2027届高考英语一轮复习应用文话题之学习评价 学习任务单

2026-07-18
| 8页
| 220人阅读
| 1人下载
普通

资源信息

学段 高中
学科 英语
教材版本 -
年级 高三
章节 -
类型 学案-学习任务单
知识点 -
使用场景 高考复习-一轮复习
学年 2026-2027
地区(省份) 全国
地区(市) -
地区(区县) -
文件格式 DOCX
文件大小 43 KB
发布时间 2026-07-18
更新时间 2026-07-18
作者 啊呜喵
品牌系列 -
审核时间 2026-07-18
下载链接 https://m.zxxk.com/soft/58865528.html
价格 1.50储值(1储值=1元)
来源 学科网

摘要:

该高中英语高考复习学案聚焦应用文写作之学习评价专题,系统整合邮件体裁的“问题说明-建议提出”核心考点,通过背景目的、问题分析、建议构建的层级架构,结合仿写练习与问题-建议表格工具,引导学生自主梳理写作逻辑,形成结构化表达框架。 亮点在于自主诊断与思维引导设计,如设置“问题表现-原因分析”表格任务培养思维品质,提供仿写句式模板提升语言能力,配套评价清单工具助力学生自主发现写作薄弱点。这一设计既强化学习能力,又为教师提供学情反馈依据,支持个性化复习指导。

内容正文:

应用文话题之学习评价 高三一轮复习 【原题呈现】 假定你是李华,为了让学生参与到评价过程中,外教Ryan在写作课上要求同桌互评作文,你认 为这样的模式存在问题。请你给外教写一封邮件,内容包括:1. 说明问题;2. 提出建议。 注意: 1. 写作词数应为80左右; 2. 请按如下格式在答题纸的相应位置作答。 Dear Ryan, I’m Li Hua from Class 3. ____________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yours, Li Hua 类似高考题目: 假定你是李华,外教Ryan准备将学生随机分为两人一组,让大家课后练习口语,你认为这样的分组存在问题,请你给外教写一封邮件,内容包括: 1. 说明问题;2. 提出建议。 注意:1. 词数 80 左右;2. 可以适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。 Dear Ryan, I’m Li Hua from Class 3. _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Yours sincerely, Li Hua Para 1 写信背景+写信目的 1. I want to discuss the approach you mentioned for speaking practice after class. While I appreciate the intention behind random grouping, I believe there may be some issues with this method. 仿写:I want to discuss the approach you mentioned for _____________(评价) in class. While I appreciate the intention behind ___________________(两人一组评价), I believe there may be some issues with this method. 2. I hope this email finds you well. I don’t think it’s a good idea to randomly pair up students for the spoken English training after class. The reasons are as follows. 仿写: I hope this email finds you well. I don’t think it’s a good idea to ____________________________________(为英语写作课开展互评). The reasons are as follows. 3. I object to being paired with a random classmate for practicing oral conversations in your class, so I am writing to voice the reasons. hold opposing opinions on… 对...持有反对意见 disagree with sth. 不赞成某事 仿写: I ________________________________________________ (反对与同桌结对进行写作互评)in your class, so I am writing to ________________________(表达理由). 4. Learning your random grouping method for our oral practice, I personally suppose there are certain issues that need to be addressed/ this approach needs to be considered again. Here are my reasons. 仿写: Learning your _____________________(小组互评方法) for _____________________(我们的写作评价), I personally suppose there are certain issues that need to be addressed/ this approach needs to be considered again. Here are my reasons. Para 2 陈述问题+提出建议 Problem Point Specific Performance/Impact Reason Deskmates have similar language proficiency and miss mistakes Fail to identify deep-rooted errors like grammar flaws缺点 or logical gaps in compositions/writings Feedback is ineffective, making it hard for students to improve their writing weaknesses Deskmates are at similar language levels and lack a more advanced perspective to check compositions Desk-mate relationships affect feedback authenticity(真实性) Be reluctant to point out shortcomings due to familiarity, leading to overly mild feedback Conceal real problems in compositions and lose the meaning of peer review Close daily relationships between deskmates create a "conflict avoidance" mindset 1. First, deskmates usually have similar ____________________, so they often___________________ deep-rooted mistakes such as grammar flaws or logical gaps in each other’s compositions, ______________________________________________________(定语从句). 首先,同桌的语言水平通常相近,因此他们往往难以发现彼此作文中诸如语法漏洞或逻辑缺口之类的深层错误,这使得此类反馈对提升写作能力毫无用处。 2. Besides, some deskmates ______________________________________________________ because of their close daily relationships. Their overly mild feedback _____________________ and ___________________________________. 此外,部分同桌由于日常关系密切,不愿意指出对方作文中明显的不足。他们过于温和的反馈掩盖了作文中的真实问题,也让这次互评失去了原本的意义。 Suggestions Advantages Group students by different writing levels (e.g., pair advanced writers with those needing improvement) Advanced students can provide targeted advice on complex issues; students with weaknesses can clearly know how to improve Provide a "writing review checklist" in advance (covering grammar, logic, structure, etc.) Students have clear evaluation dimensions维度, making feedback more accurate and conclusive 1. To address these problems, I suggest __________________ by different writing levels. For example, ________________________________ those needing improvement allows ___________ to ________________________________.为解决这些问题,我建议按不同写作水平给学生分组。例如,将写作水平较高的学生与需要提升的学生配对,前者便能针对复杂错误提供针对性建议。 2. Additionally, providing a writing review checklist _________ grammar, logic, and structure ________________, can help students give ________________________________ instead of being unsure about what to evaluate.此外,提前提供一份涵盖语法、逻辑和结构的作文评价清单,能帮助学生给出更准确、更有针对性的反馈,而非不确定该评价哪些内容。 Para 3 希望外教考虑你的建议 1. Thank you for considering my suggestion. 2. Hopefully, you can take my suggestions into serious consideration/account. 3. I understand the desire to create a dynamic language _________________, and __________________________, we can _________ that students benefit from _________________. 我理解您希望营造一个富有活力的语言学习环境,而通过这些调整,我们能够确保学生从有效的反馈中获益。 4. Thank you for considering these suggestions. I believe that by _________ a more ____________________________________, we can __________________ the writing class for our students. 感谢您考虑这些建议。我相信,通过采用一种更具针对性 / 更具策略性的互评环节,我们能够进一步丰富学生的写作课体验。 参考范文: Dear Ryan, I’m Li Hua from Class 3. We really appreciate your effort to engage students in the evaluation process. However, I’m afraid that peer assessment might be problematic, for some may lack the ability to provide constructive feedback, leading to misunderstandings or demotivation. To facilitate an effective peer review system, instead of restricting evaluations to deskmates, would you consider forming temporary groups with students from different backgrounds or skill levels? This would provide a richer variety of perspectives and promote more constructive feedback. Additionally, it couldn’t be better if we were given a structured feedback form that outlines specific criteria for evaluation, which can help standardize the process and ensure that all students benefit from comprehensive and balanced feedback. Thank you for considering my suggestions. I am more than happy to discuss this further. Yours, Li Hua 学科网(北京)股份有限公司 应用文话题之学习评价 高三一轮复习 【原题呈现】 假定你是李华,为了让学生参与到评价过程中,外教Ryan在写作课上要求同桌互评作文,你认 为这样的模式存在问题。请你给外教写一封邮件,内容包括:1. 说明问题;2. 提出建议。 注意: 1. 写作词数应为80左右; 2. 请按如下格式在答题纸的相应位置作答。 Dear Ryan, I’m Li Hua from Class 3. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yours, Li Hua 类似高考题目: 假定你是李华,外教Ryan准备将学生随机分为两人一组,让大家课后练习口语,你认为这样的分组存在问题,请你给外教写一封邮件,内容包括: 1. 说明问题;2. 提出建议。 注意:1. 词数 80 左右;2. 可以适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。 Dear Ryan, I’m Li Hua from Class 3. _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Yours sincerely, Li Hua Para 1 写信背景+写信目的 1. I want to discuss the approach you mentioned for speaking practice after class. While I appreciate the intention behind random grouping, I believe there may be some issues with this method. 仿写: I want to discuss the approach you mentioned for evaluation in class. While I appreciate the intention behind pair assessment, I believe there may be some issues with this method. 2. I hope this email finds you well. I don’t think it’s a good idea to randomly pair up students for the spoken English training after class. The reasons are as follows. 仿写: I hope this email finds you well. I don’t think it’s a good idea to conduct mutual assessment for the English writing class. The reasons are as follows. 3. I object to being paired to a random classmate for practicing oral conversations in your class, so I am writing to voice the reasons. hold opposing opinions on… 对...持有反对意见 disagree with sth. 不赞成某事 仿写: I object to being paired with my deskmate for writing assessment in your class, so I am writing to voice the reasons. 4. Learning your random grouping method for our oral practice, I personally suppose there are certain issues that need to be addressed/ this approach needs to be considered again. Here are my reasons. 仿写: Learning your pair work method for our writing evaluation, I personally suppose there are certain issues that need to be addressed/ this approach needs to be considered again. Here are my reasons. Para 2 陈述问题+提出建议 Problem Point Specific Performance/Impact Reason Deskmates have similar language proficiency and miss mistakes Fail to identify deep-rooted errors like grammar flaws缺点 or logical gaps in compositions/writings Feedback is ineffective, making it hard for students to improve their writing weaknesses Deskmates are at similar language levels and lack a more advanced perspective to check compositions Desk-mate relationships affect feedback authenticity(真实性) Be reluctant to point out shortcomings due to familiarity, leading to overly mild feedback Conceal real problems in compositions and lose the meaning of peer review Close daily relationships between deskmates create a "conflict avoidance" mindset 1. First, deskmates usually have similar language proficiency, so they often fail to spot deep-rooted mistakes such as grammar flaws or logical gaps in each other’s compositions, which makes the feedback useless for improving writing(定语从句). 首先,同桌的语言水平通常相近,因此他们往往难以发现彼此作文中诸如语法漏洞或逻辑缺口之类的深层错误,这使得此类反馈对提升写作能力毫无用处。 2. Besides, some deskmates are reluctant/unwilling to point out obvious shortcomings because of their close daily relationships. Their overly mild feedback conceals real problems and makes the peer review meaningless. 此外,部分同桌由于日常关系密切,不愿意指出对方作文中明显的不足。他们过于温和的反馈掩盖了作文中的真实问题,也让这次互评失去了原本的意义。 Suggestions Advantages Group students by different writing levels (e.g., pair advanced writers with those needing improvement) Advanced students can provide targeted advice on complex issues; students with weaknesses can clearly know how to improve Provide a "writing review checklist" in advance (covering grammar, logic, structure, etc.) Students have clear evaluation dimensions维度, making feedback more accurate and conclusive 3. To address these problems, I suggest grouping students by different writing levels. For example, pairing advanced writers with those needing improvement allows the former to offer targeted advice on complex errors. 为解决这些问题,我建议按不同写作水平给学生分组。例如,将写作水平较高的学生与需要提升的学生配对,前者便能针对复杂错误提供针对性建议。 4. Additionally, providing a writing review checklist covering grammar, logic, and structure in advance, can help students give more accurate and conclusive feedback instead of being unsure about what to evaluate. 此外,提前提供一份涵盖语法、逻辑和结构的作文评价清单,能帮助学生给出更准确、更有针对性的反馈,而非不确定该评价哪些内容。 Para 3 希望外教考虑你的建议 1. Thank you for considering my suggestion. 2. Hopefully, you can take my suggestions into serious consideration/account. 3. I understand the desire to create a dynamic language learning setting, and with these adjustments, we can ensure that students benefit from effective feedback. 我理解您希望营造一个富有活力的语言学习环境,而通过这些调整,我们能够确保学生从有效的反馈中获益。 4. Thank you for considering these suggestions. I believe that by employing/adopting a more tailored/strategic assessment session, we can further enrich the writing class for our students. 感谢您考虑这些建议。我相信,通过采用一种更具针对性 / 更具策略性的互评环节,我们能够进一步丰富学生的写作课体验。 参考范文: Dear Ryan, I’m Li Hua from Class 3. We really appreciate your effort to engage students in the evaluation process. However, I’m afraid that peer assessment might be problematic, for some may lack the ability to provide constructive feedback, leading to misunderstandings or demotivation. To facilitate an effective peer review system, instead of restricting evaluations to deskmates, would you consider forming temporary groups with students from different backgrounds or skill levels? This would provide a richer variety of perspectives and promote more constructive feedback. Additionally, it couldn’t be better if we were given a structured feedback form that outlines specific criteria for evaluation, which can help standardize the process and ensure that all students benefit from comprehensive and balanced feedback. Thank you for considering my suggestions. I am more than happy to discuss this further. Yours, Li Hua $

资源预览图

2027届高考英语一轮复习应用文话题之学习评价 学习任务单
1
2027届高考英语一轮复习应用文话题之学习评价 学习任务单
2
2027届高考英语一轮复习应用文话题之学习评价 学习任务单
3
所属专辑
相关资源
示范课
由于学科网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不确保部分用户上传资料的 来源及知识产权归属。如您发现相关资料侵犯您的合法权益,请联系学科网,我们核实后将及时进行处理。