内容正文:
专题05 阅读理解(议论文)
(原卷版)
目录
1. 上海市徐汇区2023年高三试卷
2. 上海市2023年奉贤高三统考测试
3. 上海市2023年高三“六校联合教研”调研试卷
4. 上海交大附中2023年高三试卷
5. 上海市2023年年高三模拟试题
6. 上海市进才学校2022年高三试卷
7. 上海市复旦附中2022年高三试题
8. 上海市嘉定2022年高三试卷
9. 上海市嘉定区2022年高三试题
10.上海市2023年高三一模试卷
1.【上海市徐汇区2023年高三试卷】
Casting blame is natural: it is tempting to fault someone else for a mistake rather than taking responsibility yourself. But blame is also harmful. It makes it less likely that people will own up to mistakes, and thus less likely that organizations can learn from them. Research published in 2015 suggests that firms whose managers pointed to external factors to explain their failings underperformed companies that blamed themselves.
Blame culture can spread like a virus. Just as children fear mom and dad’s punishment if they admit to wrongdoing, in a blaming environment, employees are afraid of criticism and punishment if they acknowledge making a mistake at work. Blame culture asks, “who dropped the ball?” instead of “where did our systems and processes fail?” The focus is on the individuals, not the processes. It’s much easier to point fingers at a person or department instead of doing the harder, but the more beneficial, exercise of fixing the root cause, so the problem does not happen again.
The No Blame Culture was introduced to make sure errors and deficiencies (缺陷) were highlighted by employees as early as possible. It originated in organizations where tiny errors can have catastrophic (灾难性的) consequences. These are known as high reliability organizations (HROs) and include hospitals, submarines and airlines. Because errors can be so disastrous in these organizations, it’s dangerous to operate in an environment where employees don’t feel able to report errors that have been made or raise concerns about that deficiencies may turn into future errors. The No Blame Culture maximizes accountability because all contributions to the event occurring are identified and reviewed for possible change and improvement.
The N