拆解高考真题英语阅读理解题16：2026年浙江高考1月卷阅读理解D篇 2026届高考英语一轮复习

拆解高考真题英语阅读理解题16：2026年浙江高考1月卷阅读理解D篇 原题呈现:2026年浙江高考1月卷阅读理解D篇 文章主题：索尔克研究所利用AI技术优化植物根系以增强固碳能力 文章题材：科技 文体类型：说明文 Carbon removal is crucial for fighting climate change. Scientists at Salk Institute are making use of the natural capacity of plants to absorb carbon dioxide by enhancing their root systems. This optimization（优化）aims to increase the amount of carbon stored and extend the duration of its storage. To design these climate-saving plants, the scientists are using a research tool called SLEAP - an AI software that tracks multiple features of root growth. Created by Salk Fellow Talmo Pereira, SLEAP was initially designed to track animal movement in the lab. Now, Pereira has teamed up with plant scientist Professor Wolfgang Busch to apply SLEAP to plants. In a study published in Plant Phenomics, Busch and Pereira establish a new procedure for using SLEAP to analyze plant root phenotypes - how deep and wide they grow, how massive their root systems become, and other physical qualities. Prior to SLEAP, tracking the physical characteristics of both plants and animals required a lot of labor that slowed the scientific process. SLEAP uses computer vision (the ability for computers to understand images) and deep learning (an AI approach for training a computer to learn and work like the human brain) to help researchers process images much more quickly. The application of SLEAP to plants has already enabled researchers to establish the most extensive catalog（目录）of plant root phenotypes to date. What’s more, tracking these physical root system characteristics helps scientists find genes（基因）associated with those characteristics... This allows the Salk team to determine what genes are most beneficial to their plant designs. “Our cooperation is truly proof of what makes Salk science so special and impactful,” says Pereira. “We’re not just ‘borrowing’ from different disciplines - we’re really putting them on equal footing in order to create something greater than the sum of its parts.” 32. What do the scientists at Salk Institute hope to achieve? A. Keeping more carbon in plants. B. Optimizing the use of energy. C. Enhancing biological diversity. D. Reducing carbon absorption. 33. Why did Pereira create SLEAP? A. To generate plant images. B. To conduct research on animals. C. To study climate patterns. D. To track features of root growth. 34. What will SLEAP help the scientists do? A. Pick out diseased plants in the forest. B. Collect samples of plant root systems. C. Identify genes for desirable plant roots. D. Preserve the genes of endangered plants. 35. What can be inferred from Pereira’s words? A. Academic disciplines are of equal importance. B. Computer programming is a must for scientists. C. Interdisciplinary approach promotes creativity. D. Cooperation outweighs competition in research. 【解析】 第32题：What do the scientists at Salk Institute hope to achieve? A.Keeping more carbon in plants. B.Optimizing the use of energy. C.Enhancing biological diversity. D.Reducing carbon absorption. 题干关键词：scientists at Salk Institute、hope to achieve 题型归属:事实细节提取 1. 原文定位与关键信息 第一段明确提到：“This optimization（优化）aims to increase the amount of carbon stored and extend the duration of its storage”，关键信息是科学家优化植物根系的核心目标是“增加碳储存量并延长储存时间”，即让植物留存更多碳。 2. 解题过程与标准答案 题干问索尔克研究所的科学家希望达成什么目标。原文直接说明优化根系的目的是“增加碳储存”，因此标准答案是A。 3. 选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 正确：选项“Keeping more carbon in plants（让植物留存更多碳）”完全对应原文“increase the amount of carbon stored and extend the duration of its storage”，是对目标的精准概括。 B 错误：选项“Optimizing the use of energy（优化能源利用）”属于无中生有。原文未提及“能源利用”相关内容，学生若误选，是脱离原文的主观联想。 C 错误：选项“Enhancing biological diversity（增强生物多样性）”属于无中生有。文章核心是“固碳”与“根系优化”，未涉及生物多样性，学生若选此项，是混淆了环保相关的不同主题。 D 错误：选项“Reducing carbon absorption（减少碳吸收）”与原文矛盾。原文明确说“利用植物吸收二氧化碳的天然能力”，优化根系是为了提升固碳效果，而非减少吸收，学生若误选，是误解了“碳吸收”与“碳储存”的关系。 4. 答题方法总结 事实细节题需定位“aims to”对应的核心目标表述（增加碳储存量、延长储存时间），直接匹配选项。排除与原文核心主题无关或相反的干扰项。 第33题：Why did Pereira create SLEAP? A.To generate plant images. B.To conduct research on animals. C.To study climate patterns. D.To track features of root growth. 题干关键词：Pereira、create SLEAP、why 题型归属：事实细节提取 1. 原文定位与关键信息 第二段明确提到：“Created by Salk Fellow Talmo Pereira, SLEAP was initially designed to track animal movement in the lab”，关键信息是SLEAP最初的设计目的是“追踪实验室里动物的运动”。 2. 解题过程与标准答案 题干问Pereira创建SLEAP的原因。原文直接说明其最初用途是“追踪动物运动”，即开展动物相关研究，因此标准答案是B。 3. 选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 错误：选项“To generate plant images（生成植物图像）”属于无中生有。SLEAP的功能是“追踪特征、分析图像”，而非“生成图像”，学生若误选，是混淆了“处理图像”与“生成图像”。 B 正确：选项“To conduct research on animals（开展动物研究）”对应原文“track animal movement in the lab”，是创建SLEAP的初衷。 C 错误：选项“To study climate patterns（研究气候模式）”属于无中生有。SLEAP是辅助生物研究的工具，与“气候模式研究”无关，学生若选此项，是过度关联文章“气候保护”的背景。 D 错误：选项“To track features of root growth（追踪根系生长特征）”属于张冠李戴。这是SLEAP后来被应用于植物研究的用途，并非最初创建的目的，学生若误选，是混淆了“初始设计”与“后续应用”。 4. 答题方法总结 细节题需关注“initially designed”（最初设计）这一关键时间限定，提取创建的原始目的。排除“后续应用”“无关功能”类干扰项，避免混淆不同阶段的用途。 第34题：What will SLEAP help the scientists do? A.Pick out diseased plants in the forest. B.Collect samples of plant root systems. C.Identify genes for desirable plant roots. D.Preserve the genes of endangered plants. 题干关键词：SLEAP help the scientists do 题型归属：事实细节提取 1. 原文定位与关键信息 第四段明确提到：“tracking these physical root system characteristics helps scientists find genes（基因）associated with those characteristics”，关键信息是SLEAP通过追踪根系物理特征，帮助科学家找到与之相关的基因，即识别理想根系对应的基因。 2. 解题过程与标准答案 题干问SLEAP能帮助科学家做什么。原文说明其核心作用是“通过追踪根系特征找到相关基因”，因此标准答案是C。 3. 选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 错误：选项“Pick out diseased plants in the forest（在森林中筛选病株）”属于无中生有。SLEAP的功能是“分析根系表型、关联基因”，与“筛选病株”无关，学生若误选，是主观扩大工具用途。 B 错误：选项“Collect samples of plant root systems（收集植物根系样本）”属于无中生有。SLEAP是“分析图像、追踪特征”的软件，不涉及“收集样本”的实体操作，学生若选此项，是混淆了“研究工具”与“采样行为”。 C 正确：选项“Identify genes for desirable plant roots（识别理想植物根系的基因）”对应原文“tracking these physical root system characteristics helps scientists find genes associated with those characteristics”，是对功能的准确概括。 D 错误：选项“Preserve the genes of endangered plants（保护濒危植物的基因）”属于无中生有。文章未提及“濒危植物”“基因保护”，学生若误选，是脱离原文的不合理联想。 4. 答题方法总结 细节题需定位SLEAP的直接作用（追踪根系特征→找到相关基因），匹配“识别理想根系基因”的选项。排除与软件功能无关的实体操作或未提及的内容。 第35题：What can be inferred from Pereira’s words? A.Academic disciplines are of equal importance. B.Computer programming is a must for scientists. C.Interdisciplinary approach promotes creativity. D.Cooperation outweighs competition in research. 题干关键词：inferred、Pereira’s words 题型归属:推理判断 1. 原文定位与关键信息 Pereira提到：“We’re not just ‘borrowing’ from different disciplines - we’re really putting them on equal footing in order to create something greater than the sum of its parts”，关键信息是跨学科合作（结合不同学科）能创造出更有价值的成果，即跨学科方法促进创新。 2. 解题过程与标准答案 题干问从Pereira的话中可推断出什么。其核心观点是“跨学科合作产生更大价值”，因此标准答案是C。 标准答案：C 3. 选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 错误：选项“Academic disciplines are of equal importance（所有学科都同等重要）”属于过度解读。Pereira强调“跨学科结合”，而非“所有学科地位平等”，学生若误选，是曲解了“putting them on equal footing”的含义。 B 错误：选项“Computer programming is a must for scientists（编程是科学家的必备技能）”属于无中生有。文中未提及“编程技能”的必要性，学生若选此项，是过度关联SLEAP的AI属性。 C 正确：选项“Interdisciplinary approach promotes creativity（跨学科方法促进创新）”对应原文“borrowing from different disciplines... create something greater than the sum of its parts”，是合理推断。 D 错误：选项“Cooperation outweighs competition in research（研究中合作比竞争更重要）”属于偏离重点。Pereira的话核心是“跨学科”，而非“合作 vs 竞争”，学生若误选，是混淆了“跨学科合作”与“普通合作”。 4. 答题方法总结 推理题需抓住Pereira话语的核心（跨学科结合创造更大价值），推断出“跨学科促进创新”。排除过度解读、偏离核心主题的选项，避免扩大表述范围。 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $