拆解高考真题英语阅读理解题14：2026年浙江高考1月卷阅读理解C篇 讲义 2026届高考英语一轮复习

拆解高考真题英语阅读理解题14：：2026年浙江高考1月卷阅读理解C篇 原题呈现:2026年高考浙江春季英语C篇 文章主题：虚假评论的特点及消费者对其的认知研究 文章题材：社会研究 文体类型：说明文 Human beings have always loved reviews: word of mouth has long been regarded as one of the most valuable marketing tools available to a company. Consumers enjoy reading and giving reviews. However, the problem is that a lot of the reviews are fake (假的). Shabnam Azimi and Alexander Krasnikov of Loyola University of Chicago and Kwong Chan of Northeastern University recently published a study on fake reviews. The study used a dataset of 1,600 reviews of Chicago hotels. Some of them were real; others were fake. The reviews were presented to 400 subjects. Each subject got eight reviews to read: a balanced set of two positive fake, two positive real, two negative fake and two negative real, presented in a random order. The reviews were written by real people who were given information about the hotel. The results show that consumers generally trust negative reviews more than positive ones. Moreover, we humans tend to assume that positive reviews might be fake. "Overall, negative reviews are less common. So, we pay more attention to them. When a negative review is fake, we get tricked," Azimi says. When it came to faking a review, length was important to believability, as was detail. A long, negative review of a hotel, complete with lots of information, tended to convince participants. A lengthy, positive review, on the other hand, was regarded as suspicious, and participants tended to trust writers that kept their glowing reviews short. Emotion was also important in convincing readers- or the lack of emotion, at least. Azimi says study participants tended not to trust reviews where the writers expressed their feelings in a big way. The more dispassionate that negative write-up, the more likely it was to take the reader in. The fake reviews written for Azimi's study were put together by humans, but increasingly, fake reviews are being written by AI, which makes them look more real. Though many companies use algorithms(算法) to weed out fake reviews, Azimi points out that the machines are programmed by humans, and given our limited ability to spot fake reviews, this isn't a good sign. 28. Which aspect of the study does paragraph 2 mainly talk about? A. Its design.　　B. Its findings.　　 C. Its purposes.　　D. Its significance. 29. What does the underlined word"glowing" in paragraph 4 mean? A. Funny.　　B. Abusive.　　 C. Insightful.　　D. Praising. 30. What kind of review would readers most likely trust? A. A long, positive one.　　B. An unemotional, negative one. C. A short, negative one.　　D. An enthusiastic, positive one. 31. What can be inferred from the last paragraph? A. Many companies are producing fake reviews. B. Writing fake reviews will be declared illegal. C. Machines can detect fake reviews accurately. D. It will be harder to recognize fake reviews. 第28题：Which aspect of the study does paragraph 2 mainly talk about? A. Its design.　　B. Its findings.　　 C. Its purposes.　　D. Its significance. 题干关键词：aragraph 2、aspect of the study 题型归属：段落主旨理解 1.原文定位与关键信息 第二段明确介绍了研究的具体安排：“a balanced set of two positive fake, two positive real, two negative fake and two negative real, presented in a random order”，关键信息是研究的样本、对象、材料分配等设计细节。 2.解题过程与标准答案 题干问第二段主要讲研究的哪个方面。第二段描述了研究的“数据集、受试者、评论分配方式”，属于研究设计内容，因此标准答案是A。 标准答案：A 3.选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 正确：选项“Its design（研究设计）”对应原文“数据集、受试者、评论组合与呈现方式”等研究的具体安排，是对段落内容的精准概括。 B 错误：选项“Its findings（研究结果）”属于张冠李戴。研究结果出现在第三段，学生若误选，是混淆了段落的功能。 C 错误：选项“Its purposes（研究目的）”属于无中生有。第二段未提及研究目的，学生若选此项，是主观猜测段落内容。 D 错误：选项“Its significance（研究意义）”属于无中生有。第二段未涉及研究的意义，学生若误选，是脱离段落实际内容的联想。 4.答题方法总结 段落主旨题需梳理段落内容（研究的样本、对象、材料安排），判断其属于“研究设计”。排除时注意区分“设计”“结果”“目的”等研究的不同环节，避免张冠李戴。 第29题：What does the underlined word "glowing" in paragraph 4 mean? A. Funny.　　B. Abusive.　　 C. Insightful.　　D. Praising. 题干关键词：glowing、paragraph 4 题型归属：词义猜测 1.原文定位与关键信息 第四段语境为：“A lengthy, positive review... was regarded as suspicious, and participants tended to trust writers that kept their glowing reviews short”，关键逻辑是“positive review（正面评论）”与“glowing reviews”是同义对应，因此“glowing”意为“赞扬的”。 2. 解题过程与标准答案 题干问“glowing”的含义。根据前文“positive review”的对应关系，可知该词表示“赞扬的”，因此标准答案是D。 标准答案：D 3.选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 错误：选项“Funny（有趣的）”属于无中生有。语境未涉及“有趣”的描述，学生若误选，是脱离“正面评论”主题的猜测。 B 错误：选项“Abusive（辱骂的）”与原文矛盾。该词对应“negative review”，与“glowing”（正面）相反，学生若误选，是混淆了正负评论的特点。 C 错误：选项“Insightful（有洞察力的）”属于偏离重点。语境强调的是评论的“态度（正面）”，而非“洞察力”，学生若误选，是误解了评论的核心属性。 D 正确：选项“Praising（赞扬的）”对应前文“positive review”的语境，是对“glowing”的准确释义。 4. 答题方法总结 词义猜测题需利用上下文的同义对应（“positive review”与“glowing reviews”）推断词义。排除与“正面态度”无关或相反的选项。 第30题：What kind of review would readers most likely trust? A. A long, positive one.　　B. An unemotional, negative one. C. A short, negative one.　　D. An enthusiastic, positive one. 题干关键词：most likely trust、review 题型归属：事实细节提取 1.原文定位与关键信息 第四段明确提到：“A long, negative review... complete with lots of information, tended to convince participants”“The more dispassionate that negative write-up, the more likely it was to take the reader in”，关键信息是“篇幅长、无强烈情绪的负面评论”最易被信任。 2.解题过程与标准答案 题干问读者最可能信任哪种评论。原文说明“长且无强烈情绪的负面评论”最有说服力，因此标准答案是B。 标准答案：B 3.选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 错误：选项“A long, positive one（长的正面评论）”与原文矛盾。原文提到“lengthy, positive review was regarded as suspicious”，学生若误选，是忽略了“suspicious”的表述。 B 正确：选项“An unemotional, negative one（无情绪的负面评论）”对应原文“The more dispassionate that negative write-up, the more likely it was to take the reader in”，是对信任类型的准确概括。 C 错误：选项“A short, negative one（短的负面评论）”属于偏离重点。原文强调负面评论需“长且有细节”，学生若误选，是混淆了正负评论的篇幅偏好。 D 错误：选项“An enthusiastic, positive one（热情的正面评论）”与原文矛盾。原文提到“expressed their feelings in a big way”的评论不被信任，学生若误选，是颠倒了情绪对信任度的影响。 4. 答题方法总结 细节题需定位“trust”对应的原文表述（长、细节多、无情绪的负面评论），匹配选项中的“无情绪+负面”。排除与原文“可疑”“不被信任”表述矛盾的选项。 第31题：What can be inferred from the last paragraph? A. Many companies are producing fake reviews. B. Writing fake reviews will be declared illegal. C. Machines can detect fake reviews accurately. D. It will be harder to recognize fake reviews. 题干关键词：inferred、last paragraph 题型归属：推理判断 1.原文定位与关键信息 最后一段明确提到：“fake reviews are being written by AI, which makes them look more real... the machines are programmed by humans, and given our limited ability to spot fake reviews, this isn't a good sign”，关键信息是AI写的虚假评论更逼真，而人类识别能力有限，因此识别虚假评论会更难。 2.解题过程与标准答案 题干问从最后一段可推断出什么。原文说明AI让虚假评论更逼真，且人类识别能力有限，因此“识别虚假评论会更难”，标准答案是D。 标准答案：D 3.选项详细分析 & 学生为何会被干扰 A 错误：选项“Many companies are producing fake reviews（很多公司制作虚假评论）”属于无中生有。原文说公司用算法“剔除”虚假评论，并非“制作”，学生若误选，是误解了公司的行为。 B 错误：选项“Writing fake reviews will be declared illegal（写虚假评论会被定为非法）”属于无中生有。原文未提及“法律规定”，学生若误选，是主观延伸了研究的影响。 C 错误：选项“Machines can detect fake reviews accurately（机器能精准识别虚假评论）”与原文矛盾。原文提到“机器由人类编程，而人类识别能力有限”，说明机器无法精准识别，学生若误选，是忽略了“this isn't a good sign”的表述。 D 正确：选项“It will be harder to recognize fake reviews（识别虚假评论会更难）”对应原文“AI让虚假评论更逼真+人类识别能力有限”的逻辑，是合理推断。 4.答题方法总结 推理判断题需整合段落核心信息（AI让虚假评论更逼真+人类识别能力有限），推断出“识别更难”的结论。排除与原文行为、态度矛盾的选项。 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $