应用文写作 致外教：英美文学课考核方式的探讨与建议 讲义-广东省广州外国语、广大附中、铁一中学等三校2024-2025学年高三上学期期中联考试英语试

应用文写作 假定你是李华，本学期参加了英美文学选修课，外教老师Ryan公布了该课程的考核方式为2小时的课堂闭卷考试。请你给老师写一封邮件，谈谈你对该考核方式的看法，内容包括： (1) 你的看法及理由； (2) 你的建议。 注意: (1) 写作词数应为80个左右； (2) 请按如下格式在答题卡的相应位置作答。 参考词汇：英美文学选修课 British and American Literature course ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 写作提纲： 第一段：表明写信目的是与老师探讨英美文学选修课的考核方式，提及外教公布的闭卷考试形式。 第二段：阐述自己对闭卷考试考核方式的看法及理由。看法可以是认为有一定合理性但也存在不足。理由如闭卷考试能考查知识记忆但难以全面考查对文学作品的深度理解、分析和感悟能力等。 第三段：提出自己的建议，如增加平时作业、论文写作、课堂展示等考核占比，与闭卷考试相结合，以更全面地评估学生对英美文学的学习成果等。 语言积累： 1. I am writing to express my thoughts about the assessment method of the British and American Literature course.（我写信是为了表达我对英美文学课程考核方式的看法。） 2. The closed-book exam within two hours has its own advantages and disadvantages.（两小时的闭卷考试有其自身的优点和缺点。） 3. It can test our knowledge memory to some extent.（它在一定程度上能测试我们的知识记忆。） 4. However, it fails to comprehensively evaluate our in-depth understanding and analysis of literary works.（然而，它无法全面评估我们对文学作品的深度理解和分析。） 5. We may not have enough time to elaborate on our insights during the exam.（在考试期间我们可能没有足够时间详细阐述我们的见解。） 6. I suggest that more weight could be given to regular assignments.（我建议给予平时作业更多的权重。） 7. Writing papers about specific literary works can better reflect our research and thinking abilities.（撰写关于特定文学作品的论文能更好地反映我们的研究和思考能力。） 8. Classroom presentations can also be an effective assessment part.（课堂展示也可以是一个有效的考核部分。） 9. A combination of different assessment methods would be more fair and comprehensive.（不同考核方式的结合会更加公平和全面。） 10. I hope you can consider my suggestions and make the assessment more suitable for our learning.（我希望您能考虑我的建议，使考核更适合我们的学习。） 写作示范一： Dear Mr. Ryan, I am Li Hua. I am writing to share my views on the assessment method of the British and American Literature course. The two-hour closed-book exam has certain merits as it can check our basic knowledge of the literature. But it also has drawbacks. Literature study is more about in-depth analysis and personal feelings, which a closed-book exam may not fully assess. We might not be able to show our true understanding within a limited time. Therefore, I propose that besides the exam, we could have more regular assignments like writing short essays analyzing literary characters. Also, group discussions and presentations could be included. This way, our overall performance in the course could be better evaluated. Thank you for your attention. Best regards, Li Hua 写作示范二： Dear Mr. Ryan, I'm Li Hua, a student in your British and American Literature course. I'm writing to discuss the assessment mode you announced. The closed-book exam is a traditional way and can test our rote learning. However, for a literature course, it's not enough. We need time to express our profound thoughts on the plots, themes and writing styles of literary works, which the exam hardly allows. I suggest adding a project where we create a mini-play based on a certain literary work. This can test our creativity and understanding. And the proportion of the exam could be reduced, with more focus on our participation and performance in class discussions and paper writing. I hope you'll consider my suggestions. Yours sincerely, Li Hua 写作示范三： Dear Mr. Ryan, My name is Li Hua. I'm writing regarding the assessment of the British and American Literature course. The current closed-book exam is useful in examining our knowledge of facts and terms. But it neglects the essence of literature learning - the appreciation and interpretation. We may be too nervous in the exam to fully display our literary acumen. My recommendation is to introduce a literature review task. We choose a work and write a detailed review. Also, oral examinations about our favorite works could be conducted. This combination with the closed-book exam would provide a more holistic evaluation of our learning. Thank you for your time. Best wishes, Li Hua One possible version: Dear Ryan, I’m Li Hua from Class 3. I hope this email finds you well. I’m writing to share my thoughts on the assessment method for our British and American Literature course. Regarding the announced 2-hour closed-book exam, I understand its purpose in testing our knowledge. However, I feel that such an exam may not fully capture the depth of our understanding, particularly in a subject like literature where analysis and personal interpretation are key. I would like to suggest an alternative. Perhaps students could complete a term paper on a topic of personal interest, which would allow for in-depth exploration. We could also discuss ideas with classmates and refer to external resources. At the end of the term, students could present their findings and share their insights in class. Thank you again for your time and consideration. I look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely, Li Hua 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$