高考阅读理解D篇 议论文 (十）-2027届高三英语一轮复习专项

**基本信息** 聚焦高考议论文高频题型，通过外刊改编热点话题（AI版权等），系统提炼细节理解、态度判断等解题方法，强化语言能力与思维品质。 **专项设计** |模块|题量/典例|方法提炼|知识逻辑| |----|-----------|----------|----------| |社会热点议论文|4篇16题（含细节理解、主旨大意等5类题型）|细节题定位关键信息，态度题分析观点句，主旨题概括核心论点|从基础信息获取到高阶思维分析，构建题型解法递进体系|

高三 一轮复习专项｜阅读理解D篇·议论文 Passage 1 话题：[外刊改编] 生成式AI版权争议与行业规范 Passage 2 话题：[外刊改编] 深度阅读消失与短视频时代思维退化 Passage 3 话题：[外刊改编] 城市过度便利化引发的能力退化 Passage 4 话题：[外刊改编] 艺术审美对逻辑思维与创新能力的赋能 Passage 1 话题：[外刊改编] 生成式AI版权争议与行业规范 The booming development of generative AI has triggered heated global debates over digital copyright. In the past two years, numerous AI tools have been trained on massive online content, including books, articles and artworks created by human creators, without official authorization or payment. Many artists and writers have raised objections, arguing that AI’s free use of creative works threatens the survival of original creation. Supporters of unrestricted AI training hold a different opinion. They claim that AI learning from public resources falls within the scope of “fair use”. Similar to human learners who absorb ideas from existing works, AI only processes data and produces new outputs instead of simply copying. Strict copyright limits, they believe, will greatly block technological innovation and slow down the progress of artificial intelligence. However, the vague boundary of AI copyright has caused widespread chaos. At present, no unified international rules have been established to define who owns the rights of AI-generated content. Some commercial platforms sell AI works for profit, while original creators receive no compensation at all. Such an unbalanced situation discourages creators from investing time and energy in original works, resulting in a decline in creative diversity. Experts suggest that balanced AI regulation is urgently needed. Governments should formulate clear rules to protect creators’ legitimate rights while reserving reasonable space for technological development. The future of AI lies not in unlimited data exploitation, but in win-win cooperation between human creativity and machine technology. 1. Why do many creators oppose current AI training modes? A. AI copies original works completely. B. Their works are used without permission. C. AI works are more creative than human ones. D. Strict copyright rules are ignored by the public. 2. What do AI supporters think of AI data learning? A. It is a reasonable form of fair use. B. It should be completely banned by law. C. It damages the interests of technology firms. D. It requires high payment for original resources. 3. What problem is caused by unclear AI copyright rules? A. Rapid growth of creative works. B. Over-competition among AI platforms. C. Reduced diversity of original creation. D. Slow update of AI technological functions. 4. What is the author’s attitude towards AI copyright regulation? A. Doubtful. B. Supportive. C. Uncaring. D. Negative. Passage 2 话题：[外刊改编] 深度阅读消失与短视频时代思维退化 In the age of short-video dominance, long-form deep reading is gradually fading out of people’s daily life. Most people nowadays prefer scrolling through short, fast-paced video content rather than reading lengthy articles or classic books. This behavioral shift has aroused widespread concern among educators and psychologists. Short videos are designed to provide instant pleasure and quick information. Within seconds, viewers gain visual excitement and simple answers without thinking deeply. Gradually, people get used to accepting fragmented information passively. They lose the patience to analyze complex logic, reflect on abstract ideas or follow long reasoning chains, which are core abilities cultivated by deep reading. Many people argue that short videos also serve as an efficient way to learn knowledge. They believe short platforms make knowledge popular and accessible to ordinary people. However, superficial fragmented information can never replace systematic reading. Short-video learning tends to offer simplified conclusions, ignoring complex backgrounds and logical processes. It enables people to “know the result” but fails to teach them “how to think”. The decline of deep reading leads to potential mental risks. Young generations may become accustomed to instant satisfaction and lose the ability of long-term concentration and independent thinking. To reverse this trend, individuals need to actively rebuild reading habits. Only continuous deep reading can shape steady logical thinking and critical judgment, which are essential for personal long-term development. 1. What worries educators about the short-video era? A. The rapid update of video platforms. B. The disappearance of deep reading habits. C. The difficulty of accessing online resources. D. The over-popularity of classic books. 2. What ability will people lose without deep reading? A. Receiving information quickly. B. Enjoying instant pleasure easily. C. Analyzing complex logical problems. D. Sharing online content freely. 3. What does the author stress about short-video learning? A. It cannot replace systematic deep reading. B. It helps learners form independent thinking. C. It provides complete knowledge backgrounds. D. It improves people’s long-term concentration. 4. What is the best title for the text? A. The Advantages of Short-video Learning B. The Hidden Cost of Abandoning Deep Reading C. How to Develop Efficient Learning Methods D. The Future of Online Knowledge Sharing Passage 3 话题：[外刊改编] 城市过度便利化引发的能力退化 Modern cities are becoming increasingly convenient with the rapid development of digital services. Food delivery, online payment and intelligent navigation save people plenty of time and energy. While enjoying the benefits of high convenience, people ignore the hidden social and personal risks brought by over-reliance on intelligent services. In daily life, many young people cannot cook simple meals, recognize road directions or manage daily expenses independently. Intelligent tools solve almost all trivial problems for them. Convenience eliminates minor troubles in life, but meanwhile deprives people of the chances to practice basic living skills. Gradually, people become dependent on technology and lose the ability to deal with daily challenges on their own. Moreover, excessive convenience weakens people’s mental resilience. Small difficulties and setbacks in life used to help people build patience and perseverance. When all difficulties are solved by intelligent systems, people become more sensitive and fragile. They are more likely to feel anxious and frustrated when facing unexpected troubles that cannot be solved by digital tools. It is undeniable that technological convenience promotes social progress. However, people should treat modern services rationally. Technology is supposed to assist human life rather than replace human abilities. Keeping moderate independence in daily life is essential for maintaining personal competence and mental strength in the digital age. 1. What risk does over-reliance on intelligent services bring? A. Waste of plenty of spare time. B. Degradation of personal basic abilities. C. Slow development of urban technology. D. Increased difficulty of urban management. 2. The underlined word “resilience” in Paragraph 3 most probably means ______. A. flexibility to face difficulties B. interest in modern technology C. awareness of social rules D. preference for convenient life 3. What can we infer from the text? A. Modern convenience does more harm than good. B. Young people lack practice of daily living skills. C. Intelligent tools should be completely refused. D. Digital services make people more patient. 4. What is the author’s main purpose of writing the text? A. To praise the progress of modern urban technology. B. To explain how intelligent services work in daily life. C. To remind people of rational use of modern convenience. D. To encourage people to refuse digital intelligent tools. Passage 4 话题：[外刊改编] 艺术审美对逻辑思维与创新能力的赋能 Many people hold the stereotype that art appreciation is merely a relaxing hobby with little practical value. They believe scientific thinking and logical analysis contribute more to personal development, while art only brings emotional enjoyment. However, latest psychological research proves that regular art appreciation can greatly improve people’s abstract thinking and creative problem-solving abilities. A study conducted by Cambridge University divided participants into two groups. One group only viewed artworks casually, while the other group carried out active appreciation, including observing details, analyzing styles and expressing personal opinions. The result showed that active art appreciation participants scored much higher in abstract thinking and logical reasoning tests. Artworks contain complex symbolic meanings and diverse structural designs. When people try to understand artistic creation, they need to jump out of fixed thinking patterns, observe things from new perspectives and connect scattered details into complete logic. This thinking process effectively trains people’s ability of multi-angle observation and innovative analysis, which are also core qualities required in scientific research and social work. Balanced development requires both scientific rationality and artistic sensibility. Pure logical thinking may make people rigid and limited, while art appreciation opens up people’s minds and broadens their thinking boundaries. Integrating art education into daily learning helps individuals develop comprehensive abilities and adapt better to complex modern social challenges. 1. What is people’s traditional attitude towards art appreciation? A. It is beneficial to logical work. B. It has few practical functions. C. It trains innovative thinking greatly. D. It is more important than science study. 2. What does the Cambridge study find? A. Casual viewing of artworks improves logic greatly. B. Active art appreciation boosts abstract thinking. C. Scientific training has no obvious effect on creativity. D. Art study can replace logical reasoning training. 3. Why does art appreciation improve people’s thinking ability? A. It requires multi-angle and innovative thinking. B. It provides fixed thinking modes for learners. C. It focuses solely on emotional experience. D. It simplifies complex logical problems. 4. Which of the following is the best title for the text? A. The Traditional Value of Scientific Logical Thinking B. How Art Changes People’s Emotional World C. The Practical Power of Art Appreciation in Thinking Training D. Balanced Development of Art and Science Education 参考答案与解析 Passage 1 1. B 【考点】细节理解题 解析：根据第一段“AI tools have been trained on massive online content… without official authorization or payment”可知，创作者反对的核心原因是人工智能未经授权、未支付报酬就使用原创作品。A错误，AI是生成新内容而非完全复制；C、D无原文依据。 2. A 【考点】细节理解题 解析：第二段支持者观点“AI learning from public resources falls within the scope of ‘fair use’”，他们认为AI数据学习属于合理使用范畴。B、C、D均与支持者观点相反。 3. C 【考点】细节理解题 解析：第三段指出版权规则模糊造成行业混乱，使得原创者积极性受挫，最终导致“resulting in a decline in creative diversity”，即原创多样性减少。A与文意相反；B、D文中未提及。 4. B 【考点】作者态度题 解析：文末作者明确提出需要建立均衡的AI监管规则，保护创作者权益、兼顾科技发展，可见作者支持合理的AI版权规范。怀疑、漠视、消极态度均不符合文本基调。 Passage 2 1. B 【考点】细节理解题 解析：文章首段点明核心问题：短视频盛行时代，深度阅读逐渐消失，这一现象引发教育者担忧。A、C、D均非教育者担忧的核心问题。 2. C 【考点】细节理解题 解析：第二段明确指出，习惯碎片化短视频的人群，会失去分析复杂逻辑、深度思考的能力。A、B是短视频带来的能力，并非缺失的能力；D无依据。 3. A 【考点】细节理解题 解析：第三段作者明确表态“superficial fragmented information can never replace systematic reading”，短视频碎片化学习无法替代系统深度阅读。B、C、D均与原文观点相悖。 4. B 【考点】主旨大意题 解析：全文围绕放弃深度阅读、沉迷短视频的隐性危害展开，论述其对思维、专注力、判断力的负面影响。A片面（文章否定短视频优势）；C、D范围过大，偏离核心话题。 Passage 3 1. B 【考点】细节理解题 解析：第二段、第三段点明核心弊端：过度依赖智能便利服务，使人丧失基本生活技能、心理抗压能力，造成个人能力退化。A、C、D均非原文提及的风险。 2. A 【考点】词义猜测题 解析：后文解释：生活小挫折原本能培养耐心与毅力，而便利生活使人脆弱、焦虑。由此推断resilience指面对困难的抗压能力、适应力。B、C、D语义不符。 3. B 【考点】推理判断题 解析：第二段“many young people cannot cook simple meals… deprives people of the chances to practice basic living skills”可推知，年轻人缺乏生活技能锻炼。A过度解读（文章承认便利有好处）；C、D表述与原文相反。 4. C 【考点】写作目的题 解析：全文辩证论述智能便利的利弊，最终呼吁人们理性对待科技便利、保持个人独立能力。A片面褒扬；B偏离主旨；D表述绝对，作者并非拒绝科技工具。 Passage 4 1. B 【考点】细节理解题 解析：第一段首句“Many people hold the stereotype that art appreciation is merely a relaxing hobby with little practical value”，传统观点认为艺术审美几乎没有实用价值。A、C、D均为现代研究新结论，非传统观点。 2. B 【考点】细节理解题 解析：剑桥实验表明：主动品鉴艺术的受试者，在抽象思维、逻辑推理测试中得分更高，证明主动艺术鉴赏能提升抽象思维能力。A错误，随意观赏无明显效果；C、D表述绝对且无依据。 3. A 【考点】细节理解题 解析：第三段说明，艺术鉴赏需要跳出固定思维、多角度观察、整合细节逻辑，训练创新分析能力。B、C、D均与原文艺术思维特点相反。 4. C 【考点】主旨大意题 解析：全文打破艺术无用的刻板印象，论证艺术审美在思维训练、创新能力培养上的实用价值。A偏离艺术主题；B片面（不止情绪价值）；D范围过大，文章重点是艺术的思维价值，非二者均衡教育。 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $