UNIT 1 The mass media(课时跟踪检测)-【优学精研】2027年高考英语一轮总复习学用Word（译林版）

**基本信息** 聚焦社交媒体热点，包含2篇阅读理解和1篇阅读七选五，素材涉及平台政策与媒体影响、照片编辑与心理健康、网络新闻辨别，考查语言理解与思维分析能力。 **题型特征** |题型|题量/分值|知识覆盖|命题特色| |----|-----------|----------|----------| |阅读理解A|4题|细节理解、主旨大意|结合江苏无锡期末真题，以社交媒体政策变化为情境，考查对媒体影响的分析| |阅读理解B|4题|推理判断、词义猜测|基于山东泰安一模素材，探究照片编辑与心理健康关系，注重逻辑推理| |阅读七选五|5题|篇章结构、语境衔接|选用湖南常德一模题，围绕网络新闻辨别策略，强调信息筛选与语篇连贯|

UNIT 1　The mass media Ⅰ.阅读理解 A 　　（2026·江苏无锡期末）Negative news stories about social media platforms appear to be highly effective at pressuring companies into changing their policies.Katzenbach at the University of Bremen analyzed policy changes across Facebook， Twitter （now X） and YouTube between 2006 and 2024， as well as how media reporting from 26 major English-language publications affected their policies.“There are significantly more changes in the policies by the platforms in the weeks and months after an increase of negative reporting，” says Katzenbach.For every negative story about a platform， the possibility of that platform changing its user policies increased by 6 per cent. 　　To measure negative reporting， the researchers looked at the content of news stories using an AI model that classifies emotions.The AI had been trained on a dataset of 11，000 news stories about US politics. 　　Facebook was the subject of the most negative reporting， with around 37 per cent of news stories from the 26 major English-language publications being seen as negative.Around 26 per cent of reporting about YouTube and Twitter was considered negative.The percentage of negative reporting about all platforms significantly increased after 2018， when accusing of the misuse of Facebook user data by the consulting firm Cambridge Analytica came to light. 　　“We’ve seen that platforms do respond to public criticism，” says Katzenbach.For example， in 2014， a campaign called Free the Nipple pressured Facebook into allowing users to post photos of breastfeeding.However， those rules， and how they are enforced （强制实行）， remain a topic of debate.Meta’s oversight board （监督委员会） told the platform to explain its policies in January 2024 following confusion over what did and didn’t break policy. 　　Carolina at Northumbria University says a more active approach is needed to regulate social media platforms， including laws that check how policies affect users.“We’re taking for granted that platforms are always going to run the system as they are — while we need to hold them far more responsible than that，” Katzenbach agrees with this view.“Definitely you need regulation， and strong regulation，” he says.“Media reporting cannot replace that.” 1.What’s the main focus of Katzenbach’s analysis of social media platforms？（　　） A.User behavior patterns on social media. B.Policy changes and media influence. C.Technological advancements of platforms. D.Advertising strategies on social media. 2.What caused a sharp increase in negative reporting after 2018？（　　） A.A new AI measurement system. B.The exposure of a data issue. C.The increased public criticism. D.The growth of social media users. 3.How does the author explain the platforms’ response to public criticism？（　　） A.By quoting official statements. B.By presenting statistical data. C.By conducting a public survey. D.By giving a specific example. 4.What can be the best title for the text？（　　） A.Social Media： Policy Shifts in the Media Focus B.Social Media： Advertising Trends and Their Impacts C.Social Media： User Reactions and Platform Responses D.Social Media： Technological Innovations and Challenges B 　　（2026·山东泰安一模） Nowadays， social media is widely used by millions of people to connect and share their lives.However， research suggests that excessive （过度） use of social media may lead to mental health issues like depression and anxiety. 　　One behavior that researchers have focused on recently is photo editing， which involves altering one’s appearance in pictures before posting them on social media.While some studies have suggested that photo editing is linked to negative outcomes such as seeing oneself as an object and having low self-esteem， the relationship between these factors is not well understood. 　　Phillip Ozimek and his colleagues conducted a study with 403 young adults recruited through social media platforms to investigate the potential risks associated with photo editing on social media.Participants completed an online survey that included questions about their social media use， photo editing behavior， self-perception as an object， comparisons of physical appearance， self-esteem （自尊）， and other relevant factors. 　　To measure photo editing behavior， participants reported how often they edited their selfies before posting them on social media.To assess self-perception as an object and comparisons of physical appearance， participants answered questions about how much they monitored their bodies and compared themselves to others’ looks.Finally， participants’ self-esteem was measured using a questionnaire that evaluated their overall sense of self-worth. 　　The data showed that higher levels of photo editing were associated with increased self-perception as an object and more comparisons of physical appearance among young adults.These factors， in turn， were related to lower self-esteem. 　　The researchers suggested that photo editing behavior may contribute to feelings of self-perception as an object and basing one’s worth on appearance， especially among vulnerable groups like teenagers.They emphasized the need for further research to explore the impact of photo editing on mental health outcomes and understand why people engage in this behavior. 　　Although the study had some limitations， as acknowledged by Ozimek and his colleagues， it highlighted the importance of considering overall social media use and specific behaviors like photo editing when studying the relationship between social media and mental health outcomes.Interventions （干预） aimed at reducing excessive social media use or promoting healthier engagement with social media could have positive effects on the mental well-being of young people. 5.What were the participants asked to do in the study？（　　） A.Fill in a questionnaire about self-worth. B.Compare their looks with others. C.Edit their selfies before posting. D.See themselves as an object. 6.What does the underlined word “vulnerable” in paragraph 6 mean？（　　） A.Hardly protected. B.Particularly strong. C.Easily influenced. D.Mostly independent. 7.What can we infer from the passage？（　　） A.The higher levels of photo editing， the higher self-esteem. B.Reducing the overuse of social media might be beneficial to well-being. C.Photo editing is the only behavior that affects mental health on social media. D.The study has completely worked out the problem of the overuse of social media. 8.What is the author’s purpose of writing this passage？（　　） A.To introduce the popularity of social media. B.To explain the detailed process of a study on photo editing. C.To show teenagers are the most vulnerable group in using social media. D.To explore the relationship between photo editing and negative mental states. Ⅱ.阅读七选五 　　（2026·湖南常德一模）Anyone with an Internet connection can watch breaking news， or at least some version of it.Across social media， posts can fly up faster than most fact-checkers can handle， and they are often an unpredictable mix of true， fake， and out of context.9.　　 How do you know what to trust and what not to share？ Here are some basic tools everyone should use when consuming breaking news online. 　　10.　　 Think about who would benefit from spreading confusing information during a news event.During elections， for example， look out for conflicting information and baseless accusations that may benefit one political party or candidate.Of course， not all misinformation is serious.Some is created just for fun or to troll （恶搞） people， so be as skeptical of silly stories as serious ones. 　　Slow down while reading or watching.Social media is built for things to go viral， for users to quickly share before they are even done reading the words.No matter how shocking， enlightening or annoying a TikTok or YouTube video is， you must wait before passing it on to your network.11.　　 That’s because they are waiting until information is confirmed and accurate.So assume everything is suspect until you confirm its authenticity （真实性）. 　　Don’t use AI to get news.Tech companies are pushing their voice assistants and AI chatbot tools as a way to get the latest news.12.　　 They can be incorrect， out of date or simply copying words from sources with little credit or visibility.Some chatbots even have started adding disclaimers （免责申明） around breaking news events， advising readers to look elsewhere for new information.13.　　 A.Know why misinformation exists. B.News outlets may seem slower than social media. C.Question why you want to share it in the first place. D.Do not rely on these features for accurate information. E.Do a Google search for the person or organization’s name. F.So going directly to news sources will ensure you get more accurate information. G.The rapid spread of easily accessible AI tools is mudding the waters even further. 1 / 1 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $ 选择性必修第二册 UNIT 1　The mass media Ⅰ. 语篇解读：本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了社交媒体平台因负面新闻报道而政策改变的现象。 1.B　细节理解题。根据第一段第二句可知，Katzenbach对社交媒体平台分析的主要焦点是政策变化和媒体的影响。 2.B　细节理解题。根据第三段最后一句可知，2018年后负面报道激增的原因是数据问题的曝光。 3.D　推理判断题。根据第四段第二、三句可推知，作者通过举出一个具体的例子来解释平台对公众批评的反应。 4.A　标题归纳题。文章介绍了社交媒体平台因负面新闻报道如何有效促使公司改变政策。研究分析了3家媒体的政策变化，以及26家主要英文出版物的媒体报道如何影响这些政策。因此A项（社交媒体：媒体关注下的政策转变）为文章最佳标题。 语篇解读：本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了社交媒体中照片编辑行为与心理健康之间的关系。 5.A　细节理解题。根据第四段最后一句可知，参与者在研究中被要求填写一份关于自我价值的问卷。 6.C　词义猜测题。根据画线词上文尤其是especially可知，特别是年轻人，心理和认知还不够成熟，容易受到外界的影响。因此vulnerable意为“容易受影响的”。 7.B　推理判断题。根据最后一段第二句可推断，减少过度使用社交媒体可能对幸福有益。 8.D　写作意图题。通读全文尤其是第一段可知，作者的写作目的是探讨照片编辑与消极心理状态之间的关系。 Ⅱ. 语篇解读：本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了如何在网上辨别新闻的真伪。 9.G　根据上文可知，在社交媒体上，信息传播非常快，真假难辨。G项（轻松获取的人工智能工具的快速普及，正在进一步搅浑水）与下文“如何判断信任与分享”形成逻辑衔接。 10.A　第二段讨论错误信息的传播动机（如选举中的政治利益）。A项（知道错误信息的存在原因）概括了本段内容，适合作为本段主旨句。 11.B　根据下文可知，新闻媒体会比社交媒体谨慎。B项（新闻媒体可能比社交媒体慢）与下文形成因果关系，下句中的they指代B项中的News outlets。 12.D　根据上文可知，科技公司在推动他们的语音助手和人工智能聊天工具，下文指出人工智能工具可能提供错误或过时信息。D项（不要依赖这些功能来获取准确的信息）直接否定人工智能的可靠性，与下文的警告相呼应。 13.F　上文建议读者在其他地方寻找新信息。F项（因此，直接去新闻来源将确保你获得更准确的信息）自然承接此建议，总结应对策略。 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $