Unit 1 Period 3 Using Language（导学案）英语人教版2019选择性必修第二册

Unit 1 Science and Scientists Period 4 Reading for Writing（导学案） 【学习目标】 1.语言能力：理解并运用文本中的衔接词（如 however、besides 等），掌握描述科学家品质的词汇（如 curiosity、persistence 等）；能按照 “引言 — 主体 — 结论” 的结构写一篇关于科学精神的短文。 2.学习能力：学会从阅读文本中提取关键信息（科学家品质及案例），通过小组讨论梳理写作思路，提升信息整合与协作能力。 3.文化意识：理解科学精神在不同科学家身上的体现，认识科学精神对个人和社会的重要性，树立尊重科学、追求真理的意识。 4.思维品质：分析科学家品质与科学精神的关联，培养逻辑推理和批判性思维，能结合具体案例阐述观点。【学习重难点】 教学重点 从文本中提取伟大科学家的品质及相关案例；掌握议论文的结构和衔接词的使用。 教学难点 将阅读中获取的信息有效整合到写作中，用具体案例支撑观点；准确、恰当使用衔接词使文章逻辑连贯。【预习清单】 1.你认为伟大的科学家应具备哪些品质？请列举至少两个，如好奇心、毅力等。 2.你对钱学森和史蒂芬·霍金有哪些了解？简要写下你所知道的信息。 【学习过程】 学习理解 1.Lead in What do you think makes a great scientist? 2.Pre-reading 展示钱学森的视频和史蒂芬・霍金的图片及简介. “What do you know about Qian Xuesen and Stephen Hawking?” 3.While-reading · Read for information 1.Answer the questions below using the information from the texts. ①Why was Qian called “the father of China’s aerospace”? ②How was Hawking’s own theory proven correct? ③Read the two texts again and try to summarize--- What important personality and qualities do Qian Xuesen and Stephen Hawkinghad have respectively? · Read for Language 让学生找出文本中的衔接词，分析其功能。 -However, after the Songhu Battle broke out in 1932, … -At that time, China was poor and its rocket science was undeveloped. -Nevertheless Oian did not let that discourage him … -Because much of the technology behind the Shenzhou rockets … -However, what might have made him such an outstanding … -In general, there were two main theories … -Besides being brilliant, he was brave, … -Furthermore, he was quite determined. -Above all, Hawking was willing to admit his faults. Tips: _______________________________________________________________________________________ · Read for Structure 以钱学森的文本为例分析结构（引言 — 主体 — 结论），再让学生自主分析霍金文本的结构。 Example: Analyze Qian’s text: Introduction (Para 1): Overview impact. Body(Para 2-5): Personal history and accomplishments. Conclusion(Para 6-7): Summarize qualities. Exercise: Analyze Hawking’s text: 4. Post-reading: Read for qualities What personal qualities define the scientific spirit? How do Qian’s and Hawking’s stories illustrate it? 5.Pre-writing: Summary 总结科学精神的核心品质（如curiosity、persistence等）及写作结构（引言—主体—结论，主体部分每段阐述一种品质并结合案例）。 应用实践 1.While-writing: Practice Write an essay on the scientific spirit, following the structure and using qualities of great scientists. 2.Post writing: Assessment ①学生分组，根据checklist（如观点是否清晰、案例是否有效、衔接词使用是否恰当等）评选出组内最佳作文。 · Clear explanation of qualities? · Effective use of examples? · Appropriate linking words? · Clear paragraph functions? · Beautiful handwriting? ② 学生展示 迁移创新 作业内容 本节课作业二选一，为分层作业，难度有所区别。基础一般的同学可以选择作业一，基础较好的同学可以选择作业二。 作业一: Exchange essays with a peer, use the checklist to give feedback. 作业二: Improve your essay, using at least 3 different linking words and giving specific examples to illustrate at least 2 qualities with clear explanation. (120词)。 ( 7 / 8 ) 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$ Unit 1 Science and Scientists Period 4 Reading for Writing（导学案） 【学习目标】 1.语言能力：理解并运用文本中的衔接词（如 however、besides 等），掌握描述科学家品质的词汇（如 curiosity、persistence 等）；能按照 “引言 — 主体 — 结论” 的结构写一篇关于科学精神的短文。 2.学习能力：学会从阅读文本中提取关键信息（科学家品质及案例），通过小组讨论梳理写作思路，提升信息整合与协作能力。 3.文化意识：理解科学精神在不同科学家身上的体现，认识科学精神对个人和社会的重要性，树立尊重科学、追求真理的意识。 4.思维品质：分析科学家品质与科学精神的关联，培养逻辑推理和批判性思维，能结合具体案例阐述观点。【学习重难点】 教学重点 从文本中提取伟大科学家的品质及相关案例；掌握议论文的结构和衔接词的使用。 教学难点 将阅读中获取的信息有效整合到写作中，用具体案例支撑观点；准确、恰当使用衔接词使文章逻辑连贯。【预习清单】 1.你认为伟大的科学家应具备哪些品质？请列举至少两个，如好奇心、毅力等。 2.你对钱学森和史蒂芬·霍金有哪些了解？简要写下你所知道的信息。 【学习过程】 学习理解 1.Lead in What do you think makes a great scientist? 2.Pre-reading 展示钱学森的视频和史蒂芬・霍金的图片及简介. “What do you know about Qian Xuesen and Stephen Hawking?” 3.While-reading · Read for information 1.Answer the questions below using the information from the texts. ①Why was Qian called “the father of China’s aerospace”? ②How was Hawking’s own theory proven correct? ③Read the two texts again and try to summarize--- What important personality and qualities do Qian Xuesen and Stephen Hawkinghad have respectively? Answers: ①Because much of the technology behind the Shenzhou rockets can also be traced back to Qian’s research. ②Astronomers used their telescopes to prove his work on the big bang theory. ③ · Read for Language 让学生找出文本中的衔接词，分析其功能。 -However, after the Songhu Battle broke out in 1932, … -At that time, China was poor and its rocket science was undeveloped. -Nevertheless Oian did not let that discourage him … -Because much of the technology behind the Shenzhou rockets … -However, what might have made him such an outstanding … -In general, there were two main theories … -Besides being brilliant, he was brave, … -Furthermore, he was quite determined. -Above all, Hawking was willing to admit his faults. Tips: 衔接词语(linking words)是语篇衔接的纽带, 表达的逻辑意义包括时间关系、空间关系、列举和顺序、例证、递进、对比和转折、等同和替换、过渡和总结、结果和推论等, 其中多数是衔接性状语。 · Read for Structure 以钱学森的文本为例分析结构（引言 — 主体 — 结论），再让学生自主分析霍金文本的结构。 Example: Analyze Qian’s text: Introduction (Para 1): Overview impact. Body(Para 2-5): Personal history and accomplishments. Conclusion(Para 6-7): Summarize qualities. Exercise: Analyze Hawking’s text: Answer： Analyze Hawking’s text: Introduction (Para 1): A brief introduction. Body(Para 2): His claim to fame. Conclusion(Para 3): Characteristics that made him great. 4. Post-reading: Read for qualities What personal qualities define the scientific spirit? How do Qian’s and Hawking’s stories illustrate it? 5.Pre-writing: Summary 总结科学精神的核心品质（如curiosity、persistence等）及写作结构（引言—主体—结论，主体部分每段阐述一种品质并结合案例）。 应用实践 1.While-writing: Practice Write an essay on the scientific spirit, following the structure and using qualities of great scientists. 2.Post writing: Assessment ①学生分组，根据checklist（如观点是否清晰、案例是否有效、衔接词使用是否恰当等）评选出组内最佳作文。 · Clear explanation of qualities? · Effective use of examples? · Appropriate linking words? · Clear paragraph functions? · Beautiful handwriting? ② 学生展示 迁移创新 作业内容 本节课作业二选一，为分层作业，难度有所区别。基础一般的同学可以选择作业一，基础较好的同学可以选择作业二。 作业一: Exchange essays with a peer, use the checklist to give feedback. 作业二: Improve your essay, using at least 3 different linking words and giving specific examples to illustrate at least 2 qualities with clear explanation. (120词)。 参考答案： Marie Curie shines as an epitome of the scientific spirit, defined by persistence and integrity. Her work advanced science and set a lasting standard for pursuing and sharing knowledge. Persistence drove her breakthroughs. Amid gender barriers and crude laboratory conditions, she spent years processing tons of pitchblende to isolate radium. Failures only strengthened her resolve to unlock radioactivity’s mysteries. Integrity guided her choices. Though her discoveries could have made her rich, she refused to patent radium, believing scientific knowledge belongs to humanity. She prioritized truth over gain, ensuring her work served the greater good. Curie’s legacy lies in these virtues. Her persistence turned impossibilities into breakthroughs; her integrity ensured those breakthroughs lifted the world. She shows true science thrives not just on brilliance, but on dedication and ethics. ( 7 / 8 ) 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$