摘要:
该高中英语课件聚焦“用具体人生故事证明抽象品质”,以“科学精神”为核心,通过Lead-in环节区分“品质标签与证据”,引导学生对比弱句与强句,再结合钱学森、霍金的生平阅读,搭建CEEL(Claim-Evidence-Explanation-Link)写作支架,实现从识别证据到构建段落的逻辑递进。
其亮点在于以结构化写作培养思维品质,通过“Evidence-Quality-Why”卡片、段落功能分析表等工具,引导学生逻辑分析具体行为与抽象品质的关联,如钱学森回国服务国家项目体现责任,霍金修正理论体现诚实。同时设计语言升级任务,对比基础句与精准表达,提升语言能力,分层任务与互评清单助力学习能力发展,教师可高效引导学生完成从段落到短文的写作输出。
内容正文:
Unit 1 Science and Scientists
Using Language
写作课课件
How can specific life stories prove an abstract quality?
课堂教学课件
P1 priority deck
英语人教版选择性必修第二册
1
Contents
01 Lead-in
02 Reading Qian Xuesen
03 Reading Hawking
04 Text Analysis
05 Pre-writing
06 While-writing
07 Post-writing
08 Homework
Final output: an 80–100-word CEEL paragraph and a 120-word essay on scientific spirit.
Contents
Unit 1 | Using Language | 2/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
2
Lead-in
From quality labels to life evidence
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 3/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
3
Quality Label or Evidence?
Decide whether each sentence names a quality, gives evidence, or explains a connection.
Qian was patriotic.
He returned to China in 1955.
This choice shows that he put national needs above personal comfort.
Hawking was brilliant.
He challenged a calculation and changed his theory when evidence required it.
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 4/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
4
Which Sentence Is More Convincing?
A good paragraph proves an abstract quality through a concrete life story.
Weak
Stronger
Qian Xuesen was patriotic and intelligent.
He made many achievements.
Qian returned to China and devoted himself to rocket and space programmes.
This decision reveals responsibility because he used his knowledge for national development.
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 5/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
5
Lesson Question
1
Quality label
2
Concrete action
3
Why it matters
4
Link to scientific spirit
Today we learn how specific stories prove abstract qualities.
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 6/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
6
Reading Qian Xuesen
Find actions that reveal scientific spirit
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 7/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
7
Read for Paragraph Functions: Qian Xuesen
Part
Function
What to find
Background
Introduce identity
field and contribution
Education
Show preparation
what he studied
Return
Reveal choice
why the choice matters
Contribution
Prove value
rocket / space programmes
Evaluation
Connect to spirit
responsibility and patriotism
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 8/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
8
Qian: Evidence–Quality–Why Card
Evidence
Quality
Why it proves the quality
Changed field and kept learning
knowledgeable
He built the expertise needed for complex scientific work.
Returned to China in 1955
patriotic
He chose national need over personal convenience.
Worked on missiles and space programmes
responsible
He turned knowledge into public contribution.
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 9/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
9
Avoid Listing a Biography
Transform a life-list into an evidence-based sentence.
Life-list
Evidence-based claim
Qian studied engineering.
He returned to China.
He worked on rockets.
Qian’s decision to return and build China’s rocket and space programmes shows patriotic responsibility because his expertise served the country’s urgent scientific development.
Lead-in
Unit 1 | Using Language | 10/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
10
Exit Ticket after Qian
Complete the sentence orally before writing.
The strongest evidence of Qian’s scientific spirit is ...
This evidence shows ... because ...
The action is more convincing than a general label because ...
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 11/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
11
Reading Hawking
Use evidence verbs to prove qualities
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 12/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
12
Hawking: Structure Map
1
Challenge
2
Scientific focus
3
Evidence-based correction
4
Public influence
A scientist’s quality is visible in how he faces difficulty and evidence.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 13/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
13
Hawking: Evidence Verbs
Choose verbs that show a strong evidence relationship.
show
suggest
reveal
demonstrate
prove
reflect
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 14/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
14
Hawking Evidence Card
Evidence
Quality
Explanation
Faced serious physical limits
determination
He continued scientific work despite extreme difficulty.
Admitted problems in his theory
honesty
He valued evidence over personal pride.
Explained the universe to the public
responsibility
He made difficult science more accessible.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 15/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
15
Compare Qian and Hawking
Scientist
Strongest evidence
Quality
Scientific spirit
Qian Xuesen
returned and served national programmes
patriotism / responsibility
science serves society
Stephen Hawking
accepted evidence and revised ideas
honesty / courage
science follows truth
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 16/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
16
Text Analysis
From evidence to a strong paragraph
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 17/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
17
What Personal Qualities Define Scientific Spirit?
Choose only 1–2 qualities. Too many adjectives weaken the paragraph.
curiosity
responsibility
determination
honesty
creativity
patriotism
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 18/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
18
CEEL Four-step Structure
1
Claim: name the quality
2
Evidence: give one action
3
Explanation: explain why it proves the quality
4
Link: connect to scientific progress
The Explanation step is the key difference between listing and arguing.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 19/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
19
Analyse a Model CEEL Paragraph
CEEL step
Question
Example focus
Claim
What quality?
responsibility
Evidence
What specific action?
returned and built programmes
Explanation
Why does it prove the claim?
served national needs
Link
Why does it matter?
science advances society
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 20/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
20
Repair a Weak Paragraph
Weak: Hawking was honest. He was willing to admit his faults. He was a great scientist.
Add concrete evidence.
Explain why admitting a mistake matters in science.
Link honesty to evidence-based inquiry.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 21/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
21
Pre-writing
Select evidence and build an outline
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 22/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
22
Writing Task Breakdown
Item
Requirement
Topic
scientific spirit
Focus
Qian or Hawking
Core paragraph
80–100 words
Full essay
about 120 words
Advanced option
140–170 words
Must include
specific evidence + explanation
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 23/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
23
Evidence Bank: Choose the Strongest
Use one strong example rather than a list of achievements.
Qian’s return to China
Qian’s work on space programmes
Hawking’s response to evidence
Hawking’s public explanation of science
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 24/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
24
Outline Builder
Part
Function
My note
Opening
answer the topic
Scientific spirit means ...
Body 1
CEEL example
Qian / Hawking
Body 2
optional second quality
another action
Ending
explain value
important for progress
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 25/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
25
Useful Sentence Frames
The strongest evidence of ... is ...
This action shows ... because ...
Rather than simply ..., he/she ...
Such a choice reveals that ...
Scientific progress requires ...
Language Building
Unit 1 | Using Language | 26/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
26
Upgrade Sentences
Basic
Upgraded
Qian was patriotic. He returned to China.
Hawking was honest. He changed his idea.
Qian’s return to China shows patriotism because he used his expertise to support national scientific development.
Hawking’s willingness to revise his theory reveals honesty because he placed evidence above pride.
Language Building
Unit 1 | Using Language | 27/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
27
While-writing
Write one CEEL core paragraph
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 28/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
28
Micro-writing Task
Choose Qian or Hawking. Use CEEL to write one 80–100-word paragraph.
Claim: name one quality.
Evidence: give one concrete action.
Explanation: explain why the action proves the quality.
Link: connect the quality to scientific progress.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 29/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
29
Peer Check: Three Looks and One Revision
Look 1: Is there a clear claim?
Look 2: Is the evidence specific?
Look 3: Is the explanation logical?
Revise: add or strengthen the Explanation step.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 30/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
30
Model Paragraph Annotation
Part
Signal
Check
Claim
This example reveals ...
quality stated
Evidence
When / By ...
specific event
Explanation
This matters because ...
logic explained
Link
Therefore ...
scientific spirit connected
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 31/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
31
Why Not Include Every Achievement?
A strong essay selects evidence. It does not list a complete biography.
Select the evidence that best proves the quality.
Explain the quality–evidence relationship.
Leave less relevant life details out.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 32/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
32
Complete the 120-word Essay
Use your core paragraph as the body. Add a brief opening and ending.
1
Opening
2
CEEL body
3
Optional second point
4
Ending
Advanced option: expand to 140–170 words with a second CEEL paragraph.
Writing
Unit 1 | Using Language | 33/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
33
Self-assessment
Final Checklist
Opening directly answers scientific spirit.
Only 1–2 main qualities are selected.
Each quality has concrete evidence.
Explanation is not missing.
Ending connects qualities to scientific progress.
Words, tense and punctuation are checked.
Self-assessment
Unit 1 | Using Language | 34/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
34
Homework
Finish a 120-word essay on scientific spirit.
Underline evidence in blue and explanation in orange.
Advanced: expand to 140–170 words.
Prepare one sentence explaining your strongest evidence.
Homework
Unit 1 | Using Language | 35/36
人教版 选择性必修第二册
35
Ending
Takeaway
Specific life stories prove abstract qualities only when we explain the evidence.
Quality is the claim.
Life story is the evidence.
Explanation builds the argument.
36
$