信息必刷卷03（北京卷）-2025年高考英语考前信息必刷卷

2025年高考考前信息必刷卷（北京卷）03 英语·答案及评分标准 （满分：100分） 第一部分 知识运用（共两节，满分30分） 第一节（共10小题；每小题1.5分，满分15分） 1．C 2．B 3．C 4．B 5．A 6．B 7．C 8．B 9．A 10．A 第二节（共10小题；每小题1.5分，满分15分） 11．protected 12．will implement 13．has been established 14．where 15．on 16．more dangerous 17．Coding 18．distance 19．journals 20．whether 第二部分 阅读理解（共两节，满分38分） 第一节（共14小题；每小题2分，满分28分） 21．B 22．C 23．B 24．B 25．C 26．C 27. C 28．B 29．B 30．B 31. A 32．B 33．B 34．B 第二节 （共5小题；每小题2分，满分10分） 35．G 36．C 37．D 38. F 39. A 第三部分 书面表达（共两节，满分32分） 第一节（共4小题；第40、41题各2分，第42题3分，第43题5分，满分12分） 40. Plastic straws piling up. / The accumulation of plastic straws. 41. From her father’s difficulty in packing metal straws during camping trips. 42. Lina feels proudest of StrawTwist's sales success because she uses expensive materials for durability and completely replaces plastic straws in all schools. Lina feels proudest of StrawTwist's sales success because she uses expensive materials for durability and schools using StrawTwist report 60% less plastic waste. 43. Lina’s environmental awareness drives her to solve real problems. Her creativity in designing a portable straw and persistence despite prototype failures show that practical innovation requires both vision and resilience.（答案言之有理即可） 第二节（满分20分） 【参考范文】 Dear Tom, I’m thrilled to hear about your plan to join the wetland protection activity on Biodiversity Day! Though I cannot participate due to final exams, I wholeheartedly support your initiative. Wetlands are vital ecosystems that sustain biodiversity by providing habitats for endangered species like migratory birds. Protecting them aligns with our shared responsibility to balance nature. To further promote biodiversity, here are my suggestions: Refuse products from endangered species (e.g., ivory or shark fin dishes). Publicly rejecting such items raises awareness of wildlife conservation. Launch a campus ecological survey to document local flora and fauna. For instance, we could collaborate with biology teachers to create a species database, which would deepen students’ understanding of regional ecosystems. Design educational posters featuring quotes like “Every species matters” to display in community centers. Visual campaigns effectively inspire collective action. Let’s continue advocating for nature beyond May 22! By integrating small daily actions—such as reducing plastic use and planting native flowers—we can create a ripple effect toward lasting ecological health. Looking forward to our future endeavors! Yours, Li Hua 应用文写作评分标准 一、评分原则 1. 本题总分为20分，按5个档次给分。 2. 评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。 3. 词数少于60和多于100的，从总分中减去2分。 4. 评分时，应注意的主要内容为：内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的丰富性和准确性及上下文的连贯性。 5. 拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面，评分时，应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。 6. 如书写较差，以致影响交际，可将分数降低一个档次。 二、各档次的给分范围和要求 档次 描述 第五档 (17～20分) 完全完成了试题规定的任务。 - 覆盖所有内容要点。 - 应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。 - 语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但因尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致；具备较强的语言运用能力。 - 有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。 完全达到了预期的写作目的。 第四档 (13～16分) 完全完成了试题规定的任务。 - 虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。 - 应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。 - 语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。 - 应用简单的语句间连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。 达到了预期的写作目的。 第三档 (9～12分) 基本完成了试题规定的任务。 - 虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容。 - 应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。 - 有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解。 - 应用简单的语句间连接成分，使全文内容连贯。 整体而言，基本达到了预期的写作目的。 第二档 (5～8分) 未适当完成试题规定的任务。 - 漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容。 - 语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。 - 有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容的理解。 - 较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性。 信息未能清楚地传达给读者。 第一档 (1～4分) 未完成试题规定的任务。 - 明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理解试题要求。 - 语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。 - 较多语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响对写作内容的理解。 - 缺乏语句间的连接成分，内容不连贯。 信息未能传达给读者。 0分 未能传达给读者任何信息：内容太少，无法评判；写的内容均与所要求内容无关或所写内容无法看清。 试卷第2页，共22页 1 / 2 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$ 绝密★启用前 2025年高考考前信息必刷卷（北京卷）03 英 语 （考试时间：90分钟 试卷满分：100分） 考情速递 高考·新动向：近年北京卷英语试题持续强化“素养立意”“价值引领”和“德育渗透”，以语言能力、文化意识、思维品质和学习能力为核心考查维度，注重学生解决真实问题的综合能力。例如，2024年阅读C篇探讨“宇宙模拟”争议，引导考生关注科技伦理与创新路径，体现对批判性思维和科学探究能力的考查；2024年完形填空探讨合作与自立关系；2024年应用文写作涉及家国情怀（新中国成立75周年写作任务）。 高考·新考法：语法考查的隐性综合化。近年北京卷的语法填空不再局限于单句，而是依托完整语篇，需结合上下文时态、连词逻辑及语义连贯性解题（如故事类语篇中过去完成时与现在完成时的交替使用）。 命题·大预测：文化和科技主题是近年北京卷阅读理解和应用文写作的命题热点，本套试卷在研究近5年高考题目的基础上，对相关话题进行分析和探索，命制成高质量的题目供广大师生学习使用。如本套试卷中阅读理解的B篇，体现“科技创新”（VR教育）、“挫折教育”（竞赛失败）呼应北京卷“立足首都发展，关注青年成长”命题导向，同时符合北京英语高考“时代性、教育性、思辨性”的命题原则。 备考策略：根据北京高考英语真题命题特点，建议跨学科阅读积累：精读《经济学人》《科学美国人》等外刊的科技、社科类文章，掌握高频术语与论证逻辑。 第一部分 知识运用（共两节, 满分30分） 第一节（共10小题；每小题1.5分, 满分15分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 I gained immense 　1　 coaching youth teams; it felt like sharing life wisdom. Every training session 　2　 my spirit, especially witnessing timid beginners transform into confident players. Then came the career-ending injury. Torn ligaments forced me off the court permanently. 　3　, I could only assist junior coaches occasionally when my health permitted. Chronic pain became my relentless opponent. In 2022, another blow struck. Alongside physical limitations, I developed hand tremors affecting my 　4　 to demonstrate techniques. Coaching invitations dwindled as my 　5　 became inconsistent. I drowned in self-doubt, like sinking in quicksand. After months of despair, I 　6　 my perspective. True leadership isn't 　7　 by physical perfection. Gradually I 　8　 this truth: limitations shape unique strengths. I reinvented coaching methods using virtual simulations. Life throws unexpected passes; our 　9　 determines the game's outcome. Despite physical constraints, I found innovative ways to inspire athletes. We can't control the 　10　 life assigns us, but we can master our defensive strategies. May we face challenges with resilience, wisdom, and sportsmanship. 1. A. fame　　　 B. curiosity　　 C. fulfillment　　 D. anxiety 2. A. drained B. fueled　　　 C. challenged　　 D. measured 3. A. Simply　 B. Naturally　　 C. Eventually　　 D. Fortunately 4. A. courage　 B. ability　　　 C. intention　　 D. rhythm 5. A. skills　 B. vision　　　 C. philosophy　　 D. reputation 6. A. rejected B. adjusted　　 C. revealed　　 D. simplified 7. A. ignored B. reflected　　 C. defined　　　 D. enhanced 8. A. denied　 B. accepted　　 C. questioned D. postponed 9. A. reaction B. reference　　 C. contribution D. resistance 10. A. roles　 B. whistles　　 C. penalties　　 D. trophies 第二节（共10小题；每小题1. 5分, 满分15分） A 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 The giant panda, recognized as China's national treasure, faces renewed conservation efforts. In 2023, the Chinese government upgraded its status to a ​11. ________ (protect) species due to habitat fragmentation and climate impacts. Current estimates suggest fewer than 2,000 pandas remain in mountainous regions. Authorities 1​2. ________ (implement) stricter anti-poaching laws next year, while a cross-provincial habitat corridor 1​3. ________ (establish) recently to promote genetic diversity. B 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 Adventure racing combines navigation with endurance challenges. Participants trek across wilderness areas ​14. ________ they must locate checkpoints using maps. They wade through rivers, climb rocky slopes, and occasionally haul equipment 1​5. ________ their backs. Events frequently occur during monsoon seasons, rendering trails slippery and the competition far ​16. ________ (dangerous) than standard marathons. C 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 Digital literacy dominates modern education debates. Some educators argue that 1​7. ________ (code) should replace cursive writing in primary curricula. A 2022 provincial report proposed programming exams for middle schoolers, citing students' increased screen time during ​18. ________ (distance) learning phases. Critics counter that overreliance on digital tools might devalue handwritten ​19. ________ (journal). Nevertheless, policymakers are evaluating ​20. ________ integrating coding into standardized testing proves feasible. 第二部分 阅读理解（共两节, 满分38分） 第一节（共14小题；每小题2分, 满分28分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 A The UN Global Youth Environmental Ambassadors Program The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Youth Ambassadors initiative empowers young leaders to drive sustainable development in their communities. Twenty ambassadors are selected annually for a two-year term. They advocate for environmental protection, promoting eco-friendly practices worldwide. To become a UNEP Youth Ambassador, candidates must first complete the ​4-Week Green Leadership Camp. 4-Week Green Leadership Camp The camp, held virtually every September, includes interactive workshops on climate science and policy. Sessions can be attended live or accessed later via the UNEP learning platform. Participants must submit weekly assignments analyzing local environmental challenges. The camp welcomes applicants aged 18–25 globally. Upon completion, candidates must design an eco-project proposal for implementation if selected as ambassadors. Eligibility Criteria • Completion of the 4-Week Green Leadership Camp • High school diploma or equivalent • Minimum six months of volunteer experience • Strong teamwork and communication skills • Demonstrated commitment to sustainability • Willingness to collaborate across cultures • Openness to mentorship from environmental experts 21. During the 4-Week Green Leadership Camp, participants will ______. A. implement eco-projects in their cities B. join online environmental workshops C. collaborate with international experts D. promote UNEP’s global initiatives 22. Successful UNEP Youth Ambassadors are required to ______. A. analyze weekly climate reports B. attend in-person policy meetings C. execute a proposed eco-project D. mentor new volunteers 23. Which is a mandatory requirement for applicants? A. Holding a university degree. B. Six months of volunteer work. C. Expertise in climate science. D. Fluency in multiple languages. B Sitting in a café preparing for a tech conference, I felt my phone vibrate. My hands trembled as I recognized the sender—the AI Innovation Competition Committee. The message opened with "Dear Ms. Zhao, we appreciate your participation," followed by "the evaluation proved exceptionally competitive." It concluded with "Regrettably, your VR environmental project wasn't selected..." My screen blurred. The competition—designing virtual reality solutions for climate education—had represented my three-year research breakthrough. I'd invested countless nights refining algorithms and assumed this rejection marked the death of my tech ambitions. Yet astonishingly, two weeks later, Dr. Li Wei, chief engineer of a leading tech firm featured in the competition, contacted me to visit their VR lab. Seizing this lifeline, I found myself even more stunned when he proposed collaborating on an augmented reality project for museum education. Though less glamorous than my original concept, I committed fully. Working with a UI design team, we developed gesture-controlled historical simulations. This approach, operable through ordinary smartphones rather than expensive VR headsets, not only survived budget cuts but outperformed conventional systems. Ultimately, it redirected my focus toward accessible educational technology. When applying for master's programs, I identified three universities supporting this new direction. The familiar nervous hope returned. Being declined by my top choice hurt, but now I possessed the wisdom to prevent despair. Eventually, I received an offer from another institution better aligned with my evolved vision. This journey taught me that rigid roadmaps limit possibilities. Embracing unexpected opportunities, even imperfect ones, often leads to unanticipated success. 24. How did the author react when noticing the message sender? A. Relieved. B. Panicked. C. Confused. D. Embarrassed. 25. After communicating with Dr. Li Wei, the author chose to ______. A. abandon technology research B. organize another competition C. devote herself to the new project D. challenge the evaluation criteria 26. The AR museum project was considered ______. A. costly but effective B. complex yet outdated C. affordable and superior D. entertaining but impractical 27. What message does the story convey? A. Failure fuels fierce competition. B. Technology replaces human effort. C. Closed doors open new pathways. D. Perfection guarantees achievement. C In the digital age, scholars across disciplines warn that ​cognitive fragmentation—scattered attention across endless information—has eroded humanity’s capacity for deep focus. This fragmented thinking exacerbates critical issues: misinformation spread, declining critical analysis, and weakened cultural continuity. Sociologist Liang Wen argues that modern societies now inhabit a “perpetual present”, where “endless digital noise drowns reflection, leaving minds trapped between fleeting stimulation and intellectual numbness”. Studies confirm humans’ ​present bias toward instant gratification. Social media algorithms feed this bias, prioritizing viral content over substantive knowledge. In education, this manifests as students skimming headlines instead of reading deeply; in policymaking, as prioritizing quick public approval over sustainable strategies. For complex challenges like AI ethics, it breeds reluctance to establish long-term regulatory frameworks, favoring temporary fixes that ignore future risks. This cognitive shift stems from multiple factors, yet psychological patterns dominate. The ​availability heuristic—overvaluing easily accessible information—is key. For example, one might claim: “This viral post says AI is safe, so regulations aren’t urgent.” Similarly, emotionally charged content (e.g., celebrity scandals) overshadows gradual societal shifts, like declining book-reading rates. As a neuroscientist quipped, if aliens sought to paralyze human progress, they wouldn’t launch missiles; they’d invent TikTok. Generational “attention amnesia” emerges: elders recall pre-digital concentration spans, while youth perceive constant distraction as normal. A grandparent might remember hours spent reading novels; a teenager, accustomed to 15-second videos, scarcely comprehends that depth of focus. 28. The author cites Liang Wen primarily to ________. A. challenge a popular belief B. define a core concept C. emphasize cultural values D. illustrate a scientific theory 29. What is implied in the last paragraph? A. Traditional reading is irreplaceable. B. Humans struggle to perceive gradual mental shifts. C. Younger generations reject technological advancements. D. Alien intervention explains cognitive deterioration. 30. What message does the author convey? A. Fragmented thinking enhances adaptability. B. Sustained attention is crucial for societal progress. C. Algorithmic systems prioritize long-term benefits. D. Viral content promotes critical analysis. D What is consciousness? Like the mystery of life itself, this question escapes definitive answers. Our understanding is limited because consciousness manifests uniquely in biological systems. The emerging field of ​quantum cognition (QC) seeks to decode consciousness’s fundamental rules by creating synthetic awareness in quantum simulations. QC researchers believe that engineering artificial consciousness could finally reveal its essence. So far, no quantum model has achieved true self-awareness. This fuels skepticism, with critics dismissing QC as philosophical speculation. Dr. Elena Marquez, a quantum physicist, counters such doubts: “Questioning QC’s practicality misses its purpose. Consciousness isn’t about utility,” she argues. “When asked ‘What’s the value of synthetic consciousness?’, I reply, ‘What’s the value of a sunset?’” Though QC resists commercial focus, its research may revolutionize AI. Quantum cognition shares DNA with ​blockchain technology—both pursue decentralized innovation. QC aims to mimic the brain’s capacity for spontaneous idea generation, a phenomenon exclusive to biological minds. Success here could birth machines capable of unpredictable creativity. QC’s progress differs from blockchain’s visible milestones. Its core challenge lies in defining “consciousness”—a concept as elusive as QC itself. Divisions among QC scholars further cloud its path, resulting in scattered experimental approaches. Ironically, QC’s chaotic evolution mirrors biological consciousness’s messy emergence. Unconstrained by rigid definitions, QC drives radical rethinking of classical theories. This turbulence might not be unique. All revolutionary sciences may endure similar growing pains. Ultimately, QC’s significance may lie not in its conclusions but in its inevitability as humanity’s next cognitive frontier. 31. Regarding Dr. Marquez’s defense of QC, the author is ______. A. supportive B. critical C. indifferent D. uncertain 32. What does the word “enthralled” underlined in Paragraph 3 most probably mean? A. Restricted. B. Fascinated. C. Confused. D. Replaced. 33. What can we infer from the passage? A. Blockchain depends on QC’s breakthroughs. B. QC and blockchain target decentralized systems. C. Quantum models have achieved true innovation. D. Blockchain accelerates biological consciousness. 34. Which would be the best title for the passage? A. Consciousness Is Mysterious. Can Blockchain Decode It? B. Consciousness Emerges. Will QC’s Journey Mirror Nature? C. Consciousness Is Fluid. Can Quantum Physics Freeze It? D. Consciousness Evolves. Has Blockchain Outpaced QC? 第二节（共5小题；每小题2分, 满分10分） 根据短文内容，从短文后的七个选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项。选项中有两项为多余选项。 If you aim to excel in problem-solving, is it wiser to be a ​soloist (独奏者) or a ​collaborator? The soloist works independently, diving deep into individual analysis, while the collaborator thrives in team dynamics, integrating diverse perspectives. Is one method inherently superior? Soloist-style thinkers often insist so. ​ 35 They are widely admired for their focused expertise and decisive conclusions. According to Dr. Wang Lei, a cognitive scientist, the “soloist mindset” is crucial for developing precision in technical fields. These individuals master complex systems through concentrated study, identify their unique strengths within their domain, and refine solutions with laser-like accuracy. ​ 36 The soloist approach appears a proven route to specialized mastery. 37 Professor Li Ming’s research on innovation patterns in tech startups reveals that soloists are less likely to generate disruptive ideas compared to collaborators. Moreover, they often resist adjusting their strategies when market demands shift. Collaborators, however, leverage collective intelligence. They comfortably navigate conflicting viewpoints and synthesize ideas from varied sources. ​ 38 They actively seek to reconcile opposing proposals rather than dismissing them. Additionally, collaborators demonstrate clearer awareness of their cognitive blind spots and teammates’ strengths. So, which strategy wins? The answer lies in a hybrid model. ​ 39 Framing the choice as “soloist vs. collaborator” creates a false dilemma. True problem-solving excellence emerges from blending both approaches—the rare “solo-collaborator” who thinks deeply while engaging widely. A. In reality, both strategies offer unique advantages. B. They tend to prioritize efficiency over creative exploration. C. Thus, they benefit from rigorous specialization and self-reliance. D. Yet exclusive reliance on solo work carries hidden limitations. E. However, soloists may selectively adopt external feedback. F. When a teammate’s suggestion challenges their hypothesis, they engage constructively. G. They commit wholly to one methodology, dismissing alternatives as distractions. 第三部分 书面表达（共两节，满分32分） 第一节（共4小题；第40、41题各2分，第42题3分，第43题5分，满分12分） 阅读下面短文, 根据题目要求回答问题。 Lina, a 16-year-old environmental advocate, noticed plastic straws piling up in her school cafeteria. Determined to address single-use plastic waste, she drew inspiration from her family's stainless steel straws at home. "They worked well but were bulky to carry," Lina recalls. Her solution? A collapsible reusable straw called StrawTwist. The idea sparked when Lina watched her father struggle to pack rigid metal straws for camping trips. "I wanted something portable yet eco-friendly," she says. The StrawTwist features a silicone body with a twist-lock mechanism, folding into a capsule smaller than a lipstick. Its brush attachment ensures easy cleaning. Now sold online and in eco-stores, Lina takes pride not just in sales but in her impact: each purchase funds beach cleanups, and schools using StrawTwist report 60% less plastic waste. Despite winning national sustainability awards, Lina stays grounded. Her advice to young innovators? "Start small but think big. Patience beats perfectionism — prototypes will fail, but persistence pays off. 40. What problem did Lina observe in her school cafeteria? 41. Where did Lina get the idea for the StrawTwist design? 42. Please decide which part is false in the following statement, then underline it and explain why. ▷ Lina feels proudest of StrawTwist's sales success because she uses expensive materials for durability and completely replaces plastic straws in all schools. 43. Which of Lina's qualities do you find most valuable for solving real-world problems? Why? (In about 40 words) 第二节（满分20分） 44．假设你是红星中学高三学生李华。5月22日是国际生物多样性日，你在京学习的澳大利亚好友Amy计划当天参加社区湿地保护志愿活动，并邀请你一同参与。请你用英文给她写一封邮件，内容包括： 1．是否愿意参加及理由； 2．建议其他保护生物多样性的行动（如拒绝购买濒危物种制品、参与校园生态调查等）; 3. 表达对生态保护的长期支持。 注意: 1. 词数 100 左右； 2. 开头和结尾已给出，不计入总词数。 Dear Tom ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yours Li Hua 试卷第2页，共22页 1 / 2 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$ 绝密★启用前 2025年高考考前信息必刷卷（北京卷）03 英 语 （考试时间：90分钟 试卷满分：100分） 考情速递 高考·新动向：近年北京卷英语试题持续强化“素养立意”“价值引领”和“德育渗透”，以语言能力、文化意识、思维品质和学习能力为核心考查维度，注重学生解决真实问题的综合能力。例如，2024年阅读C篇探讨“宇宙模拟”争议，引导考生关注科技伦理与创新路径，体现对批判性思维和科学探究能力的考查；2024年完形填空探讨合作与自立关系；2024年应用文写作涉及家国情怀（新中国成立75周年写作任务）。 高考·新考法：语法考查的隐性综合化。近年北京卷的语法填空不再局限于单句，而是依托完整语篇，需结合上下文时态、连词逻辑及语义连贯性解题（如故事类语篇中过去完成时与现在完成时的交替使用）。 命题·大预测：文化和科技主题是近年北京卷阅读理解和应用文写作的命题热点，本套试卷在研究近5年高考题目的基础上，对相关话题进行分析和探索，命制成高质量的题目供广大师生学习使用。如本套试卷中阅读理解的B篇，体现“科技创新”（VR教育）、“挫折教育”（竞赛失败）呼应北京卷“立足首都发展，关注青年成长”命题导向，同时符合北京英语高考“时代性、教育性、思辨性”的命题原则。 备考策略：根据北京高考英语真题命题特点，建议跨学科阅读积累：精读《经济学人》《科学美国人》等外刊的科技、社科类文章，掌握高频术语与论证逻辑。 第一部分 知识运用（共两节, 满分30分） 第一节（共10小题；每小题1.5分, 满分15分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 I gained immense 　1　 coaching youth teams; it felt like sharing life wisdom. Every training session 　2　 my spirit, especially witnessing timid beginners transform into confident players. Then came the career-ending injury. Torn ligaments forced me off the court permanently. 　3　, I could only assist junior coaches occasionally when my health permitted. Chronic pain became my relentless opponent. In 2022, another blow struck. Alongside physical limitations, I developed hand tremors affecting my 　4　 to demonstrate techniques. Coaching invitations dwindled as my 　5　 became inconsistent. I drowned in self-doubt, like sinking in quicksand. After months of despair, I 　6　 my perspective. True leadership isn't 　7　 by physical perfection. Gradually I 　8　 this truth: limitations shape unique strengths. I reinvented coaching methods using virtual simulations. Life throws unexpected passes; our 　9　 determines the game's outcome. Despite physical constraints, I found innovative ways to inspire athletes. We can't control the 　10　 life assigns us, but we can master our defensive strategies. May we face challenges with resilience, wisdom, and sportsmanship. 1. A. fame　　　 B. curiosity　　 C. fulfillment　　 D. anxiety 2. A. drained B. fueled　　　 C. challenged　　 D. measured 3. A. Simply　 B. Naturally　　 C. Eventually　　 D. Fortunately 4. A. courage　 B. ability　　　 C. intention　　 D. rhythm 5. A. skills　 B. vision　　　 C. philosophy　　 D. reputation 6. A. rejected B. adjusted　　 C. revealed　　 D. simplified 7. A. ignored B. reflected　　 C. defined　　　 D. enhanced 8. A. denied　 B. accepted　　 C. questioned D. postponed 9. A. reaction B. reference　　 C. contribution D. resistance 10. A. roles　 B. whistles　　 C. penalties　　 D. trophies 【答案】 1．C 2．B 3．C 4．B 5．A 6．B 7．C 8．B 9．A 10．A 【导语】本文是一篇记叙文，讲述了一位教练从指导青少年球队中获得满足感，到因伤病被迫离开球场，再到通过调整心态和方法重新找到教练价值的故事。 解析： 1. C. fulfillment：根据上下文，作者从指导青年球队中获得了极大的“满足感”，感觉像是在分享人生的智慧。其他选项如“fame”（名声）、“curiosity”（好奇心）、“anxiety”（焦虑）都不符合语境。 2. B. fueled：每次训练课程都“激发”了作者的精神，特别是看到胆怯的初学者转变为自信的球员时。其他选项如“drained”（耗尽）、“challenged”（挑战）、“measured”（测量）都不符合语境。 3. C. Eventually：最终，作者只能在健康状况允许的情况下偶尔帮助初级教练。其他选项如“Simply”（简单地）、“Naturally”（自然地）、“Fortunately”（幸运地）都不符合语境。 4. B. ability：手部颤抖影响了作者“示范技术的能力”。其他选项如“courage”（勇气）、“intention”（意图）、“rhythm”（节奏）都不符合语境。 5. A. skills：随着作者的“技能”变得不稳定，教练邀请逐渐减少。其他选项如“vision”（愿景）、“philosophy”（哲学）、“reputation”（声誉）都不符合语境。 6. B. adjusted：在几个月的绝望之后，作者“调整”了自己的视角。其他选项如“rejected”（拒绝）、“revealed”（揭示）、“simplified”（简化）都不符合语境。 7. C. defined：真正的领导力并不是由身体的完美来“定义”的。其他选项如“ignored”（忽视）、“reflected”（反映）、“enhanced”（增强）都不符合语境。 8. B. accepted：作者逐渐“接受”了这个真理：限制塑造了独特的优点。其他选项如“denied”（否认）、“questioned”（质疑）、“postponed”（推迟）都不符合语境。 9. A. reaction：生活抛出意想不到的传球，我们的“反应”决定了比赛的结果。其他选项如“reference”（参考）、“contribution”（贡献）、“resistance”（抵抗）都不符合语境。 10. A. roles：我们无法控制生活分配给我们的“角色”，但我们可以掌握我们的防守策略。其他选项如“whistles”（哨子）、“penalties”（罚球）、“trophies”（奖杯）都不符合语境。 第二节（共10小题；每小题1. 5分, 满分15分） A 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 The giant panda, recognized as China's national treasure, faces renewed conservation efforts. In 2023, the Chinese government upgraded its status to a ​11. ________ (protect) species due to habitat fragmentation and climate impacts. Current estimates suggest fewer than 2,000 pandas remain in mountainous regions. Authorities 1​2. ________ (implement) stricter anti-poaching laws next year, while a cross-provincial habitat corridor 1​3. ________ (establish) recently to promote genetic diversity. B 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 Adventure racing combines navigation with endurance challenges. Participants trek across wilderness areas ​14. ________ they must locate checkpoints using maps. They wade through rivers, climb rocky slopes, and occasionally haul equipment 1​5. ________ their backs. Events frequently occur during monsoon seasons, rendering trails slippery and the competition far ​16. ________ (dangerous) than standard marathons. C 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 Digital literacy dominates modern education debates. Some educators argue that 1​7. ________ (code) should replace cursive writing in primary curricula. A 2022 provincial report proposed programming exams for middle schoolers, citing students' increased screen time during ​18. ________ (distance) learning phases. Critics counter that overreliance on digital tools might devalue handwritten ​19. ________ (journal). Nevertheless, policymakers are evaluating ​20. ________ integrating coding into standardized testing proves feasible. 【答案】 11．protected 12．will implement 13．has been established 14．where 15．on 16．more dangerous 17．Coding 18．distance 19．journals 20．whether A 11. protected ​考点：动词→形容词（过去分词作定语） ​解析：括号中给出动词“protect”，此处需形容词修饰“species”。由于物种是“被保护的”，使用过去分词“protected”表被动，构成固定搭配“protected species”（受保护物种）。 ​易错点：可能误填“protecting”（现在分词表主动），但此处强调被动保护。 12. will implement ​考点：一般将来时 ​解析：时间状语“next year”明确将来时间，主语“Authorities”（官方）需用“will + 动词原形”表计划实施的法规。 ​例句参考：The government ​will launch a new policy next month. 13. has been established ​考点：现在完成时的被动语态 ​解析：时间副词“recently”提示动作已完成且对现在有影响，主语“corridor”（走廊）是动作承受者，需用“has been + 过去分词”。 B 14. where 考点：定语从句引导词 解析：先行词“wilderness areas”表地点，从句“they must locate checkpoints”缺少地点状语，需用“where”引导。 替换验证：= in which they must locate checkpoints... 15. on 考点：介词搭配 解析：“haul equipment on their backs”为固定表达，表示“背负装备”。 对比记忆：carry sth. in a bag（装在包里） vs. carry sth. on one’s back（背在背上）。 16. more dangerous 考点：形容词比较级 解析：句中“than”提示比较级，且“dangerous”为多音节词，需加“more”构成比较级“more dangerous”。 易错点：可能误用“dangerouser”（错误形式）。 C 17. Coding 考点：动名词作主语 解析：空格需作从句主语，动词“code”需变为动名词“Coding”，表“编程”这一抽象行为。例句对比：Typing is more efficient than writing. 18. distance 考点：名词作定语 解析：修饰名词“learning phases”，需用名词“distance”作定语，构成“distance learning”（远程学习）。 易错点：可能误填形容词“distant”，但“distant learning”不符合英语表达习惯。 19. journals 考点：可数名词复数 解析：“journal”（日记）为可数名词，前无冠词且表泛指，需用复数形式“journals”。 20. whether 考点：宾语从句引导词 解析：动词“evaluating”后接宾语从句，从句“integrating coding... proves feasible”为完整陈述句，需用“whether”表“是否”。 第二部分 阅读理解（共两节, 满分38分） 第一节（共14小题；每小题2分, 满分28分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 A The UN Global Youth Environmental Ambassadors Program The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Youth Ambassadors initiative empowers young leaders to drive sustainable development in their communities. Twenty ambassadors are selected annually for a two-year term. They advocate for environmental protection, promoting eco-friendly practices worldwide. To become a UNEP Youth Ambassador, candidates must first complete the ​4-Week Green Leadership Camp. 4-Week Green Leadership Camp The camp, held virtually every September, includes interactive workshops on climate science and policy. Sessions can be attended live or accessed later via the UNEP learning platform. Participants must submit weekly assignments analyzing local environmental challenges. The camp welcomes applicants aged 18–25 globally. Upon completion, candidates must design an eco-project proposal for implementation if selected as ambassadors. Eligibility Criteria • Completion of the 4-Week Green Leadership Camp • High school diploma or equivalent • Minimum six months of volunteer experience • Strong teamwork and communication skills • Demonstrated commitment to sustainability • Willingness to collaborate across cultures • Openness to mentorship from environmental experts 21. During the 4-Week Green Leadership Camp, participants will ______. A. implement eco-projects in their cities B. join online environmental workshops C. collaborate with international experts D. promote UNEP’s global initiatives 22. Successful UNEP Youth Ambassadors are required to ______. A. analyze weekly climate reports B. attend in-person policy meetings C. execute a proposed eco-project D. mentor new volunteers 23. Which is a mandatory requirement for applicants? A. Holding a university degree. B. Six months of volunteer work. C. Expertise in climate science. D. Fluency in multiple languages. 【答案】21．B 22．C 23．B 【分析】本文为一篇说明文。文章介绍了联合国环境规划署（UNEP）青年大使项目，描述了申请流程、培训内容及入选要求。 21．细节理解题。​原文提到 “The camp, held virtually every September, includes interactive workshops on climate science and policy. Sessions can be attended live or accessed later…” 考点：​细节理解 + ​同义替换。题干中“4-Week Green Leadership Camp”对应原文“camp”，核心任务是参与“workshops”（研讨会）。选项B的“join online environmental workshops”是原文“interactive workshops... attended live”的同义改写。 ​干扰项分析： A项“implement eco-projects”是成为大使后的任务（见后文“design an eco-project proposal for implementation”），非培训期间内容。 C项“collaborate with experts”对应申请条件中的“openness to mentorship”，但培训期间未明确要求合作。 D项“promote UNEP’s initiatives”是大使职责（原文“advocate for environmental protection”），非培训阶段任务。 22．细节理解题。原文明确说明 “Upon completion, candidates must design an eco-project proposal for implementation if selected as ambassadors.” ​考点：​任务指向性细节 + ​条件状语从句。题干“if selected as ambassadors”对应原文“if selected”，任务核心是“execute a proposed eco-project”（执行提案项目）。 选项C的“execute”替换原文“implementation”，为同义表达。 ​干扰项分析： A项“analyze weekly reports”是培训期间的每周任务（原文“submit weekly assignments”），非大使职责。 B项“attend in-person meetings”原文未提及，属无中生有。 D项“mentor volunteers”反向干扰，原文要求“接受专家指导”（openness to mentorship），而非指导他人。 23．申请条件中明确列出 “Minimum six months of volunteer experience”。 ​考点：​条件筛选 + ​精准匹配。选项B的“six months of volunteer work”与原文“six months of volunteer experience”完全对应。 ​干扰项分析： A项“university degree”与原文“high school diploma or equivalent”矛盾。 C项“expertise in climate science”属过度推断，原文仅要求“commitment to sustainability”（承诺，非专业能力）。 D项“fluency in languages”未提及，原文强调“collaborate across cultures”（跨文化合作能力，非语言要求）。 B Sitting in a café preparing for a tech conference, I felt my phone vibrate. My hands trembled as I recognized the sender—the AI Innovation Competition Committee. The message opened with "Dear Ms. Zhao, we appreciate your participation," followed by "the evaluation proved exceptionally competitive." It concluded with "Regrettably, your VR environmental project wasn't selected..." My screen blurred. The competition—designing virtual reality solutions for climate education—had represented my three-year research breakthrough. I'd invested countless nights refining algorithms and assumed this rejection marked the death of my tech ambitions. Yet astonishingly, two weeks later, Dr. Li Wei, chief engineer of a leading tech firm featured in the competition, contacted me to visit their VR lab. Seizing this lifeline, I found myself even more stunned when he proposed collaborating on an augmented reality project for museum education. Though less glamorous than my original concept, I committed fully. Working with a UI design team, we developed gesture-controlled historical simulations. This approach, operable through ordinary smartphones rather than expensive VR headsets, not only survived budget cuts but outperformed conventional systems. Ultimately, it redirected my focus toward accessible educational technology. When applying for master's programs, I identified three universities supporting this new direction. The familiar nervous hope returned. Being declined by my top choice hurt, but now I possessed the wisdom to prevent despair. Eventually, I received an offer from another institution better aligned with my evolved vision. This journey taught me that rigid roadmaps limit possibilities. Embracing unexpected opportunities, even imperfect ones, often leads to unanticipated success. 24. How did the author react when noticing the message sender? A. Relieved. B. Panicked. C. Confused. D. Embarrassed. 25. After communicating with Dr. Li Wei, the author chose to ______. A. abandon technology research B. organize another competition C. devote herself to the new project D. challenge the evaluation criteria 26. The AR museum project was considered ______. A. costly but effective B. complex yet outdated C. affordable and superior D. entertaining but impractical 27. What message does the story convey? A. Failure fuels fierce competition. B. Technology replaces human effort. C. Closed doors open new pathways. D. Perfection guarantees achievement. 【答案】24．B 25．C 26．C 27. C 【分析】本文是一篇记叙文，主要讲述了作者在参加AI创新竞赛时，其三年心血的VR环境项目落选，使她感到极度失落。两周后，她意外地接到竞赛中一家领先科技公司的首席工程师李伟博士的邀请，合作开发了一款通过普通智能手机操作的增强现实历史模拟技术，取得了显著成果，并将研究方向转向了教育技术的可及性。在申请硕士项目时，尽管被首选学校拒绝，但她最终被另一所更符合她新方向的学校录取。这段经历让她明白，灵活应对意外机会，即使不完美，也能带来意想不到的成功。 24. 答案：B 考点：情感推断（通过动作描写判断心理状态） 原文关键句："My hands trembled as I recognized the sender."（“当我认出发件人时，双手颤抖。”）"trembled"（颤抖）​直接体现紧张、恐慌的情绪，与选项B（Panicked）匹配。 排除其他选项： A. Relieved（如释重负）：与后文“屏幕模糊”（因失望而视线模糊）矛盾。 C. Confused（困惑）：文中无体现“困惑”的线索（如“why”或“didn’t understand”）。 D. Embarrassed（尴尬）：与竞赛失败的挫败感无关。 25. 答案：C 解析：原文关键句："Though less glamorous than my original concept, I committed fully."（“尽管不如最初的想法光鲜，但我全力以赴。”）"committed fully"（全力以赴）​与选项C（devote herself to）完全对应。 排除其他选项： A. abandon technology research（放弃技术研究）：与后文“转向教育科技”矛盾。 B. organize another competition（组织另一场竞赛）：文中未提及。 D. challenge the evaluation criteria（质疑评审标准）：作者接受结果并转向新方向，未体现“质疑”。 26. 答案：C 解析：原文关键句： "operable through ordinary smartphones rather than expensive VR headsets"（“通过普通手机而非昂贵VR设备操作”）→ ​affordable（经济实惠）​。 "outperformed conventional systems"（“优于传统系统”）→ ​superior（更优）​。 选项C（affordable and superior）精准概括这两点。 排除其他选项： A. costly but effective（昂贵但有效）：与“ordinary smartphones”矛盾。 B. complex yet outdated（复杂而过时）：文中强调“创新”而非“过时”。 D. entertaining but impractical（有趣但不实用）：与“outperformed”（高效实用）相反。 27. 答案：C 全文脉络： 竞赛失败（closed door）→ 获得实验室机会（new pathway）→ 发现新研究方向→ 硕士申请再次失败→ 最终成功。 反复强调“拥抱不完美的机会”（embracing imperfect opportunities）。 选项C（关上的门开启新道路）是原文核心隐喻。 排除其他选项： A. Failure fuels fierce competition（失败加剧竞争）：文中未强调“竞争”，而是“转向新方向”。 B. Technology replaces human effort（技术取代人力）：与作者“亲自参与项目”的情节矛盾。 D. Perfection guarantees achievement（完美保证成功）：作者恰恰通过“不完美的机会”成功，反驳此观点。 C In the digital age, scholars across disciplines warn that ​cognitive fragmentation—scattered attention across endless information—has eroded humanity’s capacity for deep focus. This fragmented thinking exacerbates critical issues: misinformation spread, declining critical analysis, and weakened cultural continuity. Sociologist Liang Wen argues that modern societies now inhabit a “perpetual present”, where “endless digital noise drowns reflection, leaving minds trapped between fleeting stimulation and intellectual numbness”. Studies confirm humans’ ​present bias toward instant gratification. Social media algorithms feed this bias, prioritizing viral content over substantive knowledge. In education, this manifests as students skimming headlines instead of reading deeply; in policymaking, as prioritizing quick public approval over sustainable strategies. For complex challenges like AI ethics, it breeds reluctance to establish long-term regulatory frameworks, favoring temporary fixes that ignore future risks. This cognitive shift stems from multiple factors, yet psychological patterns dominate. The ​availability heuristic—overvaluing easily accessible information—is key. For example, one might claim: “This viral post says AI is safe, so regulations aren’t urgent.” Similarly, emotionally charged content (e.g., celebrity scandals) overshadows gradual societal shifts, like declining book-reading rates. As a neuroscientist quipped, if aliens sought to paralyze human progress, they wouldn’t launch missiles; they’d invent TikTok. Generational “attention amnesia” emerges: elders recall pre-digital concentration spans, while youth perceive constant distraction as normal. A grandparent might remember hours spent reading novels; a teenager, accustomed to 15-second videos, scarcely comprehends that depth of focus. 28. The author cites Liang Wen primarily to ________. A. challenge a popular belief B. define a core concept C. emphasize cultural values D. illustrate a scientific theory 29. What is implied in the last paragraph? A. Traditional reading is irreplaceable. B. Humans struggle to perceive gradual mental shifts. C. Younger generations reject technological advancements. D. Alien intervention explains cognitive deterioration. 30. What message does the author convey? A. Fragmented thinking enhances adaptability. B. Sustained attention is crucial for societal progress. C. Algorithmic systems prioritize long-term benefits. D. Viral content promotes critical analysis. 【答案】28．B 29．B 30．B 【分析】本文是一篇议论文，主要内容是关于记忆准确性的假设难以从科学上证实，受 19 世纪心理学家威廉・詹姆斯观点及现代神经科学研究启发，我们应将对 “记忆是否为过去精确记录” 的探究转变为 “能否将记忆过程建模为类似图书馆系统”，如同过往构建心理学模型一样，新的基于概念类比的记忆模型是探索未知和发现的工具，不应纠结模型与现实的一致性，而应多借助模型增进对记忆的理解 。 28. 答案：B 解析：原文定位：首段提到社会学家Liang Wen的“perpetual present”（永恒的当下），将其描述为“endless digital noise drowns reflection”（无尽数字噪音淹没反思）。 ​功能分析： 前文提出核心概念“cognitive fragmentation”（认知碎片化），Liang Wen的引用通过比喻（“digital noise”“fleeting stimulation”）​具体定义这一概念的表现形式。 ​排除干扰项： A. challenge a popular belief（挑战普遍观点）：文中未提及对某观点的反驳。 C. emphasize cultural values（强调文化价值）：与“数字噪音”等技术性描述无关。 D. illustrate a scientific theory（阐释科学理论）：Liang Wen是社会学家，其观点属于社会现象分析，非自然科学理论。 29. 答案：B 解析：关键信息提取： 末段用“generational attention amnesia”（代际注意力遗忘症）比喻人类对渐进变化的忽视。 对比两代人：“grandparent might remember hours spent reading”（祖辈记得长时间阅读） vs. “teenager... accustomed to 15-second videos”（青少年习惯短视频）。 ​逻辑推理： 通过代际差异说明人类难以察觉自身注意力的逐渐退化，正如原题末段“昆虫减少”暗示对缓慢生态变化的忽视。 选项B中“gradual mental shifts”（渐进心理变化）精准概括此意。 ​排除干扰项： A. Traditional reading is irreplaceable（传统阅读不可替代）：例子中的“reading”仅为佐证，非段落核心结论。 C. Younger generations reject technology（年轻一代排斥科技）：文中强调“accustomed to”（习惯），而非“reject”（排斥）。 D. Alien intervention explains...（外星干预解释认知退化）：比喻“外星人发明TikTok”旨在强调科技影响，非字面解释原因。 30. 答案：B 解析：全文脉络分析： ​问题提出：认知碎片化（首段）→ ​影响：教育浅薄化、政策短视（第二段）→ ​心理根源：可得性启发式（第三段）→ ​代际案例​（末段）。 ​结论句：末段暗示“深度注意力”的丧失阻碍社会进步，呼应首段“eroded humanity’s capacity for deep focus”（削弱人类深度专注力）。 ​选项匹配： B选项“持续注意力对社会进步至关重要”直接对应作者对“深度专注力丧失”的批判及呼吁。 ​排除干扰项： A. Fragmented thinking enhances adaptability（碎片化思维增强适应性）：与文中“exacerbates critical issues”（加剧关键问题）矛盾。 C. Algorithmic systems prioritize long-term benefits（算法系统优先长期利益）：第二段明确“algorithms... prioritize viral content”（算法优先病毒式内容），否定此选项。 D. Viral content promotes critical analysis（病毒内容促进批判性分析）：与“students skimming headlines”（学生浏览标题）等负面描述矛盾。 D What is consciousness? Like the mystery of life itself, this question escapes definitive answers. Our understanding is limited because consciousness manifests uniquely in biological systems. The emerging field of ​quantum cognition (QC) seeks to decode consciousness’s fundamental rules by creating synthetic awareness in quantum simulations. QC researchers believe that engineering artificial consciousness could finally reveal its essence. So far, no quantum model has achieved true self-awareness. This fuels skepticism, with critics dismissing QC as philosophical speculation. Dr. Elena Marquez, a quantum physicist, counters such doubts: “Questioning QC’s practicality misses its purpose. Consciousness isn’t about utility,” she argues. “When asked ‘What’s the value of synthetic consciousness?’, I reply, ‘What’s the value of a sunset?’” Though QC resists commercial focus, its research may revolutionize AI. Quantum cognition shares DNA with ​blockchain technology—both pursue decentralized innovation. QC aims to mimic the brain’s capacity for spontaneous idea generation, a phenomenon exclusive to biological minds. Success here could birth machines capable of unpredictable creativity. QC’s progress differs from blockchain’s visible milestones. Its core challenge lies in defining “consciousness”—a concept as elusive as QC itself. Divisions among QC scholars further cloud its path, resulting in scattered experimental approaches. Ironically, QC’s chaotic evolution mirrors biological consciousness’s messy emergence. Unconstrained by rigid definitions, QC drives radical rethinking of classical theories. This turbulence might not be unique. All revolutionary sciences may endure similar growing pains. Ultimately, QC’s significance may lie not in its conclusions but in its inevitability as humanity’s next cognitive frontier. 31. Regarding Dr. Marquez’s defense of QC, the author is ______. A. supportive B. critical C. indifferent D. uncertain 32. What does the word “enthralled” underlined in Paragraph 3 most probably mean? A. Restricted. B. Fascinated. C. Confused. D. Replaced. 33. What can we infer from the passage? A. Blockchain depends on QC’s breakthroughs. B. QC and blockchain target decentralized systems. C. Quantum models have achieved true innovation. D. Blockchain accelerates biological consciousness. 34. Which would be the best title for the passage? A. Consciousness Is Mysterious. Can Blockchain Decode It? B. Consciousness Emerges. Will QC’s Journey Mirror Nature? C. Consciousness Is Fluid. Can Quantum Physics Freeze It? D. Consciousness Evolves. Has Blockchain Outpaced QC? 【答案】31. A 32．B 33．B 34．B 【分析】本文揭示了数字时代人类认知碎片化的问题，指出注意力分散和深度思考能力下降削弱了批判性分析、文化传承和应对复杂挑战的能力。文中提到社交媒体算法助长了人类对即时满足的偏好，导致教育、政策制定等领域出现浅层化趋势，如学生只看标题、政策制定者追求短期公众认可等。文章还指出，这种认知转变源于多种因素，其中心理模式如可用性启发式偏差尤为关键，导致人们高估易得信息的价值，忽视长期风险。最后，文章警示这种现象可能引发代际“注意力失忆”，年轻人习惯于持续分心，难以理解深度专注的价值，对人类进步构成潜在威胁。 31. 答案：A ​原文定位： Dr. Marquez反驳质疑：“Questioning QC’s practicality misses its purpose... What’s the value of a sunset?”（“质疑QC的实用性误解了其意义……日落的价值观是什么？”）。 后文作者评价：“QC’s research ​may revolutionize AI”（QC研究可能革新AI）。 ​态度分析： 作者未对Marquez的类比提出质疑，反而通过“may revolutionize”等表述间接支持其观点，认为QC研究具有潜在价值。 ​排除干扰项： B. critical（批判的）：作者未批评Marquez的观点，反而肯定其研究意义。 C. indifferent（冷漠的）：后文详细讨论QC的应用前景，体现关注。 D. uncertain（不确定的）：作者用“may”表示可能性，但整体态度偏向支持，而非完全不确定。 32. 答案：B 解析：上下文线索： 原文：“QC shares DNA with blockchain technology—both ​pursue decentralized innovation.”（QC与区块链技术有共同基因——都追求去中心化创新。） “enthralled”的主语是“researchers in both fields”（两领域的研究者），宾语是“open-ended innovation”（开放式创新）。 ​逻辑推理： 研究者对“去中心化创新”的态度应为“着迷/热衷”，而非“受限”（A）或“困惑”（C）。 “enthralled”与原文“enamored”（原题词义）同义替换，均表示“被吸引”。 ​干扰项排除： A. Restricted（限制的）：与“pursue”（追求）矛盾。 C. Confused（困惑的）：无上下文支持研究者对此概念感到困惑。 D. Replaced（取代的）：区块链与QC是并列关系，非替代关系。 33. 答案：B 解析：原文定位： 第三段明确表述：“QC shares DNA with blockchain technology—both ​pursue decentralized innovation.”（QC与区块链技术有共同基因——都追求去中心化创新。） ​选项匹配： 选项B直接对应“decentralized systems”（去中心化系统），为原文同义替换。 ​排除干扰项： A. Blockchain depends on QC’s breakthroughs（区块链依赖QC突破）：文中未提及依赖关系，两者是并列类比。 C. Quantum models have achieved true innovation（量子模型已实现真正创新）：首段提到“no quantum model has achieved true self-awareness”（未实现真正自我意识），否定此选项。 D. Blockchain accelerates biological consciousness（区块链加速生物意识）：文中仅讨论QC模拟意识，未涉及区块链对生物意识的影响。 34. 答案：B 解析：全文脉络： ​核心问题：意识本质与QC的探索（首段）。 ​研究争议：Marquez为QC辩护（第二段）。 ​跨领域关联：QC与区块链的共性（第三段）。 ​演化类比：QC的混乱进程与生物意识演化的相似性（第四段）。 ​结论：QC的探索可能如生命演化般不可避免（末段）。 ​标题匹配： 选项B“Consciousness Emerges. Will QC’s Journey Mirror Nature?”（意识涌现，QC的探索会镜像自然吗？）精准概括“QC模拟自然演化”的核心隐喻。 ​排除干扰项： A. 区块链解码意识：文中未赋予区块链解码功能，两者仅为类比。 C. 量子物理冻结意识：“freeze”与QC研究目标（模拟动态演化）矛盾。 D. 区块链超越QC：文中强调两者并行发展，无“超越”表述。 第二节（共5小题；每小题2分, 满分10分） 根据短文内容，从短文后的七个选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项。选项中有两项为多余选项。 If you aim to excel in problem-solving, is it wiser to be a ​soloist (独奏者) or a ​collaborator? The soloist works independently, diving deep into individual analysis, while the collaborator thrives in team dynamics, integrating diverse perspectives. Is one method inherently superior? Soloist-style thinkers often insist so. ​ 35 They are widely admired for their focused expertise and decisive conclusions. According to Dr. Wang Lei, a cognitive scientist, the “soloist mindset” is crucial for developing precision in technical fields. These individuals master complex systems through concentrated study, identify their unique strengths within their domain, and refine solutions with laser-like accuracy. ​ 36 The soloist approach appears a proven route to specialized mastery. 37 Professor Li Ming’s research on innovation patterns in tech startups reveals that soloists are less likely to generate disruptive ideas compared to collaborators. Moreover, they often resist adjusting their strategies when market demands shift. Collaborators, however, leverage collective intelligence. They comfortably navigate conflicting viewpoints and synthesize ideas from varied sources. ​ 38 They actively seek to reconcile opposing proposals rather than dismissing them. Additionally, collaborators demonstrate clearer awareness of their cognitive blind spots and teammates’ strengths. So, which strategy wins? The answer lies in a hybrid model. ​ 39 Framing the choice as “soloist vs. collaborator” creates a false dilemma. True problem-solving excellence emerges from blending both approaches—the rare “solo-collaborator” who thinks deeply while engaging widely. A. In reality, both strategies offer unique advantages. B. They tend to prioritize efficiency over creative exploration. C. Thus, they benefit from rigorous specialization and self-reliance. D. Yet exclusive reliance on solo work carries hidden limitations. E. However, soloists may selectively adopt external feedback. F. When a teammate’s suggestion challenges their hypothesis, they engage constructively. G. They commit wholly to one methodology, dismissing alternatives as distractions. 【答案】35．G 36．C 37．D 38. F 39. A 【导语】本文是一篇议论文，围绕“问题解决策略”展开，对比了两种思维模式：​独奏者​（专注独立分析，追求精准）与合作者​（整合多元视角，灵活适应）。研究发现，独奏者虽擅长专业深耕但缺乏突破性创新，而合作者能通过协调矛盾观点激发新思路。文章最终指出，二者并非对立，​结合专注与协作的混合模式才是最优解，避免陷入“非此即彼”的思维陷阱。 35. 答案：G 解析：Soloist-style thinkers often insist so. 35 They are widely admired for their focused expertise... ​关键线索：前文“soloist是否更优”需填入支持独奏者的观点。后文“admired for expertise”强调其“专注优势”。 ​选项分析：G. They commit wholly to one methodology, dismissing alternatives as distractions. ​逻辑匹配：解释独奏者“坚持单一方法”的特点，与后文“专注”呼应。 ​代词指代：“they”指代前文“soloist-style thinkers”。 ​排除项：E项“soloists可能采纳反馈”与后文“resist adjusting strategies”矛盾。 36. 答案：C 解析：...identify their unique strengths...and refine solutions with laser-like accuracy. 36 The soloist approach appears a proven route to specialized mastery. ​关键线索：前文列举独奏者的优势（专注学习、精准解决）。空格需总结其益处，并为后文“proven route”铺垫。 ​选项分析：C. Thus, they benefit from rigorous specialization and self-reliance. ​逻辑匹配：“rigorous specialization”总结前文“专注与精准”，“self-reliance”呼应独奏者的独立性。 ​连接词：“Thus”标志因果关系，前因后果。 ​排除项：B项“效率优先”与主题无关。 37. 答案：D 解析：37 Professor Li Ming’s research...soloists are less likely to generate disruptive ideas... ​关键线索： 后文通过研究指出独奏者的局限性（缺乏颠覆性创新、抗拒调整）。空格需引入对独奏者的批评，形成转折。 ​选项分析：D. Yet exclusive reliance on solo work carries hidden limitations. ​逻辑匹配：“Yet”标志转折，引出独奏者的缺点，与后文研究结论一致。 ​关键词复现：“exclusive reliance”对应后文“resist adjusting strategies”。 ​排除项：E项“soloists可能采纳反馈”与后文矛盾。 38. 答案：F 解析：Collaborators...comfortably navigate conflicting viewpoints...38 They actively seek to reconcile opposing proposals... ​关键线索：前文强调合作者整合多元观点的能力。空格需具体说明其处理冲突的方式。 ​选项分析：F. When a teammate’s suggestion challenges their hypothesis, they engage constructively. ​逻辑匹配：以实例说明合作者如何“建设性处理冲突”，与后文“reconcile opposing proposals”呼应。 ​代词指代：“they”指代“collaborators”。 ​排除项：B项“效率优先”偏离主题 39. 答案：A 解析：So, which strategy wins? The answer lies in a hybrid model. 39 Framing the choice as “soloist vs. collaborator” creates a false dilemma. ​关键线索：前文对比二者优劣，后文提出“混合模型”。空格需承上启下，总结二者各有优势。 ​选项分析：A. In reality, both strategies offer unique advantages. ​逻辑匹配：总结前文对比，引出“结合二者”的结论。 ​关键词复现：“both strategies”对应“hybrid model”。 ​排除项：E项与结论无关 第三部分 书面表达（共两节，满分32分） 第一节（共4小题；第40、41题各2分，第42题3分，第43题5分，满分12分） 阅读下面短文, 根据题目要求回答问题。 Lina, a 16-year-old environmental advocate, noticed plastic straws piling up in her school cafeteria. Determined to address single-use plastic waste, she drew inspiration from her family's stainless steel straws at home. "They worked well but were bulky to carry," Lina recalls. Her solution? A collapsible reusable straw called StrawTwist. The idea sparked when Lina watched her father struggle to pack rigid metal straws for camping trips. "I wanted something portable yet eco-friendly," she says. The StrawTwist features a silicone body with a twist-lock mechanism, folding into a capsule smaller than a lipstick. Its brush attachment ensures easy cleaning. Now sold online and in eco-stores, Lina takes pride not just in sales but in her impact: each purchase funds beach cleanups, and schools using StrawTwist report 60% less plastic waste. Despite winning national sustainability awards, Lina stays grounded. Her advice to young innovators? "Start small but think big. Patience beats perfectionism — prototypes will fail, but persistence pays off. 40. What problem did Lina observe in her school cafeteria? 41. Where did Lina get the idea for the StrawTwist design? 42. Please decide which part is false in the following statement, then underline it and explain why. ▷ Lina feels proudest of StrawTwist's sales success because she uses expensive materials for durability and completely replaces plastic straws in all schools. 43. Which of Lina's qualities do you find most valuable for solving real-world problems? Why? (In about 40 words) 【答案】 40. Plastic straws piling up. / The accumulation of plastic straws. 41. From her father’s difficulty in packing metal straws during camping trips. 42. Lina feels proudest of StrawTwist's sales success because she uses expensive materials for durability and completely replaces plastic straws in all schools. Lina feels proudest of StrawTwist's sales success because she uses expensive materials for durability and schools using StrawTwist report 60% less plastic waste. 43. Lina’s environmental awareness drives her to solve real problems. Her creativity in designing a portable straw and persistence despite prototype failures show that practical innovation requires both vision and resilience.（答案言之有理即可） 第二节（满分20分） 44．假设你是红星中学高三学生李华。5月22日是国际生物多样性日，你在京学习的澳大利亚好友Amy计划当天参加社区湿地保护志愿活动，并邀请你一同参与。请你用英文给她写一封邮件，内容包括： 1．是否愿意参加及理由； 2．建议其他保护生物多样性的行动（如拒绝购买濒危物种制品、参与校园生态调查等）; 3. 表达对生态保护的长期支持。 注意: 1. 词数 100 左右； 2. 开头和结尾已给出，不计入总词数。 Dear Tom ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yours Li Hua 【答案】（One Possible Version） Dear Tom, I’m thrilled to hear about your plan to join the wetland protection activity on Biodiversity Day! Though I cannot participate due to final exams, I wholeheartedly support your initiative. Wetlands are vital ecosystems that sustain biodiversity by providing habitats for endangered species like migratory birds. Protecting them aligns with our shared responsibility to balance nature. To further promote biodiversity, here are my suggestions: ​Refuse products from endangered species (e.g., ivory or shark fin dishes). Publicly rejecting such items raises awareness of wildlife conservation. ​Launch a campus ecological survey to document local flora and fauna. For instance, we could collaborate with biology teachers to create a species database, which would deepen students’ understanding of regional ecosystems. ​Design educational posters featuring quotes like “Every species matters” to display in community centers. Visual campaigns effectively inspire collective action. Let’s continue advocating for nature beyond May 22! By integrating small daily actions—such as reducing plastic use and planting native flowers—we can create a ripple effect toward lasting ecological health. Looking forward to our future endeavors! Yours, Li Hua 【评解】 【总体分】 ① ​题材：本文是一封回复邮件，旨在回应好友关于参与国际生物多样性日湿地保护活动的邀请，并提出其他保护行动建议，体现生态责任意识。 ② ​时态：以一般现在时为主（如 "Wetlands are vital ecosystems"），阐述生态保护的重要性；将来时​（"Let’s continue advocating"）用于承诺长期行动。 ③ ​提示：围绕“无法参与但支持→具体建议→长期承诺”逻辑链展开，内容涵盖拒绝濒危制品、校园生态调查、公众宣传等多维度保护策略，紧扣“生物多样性”主题。 【写作步骤】 第一步：明确回应邀请 ​功能句："Though I cannot participate due to final exams, I wholeheartedly support your initiative." ​解析：以Though引导让步状语从句，委婉拒绝的同时强调支持态度（"wholeheartedly"），体现礼貌与合作精神。 第二步：多领域建议与成果论证 ​直接行动建议： ​功能句："Refuse products from endangered species (e.g., ivory or shark fin dishes)." ​解析：用祈使句提出具体措施，括号内举例（e.g.,）增强操作性。 ​校园合作方案： ​功能句："Collaborate with biology teachers to create a species database." ​解析：​不定式表目的​（to create）明确行动目标，体现学术实践性。 ​公众宣传策略： ​功能句："Design educational posters featuring quotes like ‘Every species matters’." ​解析：​分词结构​（featuring）替代定语从句，语言简洁有力，引用标语增强号召力。 第三步：升华主题与长期承诺 ​功能句："By integrating small daily actions... we can create a ripple effect toward lasting ecological health." ​解析：​By + doing结构强调方式，"ripple effect"比喻从个体到集体的连锁影响，深化主题意义。 【亮点词汇】 ① ​thrilled​（欣喜的）：替代普通词汇happy，表达强烈情感（如 "I’m thrilled to hear..."）。 ② ​initiative​（倡议）：比plan更正式，凸显行动的引领性（如 "support your initiative"）。 ③ ​flora and fauna​（动植物）：学术术语替代common animals/plants，提升专业性（如 "document local flora and fauna"）。 [高分句型] ①"Wetlands are vital ecosystems that sustain biodiversity by providing habitats for endangered species like migratory birds."（通过that从句补充湿地功能，​like举例增强说服力） ②"Visual campaigns effectively inspire collective action."（弱化主语，突出“海报”的客观影响力） ③"Even small actions count, like refusing shark fin products."（Even让步语气+like举例，强调“微小行动的重要性”） 试卷第2页，共22页 1 / 2 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$