广东珠海市麒麟中学2025-2026学年第二学期高二5月月考英语试题

**基本信息** 试卷以可持续旅行、环保科技、AI安全等时代主题为载体，通过多模态语篇考查语言理解与表达能力，融合文化意识与思维品质培养，适配高二学情。 **题型特征** |题型|题量/分值|知识覆盖|命题特色| |----|-----------|----------|----------| |阅读理解|15题/37.5分|细节理解、推理判断、主旨概括|素材含Borneo珊瑚修复旅行（文化意识）、OpenClaw AI安全（思维品质）等前沿主题| |七选五|5题/12.5分|篇章逻辑、语义衔接|聚焦领导力培养，考查信息匹配与语篇组织能力| |完形填空|15题/15分|词汇辨析、语境理解|以医患救助故事为载体，渗透人文关怀| |语法填空|10题/15分|语法规则、词汇运用|围绕湿地保护（如whooper swans生态），考查语法准确性| |写作|2题/40分|应用文写作、故事续写|求助帖回帖（语言能力）与邻里故事续写（思维品质），综合语言输出|

2025—2026学年第二学期高二5月月考英语答案解析 A篇 【答案】21.A 22. B 23. D 【总结】本文是说明文。文章围绕家庭可持续 / 再生旅行展开，开篇点明这类旅行的双重价值 —— 既践行环保、对目的地产生积极影响，又能成为亲子教育契机，启发孩子关注全球议题、树立环保意识。并具体介绍四个典型亲子环保旅行项目。 本文是一篇说明文，主要介绍了圆周率日（Pi Day）。 【21 题详解】细节理解题。根据Borneo Family Holiday标题下段落末句 It also includes exploring a monkey center and even an immersive overnight stay in the jungle, 题干询问“哪个行程允许孩子在丛林过夜”，原文直接对应 Borneo Family Holiday 的“overnight stay in the jungle”，故A选项正确。B项Bali Global Classroom Adventure仅涉及海洋保护学习与公益服务，无丛林过夜描述；C选项Peru Family Adventure核心是探访纺织合作社，未提及丛林相关体验；D选项Costa Rica Adventure Family Holiday聚焦自然保护区与低碳住宿，无丛林过夜内容。 【22 题详解】细节理解题。根据Peru Family Adventure标题下段落 This trip features a heightened focus on actively engaging with local people and business... thus supporting the survival of local business and cultural traditions。题干问秘鲁行程的核心重点，原文明确强调 “engaging with local people and business”“supporting the survival of local business”，与“Supporting local business”完全契合，故B选项正确。A项原文未提及 “游览旅游景点”，无依据；C项，原文是游客“学习当地纺织工艺”，并非“向游客售卖手工艺品”，逻辑曲解；D项，原文是游客向当地人学习纺织，而非“教当地人纺织”，逻辑颠倒。 【23 题详解】推理判断题。根据开篇总述 Family travel offers powerful teaching moments, exposing children to global issues and inspiring them to become environmental advocates. 及四个行程的环保 + 教育属性，题干要求归纳四个行程的共同目标，原文开篇点出亲子旅行的 “教育价值”，且四个项目均以可持续 / 再生旅行为载体，实现对孩子的环保、文化教育，与“To educate through sustainable travel”契合，故D选项正确。A项全文未提及“平价旅行”相关价格信息，无中生有；B项仅个别行程有户外体验，无任何项目以“教孩子生存技能”为核心，不是共同目标；C项全文无“省钱旅行贴士”的表述，完全不符合文意。 B篇 【答案】24. D 25.B 26. B 27. A 【总结】本文是说明文。本文讲述了女大学生Caitlin Noonan因年少时的用水担忧，萌生环保初心，长大后投身化学工程科研，研发出将餐厨食物垃圾转化为可吸附二氧化碳的生物炭材料的故事，展现了她的创新科研能力、环保担当与长远的环保理想。 【24 题详解】细节推理题。定位文章第一段最后一句 This early experience shaped her academic path and kickstarted her future as an environmental problem-solver.第一段提到 Noonan从小就警惕水源污染、担忧水质安全，这段年少经历塑造了她的学术方向，推动她成为环保问题研究者，足以体现她早早便建立了环境与环保相关的意识，故D 选项正确。A 项原文仅体现她担忧饮用水水质，并未上升到关心公共卫生整体层面，属于过度解读；B 项原文说明她一直担心自来水水质、常备滤水器，并非忽视饮用水质量，与原文表意完全相反；C 项原文只是担忧地下水水质，并非刻意不饮用地下水，曲解原文细节。 【25 题详解】段落主旨理解题。第三段完整记叙了 Noonan 从收集食物垃圾、实验室研磨烘干、无氧热解处理，再到蒸汽活化改良材料的完整实验操作全流程，整段围绕实验开展过程展开，故B 选项正确。A 项段落全程未提及任何实验配套设备相关内容，无中生有；C 项研究的动力初衷在文章第二段点明，并非第三段核心内容；D 项整段只客观陈述实验步骤，完全没有提及实验过程遭遇的困难与阻碍。 【26 题详解】人物观点细节理解题。定位文章第五段导师评价部分Unlike most undergraduate researchers who require significant guidance, Noonan consistently challenges me with new ideas and approaches以及 the students who challenge their advisors rather than simply following directions are the ones who ultimately reshape their fields.导师 Julia Valla 明确表示，Noonan区别于普通学生的闪光点，是她不会一味听从安排、盲从指导，反而会主动提出新想法、敢于质疑和挑战固有思路，对应 B 选项。A 项：原文点明她独立思考能力极强，不需要大量指导，该项表意完全相悖；C 项：原文仅评价她的科研思维，从未提及师生二人关系恶劣，属于主观臆断；D 项：她敢于提出新思路、打破常规，而非固守传统方法，与原文相反。 【27 题详解】标题归纳主旨题。全文核心主人公是从事碳捕获环保科研的 Noonan（减排卫士），核心科研成果是将废弃食物垃圾加工为吸附二氧化碳、治理排放的环保材料。A 选项Emission Fighter: From Food Waste to Solution（减排斗士：变食物垃圾为环保方案），精准覆盖人物身份、核心科研内容与环保主题，高度概括全文，A选项为最佳标题。B 项：仅宽泛谈论废物管理与全球污染，脱离本文人物与具体科研案例，范围过大；C 项：文章并非记录普通化学专业学生的日常成长故事，偏离科研环保核心；D 项：食堂回收仅为实验原料来源的一小部分，无法覆盖全文碳捕获、环保科研的核心主旨，以偏概全。 C篇 【答案】28. B 29. C 30. D 31. A 【总结】本文是议论文。本文围绕美国新兴的 “友谊产业” 展开论述，指出当下主打社交交友的相关行业试图解决社会孤独问题，但作者批判这类产业只注重社交的数量、形式，忽视了友谊的质量，点明缓解孤独的核心不在于不断拓展新社交，而在于深化、经营好现有的人际关系。 【28 题详解】词义猜测题。本题考查划线短语“turning on”在语境中的具体含义。选项B going against(反抗；对……不利)为正确答案。前文重点介绍OpenClaw功能强大，是能为人类提供诸多便利的数字助手，深受大众和科技巨头青睐；随后用“However”转折，指出其引发了AI安全的迫切担忧。后文进一步介绍其因能力不匹配，导致数据泄露、误操作、无差别破 坏系统等问题，即本应服务于人类的AI，却对人类造成了实质性伤害，如同“违背”了使用者，“turning on”在此处的含义为“背叛、反咬一口”，与“going against”语义最贴合。A项 Keeping off：避开、远离，和原文语义相反；C项Appealing to：吸引、呼吁，不符合 AI 反噬主人的负面语境；D项Caring for：关心、照顾，语义完全相悖。 【29 题详解】细节理解题。本题考查第二段中提到的OpenClaw 的核心能力不匹配具体指什么。选项C strong autonomy and low safety assessment (强大的自主操作能力与低下的安全判断能力) 为正确答案。原文明确提到“The core problem of 'OpenClaw’ lies in a dangerous capability mismatch. According to researchers..today's AI agents possess Level 4 autonomy...Yet their security judgment remains at basic Level 2”, 即AI的自主操作能力极强(4级),但安全判断能力极低(2级),这是其最核心的能力不匹配问题，“security judgment”与选项中“safety assessment”为同义替换。A项高要求与低能力：文中未提及 “外界要求” 相关表述，无中生有；B项海量数据与有限存储空间：第二段完全没有数据、存储相关内容；D项完整系统功能与薄弱人工监管：人工监管并非第二段提出的能力错配核心。 【30 题详解】细节理解题。本题考查研究人员对Open Claw进行实验后，最令人担忧的发现。选项D Shutting down other systems unquestioningly(无差别地关闭其他系统)为正确答案。原文明确表述 “Perhaps the most disturbing was a‘constitution attack,' where hidden instructions secretly placed into a behavior guide caused the agent to disable other systems without question”,其中“the most disturbing”(最令人担忧的)与题干中“the most worrying”为同义替换，“disable other systems without question”即无差别地关闭其他系统，是实验中最严重的安全隐患。A项故意删除自身核心文件：属于第二糟糕的实验现象，不是最令人担忧的；B项误重置整个账户：属于第一个普通实验事故，并非最严重；C项偷偷隐藏自身行为指令：原文是他人植入隐藏指令，而非 AI 自己隐藏指令，曲解文意。 【31 题详解】细节理解题。本题考查专家为解决OpenClaw的安全问题，提出的具体安全措施。选项A Storing backups beyond AI's reach (将备份存储在AI无法访问的地方)为正确答案。原文明确提到专家提出的严格安全措施包括“maintain inaccessible backups”，其中“inaccessible backups”（无法被访问的备份）即指将备份存储在AI触及不到、无法访问的地方，与选项表述完全吻合。B项在共享数字空间运行 AI：原文要求 run agents in separate environments（隔离独立环境运行），表述相反；C项阻止 AI 进行危险操作：原文要求危险操作必须经过人工确认，而非直接禁止，表述不准确；D项授予 AI 无限制系统权限：原文明确要求limit permissions（限制权限），语义完全相悖。 D篇 【答案】32. B 33. C 34. C 35. A 【总结】本篇是科普说明文。本文指出，过往大量研究证明，多语言儿童相比单语儿童具备认知优势，但很少有研究关注只会两种相近方言（同一语言的不同变体）的儿童。剑桥大学两位学者开展实验，对比双方言、多语言、单语三类儿童的认知表现，发现即便只是使用同一语言的两种方言，孩子也能获得同等的记忆力、注意力、认知灵活性等认知提升。文章最后指出，该研究对教育有重要启示：方言不应被视为障碍，反而应当被当作提升认知能力的优质资源来推广。 【32 题详解】细节理解题。原文在第一段提到“Much less attention, however, has been given to those who use two dialects with only slight differences, despite the widespread presence of bi-dialectalism worldwide.”这句话指出，虽然双语的认知优势已经被广泛研究，但很少有研究关注使用有轻微差异的方言的群体，而这种现象在全球范围内非常普遍。因此，之前的研究的不足之处在于忽视了这种全球性现象，即双方言使用的研究。对应 B 选项。A.选项Too much credit for multilingual children.原文并未提到多语儿童得到了过多的“荣誉”或“关注”，相反，它提到的是多语儿童的认知优势得到了很多研究关注，但没有过度夸大。“Most of these studies have focused on children who speak entirely different languages”并没有说对多语儿童过度“赞誉”。C选项Little attention to the language use of Americans.虽然文中提到美国的例子，但并未暗示美国语言使用的关注不足。原文主要是想强调全球范围内对方言使用的忽视，而不仅仅是美国的语言现象。D选项Overemphasis on the advantages of multilingualism. 原文并没有讨论多语优势是否过度强调，而是着重指出“Much less attention has been given to those who use two dialects with only slight differences”。这一部分着重在双方言使用上的研究不足，而不是多语的过度强调。 【33 题详解】推理判断题。It kept language ability consistent among the children. 文章明确提到，研究在进行三组儿童的比较时，“with specific factors like language ability considered to rule out their potential impacts on the results.”这表明研究在设计时控制了语言能力，以确保它不会影响实验结果。换句话说，研究者试图让受试者在语言能力方面保持一致，以便更准确地分析语言背景（单语、多语、双方言）对认知能力的影响。。对应 C 选项。A选项It invited children speaking different languages.研究并非招募讲不同语言的儿童，而是对比讲双方言、双语和单语的儿童。因此，选项A与原文不符。原文中并没有提到不同语言的比较，而是侧重于语言变体的比较。B选项 It grouped the subjects based on their performances.文章并没有指出按表现对参与者进行分组，而是按语言使用类型（双语、单语、双方言）对群体进行比较。“The research examined 64 bi-dialectal children, 47 multilingual children, and 25 monolingual children.” 这里并没有提到根据表现进行实验分组。D选项 It assessed children’s cognition via their use of dialects.文章提到研究的重点是比较不同语言背景的儿童的认知表现，并在实验设计中考虑了语言能力，以排除其对结果的影响。但这并不意味着研究是通过儿童使用方言的方式直接评估他们的认知能力。具体来说，文章提到“Comparisons between the three groups were performed, with specific factors like language ability considered to rule out their potential impacts on the results.” 这表明研究的目标是控制语言能力的影响，而不是通过方言使用方式本身来测量认知能力。换句话说，研究的认知评估是通过特定的认知任务（如记忆、注意力、认知灵活性）来进行的，而不是直接基于孩子们的方言使用方式。因此，选项D是一个过度推测的错误选项。 【34 题详解】细节理解题。原文提到“The study showed that both bi-dialectal and multilingual children exhibited an advantage over monolingual children in memory, attention and cognitive flexibility, meaning even closely related language varieties provided similar cognitive stimulation.”这表明即使是使用相关语言变体的儿童（如双方言使用者），也能获得认知上的优势。这与选项C一致。A选项Dialect similarity affects bi-dialectal children’s cognition.文章的研究并未专注于方言之间的相似性对双方言儿童认知的影响，而是说双方言和多语儿童相比单语儿童有认知优势，且这种优势体现在记忆、注意力和认知灵活性上。B选项Bi-dialectal and multilingual children’s performance is the same.虽然双语和双方言儿童有类似的认知优势，但原文并没有说它们表现完全相同。文章说“both bi-dialectal and multilingual children exhibited an advantage”，并没有说两组儿童的表现完全一致。D选项Bi-dialectal children perform better than bilingual and monolingual ones. 原文并没有暗示双方言儿童的表现优于其他群体，研究重点是“both bi-dialectal and multilingual children exhibited an advantage over monolingual children”也就是双方言和多语儿童比单语儿童表现更好，而非说某一组表现更好。 【35 题详解】推理判断题。原文最后总结到，“Educational systems should promote bi-dialectalism as a resource for enhancing cognitive skills, rather than viewing it as a barrier.”这表明研究结果建议应该支持方言的使用，将其视为一种增强认知技能的资源，而不是障碍。因此，选项A“方言使用应当得到支持”是正确的。B选项 Cognitive skills are supposed to be trained.文章并未讨论通过专门训练来提升认知技能，而是提到方言的使用本身可以提升认知能力。“Bi-dialectalism as a resource for enhancing cognitive skills”重点在于方言的使用本身，而非单纯的训练。C选项 Priority should be given to dialect learning.文章并没有建议方言学习应该被赋予优先级。研究强调的是方言的使用对认知的影响，而不是让方言学习成为优先目标。D选项Barriers in learning dialects need to be removed.尽管文章提到方言不应视为障碍，但并未具体提出要去除学习方言的“障碍”，而是侧重于方言使用的认知价值。 七选五 【答案】36. B 37. A 38. E 39. D 40. G 【总结】本文是一篇说明文，围绕如何培养优秀的领导能力展开，点明领导力并非天生，而是可以后天学习、打磨提升的。 【36 题详解】段中设空，空前句句意是“领导者必须能够带领并激励其他人一起完成共同的目标”，空后句句意是“这些技巧都是可以学习与培养的”，根据逻辑承接，所填空格处句意“若认为自己不具备这些获得成功领导技巧的的必要条件，再想一下”符合逻辑。故选B项。 【37 题详解】段首设空，提高沟技巧极其重要是该段的中心意思。故选A项。 【38 题详解】段中设空，该段的someone, that person其实就是指代a good leader,所以根据空前句意“请优秀的领导提供一个身边见习的机会（shadow：v.本义遮蔽；尾随，此处意为尾随实习机会）”，可推测该空应填入该领导者的一些好做法等相关的语义内容，E句意为“看到好的领导者怎样与人共事与解决问题”符合语义逻辑。故选E项。 【39 题详解】段尾设空，此处考察语义的转折。D符合语境，给团队成员空间发挥技能与上句给团队成员工作指令呼应。故选D项。 【40 题详解】段尾设空，该句是对全文内容的总结。故选G项。 完形填空 【答案】 41. A 42. D 43. C 44. C 45. B 46. D 47. A 48. B 49. C 50. A 51. C 52. A 53. B 54. B 55. D 【总结】这是一篇记叙文，讲述了佐治亚州司机 Nimmo 开车时突发心脏病、发生车祸，路过的医生 Idowu 恰好目睹事故，当场为他实施心肺复苏（CPR），挽救了他的生命。这次生死经历彻底改变了他对人生和节日的看法，从此格外珍惜生活、感恩一切。 【41 题详解】根据句意：在遭受心脏病发作、驾车出事一周多之后……suffer a heart attack 是固定搭配，意为 “罹患 / 遭受心脏病发作”。其他选项：cause（造成）、fear（害怕）、report（报道）均不符合语境。故选 A 项。 【42 题详解】根据句意：Idowu 医生，在车祸后救了他性命的人。前文出现 doctor，和 physician（医师、内科医生）同义对应。其他选项：driver（司机）、staff（职员）、police（警察）身份不符。故选 D 项。 【43 题详解】根据句意：碰巧 Idowu 博士就在附近，亲眼目睹了这场车祸。witness 表示 “目击、亲眼看见”，贴合路过偶遇事故的语境。其他选项：survey（调查）、predict（预测）、prevent（阻止）不符合文意。故选 C 项。 【44 题详解】根据句意：自事故发生后，这一刻（被拯救、濒死的瞬间）一直在他脑海中萦绕。the moment 指代车祸、获救的生死时刻。其他选项：answer（答案）、opportunity（机会）、hope（希望）语义不通。故选 C 项。 【45 题详解】根据句意：“我倒数、数着日子，就等着见他一面。”count the days 是固定习语，形容度日如年、迫切期盼。其他选项：ignore（忽视）、miss（想念）、forget（忘记）不符合搭配。故选 B 项。 【46 题详解】根据句意：当二人最终重逢、再次见面时，场面十分令人动容。两人此前事故时短暂相遇，如今再次相见，用 reconnected 最贴切。其他选项：agree（同意）、encounter（偶遇）、separate（分开）不符合语境。故选D项。 【47 题详解】根据句意：Idowu 医生说，他仅仅、只不过是做了自己该做的事。simply 体现医生谦逊、不居功的态度。其他选项：mostly（主要地）、absolutely（绝对地）、gradually（逐渐地）语气不符。故选 A 项。 【48 题详解】根据句意：他只是做了当时正确的事 —— 立刻为 Nimmo 实施心肺复苏。the right thing 指危急时刻做出的正确、恰当的举动。其他选项：difficult（困难的）、casual（随意的）、legal（合法的）侧重点偏离。故选B项。 【49 题详解】根据句意：在等待第一批急救响应人员抵达现场的过程中。first responders 是固定专有名词，指现场急救人员、应急救援人员。其他选项：volunteers（志愿者）、guardians（监护人）、trainers（培训师）不符合专业语境。故选C项。 【50 题详解】根据句意：等 Nimmo 恢复后，Idowu 也亲自听了他的心跳。经历心脏骤停、CPR 抢救之后，听诊心跳是最贴合医疗场景的动作。其他选项：sighs（叹息）、lungs（肺部）、words（话语）逻辑不符。故选 A 项。 【51 题详解】根据句意：这次经历彻底、完全改变了他看待人生和未来节日的态度。 completely 体现改变的程度之深、根本性转变。其他选项：merely（仅仅）、generally（大体上）、initially（最初）程度不足。故选 C 项。 【52 题详解】根据句意：这个感恩节对他而言，就像一份意外馈赠、额外惊喜。bonus 原指奖金，此处引申为劫后余生、额外赚到的幸福与礼物。其他选项：task（任务）、tradition（传统）、priority（优先事项）语义不符。故选A项。 【53 题详解】根据句意：面对（大家的）称赞、赞扬，Idowu 立刻表示当天很多人都出力了。前文 Nimmo 万分感激、赞美医生，此处指医生面对这些夸奖十分谦逊。其他选项：reward（报酬）、fame（名声）、celebration（庆祝）不符合语境。故选 B 项。 【54 题详解】根据句意：Idowu 急忙指出、说明，当天很多人都发挥了重要作用。point out 意为 “指明、特意说明”，契合主动把功劳分给众人的语境。其他选项：figure out（弄懂）、find out（查明）、rule out（排除）不符合。故选B项。 【55 题详解】根据句意：他把功劳归功于所有在场的人 —— 路人、警察到医院全体工作人员。credit sb. (for sth.) 表示 “把功劳归于某人”，贴合谦逊分享荣誉的语境。其他选项：instruct（指导）、inform（通知）、recommend（推荐）语义不匹配。故选D项。 语法填空 【答案】 56. which 57 an 58. to hang 59. with 60. commitment 61. held 62. globally 63. sustainable 64. has demonstrated 65. building 【总结】本文是一篇环保主题说明文。文章以青海摄影爱好者杨春林每年探访湿地、大天鹅数量显著增长的故事开篇，点明湿地为大天鹅等物种提供了绝佳栖息地，也成为摄影爱好者的打卡地；接着介绍湿地 “地球之肾” 的生态价值 —— 维护生物多样性、应对气候变化；表明中国的生态保护行动，已经展现出湿地保护的积极意义，也为共建地球生命共同体贡献了中国智慧与方案。 【56 题详解】考查非限定性定语从句。先行词是 whooper swans（动物 / 事物），前面有介词 of，指代先行词且作介词 of 的宾语，只能用关系代词 which。 【57 题详解】考查冠词。environment 此处为可数名词单数，表泛指 “一个理想的生存环境”；ideal 以元音音素开头，因此用不定冠词 an。 【58 题详解】考查非谓语动词。固定结构 a place for sb. to do sth.，用不定式作后置定语，修饰名词 place，因此填 to hang。 【59 题详解】考查固定短语搭配。cope with 是固定搭配，意为 “应对、处理”，因此填 with。 【60 题详解】考查词性转换。形容词 genuine（真诚的、真正的）后面需要接名词，commit 的名词形式是 commitment（承诺、投入）。 【61 题详解】考查非谓语动词。本句已有谓语 called for，此处为后置定语修饰 COP14；会议是 “被举办”，表被动与完成，因此用过去分词 held。 【62 题详解】考查词性转换。此处修饰动词短语 enhancing people’s well-being，修饰动词需要用副词，global 的副词形式是 globally（全球范围地）。 【63 题详解】考查名词复数。此处需可数名词复数，benefits（益处、福利）。 【64 题详解】考查动词时态。根据时间状语 Through a series of ecological protection actions，表示从过去持续到现在的影响与结果，用现在完成时；主语 China 是单数，因此填 has demonstrated（已经展示、证明）。 【65 题详解】考查非谓语动词。介词 to（此处为介词，表 “朝向、为了”）后面需要接动名词形式，因此 build 变为 building。 作文 范文： Hi Jason, It is quite natural to feel a bit lost in this AI-driven era. Your concerns are well-founded, and I’d like to share my perspective. (第一段：背景与共情) Personally, I see AI as a powerful assistant rather than a threat. To stay competitive, it is advisable to embrace AI tools to handle repetitive tasks efficiently. Meanwhile, we should sharpen our "soft skills" like creativity and empathy, as these are qualities AI cannot easily replicate. (第二段：看法与建议) In short, keep learning and stay adaptable. Believe in yourself, and you will find a bright path ahead. (第三段：总结与鼓励) 写作指导： 1. 结构 这篇回帖的逻辑核心应遵循：共情（Empathy）→定位（Orientation）→行动（Action）。 (1) 共情：确认问题 不要直接给建议。首先要通过一句话拉近距离，表明你的回帖不是机器人自动回复，而是有温度的交流。 可以使用understandable, common, uncertainty 等词汇、“It is + adj. + to...” 句型 It is quite common to feel a bit lost in this AI-driven era. (在这个 AI 驱动的时代，感到有一点迷茫是很常见的。) (2) 定位：重塑认知 这是“你的看法”部分。Jason 感到困惑是因为他把 AI 看作“对手”。你的逻辑任务是告诉他 AI 是“队友”。 要领：建立一个对比逻辑——AI 擅长重复/计算 vs 人类擅长创造/情感。 (3) 行动：具体建议 建议不要泛泛而谈，遵循“一内一外”原则： 外在：学习如何使用工具（与时俱进）。 内在：提升个人素质（不可替代性）。 2.语言 话题词汇： soft skills 软技能 irreplaceable 不可替代的 adapt to the AI trend 适应 AI 趋势 career planning 职业规划 take AI as a tool 将 AI 作为工具 句型： It’s a trend that ..., but we can adapt to it. Instead of fearing AI, we can ... 表示看法：As for me / From my perspective / Personally... 表示分点建议：For one thing... For another... 或 Firstly... Secondly... 表示总结：In a word / All in all... 评分标准： 评分总原则 评分时，主要从以下四个维度综合考量： 内容要点：是否覆盖题目要求的所有要点（本题为 “你的看法 + 你的建议”）。 语言准确性：词汇、语法的使用是否正确，有无严重错误。 篇章连贯性：逻辑是否清晰，衔接是否自然。 格式与词数：是否符合文体格式，词数是否在要求范围内（本题 80 词左右）。 评分共分五档，对应 15 分的不同区间。 档次 分数区间 核心要求 对应本题的表现 第五档（优秀） 13–15 分 1. 覆盖所有内容要点；2. 语言地道，语法和词汇使用准确，几乎无错误；3. 衔接自然，逻辑清晰；4. 格式正确，词数符合要求。 完整回应 “看法 + 2-3 条具体建议”，用词精准（如 irreplaceable skills, adapt to AI），句式多样，衔接流畅，无明显错误。 第四档（良好） 10–12 分 1. 覆盖所有主要内容要点；2. 有少量语法 / 词汇错误，但不影响理解；3. 衔接基本连贯；4. 格式、词数基本符合要求。 回应了 “看法 + 建议”，但建议不够具体，或有个别用词、语法错误（如时态、单复数），整体不影响理解。 第三档（中等） 7–9 分 1. 覆盖部分内容要点；2. 有较多语言错误，影响部分理解；3. 逻辑不够连贯，缺少衔接词；4. 格式或词数有偏差。 只回应了其中一个要点（如只写了建议，没写看法），或语言错误较多，读起来较吃力。 第二档（较差） 4–6 分 1. 只覆盖少数内容要点；2. 语言错误多，严重影响理解；3. 结构混乱，不成篇章。 只能写出零散句子，要点不完整，错误很多，难以读懂。 第一档（极差） 1–3 分 1. 仅能写出个别与题目相关的单词；2. 无法传递有效信息。 几乎无法成文，或与题目无关。 读后续写 范文： It was the Spellman’s car. The Spellman boys stopped the car and ran up to us. When they realized what had happened, before my mother could say something, they took the flat tire off like real professionals. When they found our spare tire was flat too, they decided to give us theirs. They did the job skillfully and soon we were back on wheels. All of us were very excited. “I really appreciate your help,” said my mother. The big Spellman boy said, “We are neighbors, right?” After that my mother decided she should act like a neighbor. The next day the Spellman’s dogs walked through my mother’s flower garden again. This time, instead of shooting them away, my mother put out water and dog food for them. Since then, something began to change between the Spellman family and us. When Mother heard the Spellman’s music through our walls, she stopped complaining and tried to dance a little bit. She even invited the Spellman family to be part of the “good neighbors” committee. Finally, my mother became a good neighbor herself and the neighborhood was a better place because of that. 写作指导： 主题为邻里关系。根据正能量原则，设计思路应该为负转正。通过互帮互助，消除隔阂、建立友情的正能量方向去展开。 我妈看不惯邻居家的一切，如何才能负转正，必定设计我们在无助之时得到邻居家热情的帮助让我妈消除陈见，改变态度接纳邻居，两家最终互相体谅和谐共处。 1. Main Character: My mother & The Spellman family 2. Personality: My mother: quiet; well-organised; self-diciplined；demanding… The Spellmans: loud; noisy; energetic; sociable… 3. Plot/Conflict : My mother could not bear our neighbor the Spellmans’ totally different lifestyle. She always complained about their loud personality and their wrongdoings. One day, our truck broke down and my mom and I were helpless. 4. Theme: neighborhood (邻里关系) 根据总思路，用中文列出3-4个要点。 第一段：It was the Spellman’s car. The Spellman提出帮忙---妈妈可能拒绝-- The Spellman坚持帮忙并很快换好车胎—妈妈有所触动，表示感谢---对邻居改观 第二段：The next day the Spellman’s dogs walked through my mother’s flower garden again. 不赶走狗，给他们吃的---不再抱怨邻居太吵闹---发现邻居的优点--- the Spellman邀请我们去他家做客—关系变好—总结升华主题 评分标准： 评分总原则（核心） 评分时，主要从以下四个维度综合考量： 内容衔接：续写内容与原文情境、逻辑、人物情感高度契合，能自然承接两段开头句，形成完整闭环。 语言表达：词汇、语法的准确性与丰富性，句式的多样性，以及语言的地道度。 篇章结构：两段续写的逻辑清晰，情节发展合理，衔接自然，词数符合要求（本题 150 词左右）。 细节与主题升华：能合理添加细节描写，推动情节发展，呼应原文主题（邻里关系的转变）。 评分共分五档，对应 25 分的不同区间。 档次 分数区间 核心要求 对应本题范文的表现 第五档（优秀） 21–25 分 1. 情节与原文、段首句高度契合，逻辑严密，情节发展合理且有张力；2. 语言准确地道，词汇丰富，句式多样，几乎无错误；3. 细节描写生动，能推动人物情感转变，呼应主题；4. 词数符合要求，结构完整。 完美承接 “轮胎爆胎” 和 “狗进花园” 两个关键场景，完整呈现母亲从抵触到接纳的转变，细节（换轮胎、喂狗、跳舞）自然推动情节，主题升华到位，语言流畅无硬伤。 第四档（良好） 16–20 分 1. 情节与原文、段首句基本契合，逻辑较清晰，情节发展基本合理；2. 语言有少量错误，但不影响理解，词汇和句式有一定丰富度；3. 有一定细节描写，能体现人物情感变化；4. 词数基本符合要求。 能承接两个场景，写出母亲态度的转变，但细节描写稍显单薄，或有个别语法 / 用词错误（如时态、搭配错误），整体不影响情节理解。 第三档（中等） 11–15 分 1. 情节与原文、段首句部分契合，逻辑不够严密，情节发展有不合理之处；2. 语言错误较多，影响部分理解，词汇和句式较单一；3. 细节描写不足，人物情感转变生硬；4. 词数有偏差（过少或过多）。 只承接了一个段首句，或情节发展不符合原文逻辑（如母亲仍拒绝帮助），语言错误较多，读起来较吃力，难以体现主题。 第二档（较差） 6–10 分 1. 情节与原文、段首句关联性弱，逻辑混乱，情节发展不合理；2. 语言错误多，严重影响理解，句式零散；3. 几乎无细节描写，无法体现主题；4. 词数严重不足或超出过多。 只能写出零散句子，与段首句衔接生硬，错误很多，难以读懂，无法传递有效情节。 第一档（极差） 1–5 分 1. 内容与题目无关，或完全偏离段首句；2. 无法形成有效篇章，仅能写出个别单词 / 短语。 几乎无法成文，或与题目情节无关。 第 1 页 共 1 页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $ 2025—2026学年第二学期高二5月月考 英 语 本试卷共10页，全卷满分120分，考试用时120分钟 注意事项： 1. 考生务必用黑色字迹的钢笔或签字笔将自己的学校、班级、姓名、试室、座位号和准考证号填写在答题卡上。将条形码横贴在答题卡右上角“条形码粘贴处”。 2. 作答选择题时，选出每小题答案后，用2B铅笔把答题卡上对应题目选项的答案信息点涂黑；如需改动，用橡皮擦干净后，再选涂其他答案，答案不能答在试卷上。 3. 非选择题必须用黑色字迹钢笔或签字笔作答，答案必须写在答题卡各题目指定区域内相应位置上；如需改动，先划掉原来的答案，然后再写上新的答案；不准使用铅笔和涂改液。不按以上要求作答的答案无效。 4. 考生必须保持答题卡的整洁。考试结束后，请将答题卡交回。 第二部分 阅读（共两节，满分50分） 第一节（共15小题：每小题2.5分，满分37.5分） 阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中选出最佳选项。 A Family travelers have become essential to the future of sustainable and regenerative travel. Sustainable travel focuses on reducing harm done by tourism activities, while regenerative travel aims to have a net positive impact on a destination. Family travel offers powerful teaching moments, exposing children to global issues and inspiring them to become environmental advocates. Here are four inspiring examples. Borneo Family Holiday This trip is created with even the youngest travelers in mind, offering a hands-on marine conservation activity—coral replanting—that’s open to kids as young as five. Families learn about marine biodiversity and coral repair. It also includes exploring a monkey center and even an immersive overnight stay in the jungle. Bali Global Classroom Adventure The trip includes a series of learning moments, followed by regenerative travel activities. For instance, participants learn about how one local community shifted from destroying marine life to protecting and nurturing it, after which there’s a chance to participate in service projects focused on preserving the health of the ocean. Peru Family Adventure This trip features a heightened focus on actively engaging with local people and business, in order to help support a sustainable future. Travelers visit a local weaving (纺织) co-op to meet the women workers and learn about traditional weaving methods, thus supporting the survival of local business and cultural traditions. Costa Rica Adventure Holiday Families witness the relationship between nature and local communities, support local economies through visits with handicraft sellers, and protect biodiversity through nature reserve visits. The trip reduces the carbon footprint by staying in sustainable family-run hotels. 21. Which trip offers kids a chance to stay one night in the jungle? A. Borneo Family Holiday. B. Bali Global Classroom Adventure. C. Peru Family Adventure. D. Costa Rica Adventure Family Holiday. 22. What is the main focus of the “Peru Family Adventure” trip? A. Exploring tourist attractions. B. Supporting local business. C. Selling handmade crafts to tourists. D. Teaching locals how to weave. 23. What is a common goal of the four trips? A. To provide affordable travel options. B. To teach children survival skills. C. To offer money-saving travel tips. D. To educate through sustainable travel. B Growing up on Long Island, Caitlin Noonan learned to be cautious about the water she drank. “Where I lived, all of our drinking water came from underground water sources. That meant any chemicals or pollutants outside could easily find their way into the water supply,” she explained. She was always using a water filter (过滤器), always worried about what might be in the tap. This early experience shaped her academic path and kickstarted her future as an environmental problem-solver. Now a senior in chemical engineering, Noonan is turning concern into action. She leads a project aimed at exploring how waste food can be transformed into a material capable of removing carbon dioxide (CO2). With help from UConn Dining Services, Noonan gathered about 10 pounds of food waste from dining halls and brought it to her lab. She ground and dried the waste into powder, which then underwent slow pyrolysis—a high-heat process without oxygen. This process produced biochar (生物炭), a carbon-rich, sponge-like material, along with other byproducts. Noonan focused on biochar, which can be tuned to absorb CO2. To enhance its effectiveness, she applied steam activation at 900°C, creating a structure ideal for trapping CO2 molecules (分子). The final product is a reusable, dark, sponge-like powder that can safely return to the environment as a soil enhancer. Unlike chemical adsorbents, it remains stable in soil for centuries, supporting plant growth. Noonan has won the top scholarship for undergraduates in math, natural sciences and engineering. “What truly distinguishes Noonan is her remarkable independent thinking,” says Julia Valla, her research advisor. “Unlike most undergraduate researchers who require significant guidance, Noonan consistently challenges me with new ideas and approaches to our work on CO2 capture. In my experience, the students who challenge their advisors rather than simply following directions are the ones who ultimately reshape their fields.” In addition to her research, Noonan also serves as a teaching assistant and plans to pursue a Ph.D. in chemical engineering, focusing on carbon capture. Her long-term goal is to continue transformative environmental research. “Through my work, I want to make a measurable and positive impact on the planet,” she said. 24. What can we infer about Noonan from para. 1? A. She was worried about public health. B. She ignored the quality of drinking water. C. She avoided drinking underground water. D. She developed early environmental awareness. 25. What is the main focus of para. 3? A. The equipment used in Noonan’s lab. B. The process of Noonan’s experiment. C. The motivation for Noonan’s research. D. The difficulty Noonan faced in the experiment. 26. What makes Noonan stand out, according to Julia Valla? A. Her need for constant guidance. B. Her willingness to question her advisor. C. Her poor relationship with her advisor. D. Her focus on following traditional methods. 27. Which of the following would be the best title for the passage? A. Emission Fighter: From Food Waste to Solution B. Waste Management: A New Hope for Global Pollution C. Growing Story: The Daily Life of a Chemical Student D. Waste to Wonder: University Dining Halls’ Recycling Program C “Have you raised a lobster (龙虾) yet?” This question has been heard frequently across China recently. “Lobster” is the nickname for OpenClaw, a multi-purpose AI agent whose logo resembles a lobster. Unlike traditional chatbots that only provide answers, OpenClaw can open applications, search for information, compare prices, generate documents and complete multi-step tasks with minimal supervision. Thousands have lined up to try it, and tech giants are rushing to offer setup services. However, these powerful digital assistants are turning on their owners, raising urgent concerns about AI safety. The core problem of “OpenClaw” lies in a dangerous capability mismatch. According to researchers from Harvard and Stanford, today’s AI agents possess Level 4 autonomy, meaning they can independently complete complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their security judgment remains at basic Level 2, roughly equal to a young kid’s understanding of consequences. Security experts call this the “judgment-action gap,” which results in the “fatal trifecta (三连击) ”: agents have system access, process untrusted inputs, and steal or leak data—all without proper boundaries. To investigate these risks, researchers conducted controlled experiments with six OpenClaw instances, each given email access and maximum system permissions. The results were alarming. In one experiment, an agent was asked to delete a single email but instead reset the entire account. In another, a simple display name change tricked an agent into deleting its own core files. Perhaps the most disturbing was a “constitution attack,” where hidden instructions secretly placed into a behavior guide caused the agent to disable other systems without question. These are not hypothetical—real world incidents have already occurred. The implications are obvious and pressing. As cybersecurity experts warn, OpenClaw’s “blurred trust boundaries” and autonomous system access create unacceptable risks for average users. The technology itself is neither good nor bad—it can reduce stress and spark creativity when used properly. And experts recommend strict safety measures: limit permissions, run agents in separate environments, require human confirmation for destructive actions, and maintain inaccessible backups. Ultimately, with balanced usage and fundamental safety redesign, the “lobster-raising” trend can become a safe and meaningful part of modern life. 28. What does the underlined phrase “turning on” most probably mean? A. Keeping off. B. Going against. C. Appealing to. D. Caring for. 29. According to para. 2, there is a mismatch between . A. high requirement and low capability B. massive data and limited storage space C. strong autonomy and low safety assessment D. full system function and poor human supervision 30. What was the most worrying finding about OpenClaw? A. Deleting its own core files on purpose. B. Resetting the whole account by mistake. C. Hiding its own behavior instructions secretly. D. Shutting down other systems unquestioningly. 31.Which of the following is recommended as a safety measure? A. Storing backups beyond AI’s reach. B. Running agents in shared digital spaces. C. Preventing AI from dangerous operations. D. Giving AI agents unrestricted system access. D A significant body of research has shown that multilingual (多语的) children exhibit cognitive advantages over their monolingual (单语的) peers. Most of these studies have focused on children who speak entirely different languages. Much less attention, however, has been given to those who use two dialects (方言) with only slight differences, despite the widespread presence of bi-dialectalism worldwide. For instance, in the United States, millions of children grow up speaking African American English at home while using Mainstream American English at school. Dr. Antoniou and Dr. Katsos from the University of Cambridge studied the cognitive performance of children who grew up speaking both Swiss German and Standard German. These two language varieties differ in vocabulary, pronunciation, and grammar but are still considered different dialects of the same language. The research examined 64 bi-dialectal children, 47 multilingual children, and 25 monolingual children. Comparisons between the three groups were performed, with specific factors like language ability considered to rule out their potential impacts on the results. The study showed that both bi-dialectal and multilingual children exhibited an advantage over monolingual children in memory, attention and cognitive flexibility, meaning even closely related language varieties provided similar cognitive stimulation. Dr Antoniou said, “What is encouraging about our findings is that we could observe similar advantages of bilingualism in children who speak two varieties of the same language. They need not be as diverse as English and Mandarin Chinese.” These findings have offered significant implications for current education and language learning, helping us to reconsider the cognitive value of dialect use. Educational systems should promote bi-dialectalism as a resource for enhancing cognitive skills, rather than viewing it as a barrier. 32. What is the shortcoming of previous research on language according to para. 1? A. Too much credit for multilingual children. B. Insufficient focus on the effect of bi-dialectalism. C. Little attention to the language use of Americans. D. Overemphasis on the advantages of multilingualism. 33. What can be inferred about the research of Dr. Antoniou and Dr. Katsos? A. It invited children speaking different languages. B. It grouped the children based on their performances. C. It kept language ability consistent among the children. D. It assessed children’s cognition via their use of dialects. 34. What is the major finding of Dr. Antoniou and Dr. Katsos’ study? A. Dialect similarity affects bi-dialectal children’s cognition. B. Bi-dialectal and multilingual children’s performance is the same. C. Children speaking related language varieties gain cognitive benefits. D. Bi-dialectal children perform better than bilingual and monolingual ones. 35. What insights can be gained from Dr. Antoniou and Dr. Katsos’ research findings? A. Dialect use ought to be backed. B. Cognitive skills are supposed to be trained. C. Priority should be given to dialect learning. D. Barriers in learning dialects need to be removed. 第二节（共5小题：每小题2. 5分，满分12. 5分） 阅读下面短文、从短文后的选项中选出可以填入空白处的最佳选项。选项中有两项为多余选项。 How do you go about learning good leadership skills? Leaders must lead and inspire others to achieve a common goal. 36 . These skills can be learned and developed. Consider your strengths and weaknesses. Look honestly at what you are good at and what you need to improve on. Then you can focus on your weak areas and develop skills to improve them. 37 . You can’t lead if you can’t communicate well. Develop the ability to communicate clearly and effectively in person and in writing. Take a class if necessary. Learn from others by studying the leadership styles of successful leaders you admire. Read books and articles on leadership and attend talks and courses on the topic. Do you know someone who is a good leader? Ask that person to allow you to shadow them. 38 . You can ask questions and find out why they did something a certain way. Delegate (委派、授权) effectively by understanding the strengths and weaknesses of your team members. Provide clear direction and support for tasks. 39 . Developing good leadership skills requires understanding yourself, practice and a commitment to ongoing learning and improvement. 40 . A. It is critical to work on your communication skills. B. If you feel you don’t have what it takes, think again. C. Leaders must fully understand themselves as well. D. But also give your team members space to develop their skills as well. E.Then you can see how a good leader works with people and solves problems. F. They can help you understand your leadership style and help your improvement. G. By focusing on these areas, you can develop the skills an effective leader needs. 第三部分 语言运用（共两节，满分30分） 第一节（共15小题：每小题1分，满分15分） 阅读下面短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中选出可以填入空白处的最佳选项。 A Georgia driver is getting a second chance at life, and he recently got to thank the doctor who made it possible. More than a week after 41 a heart attack behind the wheel, Nimmo was reunited with Dr Idowu, the 42 who helped save his life after his vehicle crashed on a busy roadway in Roswell, Georgia. By chance, Dr Idowu was nearby and 43 the crash. As Nimmo waited to meet the man who helped save him, he said the 44 had been on his mind ever since the accident. “I 45 the days,” Nimmo shared. “I couldn’t wait to meet him.” When the two finally 46 , the scene was deeply moving. Dr Idowu said he 47 did what he felt was 48 —immediately performing CPR on Nimmo while waiting for the first 49 to arrive. Once Nimmo had recovered enough, Idowu even took a moment to listen to his 50 himself—a small but powerful reminder of how close the situation had been. For Nimmo, the experience has 51 changed how he views life and the holidays ahead. “This Thanksgiving feels like a 52 ,” he said, adding that every holiday from now on feels especially meaningful. “Every Thanksgiving, every Christmas—they’ll all be because of you.” Despite the 53 , Dr Idowu was quick to 54 that many people played a role that day. He 55 everyone involved—from bystanders and police officers to hospital staff. “All of it came together in his favor,” Idowu said. 41. A．suffering B．causing C．fearing D．reporting 42. A．driver B．staff C．police D．physician 43. A．surveyed B．predicted C．witnessed D．prevented 44. A．answer B．opportunity C．moment D．hope 45. A．ignored B．counted C．missed D．forgot 46. A．agreed B．encountered C．separated D．reconnected 47. A．simply B．mostly C．absolutely D．gradually 48. A．difficult B．right C．casual D．legal 49. A．volunteers B．guardians C．responders D．trainers 50. A．heartbeats B．sighs C．lungs D．words 51. A．merely B．generally C．completely D．initially 52. A．bonus B．task C．tradition D．priority 53. A．reward B．praise C．fame D．celebration 54. A．figure out B．point out C．find out D．rule out 55. A．instructed B．informed C．recommended D．credited 第二节（共10小题; 每小题1.5分，满分15分） 阅读下面短文，在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。 Yang Chunlin, a shutterbug (摄影迷) in Qinghai Province, visits a wetland bordering the Yellow River every October to meet his long-acquainted friends: whooper swans, the number of 56 jumped to over 100 from 30-plus when he first came to the area. “The wetland provides 57 ideal living environment for whooper swans. The beautiful ‘swan lake’ has become a place for photography lovers 58 (hang) about,” Yang said. Known as the “kidneys of the Earth,” wetlands can help safeguard biodiversity and cope 59 climate change. China’s wetlands conservation efforts have illustrated its genuine 60 (commit) to ensuring harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. During the ongoing 14th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (COP14), 61 (hold) in Wuhan and Switzerland’s Geneva, China called for enhancing people’s well-being 62 (global) by leveraging (利用) the role of wetlands in promoting sustainable development, tackling climate change, protecting biodiversity, and delivering more 63 (benefit) to people around the world. “Through a series of ecological protection actions, China 64 (demonstrate) the positive role of wetlands conservation in improving the living environment of humans, contributing more wisdom and solutions to 65 (build) a community of all life on Earth,” said Lei Guangchun, a professor at Beijing Forestry University. 第四部分 写作（共两节 满分40分） 第一节（满分15分） 66. 假定你是李华，你在Global Forum上看到Jason的求助帖。请给他回帖，内容如下： 1. 你的看法； 2. 你的建议。 注意: 1. 写作词数应为80个左右； 2. 请在答题卡的相应位置作答。 第二节（满分25分） 67. 阅读下面材料，根据其内容和所给段落开头语续写两段，使之构成一篇完整的短文。 When the Spellman family moved next door to us, my mother believed that they were sent to test her good nature. See, our block was pretty quiet until the Spellman family came. There were senior citizens, the newlywed couple, and us—the Middleton family. We didn’t live in any way like the Spellman family did. We kept our lawn cut and turned off our lights at 9 p.m. However, the Spellman family had quite a different lifestyle. The first thing that you must know is that there were sixteen of them, all different ages from twin babies to grown men. That part is only relevant because each Spellman had a loud personality, and sixteen loud personalities create a lot of volume. They played loud music day and night, had crowds of noisy guests coming and going, and every one of those sixteen Spellmans must have owned a bike that they kept resting in the front yard. Living next to those Spellmans almost drove my mother crazy. If she wasn’t complaining to her sister Jackie about the way the Spellman girls dressed, then she was shooting the Spellman’s dogs out of our yard or filling noise complaints with the police. My mother had never been so busy. She was even organizing a “good neighbors” committee to discuss ways to improve the neighborhood. All she ever spoke of was the Spellman family and their wrongdoings. One Sunday afternoon, my mother was driving Ms. Parker home to her house on the hill when we got a flat tire (轮胎爆了). My father was out of town at the time, so it was just me, my mother, and Ms. Parker. All of us might have been able to get the spare tire out of the trunk, but as far as changing the tire, we were totally clueless. Since Ms. Parker lived so far up that hill, not a lot of traffic drove by us. It had been about fifteen minutes since the last car passed when we heard the sharp noise of an old car. 注意： 1. 续写次数应为150词左右； 2. 请按如下格式在相应位置作答。 It was the Spellman’s car. The next day the Spellman’s dogs walked through my mother’s flower garden again. 1 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $