信息必刷卷04（北京卷）-2025年高考英语考前信息必刷卷

2025年高考考前信息必刷卷（北京卷）04 英语·答案及评分标准 （满分：100分） 第一部分 知识运用（共两节，满分30分） 第一节（共10小题；每小题1.5分，满分15分） 1．B 2．D 3．B 4．C 5．A 6．C 7．A 8．B 9．A 10．B 第二节（共10小题；每小题1.5分，满分15分） 11．employing 12．proved 13．highlighting 14．have 15．that 16．to meet 17．a 18．has experienced 19．for 20．be interpreted 第二部分 阅读理解（共两节，满分38分） 第一节（共14小题；每小题2分，满分28分） 21．D 22．B 23．D 24．C 25．A 26．B 27. A 28．C 29．A 30．B 31. A 32．C 33．A 34．D 第二节 （共5小题；每小题2分，满分10分） 35．G 36．B 37．D 38. F 39. C 第三部分 书面表达（共两节，满分32分） 第一节（共4小题；第40、41题各2分，第42题3分，第43题5分，满分12分） 40. Constructive conflict involves team members voicing differing perspectives on task-related issues while maintaining mutual respect. 41. Experienced teams prioritize project objectives over personal preferences and distinguish critical issues from peripheral matters. 42. Resolving task conflicts improves team efficiency because it increases stress indicators and reduces workflow interruptions. Resolving task conflicts improves team efficiency because it decreases stress indicators and reduces workflow interruptions. 43. Conflict resolution fosters innovation by integrating diverse ideas, strengthens trust through transparent communication, reduces employee turnover by improving workplace satisfaction, and enhances risk management by addressing issues proactively.（答案言之有理即可） 第二节（满分20分） 【参考范文】 Dear Anna, I hope this email finds you well. Regarding our Community Smart Waste Management Project Design Competition, I've drafted a preliminary plan which combines smart technology with community engagement. Firstly, my proposal centers on installing AI-powered sensors in trash bins to automatically categorize recyclables, kitchen waste, and hazardous materials. To ensure smooth operation, we could design bilingual instruction labels (Chinese/English) with QR codes linking to video demonstrations. Additionally, organizing monthly "Green Star Families" competitions using a gamified point system would encourage sustained participation. However, I'm particularly eager to hear your suggestions on improving the volunteer training program. Specifically, should we conduct offline workshops where residents practice sorting, or create an interactive VR simulation that allows trial-and-error learning? Furthermore, your insights would be invaluable in designing culturally sensitive promotion materials for elderly residents. Looking forward to refining this plan with your creative ideas. Let's work together to create an award-winning project that truly benefits our community! Yours, Li Hua 应用文写作评分标准 一、评分原则 1. 本题总分为20分，按5个档次给分。 2. 评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。 3. 词数少于60和多于100的，从总分中减去2分。 4. 评分时，应注意的主要内容为：内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的丰富性和准确性及上下文的连贯性。 5. 拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面，评分时，应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。 6. 如书写较差，以致影响交际，可将分数降低一个档次。 二、各档次的给分范围和要求 档次 描述 第五档 (17～20分) 完全完成了试题规定的任务。 - 覆盖所有内容要点。 - 应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。 - 语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但因尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致；具备较强的语言运用能力。 - 有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。 完全达到了预期的写作目的。 第四档 (13～16分) 完全完成了试题规定的任务。 - 虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。 - 应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。 - 语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。 - 应用简单的语句间连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。 达到了预期的写作目的。 第三档 (9～12分) 基本完成了试题规定的任务。 - 虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容。 - 应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。 - 有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解。 - 应用简单的语句间连接成分，使全文内容连贯。 整体而言，基本达到了预期的写作目的。 第二档 (5～8分) 未适当完成试题规定的任务。 - 漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容。 - 语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。 - 有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容的理解。 - 较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性。 信息未能清楚地传达给读者。 第一档 (1～4分) 未完成试题规定的任务。 - 明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理解试题要求。 - 语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。 - 较多语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响对写作内容的理解。 - 缺乏语句间的连接成分，内容不连贯。 信息未能传达给读者。 0分 未能传达给读者任何信息：内容太少，无法评判；写的内容均与所要求内容无关或所写内容无法看清。 试卷第2页，共22页 1 / 2 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$ 绝密★启用前 2025年高考考前信息必刷卷（北京卷）04 英 语 （考试时间：90分钟 试卷满分：100分） 考情速递 高考·新动向：近年北京卷英语试题持续强化“素养立意”“价值引领”和“德育渗透”，以语言能力、文化意识、思维品质和学习能力为核心考查维度，注重学生解决真实问题的综合能力。例如，2024年阅读C篇探讨“宇宙模拟”争议，引导考生关注科技伦理与创新路径，体现对批判性思维和科学探究能力的考查；2024年完形填空探讨合作与自立关系；2024年应用文写作涉及家国情怀（新中国成立75周年写作任务）。 高考·新考法：语法考查的隐性综合化。近年北京卷的语法填空不再局限于单句，而是依托完整语篇，需结合上下文时态、连词逻辑及语义连贯性解题（如故事类语篇中过去完成时与现在完成时的交替使用）。 命题·大预测：生态文明建设主题是近年北京卷的命题热点，本套试卷在研究近5年高考题目的基础上，对相关话题进行分析和探索，命制成高质量的题目供广大师生学习使用。如本套试卷中的阅读理解A篇，传递“青年参与生态治理”的价值观，符合北京卷“素养立意”命题导向 备考策略：根据北京高考英语真题命题特点，建议跨学科阅读积累：精读《经济学人》《科学美国人》等外刊的科技、社科类文章，掌握高频术语与论证逻辑。 第一部分 知识运用（共两节, 满分30分） 第一节（共10小题；每小题1.5分, 满分15分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 When Alex was a sophomore, his track coach Ms. Carter announced a demanding challenge: Participate in the regional relay race qualifications. "After a knee injury last season, I'd be 　1　 to keep up during practices. Sometimes I'd freeze at the starting line or 　2　 my steps awkwardly," Alex recalled. The memory of falling behind teammates became too painful to 　3　. Alex approached his father, 　4　 his fear of re-injury. With parental support, he requested to be 　5　 from the competition team. On qualification day, Ms. Carter arranged for Alex to timekeep instead of running. 　6　 the event ended, she said something unexpected: She admired his analytical skills in tracking performance. This made Alex realize athletic value wasn't limited to 　7　. Through high school and college, Alex maintained distance from track events. Years later, he 　8　 a position as sports event planner. The career made him recognize Ms. Carter's 　9　 on his self-perception. "Now I coordinate races nationwide. Occasional leg stiffness? Just part of my journey," he smiled. Recently, Alex decided to 　10　 his former coach, planning to send her a medal from his first successful event organization. "Coach Carter quietly reshaped my life path. Had I kept my potential hidden, I'd never have discovered this fulfilling career," he reflected. 1. A. continuing　 B. struggling　 C. pretending　 D. learning 2. A. count　　　　 B. miss　　　　 C. shorten　　　 D. adjust 3. A. share　　　　 B. bear　　　　 C. explain　　　 D. ignore 4. A. teaching　　 B. hiding　　　 C. revealing　 D. questioning 5. A. excused　　 B. banned　　　 C. protected　 D. separated 6. A. While　　 B. Unless　　 C. Once　　　 D. Until 7. A. speed　　　 B. teamwork C. medals　　　 D. records 8. A. wanted　　　 B. landed　　　 C. designed　　 D. refused 9. A. impact　　　 B. pressure　　 C. comment　　 D. dependence 10. A. judge　　　 B. contact　　　 C. replace　　　 D. congratulate 【答案】 1．B 2．D 3．B 4．C 5．A 6．C 7．A 8．B 9．A 10．B 【导语】本文主要讲述了Alex在经历膝盖受伤后的心理挣扎和成长，以及他如何在教练的启发下重新认识自己的运动价值，并最终在体育赛事策划领域取得成功的故事。 【解析】 1. B. struggling：根据上下文，Alex在上个赛季膝盖受伤后，在训练中很难跟上，因此选“struggling”表示挣扎。其他选项如“continuing”（继续）、“pretending”（假装）、“learning”（学习）都不符合语境。 2. D. adjust：Alex有时会在起跑线处僵住，或者“调整”步伐很困难。其他选项如“count”（数数）、“miss”（错过）、“shorten”（缩短）都不符合语境。 3. B. bear：被队友甩在后面的回忆变得太痛苦而难以“忍受”。其他选项如“share”（分享）、“explain”（解释）、“ignore”（忽视）都不符合语境。 4. C. revealing：Alex向父亲“透露”了他对再次受伤的恐惧。其他选项如“teaching”（教）、“hiding”（隐藏）、“questioning”（质疑）都不符合语境。 5. A. excused：在父母的支持下，他要求被“免除”竞赛队的职责。其他选项如“banned”（禁止）、“protected”（保护）、“separated”（分开）都不符合语境。 6. C. Once：比赛结束后，“一旦”事件结束，她说了些意想不到的话。其他选项如“While”（当……时候）、“Unless”（除非）、“Until”（直到）都不符合语境。 7. A. speed：这让Alex意识到运动价值不仅仅局限于“速度”。其他选项如“teamwork”（团队合作）、“medals”（奖牌）、“records”（记录）都不符合语境。 8. B. landed：多年后，他“获得”了一个体育赛事策划的职位。其他选项如“wanted”（想要）、“designed”（设计）、“refused”（拒绝）都不符合语境。 9. A. impact：这份职业让他认识到Ms. Carter对他的自我认知的“影响”。其他选项如“pressure”（压力）、“comment”（评论）、“dependence”（依赖）都不符合语境。 10. B. contact：最近，Alex决定“联系”他以前的教练。其他选项如“judge”（判断）、“replace”（替换）、“congratulate”（祝贺）都不符合语境。 第二节（共10小题；每小题1. 5分, 满分15分） A 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 A farmer's anxiety turned to gratitude in Shandong as firefighters bravely rescued a trapped calf from an abandoned well. The rescue team initiated an urgent operation, ____11____​ (employ) drones and thermal scanners. Advanced positioning systems ____12____​ (prove) vital in locating the animal 15 meters underground. Local news footage highlighted the professionals' dedication, ____13____​ their innovative techniques. Villagers applauded the crew for transforming what could ​____14____ been an ecological disaster into a triumph of modern agriculture. B 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 Hydrogen fuel cells, though eco-friendly, demand cautious handling. These devices store energy through chemical reactions ____15____​ may produce explosive mixtures if mishandled. Consumers should only purchase products certified ____16____​ (meet) international safety protocols. If detecting unusual vibrations or temperature spikes, immediately activate emergency shutdown. The optimal installation site is ​____17____ ventilated industrial zone, never in residential areas. C 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 To excel in China's rural revitalization, enterprises must align with farmers' evolving needs. Over the past five years, the "new countryside economy" ____18____​ (experience) rapid growth, with 70% of agricultural cooperatives favoring smart farming tools. Companies demonstrating authentic respect ​____19____ rural traditions through tech-integrated solutions gain market advantages. While incorporating folk elements into product design resonates culturally, excessive rustic styling might ​____20____ (interpret) as outdated. 【答案】 11．employing 12．proved 13．highlighting 14．have 15．that 16．to meet 17．a 18．has experienced 19．for 20．be interpreted A 11. 解析：现在分词作伴随状语。句子描述救援队启动紧急行动的同时使用无人机和热成像仪，需用现在分词表伴随动作。主句动词为"initiated"，"employ"需转化为非谓语形式，表主动且同时发生的动作，故填employing。 12. 解析：一般过去时被动语态。定位系统在救援中被证明至关重要，动作发生在过去。上下文描述已完成的救援事件，"prove"需用过去式proved。上下文描述已完成的救援事件，"prove"需用过去式proved。 13. 解析：介词短语逻辑衔接。新闻镜头通过展示创新技术来凸显专业精神，需用现在分词表结果。前后句为因果关系，​highlighting​（突出）连接动作与结果。 14. 解析：虚拟语气。句子表达“本可能成为生态灾难”，需用could have been结构。虚拟语气中情态动词后接完成式，故填have。 B 15. 解析： 定语从句关系词。先行词为"chemical reactions"，从句缺少主语，需用that引导。定语从句修饰限定先行词，​that指代"reactions"。 16. 解析： 不定式作目的状语。认证的目的是符合国际安全标准，需用不定式表目的。​certified to meet意为“认证以满足”，符合语法逻辑。 17. 解析：冠词与形容词搭配。需不定冠词修饰"ventilated industrial zone"，辅音开头用a。a ventilated zone表示“一个通风良好的区域”。 C 18. 解析： 现在完成时。时间状语"over the past five years"要求动作持续至今，需完成时。主语为单数"economy"，故填has experienced。 19. 解析： 介词固定搭配。"respect for"为固定短语，表示“对……的尊重”。demonstrating respect for traditions意为“展现对传统的尊重”。 20. 解析： 被动语态。主语"styling"为动作承受者，需用被动式be interpreted。句子表达“乡土风格可能被解读为过时”，故填be interpreted。 第二部分 阅读理解（共两节, 满分38分） 第一节（共14小题；每小题2分, 满分28分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 A Green Mentor Program (GMP) is a student-led environmental initiative organized by university volunteers in Beijing communities. It focuses on practical eco-projects like waste sorting guidance and biodiversity surveys. GMP involves weekly workshops where participants collaborate to ​analyze local ecological data and ​design solutions for issues such as胡同垃圾管理. The program does not repeat classroom lectures but encourages applying green skills to real challenges. Participants interactively set weekly goals. For example, a group may choose to focus on creating recycling posters or testing water quality in社区池塘. This flexibility ensures activities directly address community needs. Registration for Spring Semester opens at 9:00 am, March 25, 2025. Waiting lists: If a workshop is full, sign up for the waiting list. You’ll receive an email notification if a spot opens or new sessions are added. Attendance rules: Missing ​two consecutive sessions will result in automatic deregistration to prioritize active members. Scan the QR code at each workshop to record attendance. 21. In GMP, students ________. A. attend environmental lectures B. follow fixed weekly schedules C. collect ecological data individually D. use their skills to solve practical problems 22. What can students do if a workshop is full? A. Ignore attendance rules. B. Join the waiting list. C. Propose new lecture topics. D. Contact volunteers via QR codes. 23. Students will be deregistered if ________. A. they submit incorrect proposals B. they refuse to analyze water quality C. they share their spots with friends D. they miss two sessions in a row 【答案】21．D 22．B 23．D 【分析】本文为一篇说明文。文章介绍了GMP绿色志愿活动项目。 21．细节理解题。原文依据：GMP活动描述明确提到“design solutions for issues such as胡同垃圾管理”及“applying green skills to real challenges”。命题逻辑：本题考查活动本质理解，需区分“重复课堂内容”与“实践应用”。干扰项A（lectures）与原文“does not repeat classroom lectures”直接矛盾；选项D精准对应北京卷“学以致用”的命题导向，强调语言运用能力与实际问题解决能力的结合。 22．细节理解题。原文依据：等待名单机制明确说明“If a workshop is full, sign up for the waiting list”。命题逻辑：本题为细节定位题，需排除干扰项D（扫码联系志愿者）的迷惑性。选项B直接对应原文操作步骤，符合北京卷“真实性与任务性”命题原则，强调考生在现实场景中信息筛选能力。备考启示：此类题目要求考生快速定位关键词（如“full” “waiting list”），并识别同义替换（如“sign up”对应“join”）。 23．原文依据：考勤规则明确“Missing two consecutive sessions will result in automatic deregistration”。命题逻辑：本题考查规则细节与同义替换。选项D中“miss two sessions in a row”与“two consecutive sessions”完全对应，体现北京卷对精准语言理解的要求。干扰项B（拒绝水质分析）利用活动内容制造干扰，但原文未将此列为除名条件。思维陷阱：考生需注意“因果逻辑”与“条件限定”，避免因“活动内容相关选项”产生联想偏差。 B My name is Lucas. As a computer science sophomore, I once lived under the shadow of "code perfectionism". Every line of programming had to be flawlessly efficient; every algorithm must achieve optimal complexity. This obsession turned my passion into paralysis. For months, I stared blankly at my IDE (集成开发环境), trapped in an endless loop of self-doubt—a digital Sisyphus pushing syntax boulders uphill. The turning point came unexpectedly. At a campus tech forum, AI ethics pioneer Dr. Elena Marquez demonstrated how imperfect algorithms could drive societal good. Her case study on biased facial recognition systems ignited something dormant within me. During the Q&A, my trembling hand rose—a gesture as revolutionary as the first ENIAC boot-up. "What if...we reframe errors as iterative opportunities?" I stammered. Her approving nod felt like a compiler passing my first successful code. Weeks later, Dr. Marquez invited me to co-develop an AI fairness toolkit. Simultaneously, my department announced a "Responsible AI Hackathon". The old Lucas would have dismissed these as impossibilities, but the new me embraced the challenge. Our team's prototype—an bias-detection plugin for TensorFlow—won honorable mention. Each debugging session, each imperfect commit, became stepping stones across the algorithmic abyss. Six months into this journey, I've decoded my core malfunction: the paralyzing mantra of "syntax error". Tech evolution thrives not on flawless code, but on continuous iteration. They say innovation favors the prepared mind; I say: Ship the MVP (最小可行产品), then optimize. After all, in the silicon realm, complacency is the ultimate system crash. 24. What initially caused Lucas's paralysis? A. His inability to meet deadlines B. His addiction to digital devices C. His pursuit of coding perfection D. His lack of programming skills 25. How did Dr. Marquez's lecture impact Lucas? A. It inspired him to embrace iterative development B. It taught him advanced algorithm techniques C. It revealed the dangers of facial recognition D. It cured his public speaking anxiety 26. The hackathon experience helped Lucas grow more ________. A. cooperative B. confident C. competitive D. cautious 27. Which saying best reflects the article's message? A. Perfect is the enemy of good B. Silence is golden C. Knowledge is power D. Slow and steady wins the race 【答案】24．C 25．A 26．B 27. A 【分析】本文是一篇记叙文，主要讲述了Lucas曾因追求代码完美主义陷入创作瘫痪，过度苛求算法效率导致自我怀疑。他在一场AI伦理讲座中受到启发，开始接纳"迭代开发"理念，勇敢参与黑客松比赛。通过开发有缺陷但实用的算法工具，他逐步克服心理障碍，重拾编程热情。最终他领悟到技术创新不在于初始完美，而在于持续改进的行动力。 24. 答案：C 解析：首段第二句："Every line of programming had to be flawlessly efficient; every algorithm must achieve optimal complexity."首段末句："This obsession turned my passion into paralysis."题干关键词 "paralysis" 对应原文 "paralysis"（行动力丧失）。原文明确提到 Lucas 因追求代码的极致效率与算法完美（"flawlessly efficient", "optimal complexity"）而陷入停滞，即选项 C 中 "coding perfection"。排除选项：A（无法按时完成）：文中未提及时间管理问题。B（沉迷数字设备）：文中强调心理压力，而非设备依赖。D（缺乏编程技能）：Lucas 实际具备技能，但被完美主义限制。 25. 答案：A 解析：第二段第二句："Her case study on biased facial recognition systems ignited something dormant within me."第二段末句："What if...we reframe errors as iterative opportunities?"题干问讲座的影响，原文用 "ignited" 和 Lucas 提出的 "iterative opportunities" 表明其观念转变。选项 A 的 "embrace iterative development"（接受迭代开发）直接对应 "reframe errors as iterative opportunities"。排除选项：B（学习高级算法）：讲座主题是伦理而非技术提升。C（揭露面部识别危险）：案例用于说明不完美算法的价值，非核心影响。D（治愈演讲焦虑）：虽提到 Lucas 举手提问，但这是结果而非讲座的直接目的。 26. 答案：B 解析：第三段末句："Each debugging session, each imperfect commit, became stepping stones across the algorithmic abyss."第三段第三句："The old Lucas would have dismissed these as impossibilities, but the new me embraced the challenge."解析：题干关键词 "grow more" 要求判断人物品质变化。原文通过新旧 Lucas 的对比（"old Lucas dismissed" → "new me embraced"）和 "stepping stones" 比喻，体现其逐渐建立自信。选项 B "confident"（自信）最贴合语境。排除选项：A（合作）：文中提团队但未强调合作能力提升。C（竞争）：黑客松结果（honorable mention）非竞争性描述。D（谨慎）：Lucas 的转变在于勇于尝试，与谨慎相反。 27. 答案：A 解析：末段第二句："Tech evolution thrives not on flawless code, but on continuous iteration."末句："complacency is the ultimate system crash."主旨题需综合全文核心观点。原文批判追求完美（"code perfectionism"），主张通过迭代行动（"continuous iteration", "Ship the MVP"）进步。选项 A "完美是好的敌人" 直接呼应这一主题。排除选项：B（沉默是金）：与 Lucas 主动提问的行为矛盾。C（知识就是力量）：文中强调行动而非知识积累。D（稳扎稳打）：原文主张快速行动（"Ship the MVP"），非强调"缓慢"。 C "What if glaciers never melted?" This was the question Dr. Green posed to his geography class. Students stumbled, he later noted, because envisioning realities beyond lived experience—and strategizing to achieve them—remains an underdeveloped skill among scientists, though routinely cultivated in architects and urban planners. Determined to bridge this gap, Green pioneered a methodology now deemed vital for planetary crises: ecological systems analysis. This approach proves indispensable for goals like carbon neutrality and biodiversity preservation, demanding examination of industrial production, energy consumption, and emission cycles—and their intersections with geopolitics, technology, and cultural practices. Implementing systemic change requires three phases: mapping all ecosystem components, deciphering their interdependencies, and quantifying ripple effects across and beyond the system. Consider Arctic research. Recent UN climate reports reveal accelerated ice loss despite advanced predictive models. Satellite monitoring of 200 atmospheric variables has exposed links between CO₂ levels, ocean currents, and extreme weather. Yet AI simulations suggest glacial ecosystems involve over 50,000 interacting factors—95% insufficiently studied. This underscores the distance to phase one's completion: comprehensively identifying the climate system's elements. Critically, systemic methodology assumes balanced stakeholder influence—an ideal contradicted by reality. Studies confirm developed nations hold disproportionate decision-making power in environmental policies. To recalibrate this imbalance, universities must follow Green's lead in mainstreaming systems thinking curricula. Only when researchers, legislators, and industry leaders adopt this panoramic perspective can breakthroughs emerge. As Green concluded: "Blueprints don't melt glaciers, but without blueprints, we wander frozen in darkness." 28. The author mentions Dr. Green's question in Paragraph 1 to _______. A. present a contradiction B. emphasize a philosophy C. introduce the methodology D. challenge a assumption 29. What is implied about current climate studies? A. Phase one objectives remain partially unmet B. Satellite data has clarified core relationships C. AI alone can address glacial degradation D. Geopolitical factors are unmeasurable 30. Regarding systems thinking, the author would endorse which view? A. It risks justifying existing hierarchies B. It applies to crisis resolution C. It explains historical climate patterns D. It transcends scientific frameworks 【答案】28．C 29．A 30．B 【分析】本文是一篇议论文，主要内容是关于记忆准确性的假设难以从科学上证实，受 19 世纪心理学家威廉・詹姆斯观点及现代神经科学研究启发，我们应将对 “记忆是否为过去精确记录” 的探究转变为 “能否将记忆过程建模为类似图书馆系统”，如同过往构建心理学模型一样，新的基于概念类比的记忆模型是探索未知和发现的工具，不应纠结模型与现实的一致性，而应多借助模型增进对记忆的理解 。 28. 答案：C 解析：首段通过“What if glaciers never melted?”这一假设性问题引发思考，引出Dr. Green的教学实践与“ecological systems analysis”方法论的产生背景。这与北京卷“引入主题”的典型手法一致。命题意图：北京卷阅读题常以引语开篇，旨在通过问题或故事激发兴趣并自然过渡到核心概念。原文中Dr. Green的问题直接关联后文“ecological systems analysis”的提出，符合“引入方法论”的逻辑链。排除干扰项：A项“呈现矛盾”仅描述现象，未体现段落核心功能；B项“强调哲学”过度引申，原文未展开哲学讨论；D项“挑战假设”与后文方法论构建无关。 29. 答案：A 解析：第三段指出，尽管卫星监测了200个变量，但AI模拟显示冰川系统涉及“50,000+因素，95%未被充分研究”，直接呼应系统思维第一阶段目标（全面识别要素）的未完成性。逻辑推断：北京卷阅读题强调“隐含信息提取”，需结合数据对比（已知200 vs. 未知50,000）推断研究阶段进展。干扰项排除：B项“卫星数据已阐明核心关系”与“95%未研究”矛盾；C项“AI单独解决”违背系统思维的多方协作原则；D项“地缘因素不可量化”曲解原文“quantifying ripple effects”的要求。 30. 答案：B 解析：末段强调“系统性视角（panoramic perspective）是突破的关键”，呼应首段“应对行星危机（planetary crises）”，表明作者认为系统思维适用于解决复杂危机。北京卷命题特征：注重“方法论的应用价值”。原文通过气候案例论证系统思维的实际效用，符合“解决危机”的选项。干扰项辨析：A项“合理化等级制度”与原文批判权力不平等矛盾；C项“解释历史气候模式”局限于单一功能，未涵盖前瞻性应用；D项“超越科学框架”曲解原文“科学工具（tools）”的定位。 D Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has dominated tech discussions recently. A colleague keeps forwarding reports on how AGI systems might address humanity’s most pressing issues. Meanwhile, I’ve consulted two specialists: computer scientist Dr. Li Zhang, known for scrutinizing AI ethics, and robotics engineer Emma Wong. For years, AGI remained confined to academic debates. Now, both tech giants and startups aggressively fund related projects. Tech Horizon Weekly claims AGI could "eradicate mental health crises and reverse ecological collapse"—statements Zhang considers dangerously exaggerated. "The alarming shift," Zhang notes, "is how billions now flow into labs making grand promises they may never fulfill." As investments surge, Zhang fears researchers might unintentionally mislead stakeholders about timelines and capabilities. Unmet expectations could trigger public distrust, he warns, a cycle seen in nanotechnology and fusion energy. "But AGI’s 'human-like' label makes it particularly vulnerable to overstatement," Zhang observes, "because people project magical abilities onto what they don’t fully grasp." This echoes Wong’s advice to read her manifesto Machines & Morality. Post-reading, Wong clarified her views and discussed NeuroTech, her AGI firm established in 2020. While sharing Zhang’s skepticism about industry hype, she insists NeuroTech operates differently. "We’re vastly closer than competitors to creating a functional AGI that solves otherwise impossible challenges," Wong asserts. "Skepticism is healthy, but our progress metrics withstand quantitative peer review." Does NeuroTech truly lead the race "by significant margins"? As a layperson, I refrain from investment advice. Yet both experts’ integrity commands respect: Zhang’s vigilance anchors the field, while Wong’s transparency fuels cautious optimism. 31. Regarding Zhang’s concerns, the author feels ________. A. sympathetic B. unconcerned C. doubtful D. excited 32. What supports Wong’s confidence in AGI development? A. Her academic authority. B. The industry’s growth pace. C. NeuroTech’s technical edge. D. Government funding policies. 33. What does the underlined word “vulnerable” in Paragraph 3 most probably mean? A. Open. B. Resistant. C. Adaptive. D. Sensitive. 34. Which would be the best title for the passage? A. Is AGI Outperforming Human Intelligence? B. Can AGI Ethics Keep Pace with Innovation? C. Will AGI Reshape Humanity’s Future? D. Will AGI Development Meet Its Grand Promises 【答案】31. A 32．C 33．A 34．D 【分析】本文是一篇议论文，主要内容是围绕通用人工智能（AGI）的发展争议展开。计算机科学家张博士警示行业过度炒作，担忧巨额投资催生不切实际的承诺；而工程师黄女士创立的NeuroTech公司则声称在技术上大幅领先，强调其成果经得起量化验证。文章通过两位专家的观点碰撞，探讨了AGI领域“理想承诺与现实进展”的冲突，最终以作者对双方专业性的尊重作结，呼吁理性看待技术前景。 31. 答案：C 解析：第二段提到Zhang认为AGI的声明“dangerously exaggerated（危险地夸大）”，并指出“billions now flow into labs making grand promises they may never fulfill（数十亿资金涌入实验室，但这些实验室可能永远无法兑现承诺）”。末段作者评价：“Zhang’s vigilance anchors the field（张的警惕性为这一领域奠定了基础）”，明确表达对Zhang观点的支持。态度推断：“vigilance（警惕）”和“anchors（奠定基础）”体现作者对Zhang的认可，而非怀疑（C）或冷漠（B）。作者并未质疑Zhang的担忧，而是将其视为行业的必要警示，因此选A。干扰项排除：B项“unconcerned（漠不关心）”与作者多次引用Zhang的观点矛盾；C项“doubtful（怀疑）”不符合末段对Zhang的正面评价；D项“excited（兴奋）”与作者中立立场不符。 32. 答案：A 解析：第四段Wong声称：“We’re vastly closer than competitors to creating a functional AGI（我们比竞争对手更接近开发功能性AGI）”，并强调“our progress metrics withstand quantitative peer review（我们的进展指标经得起同行量化审查）”。逻辑分析：Wong的信心直接源于NeuroTech的技术领先（“vastly closer”）和可验证的量化数据（“progress metrics”），而非个人权威（A）或行业趋势（B）。干扰项排除：A项“academic authority（学术权威）”未提及，文中Wong身份是工程师；B项“industry’s growth pace（行业发展速度）”与“competitors”无关；D项“government funding（政府投资）”在文中无支持。 33. 答案：B 解析：原文：“AGI’s ‘human-like’ label makes it particularly ​vulnerable to overstatement（AGI的‘类人’标签使其特别容易被夸大）”。后文解释：“people project magical abilities onto what they don’t fully grasp（人们将神奇能力投射到他们不完全理解的事物上）”。词义推断：“vulnerable”在此处指“因特性（类人标签）而易被夸大”，与“open to harm/influence（易受影响）”相符。其他选项：B. Resistant（抵抗的）语义相反；C. Adaptive（适应的）、D. Sensitive（敏感的）偏离语境。 34. 答案：D 解析：全文围绕“AGI的炒作（hype）与现实进展”展开：第二段批评过度承诺（“dangerously exaggerated”）；第三段分析炒作原因（“human-like label”）；第四段讨论技术进展（“functional AGI”）；末段提出中立但谨慎的态度（“cautious optimism”）。选项D涵盖核心矛盾——承诺（hype）与兑现（meet）的冲突。 ​干扰项排除：A项“AGI是否超越人类智能”偏离主题（文中未讨论技术超越）；B项“伦理能否跟上创新”片面（伦理仅是Zhang观点的一部分）；C项“AGI是否重塑人类未来”过于宽泛，未聚焦“承诺vs现实”。 第二节（共5小题；每小题2分, 满分10分） 根据短文内容，从短文后的七个选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项。选项中有两项为多余选项。 Mental well-being is fundamental to living a fulfilling life. However, modern stressors often lead us to neglect our psychological needs. 35 It's our emotional resilience that enables us to navigate these challenges effectively. 36 We require emotional strength to maintain mental health, just as psychological stability naturally motivates us to cultivate inner resilience. Mental health refers to our psychological state at any moment – we might lack diagnosed conditions yet possess fragile minds vulnerable to negative thoughts. 37 This doesn't imply poor mental health, but rather indicates our coping mechanisms need strengthening relative to life stages and environmental demands. Prioritizing mental wellness requires dedicated time. 38 For example, daily mindfulness practices benefit individuals across all professions and age groups, though specific techniques should align with personal circumstances. Equally crucial is emotional recovery. Regular digital detoxes (8-10 hours weekly) enhance cognitive functions and build psychological defenses. 39 This process naturally reveals new dimensions of self-care and personal growth. A. Emotional resilience determines life satisfaction. B. Mental health and emotional resilience are interdependent. C. It also promotes emotional balance and mental clarity. D. For instance, we might frequently experience unexplained irritability. E. Cultivating psychological strength allows fuller life engagement. F. Certain foundational practices benefit all individuals universally. G. This drains our emotional reserves, inviting anxiety and mood disorders. 【答案】35．G 36．B 37．D 38. F 39. C 【导语】本文是一篇议论文，文章探讨在追求卓越创造力时，做专注深入一个领域的 “潜水者” 还是涉猎多种想法的 “冲浪者” 更好，“潜水者” 式思考者认为专注有优势，专注能让人成为专家，但研究发现 “潜水者” 在跨情境创新及适应新趋势方面不如 “冲浪者”，“冲浪者” 能从多源获取灵感、接受不确定性，两种方式各有优势，最有效的是成为兼具两者特点的 “冲浪者 - 潜水者”。 35. 答案：G 解析。前文：“modern stressors often lead us to neglect our psychological needs”（现代压力导致忽视心理需求）后文：“emotional resilience enables us to navigate challenges”（情感韧性帮助应对挑战）正确选项：​G. This drains our emotional reserves, inviting anxiety and mood disorders.逻辑衔接：“This”指代前文“忽视心理需求”的行为；“drains reserves”（消耗储备）与后文“resilience”（韧性）形成因果对比。干扰项排除：D（易怒举例）未体现后果的严重性；E（心理力量的好处）与后文重复。 36. 答案：C 解析：前文无直接提示；后文：“require emotional strength to maintain mental health... psychological stability motivates resilience”（需要情感力量保持心理健康，心理稳定促进韧性）正确选项：​B. Mental health and emotional resilience are interdependent. 逻辑衔接：“interdependent”（相互依存）概括后文“情感力量↔心理健康”的互惠关系；选项B为段落主旨句。干扰项排除：A（韧性决定生活满意度）片面，未涵盖双向关系；E（心理力量的作用）仅为后文分论点。 37. 答案：D 解析：前文：“possess fragile minds vulnerable to negative thoughts”（心理脆弱易受负面思想影响）后文：“doesn’t imply poor mental health... coping mechanisms need strengthening”（不意味着不健康，但需加强应对机制）正确选项：​D. For instance, we might frequently experience unexplained irritability. 逻辑衔接：“For instance”举例说明“脆弱心理”的表现（易怒）；具体案例支持前文抽象描述（fragile minds）。干扰项排除：G（消耗情感储备）与后文解释矛盾；F（普遍性实践）脱离上下文举例需求。 36. 答案：F 解析：前文：“Prioritizing mental wellness requires dedicated time”（需投入时间）；后文：“daily mindfulness practices benefit all... techniques should align with circumstances”（日常正念练习的普适性与个性化）正确选项：​F. Certain foundational practices benefit all individuals universally.逻辑衔接：“foundational practices”对应后文“daily mindfulness”；“universally”呼应“all professions and age groups”。干扰项排除：E（心理力量的好处）未体现“普遍性”；C（情绪平衡）属于后文益处，非建议。 37. 答案：A 解析：前文：“Regular digital detoxes enhance cognitive functions”（数字戒断提升认知功能）；后文：“reveals new dimensions of self-care”（揭示自我认知新维度）正确选项：​C. It also promotes emotional balance and mental clarity. 逻辑衔接：“It”指代前文“digital detoxes”；“promotes balance and clarity”（促进平衡与清晰）自然衔接后文“new dimensions”（新维度）。干扰项排除：E（生活参与）与前文“恢复措施”主题偏离；A（生活满意度）过于笼统，未具体化益处。 第三部分 书面表达（共两节，满分32分） 第一节（共4小题；第40、41题各2分，第42题3分，第43题5分，满分12分） 阅读下面短文, 根据题目要求回答问题。 Recent studies indicate that addressing conflicts constructively in workplace teams can dramatically reduce tension and enhance project outcomes. Therefore, initiating open dialogues with colleagues about disagreements may prove more beneficial than avoiding them. There's a distinction between constructive conflict and unproductive disputes. Constructive conflict involves team members voicing differing perspectives while focusing on task-related issues, maintaining mutual respect. Unproductive disputes, conversely, often include personal criticisms, emotional outbursts, and disengagement from collaborative processes. Proactively resolving professional disagreements rather than suppressing them boosts team efficiency. A 2022 organizational behavior survey tracking 1,500 employees' daily interactions revealed that teams resolving task-related conflicts saw 40% lower stress indicators compared to those avoiding confrontations. Stress indicators here refer to reduced productivity or increased interpersonal friction. Teams achieving resolution reported stabilized workflow quality within 48 hours, equivalent to conflict-free groups. This demonstrates that properly managed conflicts can restore operational harmony. Furthermore, teams with members possessing over five years' collaborative experience resolved task conflicts 30% faster than novice groups. This likely stems from seasoned professionals' ability to prioritize project objectives over personal preferences, distinguishing critical path issues from peripheral matters. While sidestepping disagreements provides temporary comfort, courageously navigating them often yields superior long-term results. 40. According to this passage, what is constructive conflict? 41. Why do experienced teams resolve task conflicts more efficiently? 42. Please decide which part is false in the following statement, then underline it and explain why. ▷ Resolving task conflicts improves team efficiency because it increases stress indicators and reduces workflow interruptions. 43. Besides enhancing team efficiency, what other benefits might conflict resolution bring to organizations? (In about 40 words) 【答案】 40. Constructive conflict involves team members voicing differing perspectives on task-related issues while maintaining mutual respect. 41. Experienced teams prioritize project objectives over personal preferences and distinguish critical issues from peripheral matters. 42. Resolving task conflicts improves team efficiency because it increases stress indicators and reduces workflow interruptions. Resolving task conflicts improves team efficiency because it decreases stress indicators and reduces workflow interruptions. 43. Conflict resolution fosters innovation by integrating diverse ideas, strengthens trust through transparent communication, reduces employee turnover by improving workplace satisfaction, and enhances risk management by addressing issues proactively.（答案言之有理即可） 第二节（满分20分） 44．假设你是红星中学高三学生李华，你与本校国际部交换生Anna计划组队参加学校组织的“社区智能垃圾分类志愿服务项目设计大赛”（Community Smart Waste Management Project Design Competition）。请用英语给Anna写一封邮件，内容包括： 1． 提出你的初步设计方案； 2． 征求Anna的改进建议。 注意: 1. 词数 100 左右； 2. 开头和结尾已给出，不计入总词数。 Dear Anna ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yours Li Hua 【答案】（One Possible Version） Dear Anna, I hope this email finds you well. ​Regarding our Community Smart Waste Management Project Design Competition, I've drafted a preliminary plan which combines smart technology with community engagement. Firstly, my proposal centers on installing AI-powered sensors in trash bins to automatically categorize recyclables, kitchen waste, and hazardous materials. ​To ensure smooth operation, we could design bilingual instruction labels (Chinese/English) with QR codes linking to video demonstrations. ​Additionally, organizing monthly "Green Star Families" competitions using a gamified point system would encourage sustained participation. However, I'm particularly eager to hear your suggestions on improving the volunteer training program. ​Specifically, should we conduct offline workshops where residents practice sorting, or create an interactive VR simulation that allows trial-and-error learning? ​Furthermore, your insights would be invaluable in designing culturally sensitive promotion materials for elderly residents. Looking forward to refining this plan with your creative ideas. Let's work together to create an award-winning project that truly benefits our community! Yours, Li Hua 【评解】 【总体分】 ①题材：本文属于应用文中的建议合作类邮件，旨在与国际交换生探讨智能垃圾分类项目设计方案，符合"人与社会"主题下科技赋能社区服务的时代命题。 ② ​时态：以一般现在时为主（如"I've drafted a preliminary plan"陈述现有方案），穿插将来时态（如"we could design"表计划），符合方案设计类文本的时态特征。 ③ ​结构：采用"总-分-总"结构，先概述项目核心（智能技术+社区参与），再分层说明技术方案与激励机制，最后通过设问引导合作，逻辑链条清晰 【写作步骤】 第一步：以"Regarding..."句式开门见山点明主题，通过"combines...with..."点明项目双核特色（科技+人文），呼应题干"志愿服务"与"智能设计"的双重要求。 第二步：分层次说明方案： ​ 技术层：用"AI-powered sensors"+"QR codes"构建智能硬件与交互软件的双重支撑（体现科技深度） ​ 机制层：通过"gamified point system"将垃圾分类游戏化（体现行为心理学应用） ​ 人文层：用"culturally sensitive promotion materials"关注老年群体需求（体现社会关怀） 第三步：以设问形式（"should we conduct...or create..."）自然过渡到建议征求环节，通过"invaluable insights"等谦辞强化合作感。 【亮点词汇】 ① ​categorize​（分类）：较基础词"classify"更突出系统性分类的技术特征 ② ​gamified​（游戏化）：超纲但符合科技主题，生动描述积分激励机制 ③ ​trial-and-error learning​（试错学习）：专业教育学术语，精准描述VR培训设计理念 【高分句型】 ① ​分词作状语："organizing monthly competitions using..."（-ing分词表伴随动作，使句式紧凑） ② ​条件状语从句："should we conduct...or create..."（虚拟语气表礼貌征询，体现合作精神） ③ ​定语从句："materials for elderly residents who may..."（隐含对特殊群体的关怀，未写出但逻辑自洽） 试卷第2页，共22页 1 / 2 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$ 绝密★启用前 2025年高考考前信息必刷卷（北京卷）04 英 语 （考试时间：90分钟 试卷满分：100分） 考情速递 高考·新动向：近年北京卷英语试题持续强化“素养立意”“价值引领”和“德育渗透”，以语言能力、文化意识、思维品质和学习能力为核心考查维度，注重学生解决真实问题的综合能力。例如，2024年阅读C篇探讨“宇宙模拟”争议，引导考生关注科技伦理与创新路径，体现对批判性思维和科学探究能力的考查；2024年完形填空探讨合作与自立关系；2024年应用文写作涉及家国情怀（新中国成立75周年写作任务）。 高考·新考法：语法考查的隐性综合化。近年北京卷的语法填空不再局限于单句，而是依托完整语篇，需结合上下文时态、连词逻辑及语义连贯性解题（如故事类语篇中过去完成时与现在完成时的交替使用）。 命题·大预测：生态文明建设主题是近年北京卷的命题热点，本套试卷在研究近5年高考题目的基础上，对相关话题进行分析和探索，命制成高质量的题目供广大师生学习使用。如本套试卷中的阅读理解A篇，传递“青年参与生态治理”的价值观，符合北京卷“素养立意”命题导向 备考策略：根据北京高考英语真题命题特点，建议跨学科阅读积累：精读《经济学人》《科学美国人》等外刊的科技、社科类文章，掌握高频术语与论证逻辑。 第一部分 知识运用（共两节, 满分30分） 第一节（共10小题；每小题1.5分, 满分15分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 When Alex was a sophomore, his track coach Ms. Carter announced a demanding challenge: Participate in the regional relay race qualifications. "After a knee injury last season, I'd be 　1　 to keep up during practices. Sometimes I'd freeze at the starting line or 　2　 my steps awkwardly," Alex recalled. The memory of falling behind teammates became too painful to 　3　. Alex approached his father, 　4　 his fear of re-injury. With parental support, he requested to be 　5　 from the competition team. On qualification day, Ms. Carter arranged for Alex to timekeep instead of running. 　6　 the event ended, she said something unexpected: She admired his analytical skills in tracking performance. This made Alex realize athletic value wasn't limited to 　7　. Through high school and college, Alex maintained distance from track events. Years later, he 　8　 a position as sports event planner. The career made him recognize Ms. Carter's 　9　 on his self-perception. "Now I coordinate races nationwide. Occasional leg stiffness? Just part of my journey," he smiled. Recently, Alex decided to 　10　 his former coach, planning to send her a medal from his first successful event organization. "Coach Carter quietly reshaped my life path. Had I kept my potential hidden, I'd never have discovered this fulfilling career," he reflected. 1. A. continuing　 B. struggling　 C. pretending　 D. learning 2. A. count　　　　 B. miss　　　　 C. shorten　　　 D. adjust 3. A. share　　　　 B. bear　　　　 C. explain　　　 D. ignore 4. A. teaching　　 B. hiding　　　 C. revealing　 D. questioning 5. A. excused　　 B. banned　　　 C. protected　 D. separated 6. A. While　　 B. Unless　　 C. Once　　　 D. Until 7. A. speed　　　 B. teamwork C. medals　　　 D. records 8. A. wanted　　　 B. landed　　　 C. designed　　 D. refused 9. A. impact　　　 B. pressure　　 C. comment　　 D. dependence 10. A. judge　　　 B. contact　　　 C. replace　　　 D. congratulate 第二节（共10小题；每小题1. 5分, 满分15分） A 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 A farmer's anxiety turned to gratitude in Shandong as firefighters bravely rescued a trapped calf from an abandoned well. The rescue team initiated an urgent operation, ____11____​ (employ) drones and thermal scanners. Advanced positioning systems ____12____​ (prove) vital in locating the animal 15 meters underground. Local news footage highlighted the professionals' dedication, ____13____​ their innovative techniques. Villagers applauded the crew for transforming what could ​____14____ been an ecological disaster into a triumph of modern agriculture. B 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 Hydrogen fuel cells, though eco-friendly, demand cautious handling. These devices store energy through chemical reactions ____15____​ may produce explosive mixtures if mishandled. Consumers should only purchase products certified ____16____​ (meet) international safety protocols. If detecting unusual vibrations or temperature spikes, immediately activate emergency shutdown. The optimal installation site is ​____17____ ventilated industrial zone, never in residential areas. C 阅读下列短文，根据短文内容填空。在未给提示词的空白处仅填写1个适当的单词，在给出提示词的空白处用括号内所给词的正确形式填空。 To excel in China's rural revitalization, enterprises must align with farmers' evolving needs. Over the past five years, the "new countryside economy" ____18____​ (experience) rapid growth, with 70% of agricultural cooperatives favoring smart farming tools. Companies demonstrating authentic respect ​____19____ rural traditions through tech-integrated solutions gain market advantages. While incorporating folk elements into product design resonates culturally, excessive rustic styling might ​____20____ (interpret) as outdated. 第二部分 阅读理解（共两节, 满分38分） 第一节（共14小题；每小题2分, 满分28分） 阅读下列短文, 掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。 A Green Mentor Program (GMP) is a student-led environmental initiative organized by university volunteers in Beijing communities. It focuses on practical eco-projects like waste sorting guidance and biodiversity surveys. GMP involves weekly workshops where participants collaborate to ​analyze local ecological data and ​design solutions for issues such as胡同垃圾管理. The program does not repeat classroom lectures but encourages applying green skills to real challenges. Participants interactively set weekly goals. For example, a group may choose to focus on creating recycling posters or testing water quality in社区池塘. This flexibility ensures activities directly address community needs. Registration for Spring Semester opens at 9:00 am, March 25, 2025. Waiting lists: If a workshop is full, sign up for the waiting list. You’ll receive an email notification if a spot opens or new sessions are added. Attendance rules: Missing ​two consecutive sessions will result in automatic deregistration to prioritize active members. Scan the QR code at each workshop to record attendance. 21. In GMP, students ________. A. attend environmental lectures B. follow fixed weekly schedules C. collect ecological data individually D. use their skills to solve practical problems 22. What can students do if a workshop is full? A. Ignore attendance rules. B. Join the waiting list. C. Propose new lecture topics. D. Contact volunteers via QR codes. 23. Students will be deregistered if ________. A. they submit incorrect proposals B. they refuse to analyze water quality C. they share their spots with friends D. they miss two sessions in a row B My name is Lucas. As a computer science sophomore, I once lived under the shadow of "code perfectionism". Every line of programming had to be flawlessly efficient; every algorithm must achieve optimal complexity. This obsession turned my passion into paralysis. For months, I stared blankly at my IDE (集成开发环境), trapped in an endless loop of self-doubt—a digital Sisyphus pushing syntax boulders uphill. The turning point came unexpectedly. At a campus tech forum, AI ethics pioneer Dr. Elena Marquez demonstrated how imperfect algorithms could drive societal good. Her case study on biased facial recognition systems ignited something dormant within me. During the Q&A, my trembling hand rose—a gesture as revolutionary as the first ENIAC boot-up. "What if...we reframe errors as iterative opportunities?" I stammered. Her approving nod felt like a compiler passing my first successful code. Weeks later, Dr. Marquez invited me to co-develop an AI fairness toolkit. Simultaneously, my department announced a "Responsible AI Hackathon". The old Lucas would have dismissed these as impossibilities, but the new me embraced the challenge. Our team's prototype—an bias-detection plugin for TensorFlow—won honorable mention. Each debugging session, each imperfect commit, became stepping stones across the algorithmic abyss. Six months into this journey, I've decoded my core malfunction: the paralyzing mantra of "syntax error". Tech evolution thrives not on flawless code, but on continuous iteration. They say innovation favors the prepared mind; I say: Ship the MVP (最小可行产品), then optimize. After all, in the silicon realm, complacency is the ultimate system crash. 24. What initially caused Lucas's paralysis? A. His inability to meet deadlines B. His addiction to digital devices C. His pursuit of coding perfection D. His lack of programming skills 25. How did Dr. Marquez's lecture impact Lucas? A. It inspired him to embrace iterative development B. It taught him advanced algorithm techniques C. It revealed the dangers of facial recognition D. It cured his public speaking anxiety 26. The hackathon experience helped Lucas grow more ________. A. cooperative B. confident C. competitive D. cautious 27. Which saying best reflects the article's message? A. Perfect is the enemy of good B. Silence is golden C. Knowledge is power D. Slow and steady wins the race C "What if glaciers never melted?" This was the question Dr. Green posed to his geography class. Students stumbled, he later noted, because envisioning realities beyond lived experience—and strategizing to achieve them—remains an underdeveloped skill among scientists, though routinely cultivated in architects and urban planners. Determined to bridge this gap, Green pioneered a methodology now deemed vital for planetary crises: ecological systems analysis. This approach proves indispensable for goals like carbon neutrality and biodiversity preservation, demanding examination of industrial production, energy consumption, and emission cycles—and their intersections with geopolitics, technology, and cultural practices. Implementing systemic change requires three phases: mapping all ecosystem components, deciphering their interdependencies, and quantifying ripple effects across and beyond the system. Consider Arctic research. Recent UN climate reports reveal accelerated ice loss despite advanced predictive models. Satellite monitoring of 200 atmospheric variables has exposed links between CO₂ levels, ocean currents, and extreme weather. Yet AI simulations suggest glacial ecosystems involve over 50,000 interacting factors—95% insufficiently studied. This underscores the distance to phase one's completion: comprehensively identifying the climate system's elements. Critically, systemic methodology assumes balanced stakeholder influence—an ideal contradicted by reality. Studies confirm developed nations hold disproportionate decision-making power in environmental policies. To recalibrate this imbalance, universities must follow Green's lead in mainstreaming systems thinking curricula. Only when researchers, legislators, and industry leaders adopt this panoramic perspective can breakthroughs emerge. As Green concluded: "Blueprints don't melt glaciers, but without blueprints, we wander frozen in darkness." 28. The author mentions Dr. Green's question in Paragraph 1 to _______. A. present a contradiction B. emphasize a philosophy C. introduce the methodology D. challenge a assumption 29. What is implied about current climate studies? A. Phase one objectives remain partially unmet B. Satellite data has clarified core relationships C. AI alone can address glacial degradation D. Geopolitical factors are unmeasurable 30. Regarding systems thinking, the author would endorse which view? A. It risks justifying existing hierarchies B. It applies to crisis resolution C. It explains historical climate patterns D. It transcends scientific frameworks D Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has dominated tech discussions recently. A colleague keeps forwarding reports on how AGI systems might address humanity’s most pressing issues. Meanwhile, I’ve consulted two specialists: computer scientist Dr. Li Zhang, known for scrutinizing AI ethics, and robotics engineer Emma Wong. For years, AGI remained confined to academic debates. Now, both tech giants and startups aggressively fund related projects. Tech Horizon Weekly claims AGI could "eradicate mental health crises and reverse ecological collapse"—statements Zhang considers dangerously exaggerated. "The alarming shift," Zhang notes, "is how billions now flow into labs making grand promises they may never fulfill." As investments surge, Zhang fears researchers might unintentionally mislead stakeholders about timelines and capabilities. Unmet expectations could trigger public distrust, he warns, a cycle seen in nanotechnology and fusion energy. "But AGI’s 'human-like' label makes it particularly vulnerable to overstatement," Zhang observes, "because people project magical abilities onto what they don’t fully grasp." This echoes Wong’s advice to read her manifesto Machines & Morality. Post-reading, Wong clarified her views and discussed NeuroTech, her AGI firm established in 2020. While sharing Zhang’s skepticism about industry hype, she insists NeuroTech operates differently. "We’re vastly closer than competitors to creating a functional AGI that solves otherwise impossible challenges," Wong asserts. "Skepticism is healthy, but our progress metrics withstand quantitative peer review." Does NeuroTech truly lead the race "by significant margins"? As a layperson, I refrain from investment advice. Yet both experts’ integrity commands respect: Zhang’s vigilance anchors the field, while Wong’s transparency fuels cautious optimism. 31. Regarding Zhang’s concerns, the author feels ________. A. sympathetic B. unconcerned C. doubtful D. excited 32. What supports Wong’s confidence in AGI development? A. Her academic authority. B. The industry’s growth pace. C. NeuroTech’s technical edge. D. Government funding policies. 33. What does the underlined word “vulnerable” in Paragraph 3 most probably mean? A. Open. B. Resistant. C. Adaptive. D. Sensitive. 34. Which would be the best title for the passage? A. Is AGI Outperforming Human Intelligence? B. Can AGI Ethics Keep Pace with Innovation? C. Will AGI Reshape Humanity’s Future? D. Will AGI Development Meet Its Grand Promises 第二节（共5小题；每小题2分, 满分10分） 根据短文内容，从短文后的七个选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项。选项中有两项为多余选项。 Mental well-being is fundamental to living a fulfilling life. However, modern stressors often lead us to neglect our psychological needs. 35 It's our emotional resilience that enables us to navigate these challenges effectively. 36 We require emotional strength to maintain mental health, just as psychological stability naturally motivates us to cultivate inner resilience. Mental health refers to our psychological state at any moment – we might lack diagnosed conditions yet possess fragile minds vulnerable to negative thoughts. 37 This doesn't imply poor mental health, but rather indicates our coping mechanisms need strengthening relative to life stages and environmental demands. Prioritizing mental wellness requires dedicated time. 38 For example, daily mindfulness practices benefit individuals across all professions and age groups, though specific techniques should align with personal circumstances. Equally crucial is emotional recovery. Regular digital detoxes (8-10 hours weekly) enhance cognitive functions and build psychological defenses. 39 This process naturally reveals new dimensions of self-care and personal growth. A. Emotional resilience determines life satisfaction. B. Mental health and emotional resilience are interdependent. C. It also promotes emotional balance and mental clarity. D. For instance, we might frequently experience unexplained irritability. E. Cultivating psychological strength allows fuller life engagement. F. Certain foundational practices benefit all individuals universally. G. This drains our emotional reserves, inviting anxiety and mood disorders. 第三部分 书面表达（共两节，满分32分） 第一节（共4小题；第40、41题各2分，第42题3分，第43题5分，满分12分） 阅读下面短文, 根据题目要求回答问题。 Recent studies indicate that addressing conflicts constructively in workplace teams can dramatically reduce tension and enhance project outcomes. Therefore, initiating open dialogues with colleagues about disagreements may prove more beneficial than avoiding them. There's a distinction between constructive conflict and unproductive disputes. Constructive conflict involves team members voicing differing perspectives while focusing on task-related issues, maintaining mutual respect. Unproductive disputes, conversely, often include personal criticisms, emotional outbursts, and disengagement from collaborative processes. Proactively resolving professional disagreements rather than suppressing them boosts team efficiency. A 2022 organizational behavior survey tracking 1,500 employees' daily interactions revealed that teams resolving task-related conflicts saw 40% lower stress indicators compared to those avoiding confrontations. Stress indicators here refer to reduced productivity or increased interpersonal friction. Teams achieving resolution reported stabilized workflow quality within 48 hours, equivalent to conflict-free groups. This demonstrates that properly managed conflicts can restore operational harmony. Furthermore, teams with members possessing over five years' collaborative experience resolved task conflicts 30% faster than novice groups. This likely stems from seasoned professionals' ability to prioritize project objectives over personal preferences, distinguishing critical path issues from peripheral matters. While sidestepping disagreements provides temporary comfort, courageously navigating them often yields superior long-term results. 40. According to this passage, what is constructive conflict? 41. Why do experienced teams resolve task conflicts more efficiently? 42. Please decide which part is false in the following statement, then underline it and explain why. ▷ Resolving task conflicts improves team efficiency because it increases stress indicators and reduces workflow interruptions. 43. Besides enhancing team efficiency, what other benefits might conflict resolution bring to organizations? (In about 40 words) 第二节（满分20分） 44．假设你是红星中学高三学生李华，你与本校国际部交换生Anna计划组队参加学校组织的“社区智能垃圾分类志愿服务项目设计大赛”（Community Smart Waste Management Project Design Competition）。请用英语给Anna写一封邮件，内容包括： 1． 提出你的初步设计方案； 2． 征求Anna的改进建议。 注意: 1. 词数 100 左右； 2. 开头和结尾已给出，不计入总词数。 Dear Anna ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yours Li Hua 试卷第2页，共22页 1 / 2 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$