内容正文:
Cohesion & Coherence
Today, we are going to talk about a pair of concepts: cohesion and coherence. As you can see, the two terms in text analysis look quite similar, so there must be correlation in between, but they of course represent different ideas. Due to time limit, our focus today is cohesion
Cohesion
Jakobson (1960)
Halliday&Hassan(1976)
Baker (1992)
“The concept of cohesion is a semantic one; it refers
to relations of meaning that exist within the text, and that define it as a text.
------ Cohesion in English
Cohesion is the network of lexical, grammatical, and other relations which provide links between various parts of a text .
Jakobson first talked about it in detail, but it is Halliday that introduced this concept as a linguistic term, and his book with Hassan drew the attention
of the academics to cohesion. The initial definition is.... . It is semantic, not structural. But later scholars' interpretation might be a bit different. They think cohesion
is reflected in linguistic devices, which is similar to nowadays' understanding (衔接手段)
Coherence
not defined
in rhetorics
comparison
All part of a text are closely related to make it valid.
1. meaning VS structural properties
2. implicit VS explicit
coherence compared with cohesion
Correlation:
cohesion =>coherence ?
! not necessary
! not sufficient
! helpful
The king died. The queen died of grief.
A: Can you go to Edinburgh tomorrow?
B: B.E.A. pilots are on stike.
“
lexical
1
Grammatical
2
reference
A
substitu-
tion
A
ellipsis
A
conjuc-
tion
A
reference
definiton
A participant or circumstantial element introduced at one place in the text can be taken as a reference point for something that follows.
---Halliday
reference
types
● personal reference
① personal pronoun
② possessive pronoun
eg. He shrugged his shoulders, shock his head