内容正文:
易错点15 阅读理解推理判断题
目 录
01 易错陷阱(4大陷阱)
02 举一反三
【易错点提醒一】观点态度易混易错点
【易错点提醒二】文章出处和读者对象易混易错点
【易错点提醒三】写作目的和意图易混易错点
【易错点提醒四】细节推断易混易错点
03 易错题通关
易错陷阱1:观点态度易混易错点。
【分析】
1. 选项中的观点态度类词意辨析不清;
2. 原文中表达作者观点、态度的形容词和副词词义;
3. 未能从所列举的例子中理解作者真正表达的意思;
易错陷阱2:文章出处和读者对象易混易错点。
【分析】读者需要具备一定的生活常识,对报纸、杂志、网络、科普、小说、广告、说明书、旅游指南等有基本的了解,才能根据文章的特点对号入座,选出正确的答案。有时命题者为了增加试题的难度,特殊的格式或日期可能不出现,这时需要根据文章的题材内容进行推断。
如,发布新闻,最可能是出现在报纸上;如果是科普读物,可能是出自科普杂志上。
易错陷阱3:写作目的和意图易混易错点。
【分析】考生应根据文章的论述,揣测作者的写作意图和写作手法。作者一般不直接陈述自己的意图,而是通过文章所提供的事实,客观地使读者信服某种想法或观点。这就要求考生不但要理解文章的主旨大意,而且要具备对作者阐述问题的方法进行归纳总结和分析的能力。如,广告是作者要推销一种产品或一种服务:吸引更多的游客﹑读者或订户﹑观众等。议论文是为了说服读者接受或赞同某一观点。
易错陷阱4:细节推断易混易错点。
【分析】细节推断要求考生根据文章内容,推断具体的细节,如时间、地点、人物关系、人物身份、事件等。题干中常出现infer(推断),indicate(象征,暗示),imply(暗示),suggest(暗示).conclude(作出结论),assume(假定,设想)等词。考生应以文中信息为依据,不但要理解表层含义,而且要理解深层意义。
【易错点提醒一】 观点态度易混易错点
【例1】 (2024届河北省百师联盟高三联考)
But, it doesn't have to be all bad news. “One major motivation in studying the link between climate change and human-wildlife conflicts is finding solutions,” said Abrahms. “As we learn about specific incidents, we can identify patterns and tends-and come up with interventions(干预) to try to address these conflicts.”
Some interventions maybe as simple as public-awareness campaigns. Governments can also plan forties when extreme climate events will bring people and wild if e into closer contact. “Once you know the root causes of a conflict, you can design interventions to help both people and wildlife,” said Abrahms. “We can change.”
What does Abrahms think of interventions?
A. They are too simple. B. They are out-of-date.
C. They are changeable. D. They are beneficial.
【变式1】(江苏省2023-2024学年高三名校联考检测试题)
Of course, all of these are predictions. Scientists have said it’s almost impossible to truly predict how evolution will unfold. As we go further and further out, the prediction is less accurate. And it’s even more difficult to predict whether another species will develop human-level intelligence, Some think that it could happen. Others, however,