2021-2025年I卷真题D篇语篇精讲 课件-2026届高三英语二轮复习专项

该高中英语高考复习课件聚焦2021-2025年新高考I卷阅读D篇，覆盖说明文、议论文等核心语篇类型，主题语境涵盖人与自然、人与社会、人与自我。依据高考评价体系，梳理细节理解、推理判断、主旨大意等考查维度，通过真题分析明确“细节题占比45%、推理题占30%”的高频考点分布，构建针对性答题框架。 课件亮点在于“真题精讲+语篇结构建模+核心素养提升”，如以2025年微塑料污染说明文为例，解析“问题-解决方案-局限”结构，培养学生语言能力和逻辑思维品质。归纳熟词生义（如settle、trap）、题型突破技巧（题文同序定位法），帮助学生掌握答题节奏，教师可据此精准指导，实现高效备考冲刺。

2021-2025年新高考I卷 阅读D篇真题精讲 (2025年新课标I卷阅D) 语篇类型：说明文 主题语境：人与自然 内容：介绍了微塑料污染的普遍性及其对人类健康的潜在威胁，并提出了一种简单且经济的方法—煮沸和过滤自来水—来减少饮用水中的微塑料含量。 3 32.How does the author present the issue in the first paragraph? A. By quoting an expert. B. By defining a concept. C. By giving examples. D. By providing statistics. 1 Microplastics have become a common source of pollution across the Earth — they have settled in the deep sea and on the Himalayas, stuck inside volcanic rocks, filled the stomachs of seabirds and even fallen in fresh Antarctic snow. They are even appearing inside humans. 微塑料已经成为地球上常见的污染源——它们出现在深海和喜马拉雅山上，在火山岩中，填满海鸟的胃，甚至落在南极的新雪中。它们甚至出现了在人类身体里。 C v.沉积 P1 问题呈现：微塑料污染普遍性 Now, new research suggests that a simple, cheap measure may significantly reduce the level of microplastics in water from your tap (水龙头): boiling and filtering (过滤) it. In a study published Wednesday in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, researchers from China found that boiling tap water for just five minutes — then filtering it after it cools — could remove at least 80 percent of its microplastics. P2 解决方案：煮沸+过滤可去除微塑料 33.What determines the effectiveness of trapping microplastics in water? A. The hardness of water. B. The length of cooling time. C. The frequency of filtering. D. The type of plastic in water. 3 Crucially, this process relies on the water containing enough calcium carbonate(碳酸钙) to trap the plastics. In the study, boiling hard water containing 300 milligrams of calcium carbonate led to an almost 90 percent drop in plastics. But in samples with less than 60 milligrams of calcium carbonate, boiling reduced the level of plastics by just 25 percent. Additionally, the research didn’t include all types of plastics. The team focused only on three common types — polystyrene, polyethylene and polypropylene — and they didn’t study other chemicals previously found in water such as vinyl chloride. A P3 条件与局限：水硬度决定效果 34.What does the author try to illustrate by mentioning bottled water in paragraph 4? A. The importance of plastic recycling. B. The severity of the microplastic problem. C. The danger in overusing pure water. D. The difficulty in treating polluted water. 4 Still, the findings show a potential path forward for reducing microplastic exposure — a task that’s becoming increasingly difficult. Even bottled water, scientists found earlier this year, contains 10 to 1,000 times more microplastics than originally thought. 比想象中还要多的微塑料 严重性 愈发艰难的任务（减少微塑料接触） 严重性 B P4 问题严重性佐证：瓶装水污染更甚 5 Scientists are still trying to determine how harmful microplastics are — but what they do know has raised concerns. The new study suggests boiling tap water could be a tool to limit intake. “The way they demonstrated how microplastics were trapped through the boiling process was nice,” Caroline Gauchotte-Lindsay, an environmental engineer at the University of Glasgow in Scotland who was not involved in the research, tells New Scientist. “We should be looking into upgrading drinking water treatment plants so they remove microplastics.” 35.What is Gauchotte-Lindsay’s suggestion about? A. Choice of new research methods. B. Possible direction for further study. C. Need to involve more researchers. D. Potential application of the findings. 应升级饮用水处理厂以去除微塑料 实际应用 v.收集，捕获 P5 专家观点与建议：升级饮用水处理厂 熟词生义 语篇类型 主题语境 语篇结构 2025 新高考I卷 阅读D篇 settle; trap；plant 说明文 人与自然 微塑料污染及解决方案 P1 问题呈现：微塑料污染普遍性 P2 解决方案：煮沸+过滤可去除微塑料 P3 条件与局限：水硬度决定效果 P4 问题严重性佐证：瓶装水污染更甚 P5 专家观点与建议：升级饮用水处理厂 (2024年新课标I卷阅D) 语篇类型：说明文 主题语境：人与自然 内容：斯坦福大学的一项新研究发现，当前利用技术手段采集的生物多样性观察数据存在偏差，其主要集中在某些地区和物种上。该研究表明，尽管这些数据不完美，但通过指导用户前往未采样区域以及由专家确认图片，可以提高数据质量。 11 citizen scientists 公民科学家 指那些在科学研究中参与数据收集、 分析和解决问题的普通民众，他们通常没有正式的科学背景或训练 records of biodiversity 生物多样性数据采集 通过各种方法和技术手段，收集有关生物多样性的信息，包括物种的种类、数量、分布、生存状况、生态功能等。 背景知识 D 【1】In the race to document the species on Earth before they go extinct, researchers and citizen scientists have collected billions of records. Today, most records of biodiversity are often in the form of photos, videos, and other digital records. Though they are useful for detecting shifts in the number and variety of species in an area, a new Stanford study has found that this type of record is not perfect. 【2】“With the rise of technology it is easy for people to make observations of different species with the aid of a mobile application,” said Barnabas Daru, who is lead author of the study and assistant professor of biology in the Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences. “These observations now outnumber the primary data that comes from physical specimens (标本), and since we are increasingly using observational data to investigate how species are responding to global change, I wanted to know: Are they usable?” 【3】Using a global dataset of 1.9 billion records of plants, insects, birds, and animals, Daru and his team tested how well these data represent actual global biodiversity patterns. 【4】“We were particularly interested in exploring the aspects of sampling that tend to bias (使有偏差) data, like the greater likelihood of a citizen scientist to take a picture of a flowering plant instead of the grass right next to it,” said Daru. 【5】Their study revealed that the large number of observation-only records did not lead to better global coverage. Moreover, these data are biased and favor certain regions, time periods, and species. This makes sense because the people who get observational biodiversity data on mobile devices are often citizen scientists recording their encounters with species in areas nearby. These data are also biased toward certain species with attractive or eye-catching features. 【6】What can we do with the imperfect datasets of biodiversity? 【7】“Quite a lot,” Daru explained. “Biodiversity apps can use our study results to inform users of oversampled areas and lead them to places — and even species — that are not well-sampled. To improve the quality of observational data, biodiversity apps can also encourage users to have an expert confirm the identification of their uploaded image.” 了解现状： 生物多样性的记录形式并不完美。 分析原因： 生物多样性的记录数据有偏差，其影响因素有：采样过程、地区、时间和物种选择。 提出建议： 生物多样性应用程序可以指导公民科学家。 聚焦问题： 用于研究物种如何响应全球变化的观察数据是否足够可靠？ Step 1：快速浏览全文，了解文章大意 Para.1 研究背景 Para.2 研究原因 Para.3 方法与过程 Para.4-5 结果与解释 Para.6-8 研究前景 大多生物多样性记录以数字化记录的形式出现，但这种方式并不完美(most records of biodiversity are often in the form of digital records; not perfect) Daru想要知道这种生物观测数据是否有用(observational data; Are they usable?) Daru和他的团队使用了一个全球数据集进行测试(using a global dataset) 大量的观测数据有失偏颇，倾向于某些地区、时间段和物种(the large number of observation-only records are biased: favor certain regions, time periods, and species) 利用生物多样性应用程序引导用户(biodiversity apps; inform users) 32题 33题 34题 35题 【1】In the race to document the species on Earth before they go extinct, researchers and citizen scientists have collected billions of records. Today, most records of biodiversity are often in the form of photos, videos, and other digital records. Though they are useful for detecting shifts in the number and variety of species in an area, a new Stanford study has found that this type of record is not perfect. 32. What do we know about the records of species collected now? A. They are becoming outdated. B. They are mostly in electronic form. C. They are limited in number. D. They are used for public exhibition. 解析：理解具体信息。根据第一段 Today, most records of biodiversity are often in the form of photos, videos, and other digital records.可知，现在收集的物种记录大多是以图片、视频和其它数字形式存在的，也就是说，它们大多是电子形式的。选B。 Step 2：审题—准确定位（题文同序） Step 3：文本理解 准确定位 同义转述 【2】“With the rise of technology it is easy for people to make observations of different species with the aid of a mobile application,” said Barnabas Daru, who is lead author of the study and assistant professor of biology in the Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences. “These observations now outnumber the primary data that comes from physical specimens (标本), and since we are increasingly using observational data to investigate how species are responding to global change, I wanted to know: Are they usable?” 33. What does Daru’s study focus on? A. Threatened species. B. Physical specimens. D. Mobile applications. 解析：理解具体信息。文中提到These observations now outnumber the primary data ... I wanted to know: Are they usable? Barnabas Daru想知道:用于研究物种如何响应全球变化的观察数据是否足够可靠? 这说明他的研究重点是观测数据。选C。 C. Observational data. 准确定位 Step 2：审题—准确定位（题文同序） Step 3：文本理解 Step 2：审题—准确定位（题文同序） Step 3：文本理解 【4】“We were particularly interested in exploring the aspects of sampling that tend to bias (使有偏差) data, like the greater likelihood of a citizen scientist to take a picture of a flowering plant instead of the grass right next to it,” said Daru. 【5】Their study revealed that the large number of observation-only records did not lead to better global coverage. Moreover, these data are biased and favor certain regions, time periods, and species. This makes sense because the people who get observational biodiversity data on mobile devices are often citizen scientists recording their encounters with species in areas nearby. These data are also biased toward certain species with attractive or eye-catching features. 34. What has led to the biases according to the study? A. Mistakes in data analysis. B. Poor quality of uploaded pictures. C. Improper way of sampling. D. Unreliable data collection devices. 内容概括 更倾向于拍开花植物而非草 对某些地方，某些时间段或某些物种情有独钟 记录吸引人或醒目特色的物种 数据分析错误 上传图片质量差 数据采集设备不可靠 【7】“Quite a lot,” Daru explained. “Biodiversity apps can use our study results to inform users of oversampled areas and lead them to places — and even species — that are not well-sampled. To improve the quality of observational data, biodiversity apps can also encourage users to have an expert confirm the identification of their uploaded image.” 35. What is Daru’s suggestion for biodiversity apps? A. Review data from certain areas. B. Hire experts to check the records. C. Confirm the identity of the users. D. Give guidance to citizen scientists. 总结判断 告知用户过度采样的地方，引导其去采样不充分的地区和物种 鼓励用户找专家确认图像中的物种 解析：推断。根据最后一段可知，生物多样性应用程序可以提醒用户(公民科学家)那些已经过度采样的区域，引导他们去未被充分采样的地方对物种进行采样，并且鼓励用户让专家鉴定他们上传的图片以改善观测数据的质量。选D。 Step 2：审题—准确定位（题文同序） Step 3：文本理解 词汇掌握 语篇类型 主题语境 语篇结构 2024 新高考I卷 阅读D篇 document；outnumber；likelihood；favor 说明文 人与自然 生物多样性的数据记录 P1 了解现状：生物多样性的记录形式并不完美 P2 聚焦问题：用于研究物种如何响应全球变化的观察 数据是否足够可靠？ P3-5 分析原因：记录数据有偏差，影响因素有：采样 过程、地区、时间和物种选择。 P6-7 提出建议：生物多样性app可以指导公民科学家。 (2023年新课标I卷阅D) 语篇类型：议论文 主题语境：人与社会 内容：主要介绍了对群体智慧效应的一项新研究。这项新研究发现，当大的估算群体被分成小组做估算时，其估算的平均值比同样数量的独立个体的估算结果更准确。 21 Wisdom of Crowds Effect 群体智慧效应 指在特定条件下，大量独立个体的判断、估计或意见通过聚合后，其集体结果往往比单个专家或个体更准确、更可靠。 核心原理 误差抵消机制：个体在判断或估计时难免存在误差，有人高估，有人低估。当大量独立个体的估计值被平均或聚合时，正负误差相互抵消，使集体结果更接近真实值。 独立性与多样性：群体智慧效应成立的关键在于个体估计的独立性和多样性。如果个体之间信息来源或思维方式高度相似，容易犯相同错误，误差无法有效抵消，群体智慧效应会减弱。 名词解释 经典案例 高尔顿的猜牛体重实验：1907年，英国统计学家弗朗西斯·高尔顿在乡村集市上组织了一场猜牛体重的活动。尽管大多数参与者并非专业称重人员，但将所有猜测值取平均后，结果非常接近牛的真实体重，甚至比专业称重人员的估计更准确，这成为群体智慧效应的经典例证。 32.What is paragraph 2 of the text mainly about? The methods of estimation. The underlying logic of the effect. The causes of people's errors. The design of Galton's experiment. This effect capitalizes on the fact that when people make errors, those errors aren’t always the same. Some people will tend to overestimate, and some to underestimate. When enough of these errors are averaged together, they cancel each other out, resulting in a more accurate estimate. If people are similar and tend to make the same errors, then their errors won't cancel each other out. In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that people's estimates be independent. If for whaterer reasons, people's errors become correlated or dependent, the accuracy of the estimalte will go down. capitalizes on：利用（机会、优势等）cancel each other out：相互抵消 第2段解释了“群体智慧”效应的基本逻辑，为什么大量独立估算的平均值在某些情况下可以相当准确，这是由于人们估算的误差并不总是相同的，当这些误差足够多，并被平均开来时，它们会互相抵消，从而得出更准确的估算值， 段落结构：开头总述效应依托的核心事实，中间分述 “误差不同则抵消” 和 “误差相同则不抵消” 两种情况，结尾用专业术语总结关键前提（估算需独立）及违背前提的后果，层层推进，呈 “正面原理 + 反面限制” 的递进逻辑。 估算方法 效应的潜在逻辑/底层逻辑 人们犯错的原因 高尔顿实验的设计 23 33. Navajas'study found that the average accuracy could increase even if______ A. the crowds were relatively small B. there were occasional underestimates C. individuals did not communicate D. estimates were not fully independent. ……In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that people's estimates be independent. If for whaterer reasons, people's errors become correlated or dependent, the accuracy of the estimalte will go down. But a new study led by Joaquin Navajas offered an interesting twist(转折) on this classic phenomenon. The key finding of the study was that when crowds were further divided into smaller groups that were allowed to have a discussion, the averages from these groups were more accurate than those from an equal number of independent individuals…… Galton的结论：群体智慧效应注重的是independent。如果个体之间出于某种原因非独立，那估计的准确值就会下降。而Navajas的结论与Galton的结论相反。Navajas的研究侧重于discussion。实验结果表明即使人们进行了交流和讨论，群体智慧效应的优势仍然存在。也就是说，即个体之间并非完全独立，平均的估算准确度也会提高。 群体规模相对较小 偶尔会出现低估情况 个体之间没有交流 估算并非完全独立 24 在后续的研究中，研究人员试图更好地了解小组成员在讨论中做了什么才使估算准确度提高，因此后续研究的重点是小组内的讨论过程。 34. What did the follow-up study focus on? A. The size of the groups. B. The dominant members. C. The discussion process. D. The individual estimates. In a follow-up study with 100 university students, the researchers tried to get a better sense of what the group members actually did in their discussion. Did they tend to go with those most confident about their estimates? Did they follow those least willing to change their minds? This happened some of the time, but it wasn't the dominant response. Most frequently, the groups reported that they "shared arguments and reasoned together. “Somehow, these arguments and reasoning resulted in a global reduction in error. Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous. 小组的规模 占主导地位的成员 讨论过程 个体的估算 25 翻译：在一项以 100 名大学生为对象的后续研究中，研究者试图更深入地了解小组成员在讨论中实际会做些什么。他们是否倾向于认同那些对自己的估算最有信心的人？是否会追随那些最不愿改变想法的人？这类情况确实偶尔发生，但并非主要表现。最常见的是，这些小组反馈称，他们会 “分享观点并共同推理”。不知为何，这些观点交流与推理过程最终使得整体误差有所减少。尽管纳瓦哈斯主导的这些研究存在局限性，且仍有诸多问题有待解答，但其对群体讨论及决策所蕴含的潜在意义却是巨大的。 In a follow-up study with 100 university students, the researchers tried to get a better sense of what the group members actually did in their discussion. Did they tend to go with those most confident about their estimates? Did they follow those least willing to change their minds? This happened some of the time, but it wasn't the dominant response. Most frequently, the groups reported that they "shared arguments and reasoned together. “Somehow, these arguments and reasoning resulted in a global reduction in error. Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous. 26 although引导的让步状语从句后，有隐含的but引导的主句，该主句是重点。作者认为，尽管Navajas领导的研究有局限性和许多问题，但对小组讨论和决策的潜在影响是巨大的，由此可推断作者对Navaias的研究是支持的。 35 . What is the author's attitude toward Navajas'studies? A. Unclear. B. Dismissive. C. Doubtful. D. Approving. In a follow-up study with 100 university students, the researchers tried to get a better sense of what the group members actually did in their discussion. Did they tend to go with those most confident about their estimates? Did they follow those least willing to change their minds? This happened some of the time, but it wasn't the dominant response. Most frequently, the groups reported that they "shared arguments and reasoned together. “Somehow, these arguments and reasoning resulted in a global reduction in error. Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain, the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous. 轻蔑的，不屑一顾的 27 ［语篇分析］ 论点 与结构 文章为“总—分”结构，开篇提出 1907 年 Francis Galton 发表的论文阐释了“群体智慧”效应这一话题，之后围绕这一效应展开论述 论据 事例 论据 以 Francis Galton 进行的估计实验为例，说明“群体智慧”效应——在某些情况下，大量独立估计的平均值可能相当准确 研究 论据 以Joaquin Navajas 领导的新研究以及后续对 100 名大学生的跟进研究为主要论据，展现了分组讨论对提高估计准确性的作用 论证 文章通过列举不同的研究事例进行阐述，这属于归纳论证的方式——从具体的研究实例归纳出关于“群体智慧”效应及其新发现的一般性内容 28 (2022年新课标I卷阅D) 语篇类型：说明文 主题语境：人与社会 话题：研究表明，与饮食相关的人类咬合变化导致了新语音的产生。自人类出现以来，我们语音一直处于变化中，所发现的各种语音都是生物变化和文化演变等因素经过复杂的相互作用而产生出来的。 30 32. Which aspects of the human speech sound does Damián Blasi’s research focus on? A. Its variety. B. Its distribution. C. Its quantity. D. Its development. Human speech contains more than 2,000 different sounds, from the common “m” and “a” to the rare clicks of some southern African languages. But why are certain sounds more common than others? A ground-breaking, five-year study shows that diet-related changes in human bite led to new speech sounds that are now found in half the world’s languages. More than 30 years ago, the scholar Charles Hockett noted that speech sounds called labiodentals, such as “f” and “v”, were more common in the languages of societies that ate softer foods. Now a team of researchers led by Damián Blasi at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, has found how and why this trend arose. D P1 提出问题：为何某些人类语音声音更常见？ 饮食导致的咬合变化产生了新的语音。 P2 历史观察：吃软食物的社会中，“f”“v”等唇齿音更常见。Blasi团队进一步探究如何及为何产生这一趋势。 n.吸气音 They discovered that the upper and lower front teeth of ancient human adults were aligned (对齐), making it hard to produce labiodentals, which are formed by touching the lower lip (嘴唇) to the upper teeth. Later, our jaws changed to an overbite structure, making it easier to produce such sounds. The team showed that this change in bite was connected with the development of agriculture in the Neolithic period. Food became easier to chew at this point. The jawbone didn’t have to do as much work and so didn’t grow to be so large. 33. Why was it difficult for ancient human adults to produce labiodentals? A. They had fewer upper teeth than lower teeth. B. They could not open and close their lips easily. C. Their jaws were not conveniently structured. D. Their lower front teeth were not large enough. C P3 机制解释：牙齿咬合结构变化 → 唇齿音产生 P4 原因追溯：咬合变化与新石器时代农业发展有关 34. What is paragraph 5 mainly about? A. Supporting evidence for the research results. B. Potential application of the research findings. C. A further explanation of the research methods. D. A reasonable doubt about the research process. A Analyses of a language database also confirmed that there was a global change in the sound of world languages after the Neolithic age, with the use of “f” and “v” increasing remarkably during the last few thousand years. These sounds are still not found in the languages of many hunter-gatherer people today. P5 数据验证：语言数据库分析证实：新石器时代后，世界 语言中“f”“v”的使用显著增加 35. What does Steven Moran say about the set of human speech sounds? A. It is key to effective communication. B. It contributes much to cultural diversity. C. It is a complex and dynamic system. D. It drives the evolution of human beings. C This research overturns the popular view that all human speech sounds were present when human beings evolved (逐渐形成) around 300,000 year ago. “The set of speech sounds we use has not necessarily remained stable since the appearance of human beings, but rather the huge variety of speech sounds that we find today is the product of a complex interplay of things like biological change and cultural evolution,” said Steven Moran, a member of the research team. P6 结论与升华：语音是生物变化与文化进化复杂互动的产物， 是动态系统。 自人类出现以来，我们使用的语音并非一成不变的。相反的是，我们今天发现的大量语音，正是诸多事物进行复杂的相互作用的产物，例如生物进化、文化演变等 熟词生义 语篇类型 主题语境 语篇结构 2022 新高考I卷 阅读D篇 click 说明文 人与社会 饮食相关的咬合变化导致的新语音产生 P1 提出问题：为何某些人类语音声音更常见？ P2 历史观察：吃软食物的社会中,“f”“v”等唇齿音更常见 P3 机制解释：牙齿咬合变化 → 唇齿音产生 P4-5 原因追溯&数据验证：咬合变化与新石器时代农业 发展有关 P6 结论升华：语音复杂互动的动态系统。 (2021年新课标I卷阅D) 语篇类型：议论文 主题语境：人与自我 话题：介绍了情商概念的普及带来的误解及其有利的方面。 37 32. What is a common misunderstanding of emotional intelligence? A. It can be measured by an IQ test. B. It helps to exercise a person’s mind. C. It includes a set of emotional skills. D. It refers to a person’s positive qualities. D Popularization has in some cases changed the original meaning of emotional intelligence. Many people now misunderstand emotional intelligence as almost everything desirable in a person’s makeup that cannot be measured by an IQ test, such as character, motivation, confidence, mental stability, optimism and “people skills”. Research has shown that emotional skills may contribute to some of these qualities, but most of them move far beyond skill-based emotional intelligence. 情商这一概念的普及在某种程度上改变了情商的原始含义。现在，许多人误认为情商是一个人的特性中几乎所有理想的、不能用智商测试来衡量的东西，如性格、动机、自信、心理稳定、乐观和“人际关系技能”。研究表明，情感技能可能对其中的某些品质有帮助，但是大多数的品质远非基于技能的情商可以概括的。 P1 提出误解：情商被泛化为所有无法通过IQ 测试衡量的好的人格特质 n.性格，品质 33. Why does the author mention “doctor” and “cheater” in paragraph 2? A. To explain a rule. B. To clarify a concept. C. To present a fact. D. To make a prediction. B We prefer to describe emotional intelligence as a specific set of skills that can be used for either good or bad purposes. The ability to accurately understand how others are feeling may be used by a doctor to find how best to help her patients, while a cheater might use it to control potential victims. Being emotionally intelligent does not necessarily make one a moral person. P2 澄清误解：以医生和骗子为例，说明情绪智力是中性的技能，目的可好可坏 我们倾向于把情商描述为一系列特定的技能，可以用于好的或坏的目的。准确理解他人感受的能力可能被医生用来决定如何最有效地帮助她的病人，而骗子则可能利用它来控制潜在的受害者。有情商并不一定能让一个人成为有道德的人。 n.一套，一副，一组 34. What is the author’s attitude to the popularization of emotional intelligence? A. Favorable. B. Intolerant. C. Doubtful. D. Unclear. A Although popular beliefs regarding emotional intelligence run far ahead of what research can reasonably support, the overall effects of the publicity have been more beneficial than harmful. The most positive aspect of this popularization is a new and much needed emphasis on emotion by employers, educators and others interested in promoting social well-being. The popularization of emotional intelligence has helped both the public and researchers re-evaluate the functionality of emotions and how they serve people adaptively in everyday life. 虽然关于情商的流行看法远远超出了研究合理支持的范畴，但是这种宣传的总体效果是利大于弊的。普及情商概念最积极的作用就是雇主、教育家和其他致力于促进社会福利的人对情感有了全新的、亟需的重视。情商概念的普及帮助公众和研究人员重新评估了情绪的功能，以及情绪如何在日常生活中为人们提供适应性服务。 P3 作者态度：情商普及利大于弊 35. What does the last paragraph mainly talk about concerning emotional intelligence? A. Its appeal to the public. B. Expectations for future studies. C. Its practical application. D. Scientists with new perspectives. B Although the continuing popular appeal of emotional intelligence is desirable, we hope that such attention will excite a greater interest in the scientific and scholarly study of emotion. It is our hope that in coming decades, advances in science will offer new perspectives (视角) from which to study how people manage their lives. Emotional intelligence, with its focus on both head and heart, may serve to point us in the right direction. 虽然大众持续关注情商的现象是可取的，但是我们希望这种关注能够激发人们对情感相关科学和学术研究更大的兴趣。我们希望在未来的几十年里，科学的进步能提供新的视角来研究人们如何管理自己的生活。情商，以其对头脑和心灵的关注，可以为我们指出正确的方向。 P4 未来展望：推动情感研究的科学化发展 熟词生义 语篇类型 主题语境 语篇结构 2021 新高考I卷 阅读D篇 makeup，set 议论文 人与自我 P1 提出误解：情商被泛化为所有无法通过IQ 测试衡量的好的人格特质 P2 澄清误解：以医生和骗子为例，说明情绪智力是中性的技能，目的可好可坏 P3 作者态度：情商普及利大于弊 P4 未来展望：推动情感研究的科学化发展 情商 emotional intelligence $