必修2 单元测评 Unit 1 Food for thought （Word练习）-【金版新学案】2027年高考英语高三总复习大一轮复习讲义（外研版）

**基本信息** 该专项训练聚焦阅读理解与语法填空，通过题型分类解析构建系统性解题方法，强化语言能力与思维品质的协同发展。 **专项设计** |模块|题量/典例|方法提炼|知识逻辑| |----|-----------|----------|----------| |阅读理解|8题（2篇）|推理判断、细节定位、词义猜测等题型策略，强调原文依据与选项比对|以"食物与健康"为主题串联语篇分析，构建"现象-研究-结论"逻辑链| |语法填空|10空|名词数、非谓语、从句引导词等语法点应用，注重语境中词性转换|按"辣椒传入-文化适应-当代普及"时间线，呈现语法规则在语篇中的动态运用|

单元测评7　Unit 1　Food for thought (本栏目内容，在学生用书中以独立形式分册装订！) (时间：30分钟　满分： 35分) Ⅰ.阅读理解(本题共8个小题，每小题2.5分，共20分) A Given the popularity of inexpensive food that promotes overeating, it makes sense that we try to guard against “cheap and unhealthy” food in an effort to be healthy.But we may be overcorrecting, forgetting that “cheap and healthy” food exists, too. According to a recent study, many people believe that healthy food must be more expensive than unhealthy food, and that healthy food just needs to be expensive.In fact, the researcher found that a high-price tag (标签) will even convince consumers that a certain food is healthful.“It's concerning.The findings suggest that price of food alone can affect our understanding of what is healthy，”Rebecca Reczek, researcher of the study, said. According to Reczek, the purpose of the study was to examine the popular belief，also known as a lay (非专业的) theory, that eating healthy food means spending more money. In one experiment, Reczek gave participants a new food product.Some participants were told the product was very healthy.Others were told the product had little nutritional value.Participants who were told the product was good for them rated it as pricier (更昂贵的) than those who thought it was unhealthy.In another experiment, participants were given a health food bar labeled (用标签标明) as “the healthiest protein bar on the planet”．Some participants were told the bar cost just $0.99, while others were told the bar was $4. And here's what happened：The people who were given the“cheaper”bar needed to read more reviews about the product when it was priced at a lower price point in order to trust that it was healthy. The idea that we all believe healthy food needs to be more expensive works against Reczek.“We don't have to be misled，”she said.“We can compare nutrition labels and we can do research before we go to the grocery store.We can use facts rather than our intuition (直觉).” 【语篇解读】　本文是一篇议论文。文章指出很多人认为健康食品一定更贵，价格会影响人们对食物健康程度的判断，通过实验说明这一现象，并建议人们理性购物。 1．Which of the following statements reflects the author's opinion? A．The cheaper food is the less people will eat. B．People's health awareness needs improving. C．The price of food can't reflect its health degree. D．It is wrong of people to seek health at all costs. 答案：C 解析：推理判断题。根据第一段中“But we may be overcorrecting, forgetting that‘cheap and healthy’food exists, too.”可知，作者认为食品价格与其健康程度并无必然联系，言外之意是食物价格并不能反映其健康程度。故选C项。 2．Why did Reczek carry out the study? A．To prove her belief. B．To test a lay theory. C．To promote healthy eating. D．To examine people's idea of health. 答案：B 解析：细节理解题。根据第三段中“According to Reczek, the purpose of the study was to examine the popular belief, also known as a lay (非专业的) theory, that eating healthy food means spending more money.”可知，雷泽克进行这项研究是为了检验一种非专业理论。故选B项。 3．What does Reczek suggest we do? A．Ignore nutrition labels. B．Believe our intuition. C．Shop smartly. D．Ignore the price tag. 答案：C 解析：细节理解题。根据最后一段中“‘We don't have to be misled，’she said.‘We can compare nutrition labels and we can do research before we go to the grocery store.We can use facts rather than our intuition (直觉).’”可知，雷泽克建议我们购物时要依据事实而不是直觉，要理性、明智，即聪明地购物。故选C项。 4．What can be the best title for the text? A．People falsely believe pricier food is healthier B．Don't be misled by price tags any more C．What influences our choices when we buy food? D．How to eat cheaply and healthily? 答案：A 解析：标题归纳题。通读全文，结合第二段中“According to a recent study, ...will even convince consumers that a certain food is healthful.”可知，本文主要论述了人们错误地认为价格更高的食物更健康这一现象。故A项“People falsely believe pricier food is healthier(人们错误地认为越贵的食物越健康)”能概括文章内容，最适合作文章标题。故选A项。 B It's probably not surprising that a new study has linked added sugar consumption to an increased risk of heart disease, but a less expected discovery is that those who have an occasional sweet treat appear to be at a reduced risk of cardiovascular(心血管的)problems. Eating a cake or chocolate bar every so often may be better for your heart than a “zero-sugar” diet，according to the research team from Lund University in Sweden.However，this relationship doesn't hold for other types of sugar consumption，like fizzy drinks and sugary toppings. The researchers looked at records of 69，705 people in Swedish public health databases.The participants，aged between 45 and 83，were quizzed on their diet and lifestyle in 1997 and 2009，and then tracked up to 2019.“The most striking finding is the varying relationship between different sources of added sugar and cardiovascular disease risk，”says epidemiologist Suzanne Janzi.“This surprising contrast highlights the importance of considering not just the amount of sugar consumed，but its source and context.” According to the study，sugar intake was grouped into three categories：sugary toppings，sweet treats，and sweetened beverages(饮料).The type of added sugar consumed was then cross-referred to seven types of cardiovascular diseases，with several other risk factors like smoking taken into account.Research findings also indicated that the lowest risks across all cardiovascular diseases were found in those who limited themselves to sweet treats every now and again. There's a lot to consider when it comes to the different ways we get our sugar.“Liquid sugar，found in sweetened beverages，typically makes you feel less full than solid forms，potentially leading to overconsumption，”says Janzi.“Context also matters—sweet treats are often enjoyed in social settings or special occasions.” Bear in mind that these findings suggest relationships，rather than proving cause and effect.They also don't factor in other health consequences—like damage to teeth.The researchers suggest future studies look in more detail at associations between sugar，heart disease，and obesity，for example.“While our observational study cannot establish causation，it suggests that extremely low sugar intake may not be necessary or beneficial to cardiovascular health，”says Janzi. 【语篇解读】　本文是一篇说明文。新研究表明偶尔吃甜食或有益心脏健康。 5．What does the underlined phrase“hold for”in paragraph 2 refer to? 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 A．Differ from. B．Lead to. C．Apply to. D．Originate from. 答案：C 解析：词义猜测题。根据画线词前文“Eating a cake or chocolate bar every so often may be better for your heart than a‘zero-sugar'diet”和后文“other types of sugar consumption, like fizzy drinks and sugary toppings”以及表转折的副词“However”可知，前文的这种关系并不适用于其他类型的糖摄入，如汽水和含糖配料。由此推测“hold for”在此处意为“适用于”。故选C。 6．Which type of added sugar contributes least to cardiovascular diseases? A．Sugary toppings. B．Sweet treats. C．Solid sugar. D．Sweetened beverages. 答案：B 解析：细节理解题。根据第四段中的“Research findings also indicated that the lowest risks across all cardiovascular diseases were found in those who limited themselves to sweet treats every now and again.”可知，偶尔吃甜食对心血管疾病的影响最小。故选B。 7．What could Janzi agree with according to the last two paragraphs? A.The context of sugar consumption counts. B．Tooth damage mainly arises from sugar intake. C．Extremely low sugar intake is always necessary. D．Liquid sugar usually creates a feeling of fullness. 答案：A 解析：细节理解题。根据倒数第二段中的“Context also matters—sweet treats are often enjoyed in social settings or special occasions.(环境也很重要——甜食通常在社交场合或特殊场合享用)”可知，Janzi 认为糖摄入的环境很重要。故选A。 8．What is the best title of the text? A．Sugar Intake：Be to Blame for Obesity B．Cardiovascular Health：Cause and Effect C．Hidden Killers：Sugary Drinks and Toppings D．Occasional Sweet Treats：Better for Your Heart 答案：D 解析：标题归纳题。文章开篇指出一项新研究表明偶尔吃甜食可能降低患心血管疾病的风险，后文围绕此研究展开介绍，包括研究过程、不同类型的糖对心血管疾病影响的差异等，所以D项“偶尔吃甜食：对心脏更好”最能概括文章主旨。故选D。 Ⅱ.语法填空(本题共10个小题，每小题1.5分，共15分) Home cooks are wild about it.Chili crisp, a Chinese condiment (作料) that mixes chili peppers with oil and other elements, has become one of the food world's top 1 (pick).But how did this essential condiment originate? Chilies weren't originally from China.In fact, 2 is now considered a symbol of Chinese cuisine wasn't introduced to the country until the 16th century, when an age of exploration and trade brought chilis to the mainland. The earliest 3 (record) documentation of chilis in China dates back to 1591.According to Brian Dott, who 4 (pen)“The Chile Pepper in China：A Cultural Biography”，the famous historical figure Gao Lian wasn't “all that excited” about it, and he used the chili plant more as a 5 (decorate).However, while the upper class of Chinese society admired chili plants for their beauty, 6 general public started consuming them.By 1765, local historians observed that in Hunan, chilis were used 7 (season) sauces, vinegar, and preserve vegetables. Different 8 other spices, chili peppers were not initially farmed and traded as commodities (商品).Instead, they fell into the hands of skilled farmers 9 (accidental).Over time, chili peppers have become integrated in Chinese cooking, and nowadays, their integration into every level of society has become 10 (popular) than ever before. 【语篇解读】　本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了中国调味品辣椒脆油的起源、辣椒在中国的传播历程以及其在中国烹饪中的普及和重要性。 1．答案：picks 解析：考查名词的数。空处为固定搭配：one of＋名词的复数形式。故填picks。 2．答案：what 解析：考查主语从句。空处考查主语从句的引导词，主语从句缺少主语，指物，用引导词what引导。故填what。 3．答案：recorded 解析：考查形容词。空处为形容词形式，修饰空后的名词“documentation”，意为“有记录的”。故填recorded。 4．答案：penned 解析：考查谓语动词。空处为从句谓语动词，陈述过去事情，用一般过去时，根据意义判断动作为主动。故填penned。 5．答案：decoration 解析：考查名词。根据空前的冠词“a”可知，空处为名词的单数形式。故填decoration。 6．答案：the 解析：考查冠词。空处为冠词修饰空后的“public”，构成短语：the general public，意为“普通民众”。故填the。 7．答案：to season 解析：考查非谓语动词。空处考查非谓语动词作目的状语，用动词不定式形式。故填to season。 8．答案：from 解析：考查固定短语。固定短语：(be) different from，意为“和……不同”，符合句意。故填from。 9．答案：accidentally 解析：考查副词。空处为副词形式修饰动词短语“fell into”。故填accidentally。 10．答案：more popular 解析：考查形容词比较级。根据空后的“than ever before”可知，空处为形容词比较级。故填more popular。 学生用书第60页 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $