内容正文:
Interpretation of Optional Compulsory Two Unit 5 Education Lesson 3 Understanding
Hello, everyone. I’m honor to be here sharing my instructional design with you. My topic is Lesson 3 Understanding. I’ll explicate the lesson from six dimensions: teaching materials, the students, teaching aims, methods, teaching procedures, before-teaching reflection. The following is my statements.
The 1st part is about the teaching materials. I intend to analyze it from three aspects: what the context is, why we’ll do the bilateral instructional process and how to do.
What: The lesson belongs to Unit 5 Education in Optional Compulsory Two for senior high school, Grade 2 students, published by Beijing Normal University Press. As for the thematic context, the topic relates to human and ego, life and study to be exact.
Lesson 3 is an argumentation, by contrast with the great men’s real experience and the average people’s choice presenting two diverse patterns of understanding, analyzing which is the valid.
Why: In the whole text, the author expands on the valid one, three steps to solve the world’s problems and explore the truth, in order to stimulate students to empathize the author’s attitudes, promoting their independent thinking and strengthening their ability of doubting something.
How: The text consists of 5 paragraphs, the 1st one presenting two distinct patterns and explicating the valid steps, in Para 2. & Para 3 elaborating the sophists go forth and seek out the truth. The last two paragraphs indicate the author’s perspective.
The 2nd Part is about analysis of the target students.
As a sophomore in high school, they have had some groundings. On average, they may have these features:
1. are enthusiastic about English learning
2. have already known how to grasp the key elements of an argumentation.
3. long to explore the true and simultaneously their cognitive process become sharper.
4. can describe what impact the cognitive process in lesson 1 and interpret the cause of ed