2024届江苏省苏州市十月月考人与自我读后续写课件

English test analysis in October 月考读后续写讲评 01 02 03 Overall analysis Writing continuation CONTENTS Production PART ONE Overall analysis Overall Performance of the Class Top Performers 19 students scored below 60% and need additional support. Average Score Xxx,xxx，xxx Distribution of Scores Areas of Improvement 97.9 The majority of students scored between 60% and 73%. 4 Identification of Low-Performing Students Lack of Understanding Low Test Scores These students struggle to grasp key concepts and demonstrate a lack of understanding. Incomplete Assignments Low-performing students often fail to complete assignments or submit them late. Some students have consistently low scores on tests and assessments. PART TWO Continuation writing, a new form of testifying students’ comprehensive English competence, is also a way to better students’ learning English as a foreign language.  Writing continuation 第五档（21~25分） •创造了丰富、合理的内容，富有逻辑性，续写完整，与原文情境融洽度高； •使用了多样并且恰当的词汇和语法结构，表达流畅，可能有个别小错，但完全不影响理解； •有效地使用了语句间衔接手段，全文结构清断，前后呼应，意义连贯。 第四档（16-20分） •创造了比较丰富、合理的内容，比较有逻辑性，续写比较完整，与原文情境融治度较高； •使用了比较多样并且怡当的词汇和语法结构，表达比较流畅，可能有些许错误，但不影响理解； •比较有效地使用了语句间衔接手段，全文结构比较清晰，意义比较连贯。 第三档（11~15分） •创造了基本合理的内容，有一定的逻辑性，续写基本完整，与原文情境相关； •使用了简单的词汇和语法结构，有一些错误或不恰当之处，但基本不影响理解。 •基本有效地使用了语句间衔接手段，全文结构基本清晰，意义基本连贯。 第二档（6~10分） •内容或逻辑上有一些重大问题，续写不够完整，与原文情境有一定程度脱节； •所使用的词汇有限，语法结构单调，错误较多，且比较低级，影响理解； •未能有效地使用语句间衔接手段，全文结构不够清晰，意义不够连贯。 第一档（1~5分） •内容或逻辑上有较多重大问题，或有部分内容抄自原文，续写不完整，与原文情境基本脱节。 •所使用的词汇有限，语法结构单调，错误很多，严重影响理解； •几乎没有使用语句间衔接手段，全文结构不清晰，意义不连贯。 零分: •所写内容太少或无法看清以致无法评判 •所写内容全部抄自原文或与题目要求完全不相关 •未作答。 Rating standards Requirements one night a few years ago When Who “I” Where What my service dog, Marshall ①my bedroom ②a beautiful bike trail ① I found Marshall was in pain. ② Marshall and I spent much time together. neighbors Read for info What is “my” secret that everyone knows? Who makes “me” feel "enough"? How did “I” know something was wrong with Marshall? Read for understanding “I” don’t like to ask for help. Marshall, the serv