2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十六（D篇）

2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十六（D篇）及答案详解 学校:___________姓名：___________班级：___________考号：___________ 一. （2026高三下·广东佛山·专题练习） As a librarian, I am often asked: Does listening to audiobooks qualify as reading? Many people don’t think so. There is a snobbishness to reading a physical book. Telling someone that you have only listened to a certain book usually comes out sounding like an apology. Sure, audiobooks don’t count as reading in an extremely literal linguistic sense. You, the listener, are hearing someone else read a book, instead of looking at the words. But when we talk about “reading a book”, I don’t think anyone cares about how you’re taking it in. Audiobooks can offer a vastly different experience from reading yourself, and that’s because narrators (主播) can add so much to a story. I recently listened to Woodworking, which had three narrators at three extremely different points in their lives. The three audiobook performers brought extra depth and humor to the reading that I couldn’t have gotten just reading alone. There’s also something extra convenient about audiobooks. When I travel on public transport and can’t get a seat, holding a physical book in my hands is hard; but I can listen to an audiobook anywhere. They’re always wonderful for multitasking, whether that’s listening while doing the dishes, cleaning the bathroom or, my personal favorite, doing a craft. In 2022, the National Endowment for the Arts reported that 48.5 percent of adults said they had read at least one book in the past year, down from 52.7 percent five years earlier. At a time when fewer people are reading books, this audiobook debate can feel like a silly distraction from what really matters: Keeping books in the hands that need them, in any format at all. I read because I love stories. And, yes, that connection to the story, or essay or memoir might feel a little different depending on whether I read the words on the page or hear them performed by an audiobook narrator. But both are worth celebrating — and neither is better than the other. 1．What does the underlined word “snobbishness” in paragraph 1 probably mean? A．A lack of interest. B．A habit of apologizing. C．A feeling of superiority. D．A desire to read more books. 2．What benefit of audiobooks is stressed in paragraph 3? A．They simplify complicated plots. B．They make listeners more focused. C．They allow access to more authors. D．They bring greater richness to stories. 3．According to the author, what matters more? A．Improving the quality of books, B．Encouraging more people to read. C．Exploring more formats of reading. D．Keeping books accessible to readers. 4．What is the best title for the text? A．Audiobooks: A New Reading Trend B．Audiobooks: A Bridge Connecting Readers C．Audiobooks: Narrators Bring Stories to Life D．Audiobooks: Every Form of Reading Counts 二. （25-26高三下·江苏扬州·开学考试） The announcement that China’s railway network will significantly expand its “quiet carriage” service beginning February 1 is a modest reform with huge significance. By extending this option to nearly all “D” and “G” series high-speed trains, China State Railway Group is acknowledging a shift in public expectations: that modern travel should not only be fast, but also kind and respectful of personal space. In an era when speed is often taken for granted, comfort is increasingly defined by atmosphere. Noise — constant phone calls, deafening videos, loud conversations — has become a common source of friction in public transport. The quiet carriage is a direct response, recognizing that silence itself can be a valuable public good. Since its pilot launch in late 2020, the quiet carriage has built a loyal following. Its popularity sends a clear message: there is real demand for different services that respect varying travel needs. A mature public transport system should accommodate both lively conversation and calm. This expansion also signals confidence in social self-regulation. Passengers must agree to a “quiet agreement, ” promising to keep noise to a minimum. This is not merely procedural but an experiment in trust — an assumption that citizens, when clearly informed, are capable of regulating their own conduct. Whether this succeeds depends on everyday behavior. The quiet carriage works only if passengers internalize its spirit. Silence is sustained by mutual awareness and self- control. In this sense, each train becomes a small, moving society. Critics may argue enforcement is difficult, but this misses the point. The purpose is not about keeping people apart, but about allowing them to choose. Those preferring a relaxed environment have alternatives. What matters is that those who choose silence can expect it to be honored. Ultimately, this expansion is about trust — between institutions and citizens, and among passengers themselves. If embraced sincerely, the quiet carriage can symbolize a society learning to respect the invisible boundaries that make collective life possible. Sometimes, progress sounds like silence. 5．What can we infer from “quiet carriage”? A．It will be expanded to more trains. B．Trains will all be equipped soon. C．Public cares more about personal space. D．It aims to replace ordinary carriages. 6．Why was the quiet carriage created? A．To meet speed demands. B．To solve transport noise. C．To create total silence. D．To redefine travel comfort. 7．What’s the benefit of introducing quiet carriage? A．It reveals demand for better service. B．It helps create a zero-noise atmosphere. C．It requires people to internalize its spirit. D．It encourages passengers’ self-regulation. 8．What can we learn from the last two paragraphs? A．It is hard but important to carry out. B．It provides an alternative for people. C．It is ultimately about building trust. D．It respects invisible social boundaries. 三. （2026·山西大同·一模） Nowadays, online reviews are everywhere. We’re often asked to leave a review after making a purchase, dining out, or receiving a service. Many of us not only leave reviews but also value those from others. In fact, 98% of consumers consider reviews an essential part of the decision-making process, and 45% of users won’t buy a product without any reviews. However, what impact does this culture of online reviews have on our brains and lives? Take Helen Plyconic as an example. Her low Uber rating makes her feel anxious every time she takes a ride, even though she believes she has done nothing wrong. Businesses are also significantly affected by online reviews. Sam Morgan, who runs several restaurants, was once blackmailed (敲诈) by cheaters who threatened to post fake negative reviews if he didn’t pay up. Such malicious reviews can be a real headache for businesses. Moreover, review platforms often don’t act immediately or conduct strict reviews when dealing with such issues. Of course, online reviews aren’t all bad. Before buying clothes or other products, we often refer to reviews to learn about the product’s style, fabric, and size. Reviews can reduce our anxiety about unknown experiences to some extent. Also, constructive feedback can help businesses to make improvements. For example, if a buyer points out that the packaging is not strong enough, the seller may rethink their packaging method. Nevertheless, the truth of online reviews has always been a concern. False reviews are widespread, and AI-generated reviews are common. They usually lack emotion and clear opinions. To solve this, the UK has introduced relevant laws to ban the submission of fake reviews. Online reviews have both advantages and disadvantages. While we enjoy the convenience they bring, we also need to learn to distinguish between true and false reviews and view these evaluations rationally. 9．What is the purpose of listing the statistics in paragraph 1? A．To explain consumers’ choices before shopping. B．To show buyers’ preference for getting a service. C．To clarify these good and bad effects of reviews. D．To highlight the importance of online comments. 10．What does the underlined word “malicious” in paragraph 2 mean? A．Casual. B．Harmful. C．Honest. D．Positive. 11．What does the UK do to fight against false online reviews? A．Make related laws to forbid fake reviews. B．Stop users making AI-generated reviews. C．Ask the platforms to check false reviews. D．Warn the public not to post false reviews. 12．What is the author’s attitude towards online reviews? A．Doubtful. B．Objective. C．Supportive. D．Negative. 四. （25-26高三下·重庆沙坪坝·开学考试） When someone loses weight, people notice, comment, and ask how. The question implies that whatever method they used is worth knowing, reproducing, or admiring. It positions weight loss as an achievement, a moral victory, a signal of discipline or virtue. But what if their weight loss came from grief, stress, depression or a medication that finally brought balance to their body chemistry? Our curiosity about how someone lost weight is rarely neutral. Often, it’s rooted in our own insecurity or desire for control. We want to know what works — because culturally, we’ve been taught that managing our bodies is a lifelong project. When we see someone “succeed,” we want the recipe. However, rather than self- improvement projects, our bodies are complex ecosystems — shaped by genetics, hormones, health conditions,  socioeconomic factors, medications, and emotions. When we reduce someone’s body to a before- and- after story, we dehumanize them into an object lesson. The recent explosion of GLP-1 medications like Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro has made this question even more controversial. Many people assume any visible change must be drug- related, and they ask with hardly disguised judgment or envy. “Did you use one of those medications?” has become the new “Did you get work done?” The subtext is clear: Did you earn this, or did you cheat? This framing is not only prejudiced — it’s unscientific. GLP-1 medications are legal medical treatments for conditions like diabetes (糖尿病), metabolic dysfunction, and obesity. Shame has no place in a conversation about health or healing. Yet we’ve moralized weight loss to such an extent that even those who find life-changing relief through medication are made to feel guilty or defensive for it. We live in a society enthusiastic about Cinderella stories. Weight loss is still treated like a transformation myth. But health and self-worth are not determined by body size, and accomplishments shouldn’t be measured in pounds. When we cease looking into how people lost weight, we start to undo a small but powerful part of that narrative. We give others and ourselves permission to exist without explanation, justification, or public commentary on our bodies. 13．Why do people ask about weight loss methods? A．To manage their desire for control. B．To address their own body image anxiety. C．To identify effects of weight medications. D．To study human body ecosystems closely. 14．What does the underlined word “framing” in paragraph 4 probably mean? A．Avoiding controversial questions. B．Building support structures. C．Labelling medication as cheating. D．Misjudging health conditions. 15．Which statement would the author probably agree with? A．Weight loss signals discipline and virtue. B．Medications are universal health solutions. C．Dieters should defend their own rights. D．Self-worth is independent of body size. 16．What can be the best title for the text? A．Celebrating Body Changes B．Psychology of Losing Weight C．Stop Judging Weight Loss D．Medical Solutions to Overweight 五. （2026·山东东营·一模） Recently, I was listening to Paul Simon’s 1983 album Hearts and Bones again and was struck by a question: what did it — a weary, bittersweet reflection on a broken relationship-mean to my younger self? As a teenager with little romantic experience, I believe I was drawn to the maturity sadness seemed to represent, which hints at a complex joy found within sadness. But why value sadness when happiness is so universally pursued? Nations measure well-being through happiness Indexes (指数), and philosophies prioritize increasing joy. Yet, in reality, we don’t seek constant happiness. Sometimes sadness has a cause; sometimes we want to be. Perhaps emotional variety is preferable to monotony. But there’s more to it — sadness holds a depth that happiness lacks. Sadness inspires great art in a way that grinningly eating ice cream cannot. Essayist Hartley Coleridge praised it as a more elegant state of mind than happiness. “Melancholy (悲伤) can scarce exist in an undegraded spirit — it cannot exist in a mere animal” is how he put it, suggesting it is more dignified than happiness. I suspect most people feel joy is, at root, a kind of idiot pleasure. Melancholy is somehow more grown-up, more sincere, and more authentic. Just as what evolutionary scientists call “the handicap principle”, luxurious traits are useful, because they are so showily expensive, apparently inconveniencing the owner. They are a way of saying: I’m so strong. The peacock’s tail, for example, despite being a disadvantage attached, signals desirable genes. Sadness, according to this model, is a kind of obvious consumption. It takes more muscles to frown than smile, and maybe that’s the point. Darwin observed that sadness appears the same way across all cultures, implying a deep-rooted human capacity. Happiness can be lovely, but the profound, elegant sadness unlocks aesthetic (美学) world that happiness can never reach. 17．Why did the author like Paul Simon’s 1983 album as a teenager? A．He thought sadness inspired art. B．He viewed sadness as happiness. C．He experienced broken relationships. D．He associated sadness with being mature. 18．What’s Hartley Coleridge’s view on melancholy? A．Unrelated to art. B．Rich in variety. C．Unique to humans. D．Deep-rooted in history. 19．Why does the author refer to the peacock’s tail? A．To stress frowning takes more muscles. B．To show luxurious traits are unnecessary. C．To prove sadness is apparently convenient. D．To explain sadness has evolutionary value. 20．What’s the best title of this passage? A．Why the long face? B．Which is deeper? C．What’s happiness? D．Where’s sadness? 六. （2026·贵州贵阳·一模） “Recognition is the first human quest,” the journalist Andy Crouch writes in his book The Life We are Looking for. Babies come out of the womb (子宫) looking for a face that will see them, a parent or a caretaker who will attend to their needs. When their needs are not seen, they are emotionally hurt. Psychologists sometimes conduct “still face” experiments in which mothers are asked not to respond to their babies’ attempts to gain attention. When the babies send out signals for love and care, the mothers remain expressionless. At first, the babies appear uneasy. Soon, they cry in sorrow. These experiments are not designed to cause harm, but to reveal how deeply human beings depend on being recognized by others. Such experiences form what may be called the first education of life. From the very beginning, every child is searching for answers to basic questions: Am I safe? How does love work? Am I worthy? Even in babyhood, we internalize the answers to these questions based on what we see and how we are treated. This education does not end in childhood but continues into later adulthood, shaping how people see themselves and relate to others. The above fact tells us that everyone needs attention, so people need to develop empathy — a set of social and emotional skills that allow them to understand others. But how to develop it? One of the earliest skills related to empathy is mirroring. Mirroring means accurately catching the emotion of the person in front of you. A person who is good at mirroring is quick to experience others’ emotions. He is able to smile at smiles and frown at frowns. This happens because a powerful way to understand another person’s feelings is to live them out yourself in your own body. Through such shared emotional experiences, empathy is gradually formed rather than naturally given. When people experience reliable and empathetic recognition, they feel safe. And a person who feels safe because of others’ empathetic presence is more likely to see the world as a wider, more open, and happier place. 21．Why do psychologists conduct “still face” experiments? A．To stop emotional hurt to babies. B．To test mothers’ reactions to babies. C．To teach adults some parenting skills. D．To study babies’ needs for recognition. 22．What does the author suggest about “the first education of life”? A．It lasts through a life time. B．It is formed by relations to schools. C．It ends in early childhood. D．It is gained by proposing questions. 23．What does the underlined phrase “live them out” probably mean in paragraph 5? A．Hide the feelings. B．Ease the feelings. C．Feel the feelings. D．Overcome the feelings. 24．What can be inferred from the last paragraph? A．The world makes people more empathetic. B．Recognition shapes people’s world view. C．Emotional safety promotes independence. D．Happiness comes after showing empathy. 试卷第1页，共3页 试卷第1页，共3页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 《2026届高三英语各地模考或重点中学（联考）阅读专项训练十六（D篇）及答案详解》参考答案 题号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 答案 C D D D C B D C D B 题号 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 答案 A B B C D C D C D A 题号 21 22 23 24 答案 D A C B 一. 1．C 2．D 3．D 4．D 【难度】0.67 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。作者讨论了听有声书是否算阅读的问题，指出虽然从字面意义上不算，但有声书能带来独特的体验和便利，在阅读人数下降的当下，真正重要的是让需要书的人能够以任何形式接触到书，每种阅读形式都值得被认可。 1．词义猜测题。根据第一段“As a librarian, I am often asked: Does listening to audiobooks qualify as reading? Many people don’t think so. There is a snobbishness to reading a physical book. Telling someone that you have only listened to a certain book usually comes out sounding like an apology.”（作为一名图书管理员，我经常被问：听有声书算阅读吗？很多人认为不算。读实体书有一种______。告诉别人你只是听了一本书，听起来往往像是在道歉。）可知，人们普遍认为读实体书比听有声书更“高级”，因此“snobbishness”应指“一种优越感”。故选C项。 2．细节理解题。根据第三段“Audiobooks can offer a vastly different experience from reading yourself, and that’s because narrators can add so much to a story. ... The three audiobook performers brought extra depth and humor to the reading that I couldn’t have gotten just reading alone.”（有声书能提供与自己阅读截然不同的体验，因为主播能为故事增添许多内容。……三位朗读者为阅读增添了额外的深度和幽默，这是独自阅读无法获得的。）可知，该段强调有声书能为故事带来更丰富的内容。故选D项。 3．细节理解题。根据第五段“At a time when fewer people are reading books, this audiobook debate can feel like a silly distraction from what really matters: Keeping books in the hands that need them, in any format at all.”（在读书的人越来越少的时候，这场关于有声书的争论似乎是一种愚蠢的干扰，真正重要的是：让需要书的人能够接触到书，无论以何种形式。）可知，作者认为更重要的是“让读者能接触到书”，对应D项。B项“鼓励更多人阅读”并非原文直接表述，原文强调的是让需要书的人有书可读，而非单纯鼓励阅读行为。故选D项。 4．主旨大意题。文章开篇提出听有声书是否算阅读的争议，接着指出有声书带来不同体验且方便，最后强调在阅读人数下降的当下，真正重要的是让需要书的人以任何形式获得书，作者认为两种形式都值得庆祝，没有优劣之分。因此，最佳标题应体现“每种阅读形式都重要”这一核心观点，D项“Audiobooks: Every Form of Reading Counts”概括准确。A项只提“新趋势”，B项“连接读者的桥梁”未体现，C项“主播让故事生动”仅为部分细节，均不全面。故选D项。 二. 5．C 6．B 7．D 8．C 【难度】0.75 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要介绍了中国高铁“静音车厢”服务的扩展，探讨了其背后的社会意义，即对个人空间的尊重、对社会自我调节的信任，以及对现代旅行舒适度的重新定义。 5．推理判断题。根据第一段“The announcement that China’s railway network will significantly expand its ‘quiet carriage’ service beginning February 1 is a modest reform with huge significance. By extending this option to nearly all ‘D’ and ‘G’ series high-speed trains, China State Railway Group is acknowledging a shift in public expectations: that modern travel should not only be fast, but also kind and respectful of personal space.”（中国铁路网将从2月1日起大幅扩展“静音车厢”服务的公告，是一项意义重大的温和改革。将这一选项扩展至几乎所有“D”和“G”系列高铁，表明中国国家铁路集团承认公众期望的转变：现代旅行不仅要快，还要友好并尊重个人空间。）可知，静音车厢的推广反映出公众越来越重视个人空间，这是一种推断。A项“它将扩展到更多列车”是原文直接陈述的事实，不属于推断。故选C项。 6．细节理解题。根据第二段“Noise — constant phone calls, deafening videos, loud conversations — has become a common source of friction in public transport. The quiet carriage is a direct response, recognizing that silence itself can be a valuable public good.”（噪音——持续的电话、震耳欲聋的视频、大声的交谈——已成为公共交通中常见的摩擦来源。静音车厢正是对此的直接回应，它认识到沉默本身可以是一种宝贵的公共产品。）可知，设立静音车厢是为了解决交通噪音问题。故选B项。 7．细节理解题。根据第三段“This expansion also signals confidence in social self-regulation. Passengers must agree to a ‘quiet agreement,’ promising to keep noise to a minimum. This is not merely procedural but an experiment in trust — an assumption that citizens, when clearly informed, are capable of regulating their own conduct.”（这一扩展也标志着对社会自我调节的信心。乘客必须同意“静音协议”，承诺将噪音降到最低。这不仅仅是程序上的，更是一次信任实验——假设公民在得到明确告知后，能够规范自己的行为。）可知，引入静音车厢的好处是鼓励乘客自我调节。故选D项。 8．推理判断题。根据最后一段“Ultimately, this expansion is about trust — between institutions and citizens, and among passengers themselves.”（归根结底，这种扩展是关于信任——机构与公民之间，以及乘客之间的信任。）可知，这项举措最终是为了建立信任。故选C项。 三. 9．D 10．B 11．A 12．B 【难度】0.75 【导语】本文是一篇议论文，主要分析了在线评论存在的负面影响与积极作用，倡导理性看待在线评论。 9．推理判断题。根据第一段中的“In fact, 98% of consumers consider reviews an essential part of the decision-making process, and 45% of users won’t buy a product without any reviews.(事实上，98%的消费者认为评价是决策过程中的重要组成部分，而45%的用户在没有任何评价的情况下是不会购买该产品的)”可知，作者列举这两组数据，是为了强调在线评论在消费者决策时的重要性。故选D。 10．词句猜测题。根据第二段中的“Sam Morgan, who runs several restaurants, was once blackmailed (敲诈) by cheaters who threatened to post fake negative reviews if he didn’t pay up.(Sam Morgan经营着几家餐馆。他曾遭到一些骗子的敲诈，这些骗子威胁说，如果不给他们钱，就会上网发布虚假的负面评价)”可知，骗子发布虚假的负面评论是为了进行敲诈威胁，故这类评论是具有伤害性的。由此可推知，“malicious”的意思为“有害的”。故选B。 11．细节理解题。根据第四段中的“To solve this, the UK has introduced relevant laws to ban the submission of fake reviews.(为了解决这个问题，英国出台了相关法律，禁止提交虚假评论)”可知，为了解决虚假评论的问题，英国出台了相关法律来禁止提交虚假评论。故选A。 12．推理判断题。文章第二段讲述了在线评论带来的负面影响，第三段说明其存在的积极作用，最后一段“Online reviews have both advantages and disadvantages. While we enjoy the convenience they bring, we also need to learn to distinguish between true and false reviews and view these evaluations rationally.(网络评价既有优点也有缺点。一方面，我们享受着它们带来的便利；另一方面，我们也需要学会辨别真假评价，并以理性的态度看待这些评价)”总结在线评论利弊并存，建议人们理性看待。由此可推知，作者对在线评论的态度是客观的。故选B。 四. 13．B 14．C 15．D 16．C 【难度】0.57 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章讨论了社会对“减肥”现象的过度关注和道德化评判，批判了以体型衡量个人价值的社会观念。 13．推理判断题。根据文章第二段第一、二句“Our curiosity about how someone lost weight is rarely neutral. Often, it’s rooted in our own insecurity or desire for control. (我们对他人如何减肥的好奇心鲜少是不带立场的。它常常植根于我们自身的不安全感或对控制感的渴望)”可知，人们询问减肥方法，并非出于单纯的好奇，其深层动机是为了应对自身的不安全感，即对自己形象的焦虑，或寻求一种能掌控自己身体的方法。由此推知，人们询问减肥方法是为了解决他们自身的身体形象焦虑。故选B项。 14．词句猜测题。根据第三段最后两句““Did you use one of those medications?” has become the new “Did you get work done?” The subtext is clear: Did you earn this, or did you cheat? (“你用过那些药吗？” 已经变成了新版的“你整容了吗？”潜台词很明确：这是你努力得来的，还是你作弊了？)”及第四段第一句“This framing is not only prejudiced — it’s unscientific. (这种framing不仅是偏见——也是不科学的)”可知，这里的“framing”指的是上文将使用药物减肥视为“作弊”，这种带有道德评判的偏见的界定方式。因此，“framing”在此处是指将药物治疗贴上“作弊”的标签。故选C项。 15．推理判断题。根据文章最后一段第三句“But health and self-worth are not determined by body size, and accomplishments shouldn’t be measured in pounds. (但健康和自我价值并非由体型决定，成就也不该用磅来衡量)”和最后一句“We give others and ourselves permission to exist without explanation, justification, or public commentary on our bodies. (我们允许他人和自己无需为身体的存在而解释、辩解或接受公众评论)”可知，作者认为自我价值不应与体型挂钩，人们有权在不被评判的情况下存在。由此推知，作者会赞同“自我价值独立于体型”这一观点。故选D项。 16．主旨大意题。通读全文，第一段提出人们总是询问减肥方法的现象并对此提出质疑；第二段分析了这种好奇心背后的心理动机；第三段指出新型减肥药物使这一提问更具争议性；第四段批判了将药物减肥视为“作弊”的偏见；最后一段呼吁停止追问“如何减肥”，因为健康与自我价值不由体型决定，人们有权不因身体而受评判。文章的核心观点是呼吁人们停止对他人的减肥过程和身材变化进行道德评判。由此可知，选项C“Stop Judging Weight Loss(停止评判减肥)”准确地概括了文章的主旨，适合作本文标题。故选C项。 五. 17．D 18．C 19．D 20．A 【难度】0.65 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要讲述了作者通过个人经历及多方观点探讨了悲伤的价值，认为其比快乐更具深度且能开启美学世界。 17．细节理解题。根据第一段中“As a teenager with little romantic experience, I believe I was drawn to the maturity sadness seemed to represent, which hints at a complex joy found within sadness.(作为一个几乎没有恋爱经验的青少年，我相信我是被悲伤所代表的成熟所吸引，这暗示着悲伤中隐藏着一种复杂的喜悦)”可知，作者青少年时期喜欢Paul Simon的专辑是因为将悲伤与成熟联系在了一起。故选D。 18．推理判断题。根据第三段中“Essayist Hartley Coleridge praised it as a more elegant state of mind than happiness. “Melancholy (悲伤) can scarce exist in an undegraded spirit — it cannot exist in a mere animal” is how he put it, suggesting it is more dignified than happiness.(散文家Hartley Coleridge称赞悲伤是一种比快乐更优雅的精神状态。他是这样说的:“悲伤几乎不可能存在于一个未堕落的灵魂中——它不可能存在于一个单纯的动物身上”，这表明它比快乐更有尊严)”可知，Hartley Coleridge认为悲伤是人类独有的。故选C。 19．推理判断题。根据第四段中“Just as what evolutionary scientists call “the handicap principle”, luxurious traits are useful, because they are so showily expensive, apparently inconveniencing the owner. They are a way of saying: I’m so strong. The peacock’s tail, for example, despite being a disadvantage attached, signals desirable genes. Sadness, according to this model, is a kind of obvious consumption.(正如进化科学家所说的“劣势原则”，奢侈的特征是有用的，因为它们是如此昂贵，显然给主人带来了不便。它们是一种表达方式：我很强壮。例如，孔雀的尾巴，尽管是一种劣势，却能传递出优良基因的信号。根据这个模型，悲伤是一种炫耀性消费)”可知，作者提到孔雀的尾巴是为了解释悲伤具有进化价值。故选D。 20．主旨大意题。根据全文内容，尤其是最后一段“Happiness can be lovely, but the profound, elegant sadness unlocks aesthetic (美学) world that happiness can never reach. Happiness is often fleeting and superficial, while sadness can provide a deeper, more lasting emotional experience that opens the door to a richer aesthetic realm.(快乐可以是可爱的，但深刻、优雅的悲伤开启了快乐永远无法触及的美学世界。快乐往往是短暂的、肤浅的，而悲伤可以提供一种更深层次、更持久的情感体验，为通往更丰富的美学领域打开大门)”可知，文章主要探讨了悲伤的价值，认为其比快乐更具深度且能开启美学世界，因此A项“Why the long face?(为什么愁眉苦脸？)”作为标题最合适，该标题以疑问的形式引发读者对于悲伤的思考，与文章主旨相符。故选A。 六. 21．D 22．A 23．C 24．B 【难度】0.75 【导语】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要介绍了人类对被认可的需求、“静止脸”实验、人生的“第一教育”以及共情能力的培养等相关内容。 21．细节理解题。根据第二段“These experiments are not designed to cause harm, but to reveal how deeply human beings depend on being recognized by others.(这些实验不是为了造成伤害，而是为了揭示人类对他人认可的依赖程度有多深。)”可知，心理学家进行“静止脸”实验是为了研究婴儿对被认可的需求。故选D。 22．细节理解题。根据第三段“This education does not end in childhood but continues into later adulthood, shaping how people see themselves and relate to others.(这种教育不会在童年结束，而是持续到成年之后，塑造人们如何看待自己以及与他人的关系。)”可知，人生的“第一教育”会持续一生。故选A。 23．词句猜测题。根据第五段“A person who is good at mirroring is quick to experience others’ emotions. He is able to smile at smiles and frown at frowns. This happens because a powerful way to understand another person’s feelings is to live them out yourself in your own body.(擅长镜像反应的人能快速体验他人的情绪。他能对着微笑微笑，对着皱眉皱眉。这是因为理解他人感受的一个有效方法就是在自己的身体里live them out你自己。)”可知，理解他人情绪的有力方式是通过自己的身体亲身感受这些情绪，因此猜测“live them out”在这里的意思是“感受这些情绪”。故选C。 24．推理判断题。根据最后一段“When people experience reliable and empathetic recognition, they feel safe. And a person who feels safe because of others’ empathetic presence is more likely to see the world as a wider, more open, and happier place.(当人们体验到可靠且共情的认可时，他们会感到安全。而一个因他人的共情存在而感到安全的人，更有可能将世界视为一个更广阔、更开放、更幸福的地方。)”可知，被认可的经历会塑造人们的世界观。故选B。 答案第1页，共2页 答案第1页，共2页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $