2024届高三英语一轮复习读后续写之正确选词导学案

读后续写之正确选词 part01 命题解读与评分标准 读后续写是在传统题型考查基础上对学生语言能力的考查的一大提升。该题型是“读+写”较为完美的结合，即英语综合运用能力不再是单纯的“输出”。 命题表述及解读 命题表述：“阅读下面材料, 根据其内容和所给段落开头语续写两段, 使之构成一篇完整的短文。”（满分25分） 命题解读：“提供一篇350词以内的材料，要求考生依据材料内容、所给段落开头语及所标关键词续写（150词左右），将其发展成一篇与给定材料有逻辑衔接、情节和结构完整的短文。” 读后续写评分标准 第五档（21-25分） 与所给短文融合度高，与所提供的各段落开头语衔接合理。 内容丰富，应用了五个以上短文中标出的关键词语。 所使用语法结构和词汇丰富、准确，可能有些许错误，但完全不影响意义表达。 part02 得分要点与存在问题 1、 与段首句及上文逻辑高度融合，上下文文风一致。 2、 拒绝过度使用长难句、避免“高级词汇”的堆砌。 3、 情节有一定创新，有高潮或出乎意料情节出现，有正能量结局。 4、 两段分别7-8句，句法、语法正确，每段80单词左右。 5、 “1+2+5” ：1句写景，烘托主题；2句抒情，突出人物性格； 5句动作描写 ，串起故事。 6、 书写文字大小适中，字体整洁美观。 7、 与段首句及上文逻辑高度融合，上下文文风一致。 学生习作存在问题 词数不够，情节过于肤浅，描写不详细，人物对话不到位。 与文章主旨不符合，故事情节与上文不连贯，有的甚至瞎编乱造，不顾及逻辑关系。 语言基本功欠缺，语法结构错误，词汇贫乏，人称混乱，时态混用。 表达内容不丰富，语言能力不强，缺乏可读性。 书写不规范，字迹不工整，难识别。 part03 习作加分之正确选词 Can you identify the missing person David according to the description? Stephen Chan, Chinese, 27 years old, has a medium build. He was last seen at the airport in Seattle at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday. He was dressed in a shirt and jeans, wearing glasses and a mask. If you have seen Stephen or have any information, please call the Police Department at 412-285-3444 or contact Mr. Chan at 412-274-2566. Compare the two descriptions and pick out the better one. Description A: Harry then did something that was both very brave and very stupid: He jumped up and managed to put his arms around the troll's neck.The troll couldn't feel Harry hanging there, but even a troll will notice if you put a long bit of wood up its nose, and Harry's wand had still been in his hand when he'd jumped — it had gone straight up one of the troll's nostrils. Description B: Harry then did something that was both very brave and very stupid: He took a great running jump and managed to fasten his arms around the troll's neck from behind. The troll couldn't feel Harry hanging there, but even a troll will notice if you stick a long bit of wood up its nose, and Harry's wand had still been in his hand when he'd jumped — it had gone straight up one of the troll's nos