments with 1,800 adults, we asked participants to imagine either sending or receiving an invitation. Again and again, two facts appeared.
作者以研究者身份亮出中心论点:“maybe”暗中伤害人际关系。
First, invitees overestimate how much hosts welcome a tentative answer. In one study, 62 % of guests thought the host would rather hear “maybe” than “no,” yet only 18 % of hosts agreed. Second, hosts feel more disrespected by a “maybe” than by a clear refusal. The delay signals, “Your event is my backup plan,” which most people find insulting.
揭示认知落差——客人高估“maybe”被欢迎度,主人却觉受辱。
Why do smart adults keep using this risky word? The reason is “motivated reasoning”—a biased way of thinking that protects our own wishes. A “maybe” keeps the invitee’s options open and postpones the pain of missing out. Saying “no” feels final, so the brain kindly rewrites the story: “The host probably prefers a soft answer anyway.”
解释人们仍用“maybe”的心理机制:动机性推理维护自身选择权。
Yet the illusion can be broken. When we asked invitees to spend thirty seconds taking the host’s perspective, the use of “maybe” dropped by 34 %. In another experiment, we described the event as “a charity meeting that starts at 7 a.m.” Because no one feared missing a dawn lecture, motivated reasoning disappeared; 83 % refused immediately.
实验证明换位思考可减少34 %“maybe”;当事件无吸引力时,动机性推理消失。
Recent work by other labs points in the same direction. A 2024 paper found that people expect hosts to feel “angry” or “hurt” after a refusal, but real hosts report only mild inconvenience. Another study ranked excuses: “I’m broke” wins more sympathy than “I’m busy,” probably because money problems seem less controllable.
补充其他研究——主人实际情绪比客人预期温和,具体理由影响同情度。
The lesson is simple but hard: clarity is kindness. A fast “no” gives the host time to invite someone else, sell the spare ticket, or simply stop checking the phone. It may feel awkward (尴尬的) for five seconds, yet it saves hours of limbo (悬而未决的状态) for everyone else. Next time you receive an invitation, remember that the word “maybe” is not a polite cushion; it is a hidden thorn (刺). Pull it out quickly, and the friendship will bleed far less.
总结号召——快速拒绝是善意。
Step 2: Exercise
【基础版 · 90 分学生】
1. What does the author mainly want to tell us?
A. Saying “maybe” is more polite than saying “no”.
B. Invitations should always be accepted to keep friendships.
C. A quick “no” is kinder than a long “maybe”.
D. Missing a concert is the worst thing for a host.
1. 2. The underlined word “tentative” in paragraph 3 probably means ______.
A. final B. unclear C. welcoming D. repeated
2. In the experiments, most hosts felt ______ when they got “maybe”.
A. respected B. excited C. disrespected D. curious
3. 3. What can reduce the use of “maybe” according to paragraph 5?
A. Telling invitees the event is early in the morning.
B. Giving invitees more time to decide.
C. Promising another gift to the guests.
D. Letting the host pay for the tickets.
4. 4. Which of the following is TRUE based on the text?
A. “I’m busy” wins more sympathy than “I’m broke”.
B. Real hosts usually feel only a little troubled by a refusal.
C. Motivated reasoning helps people make fair decisions.
D. The research surveyed only college students.
【提高版 · 130 分学生】
1. What is the primary purpose of the author in writing the passage?
A. To prove that rejections damage fewer friendships than ambiguity.
B. To encourage readers to attend every social event they are invited to.
C. To explain why people overestimate the negative impact of refusing.
D. To argue that motivated reasoning is unavoidable in daily life.
1. 2. The word “illusion” in paragraph 5 refers to the belief that ______.
A. hosts secretly prefer a soft refusal
B. guests are always honest with their friends
C. saying “maybe” keeps friendships safe
D. early events are unpopular with everyone
2. 3. Which of the following findings is mentioned as a complementary support to the author’s conclusion?
A. Excuses based on lack of money receive more understanding.
B. People who refuse early are usually excluded from future events.
C. Hosts feel angrier about a late “no” than an immediate “no”.
D. Motivated reasoning disappears when money is involved.
3. 4. By describing “maybe” as “a hidden thorn”, the author implies that it ______.
A. appears harmless but actually causes pain
B. protects the invitee from being blamed
C. should be pulled out and never used again
D. grows naturally in every friendship
4. 5. Which action would the author most probably recommend?
A. Reply “I’ll try” to keep your options open.
B. Always accept if you have no schedule conflict.
C. Put yourself in the host’s shoes and answer decisively.
D. Offer a financial excuse even when it is not true.
【答案与解析】
基础版
1. C 主旨题。文章反复强调快速拒绝比长久“也许”更体贴。
2. B 词义题。“tentative answer”指不确定的回答,即 unclear。
3. C 细节题。第三段末尾指出 host 觉得“maybe”是 insulting,对应 disrespected。
4. A 细节题。第五段早晨慈善会议实验使“maybe”使用率下降。
5. B 细节题。第六段指出 real hosts 只 feel mild inconvenience。
提高版
1. A 主旨题。作者对比“no”与“maybe”对关系的破坏,得出明确拒绝伤害更小。
2. C 指代题。“illusion”指被邀请者误以为“maybe”能保护友谊,其实相反。
3. A 细节题。第六段提到“I'm broke”比“I'm busy”更易获谅解,支持“直接拒绝后果没想象严重”的结论。
4. A 修辞题。thorn 看起来小却能刺人,与“maybe”表面礼貌实则伤人对应。
5. C 推断题。作者主张换位思考并给出明确答复,与第五段实验一致。
Step 3: Learning
1. anxious
重点:形容词→名词 anxiety 拼写易错;常考搭配 be anxious about/to do。
近义词:nervous, worried
反义词:calm, relaxed
形近词:anger(n. 愤怒)
拓展:
anxious (adj.)
├── anxiety (n.)
└── anxiously (adv.)
2. refuse
重点:动词→名词 refusal 拼写;与 reject 词义辨析。
近义词:reject, decline
反义词:accept, approve
形近词:refute(v. 反驳)
拓展:
refuse (v.)
├── refusal (n.)
└── refusable (adj.)
3. respect
重点:动词/名词;派生词 respectable respectful respectful 词义区分。
近义词:admire, honour
反义词:insult, despise
形近词:respective(adj. 分别的)
拓展:
respect (v./n.)
├── respectable (adj. 值得尊敬的)
├── respectful (adj. 恭敬的)
└── disrespect (n./v.)
4. prefer
重点:后接 doing/to do 结构;形容词 preferable;介词搭配 prefer A to B。
近义词:favour, like better
反义词:reject, dislike
形近词:offer(v. 提供)
拓展:
prefer (v.)
├── preference (n.)
├── preferable (adj.)
└── preferential (adj.)
5. polite
重点:形容词→副词 politely;词根 pol(i) 表“城市/文明”。
近义词:courteous, well-mannered
反义词:rude, impolite
形近词:police(n. 警察)
拓展:
polite (adj.)
├── politeness (n.)
├── impolite (adj.)
└── politely (adv.)
6. option
重点:名词→形容词 optional;与 choice 近义辨析。
近义词:choice, alternative
反义词:obligation, necessity
形近词:opinion(n. 意见)
拓展:
option (n.)
├── optional (adj.)
└── optionally (adv.)
7. final
重点:形容词→副词 finally;常考短语 make a final decision。
近义词:ultimate, last
反义词:initial, first
形近词:fine(adj. 好的)
拓展:
final (adj.)
├── finally (adv.)
├── finale (n. 终曲)
└── finalize (v. 最终确定)
8. mild
重点:形容词→副词 mildly;与 wild 拼写对比。
近义词:gentle, slight
反义词:severe, intense
形近词:wild(adj. 野的)
拓展:
mild (adj.)
├── mildly (adv.)
└── mildness (n.)
9. convenient
重点:形容词→名词 convenience;常考 It is convenient for sb. to do。
近义词:handy, accessible
反义词:inconvenient, troublesome
形近词:convention(n. 大会)
拓展:
convenient (adj.)
├── convenience (n.)
├── inconvenient (adj.)
└── conveniently (adv.)
10. avoid
重点:动词后接 doing;名词 avoidance 高频阅读词汇。
近义词:escape, evade
反义词:face, confront
形近词:void(adj. 空的)
拓展:
avoid (v.)
├── avoidance (n.)
└── unavoidable (adj.)
11. immediate
重点:形容词→副词 immediately;词根 med 表“中间”。
近义词:instant, prompt
反义词:delayed, slow
形近词:intermediate(adj. 中间的)
拓展:
immediate (adj.)
├── immediately (adv.)
├── immediacy (n.)
└── mediate (v. 调解)
12. damage
重点:动词/名词;与 destroy 程度辨析;派生 damaging。
近义词:harm, hurt
反义词:repair, benefit
形近词:dramatic(adj. 戏剧的)
拓展:
damage (v./n.)
├── damaging (adj.)
└── damages (n. 赔偿金)
13. conclude
重点:动词→名词 conclusion;常考 draw/reach a conclusion。
近义词:infer, deduce
反义词:doubt, begin
形近词:include(v. 包括)
拓展:
conclude (v.)
├── conclusion (n.)
├── conclusive (adj.)
└── inconclusive (adj.)
14. bias
重点:名词/动词;形容词 biased 拼写易错。
近义词:prejudice, partiality
反义词:fairness, impartiality
形近词:basis(n. 基础)
拓展:
bias (n./v.)
├── biased (adj.)
├── unbiased (adj.)
└── bias-free (adj.)
15. sympathy
重点:名词→形容词 sympathetic;搭配 feel sympathy for。
近义词:pity, compassion
反义词:cruelty, indifference
形近词:symphony(n. 交响乐)
拓展:
sympathy (n.)
├── sympathetic (adj.)
├── sympathetically (adv.)
└── sympathize (v.)
16. respond
重点:动词→名词 response;与 reply 搭配差异。
近义词:answer, react
反义词:ignore, ask
形近词:responsible(adj. 负责的)
拓展:
respond (v.)
├── response (n.)
├── responsive (adj.)
└── respondent (n. 应答者)
17. embarrassed
重点:形容词→名词 embarrassment;常考 be/feel embarrassed about。
近义词:ashamed, awkward
反义词:proud, confident
形近词:embargo(n. 禁运)
拓展:
embarrassed (adj.)
├── embarrassment (n.)
├── embarrassing (adj.)
└── embarrass (v.)
18. assume
重点:动词→名词 assumption;与 presume 词义辨析。
近义词:suppose, believe
反义词:prove, deny
形近词:consume(v. 消费)
拓展:
assume (v.)
├── assumption (n.)
├── assumptive (adj.)
└── reassume (v. 再承担)
19. definite
重点:形容词→副词 definitely;与 infinite 拼写对比。
近义词:certain, clear
反义词:vague, uncertain
形近词:infinite(adj. 无限的)
拓展:
definite (adj.)
├── definitely (adv.)
├── definition (n.)
└── indefinite (adj.)
20. cancel
重点:动词→名词 cancellation 双写 l;与 postpone 近义辨析。
近义词:call off, abolish
反义词:confirm, schedule
形近词:cancer(n. 癌症)
拓展:
cancel (v.)
├── cancellation (n.)
├── cancelled (adj.)
└── cancellable (adj.)
Step 4: Complex Sentence
长难句1
原句: People overestimate how much hosts welcome a tentative answer, which most inviters actually find insulting.
汉语翻译: 人们高估了主人对模糊答复的欢迎程度,而事实上大多数邀请者认为这种拖延带有冒犯意味。
层级结构图:
· People (主语)
· overestimate (谓语)
· how much-clause (宾语从句)
· hosts (从句主语)
· welcome (从句谓语)
· a tentative answer (从句宾语)
· → which most inviters actually find insulting (定语从句,修饰 tentative answer)
长难句2
原句: A fast "no" gives the host time to invite someone else, before they waste hours in limbo.
汉语翻译: 一个迅速的“不”给了主人时间去邀请别人,免得他们在悬而未决中浪费数小时。
层级结构图:
· A fast "no" (主语)
· gives (谓语)
· the host (间接宾语)
· time (直接宾语)
· to invite someone else (不定式作后置定语,修饰 time)
· → before they waste hours in limbo (时间状语从句,修饰 gives)
Step 5: Review
序号
英语
汉语
序号
英语
汉语
序号
英语
汉语
1
anxious
8
final
15
conclude
2
anxiety
9
ultimate
16
bias
3
refuse
10
mild
17
sympathy
4
respect
11
convenient
18
respond
5
prefer
12
avoid
19
embarrassed
6
polite
13
immediate
20
assume
7
option
14
damage
21
definite
Step 6: Translate
赢得一张音乐会门票本该令人兴奋——直到你的朋友用一个词回复你的邀请:“也许。”霎那间,你的喜悦变成焦虑。你取消其他安排,不停刷新手机,苦苦等待。等到朋友最终说“不”时,剩下的只有失望。
作为一名消费心理学家,我花了十年时间研究人们如何做社交选择。我们的新研究表明,“也许”并非中立,它在悄无声息地损害关系。在五项共涉及1800名成年人的实验中,我们让参与者想象自己发出或收到邀请。结果反复出现两个事实。
第一,被邀请者高估了主人对模糊回答的欢迎程度。在其中一项研究中,62%的客人认为主人更愿意听到“也许”而非“不”,却只有18%的主人认同。第二,主人感到“也许”比明确拒绝更不受尊重。拖延传递出的信号是“你的活动只是我的备选”,这被大多数人视为冒犯。
为什么聪明的成年人仍爱用这个危险的词?原因是“动机性推理”——一种为了保护自身愿望而产生的偏见思维方式。“也许”让被邀请者的选项保持开放,并把错过的痛苦推迟。说“不”显得决绝,于是大脑善意地改写剧本:“主人大概也喜欢温和的回答。”
然而,这种幻觉可以被打破。当我们要求被邀请者花三十秒站在主人的立场思考后,使用“也许”的比例下降了34%。在另一项实验中,我们把活动描述为“早上7点开始的慈善会议”,由于没人担心错过一场黎明讲座,动机性推理消失了,83%的人立刻拒绝。
其他实验室的最新研究也指向同一方向。2024年的一篇论文指出,人们预计主人在遭到拒绝后会“生气”或“受伤”,但真实主人只感到轻微不便。另一项研究给借口排了名:“我缺钱”比“我很忙”获得更多同情,大概因为金钱问题看起来更不可控。
教训简单却难以做到:清晰即是善意。一个迅速的“不”让主人有时间邀请别人、转卖多余门票或干脆不再刷手机。它可能让你尴尬(awkward)五秒,却能为其他人节省数小时的悬而未决(limbo)。下次收到邀请时,请记住,“也许”不是礼貌的缓冲垫,而是一根隐藏的刺(thorn)。快速拔出,友谊的伤口会小得多。
学科网(北京)股份有限公司
$