内容正文:
史地人文类
Passage 1 (2025·全国一卷)
While safety improvements might have been made to our streets in recent years,transport studies also show declines in pedestrian (行人) mobility,especially among young children.Many parents say there's too much traffic on the roads for their children to walk safely to school,so they pack them into the car instead.
Dutch authors Thalia Verkade and Marco te Brömmelstroet are bothered by facts like these.In their new book Movement:How to Take Back Our Streets and Transform Our Lives,they call for a rethink of our streets and the role they play in our lives.
Life on city streets started to change decades ago.Whole neighbourhoods were destroyed to make way for new road networks and kids had to play elsewhere.Some communities fought back.Most famously,a Canadian journalist who had moved her family to Manhattan in the early 1950s led a campaign to stop the destruction of her local park.Describing her alarm at its proposed replacement with an expressway,Jane Jacobs called on her mayor(市长) to champion “New York as a decent place to live,and not just rush through”. Similar campaigns occurred in Australia in the late 1960s and 1970s as well.
Although these campaigns were widespread,the reality is that the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car.The number of cars on roads has been increasing rapidly.In Australia we now have over twenty million cars for just over twentysix million people,among the highest rate of car ownership in the world.
We invest a lot in roads that help us rush through,but we fail to account for the true costs.Do we really recognise what it costs us as a society when children can't move safely around our communities? The authors of Movement have it right:it's time to think differently about that street outside your front door.
1.What phenomenon does the author point out in paragraph 1?
A.Cars often get stuck on the road.
B.Traffic accidents occur frequently.
C.People walk less and drive more.
D.Pedestrians fail to follow the rules.
2.What were the Canadian journalist and other campaigners trying to do?
A.Keep their cities livable.
B.Promote cultural diversity.
C.Help the needy families.
D.Make expressways accessible.
3.What can be inferred about the campaigns in Australia in the late 1960s and 1970s?
A.They boosted the sales of cars.
B.They turned out largely ineffective.
C.They won government support.
D.They advocated building new parks.
4.What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.Why the Rush? B.What's Next?
C.Where to Stay? D.Who to Blame?
Passage 2 (2025·全国二卷)
English Market Towns to Visit in the UK
English market towns come in many shapes and sizes.Each has a personality shaped by the goods and services produced and traded for centuries.But each town has more to do than shop.
Hereford,Herefordshire
Hereford has remained a lively market town since 1189.Skirting the town square,you'll find lovely shops,eateries,and the Black and White House Museum.The Hereford Cathedral is the most impressive building in town.It's also home to an ancient library.One of the four original copies of the Magna Carta is displayed there.
Ludlow,Shropshire
Ludlow is known as the Foodie Center of England.Butcher shops,greengrocers,bakeries,and cheese shops line the town square.Bordering the square,the Ludlow Castle is a “must explore” medieval stronghold.The threeday Ludlow Food Festival is held each September.
Shrewsbury,Shropshire
Getting to Shrewsbury Town Center from London is challenging but worth the anxiety.The River Severn has a significant turn through town,almost making an island of Shrewsbury Town Center.The shape creates a perfect market where goods could be shipped and received using the river as a highway.Flowers are everywhere—hanging baskets,window boxes,and planters—just what you imagine in an attractive English market town.
Mevagissey,Cornwall
Even if you haven't been to the small fishing village Mevagissey,you've probably seen it in a movie or British TV show.The working harbor (港口) took shape in 1774.Fishermen go out to sea daily and sell their fish in harborside markets.Don't leave the harbor without a traditional Cornish pie.It's delicious.
1.Where can you find an original copy of the Magna Carta?
A.In the Ludlow Castle.
B.In the Foodie Center of England.
C.In the Hereford Cathedral.
D.In the Black and White House Museum.
2.What is a feature of Shrewsbury Town Center?
A.It's situated near a big island.
B.It's almost surrounded by water.
C.It's known for its flower festival.
D.It's easily accessible from London.
3.What does the author suggest visitors do in Mevagissey?
A.Try the Cornish pie.
B.Watch a British TV show.
C.Go fishing in the sea.
D.Take pictures of the harbor.
Passage 3 (2024·全国甲卷)
“I didn't like the ending,”I said to my favorite college professor.It was my junior year of undergraduate,and I was doing an independent study on Victorian literature.I had just finished reading The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot,and I was heartbroken with the ending.Prof.Gracie,with all his patience,asked me to think about it beyond whether I liked it or not.He suggested I think about the difference between endings that I wanted for the characters and endings that were right for the characters,endings that satisfied the story even if they didn't have a traditionally positive outcome.Of course,I would have preferred a different ending for Tom and Maggie Tulliver,but the ending they got did make the most sense for them.
This was an aha moment for me,and I never thought about endings the same way again.From then on,if I wanted to read an ending guaranteed to be happy,I'd pick up a love romance.If I wanted an ending I couldn't guess,I'd pick up a mystery(悬疑小说).One where I kind of knew what was going to happen,historical fiction.Choosing what to read became easier.
But writing the end — that's hard.It's hard for writers because endings carry so much weight with readers.You have to balance creating an ending that's unpredictable,but doesn't seem to come from nowhere,one that fits what's right for the characters.
That's why this issue(期)of Writer's Digest aims to help you figure out how to write the best ending for whatever kind of writing you're doing.If it's short stories,Peter Mountford breaks down six techniques you can try to see which one helps you stick the landing.Elizabeth Sims analyzes the final chapters of five great novels to see what key points they include and how you can adapt them for your work.
This issue won't tell you what your ending should be—that's up to you and the story you're telling—but it might provide what you need to get there.
1.Why did the author go to Prof.Gracie?
A.To discuss a novel.
B.To submit a book report.
C.To argue for a writer.
D.To ask for a reading list.
2.What did the author realize after seeing Prof.Gracie?
A.Writing is a matter of personal preferences.
B.Readers are often carried away by characters.
C.Each type of literature has its unique ending.
D.A story which begins well will end well.
3.What is expected of a good ending?
A.It satisfies readers' taste.
B.It fits with the story development.
C.It is usually positive.
D.It is open for imagination.
4.Why does the author mention Peter Mountford and Elizabeth Sims?
A.To give examples of great novelists.
B.To stress the theme of this issue.
C.To encourage writing for the magazine.
D.To recommend their new books.
Passage 4 (2023·新课标Ⅱ卷)
Reading Art: Art for Book Lovers is a celebration of an everyday object — the book, represented here in almost three hundred artworks from museums around the world. The image of the reader appears throughout history, in art made long before books as we now know them came into being. In artists' representations of books and reading, we see moments of shared humanity that go beyond culture and time.
In this “book of books,” artworks are selected and arranged in a way that emphasizes these connections between different eras and cultures. We see scenes of children learning to read at home or at school, with the book as a focus for relations between the generations. Adults are portrayed (描绘) alone in many settings and poses —absorbed in a volume, deep in thought or lost in a moment of leisure. These scenes may have been painted hundreds of years ago, but they record moments we can all relate_to.
Books themselves may be used symbolically in paintings to demonstrate the intellect (才智), wealth or faith of the subject. Before the wide use of the printing press, books were treasured objects and could be works of art in their own right. More recently, as books have become inexpensive or even throwaway, artists have used them as the raw material for artworks — transforming covers, pages or even complete volumes into paintings and sculptures.
Continued developments in communication technologies were once believed to make the printed page outdated. From a 21stcentury point of view, the printed book is certainly ancient, but it remains as interactive as any batterypowered ereader. To serve its function, a book must be activated by a user: the cover opened, the pages parted, the contents reviewed, perhaps notes written down or words underlined. And in contrast to our increasingly networked lives where the information we consume is monitored and tracked, a printed book still offers the chance of a wholly private, “offline” activity.
1.Where is the text most probably taken from?
A.An introduction to a book.
B.An essay on the art of writing.
C.A guidebook to a museum.
D.A review of modern paintings.
2.What are the selected artworks about?
A.Wealth and intellect.
B.Home and school.
C.Books and reading.
D.Work and leisure.
3.What do the underlined words “relate to” in paragraph 2 mean?
A.Understand. B.Paint.
C.Seize. D.Transform.
4.What does the author want to say by mentioning the ereader?
A.The printed book is not totally out of date.
B.Technology has changed the way we read.
C.Our lives in the 21st century are networked.
D.People now rarely have the patience to read.
Passage 5 (2023·全国乙卷)
What comes into your mind when you think of British food? Probably fish and chips, or a Sunday dinner of meat and two vegetables. But is British food really so uninteresting? Even though Britain has a reputation for lessthanimpressive cuisine, it is producing more top class chefs who appear frequently on our television screens and whose recipe books frequently top the best seller lists.
It's thanks to these TV chefs rather than any advertising campaign that Britons are turning away from meatandtwoveg and readymade meals and becoming more adventurous in their cooking habits. It is recently reported that the number of those sticking to a traditional diet is slowly declining and around half of Britain's consumers would like to change or improve their cooking in some way. There has been a rise in the number of students applying for food courses at UK universities and colleges. It seems that TV programmes have helped change what people think about cooking.
According to a new study from market analysts, 1 in 5 Britons say that watching cookery programmes on TV has encouraged them to try different food. Almost one third say they now use a wider variety of ingredients (配料) than they used to, and just under 1 in 4 say they now buy better quality ingredients than before. One in four adults say that TV chefs have made them much more confident about expanding their cookery knowledge and skills, and young people are also getting more interested in cooking. The UK's obsession (痴迷) with food is reflected through television scheduling. Cookery shows and documentaries about food are broadcast more often than before. With an increasing number of male chefs on TV, it's no longer “uncool” for boys to like cooking.
1.What do people usually think of British food?
A.It is simple and plain.
B.It is rich in nutrition.
C.It lacks authentic tastes.
D.It deserves a high reputation.
2.Which best describes cookery programme on British TV?
A.Authoritative. B.Creative.
C.Profitable. D.Influential.
3.Which is the percentage of the people using more diverse ingredients now?
A.20%. B.24%.
C.25%. D.33%.
4.What might the author continue talking about?
A.The art of cooking in other countries.
B.Male chefs on TV programmes.
C.Table manners in the UK.
D.Studies of big eaters.
Passage 6 (2023·全国甲卷)
I was about 13 when an uncle gave me a copy of Jostein Gaarder's Sophie's World.It was full of ideas that were new to me, so I spent the summer with my head in and out of that book.It spoke to me and brought me into a world of philosophy (哲学).
That love for philosophy lasted until I got to college.Nothing kills the love for philosophy faster than people who think they understand Foucault, Baudrillard, or Confucius better than you — and then try to explain them.
Eric Weiner's The Socrates Express: In Search of Life Lessons from Dead Philosophers reawakened my love for philosophy.It is not an explanation, but an invitation to think and experience philosophy.
Weiner starts each chapter with a scene on a train ride between cities and then frames each philosopher's work in the context (背景) of one thing they can help us do better.The end result is a read in which we learn to wonder like Socrates, see like Thoreau, listen like Schopenhauer, and have no regrets like Nietzsche.This, more than a book about understanding philosophy, is a book about learning to use philosophy to improve a life.
He makes philosophical thought an appealing exercise that improves the quality of our experiences, and he does so with plenty of humor.Weiner enters into conversation with some of the most important philosophers in history, and he becomes part of that crowd in the process by decoding (解读) their messages and adding his own interpretation.
The Socrates Express is a fun, sharp book that draws readers in with its apparent simplicity and gradually pulls them in deeper thoughts on desire, loneliness, and aging.The invitation is clear: Weiner wants you to pick up a coffee or tea and sit down with this book.I encourage you to take his offer.It's worth your time, even if time is something we don't have a lot of.
1.Who opened the door to philosophy for the author?
A.Foucault. B.Eric Weiner.
C.Jostein Gaarder. D.A college teacher.
2.Why does the author list great philosophers in paragraph 4?
A.To compare Weiner with them.
B.To give examples of great works.
C.To praise their writing skills.
D.To help readers understand Weiner's book.
3.What does the author like about The Socrates Express?
A.Its views on history are wellpresented.
B.Its ideas can be applied to daily life.
C.It includes comments from readers.
D.It leaves an open ending.
4.What does the author think of Weiner's book?
A.Objective and plain.
B.Daring and ambitious.
C.Serious and hard to follow.
D.Humorous and straightforward.
Passage 7 (2022·全国甲卷)
Sometime in the early 1960s,a significant thing happened in Sydney,Australia.The city discovered its harbor.Then,one after another,Sydney discovered lots of things that were just sort of there—broad parks,superb beaches,and a culturally diverse population.But it is the harbor that makes the city.
Andrew Reynolds,a cheerful fellow in his early 30s,pilots Sydney ferryboats for a living.I spent the whole morning shuttling back and forth across the harbor.After our third run Andrew shut down the engine,and we went our separate ways—he for a lunch break,I to explore the city.
“I'll miss these old boats,”he said as we parted.
“How do you mean?”I asked.
“Oh,they're replacing them with catamarans.Catamarans are faster,but they're not so elegant,and they're not fun to pilot.But that's progress,I guess.”
Everywhere in Sydney these days,change and progress are the watchwords(口号),and traditions are increasingly rare.Shirley Fitzgerald,the city's official historian,told me that in its rush to modernity in the 1970s,Sydney swept aside much of its past,including many of its finest buildings.“Sydney is confused about itself,”she said.“We can't seem to make up our minds whether we want a modern city or a traditional one.It's a conflict that we aren't getting any better at resolving(解决).”
On the other hand,being young and old at the same time has its attractions.I considered this when I met a thoughtful young businessman named Anthony.“Many people say that we lack culture in this country,”he told me.“What people forget is that the Italians,when they came to Australia,brought 2,000 years of their culture,the Greeks some 3,000 years,and the Chinese more still.We've got a foundation built on ancient cultures but with a drive and dynamism of a young country.It's a pretty hard combination to beat.”
He is right,but I can't help wishing they would keep those old ferries.
1.What is the first paragraph mainly about?
A.Sydney's striking architecture.
B.The cultural diversity of Sydney.
C.The key to Sydney's development.
D.Sydney's tourist attractions in the 1960s.
2.What can we learn about Andrew Reynolds?
A.He goes to work by boat.
B.He looks forward to a new life.
C.He pilots catamarans well.
D.He is attached to the old ferries.
3.What does Shirley Fitzgerald think of Sydney?
A.It is losing its traditions.
B.It should speed up its progress.
C.It should expand its population.
D.It is becoming more international.
4.Which statement will the author probably agree with?
A.A city can be young and old at the same time.
B.A city built on ancient cultures is more dynamic.
C.Modernity is usually achieved at the cost of elegance.
D.Compromise should be made between the local and the foreign.
(
1
)
学科网(北京)股份有限公司
$色学科网书城国
品牌书店·知名教辅·正版资源
b.zxxk.com
您身边的互联网+教辅专家
题组七史地人文类
Passage 1
【语篇解读】这是一篇议论文。本文论述了近年街道安全改善,但行人(尤其是儿童)的活动能
力下降,家长因交通隐患多开车送孩子上学。荷兰作者Thalia Verkade和Marco te Brommelstroet对此
类现象不满,在他们的新书中呼吁重新思考街道在我们生活中的作用。作者认同新书观点,呼吁重新
审视街道规划。
1C细节理解题。根据第一段可知,交通研究也显示行人(尤其是儿童)的活动能力在下降。许
多家长表示道路上车流量太大,孩子步行上学不安全,因此他们选择开车送孩子。C项“人们步行更
少,开车更多”。故选C。
2.A细节理解题。根据第三段中的“Describing her alarm at its proposed replacement with an
expressway.Jane Jacobs called on her mayor()to champion 'New York as a decent place to live.and
not just rush through’.”可知,Jane Jacobs描述了当得知公园计划被高速公路取代时的恐慌,她呼吁
市长将纽约建设成一个宜居的好地方,而不仅仅是一个人们匆匆而过的地方。A项“保持他们城市的
宜居性”。livable是decent place to live的同义转换。故选A。
3.B推理判断题。根据第四段中的“Although these campaigns were widespread,the reality is that
the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car.”可知,尽
管这些运动很普遍,但现实是大多数西方城市都围绕着机动车的需求进行了彻底的重新设计。再结合
最后一段中的“We invest a lot..but we fail to account for the true costs.”可知,这些运动并没有解决真正
的需求,说明在很大程度上它们是无效的运动。B项“它们在很大程度上被证明无效”。故选B。
4A文章主旨题。文章的核心批判是当前的城市规划和交通方式(以车为主)让人们“匆匆而
过”(rush through).只追求通行效率help us rush through),却忽视了这种“匆忙”(ush)带来的社会成
本(如儿童失去安全活动的空间,活动能力下降)。作者呼吁重新思考街道的作用,让城市成为生活的
地方,而不仅仅是通道。A项“Why the Rush?”(我们为何要如此匆忙?)直接,点明了文章质疑的核
心一这种追求速度、忽视生活质量的“匆忙”是否有必要?它是否值得付出如此高的社会代价?
这个标题最能引发读者的批判性思考。故选A。
Passage 2
【语篇解读】这是一篇应用文。本文主要介绍了英国四个特色集镇,每个集镇均以市场贸易为
核心,同时具备独特的历史文化特色或自然景观。
l.C细节理解题。根据Hereford,.Herefordshire部分中的“The Hereford Cathedral..One of the four
original copies of the Magna Carta is displayed there.”可知,《大宪章》的原件展示在赫里福德大教堂。
故选C。
2.B细节理解题。根据Shrewsbury,Shropshire部分中的“The River Severn has a significant turn
through town,.almost making an island of Shrewsbury Town Center”可知,塞文河在镇里有一个显著的
独家授权侵权必究
色学科网书城画
品牌书店·知名教辅·正版资源
b.ZxXk.com○
您身边的互联网+教辅专家
转弯,几乎使什鲁斯伯里镇中心成为一个岛屿。由此可知,什鲁斯伯里镇中心几乎被水包围。B项“它
几乎被水包围”。故选B。
3.A细节理解题。根据Mevagissey,.Cornwall部分中的“Don't leave the harbor without a traditional
Cornish pie.It's delicious..”可知,作者建议游客在梅瓦吉西尝试传统的康沃尔馅饼。故选A。
Passage 3
【语篇解读】这是一篇说明文。文章围绕文学作品结尾的创作展开,作者以自身经历告诉读者
不同类型的文学作品的结尾有不同的特点,好的结尾要符合故事发展等。
l.A细节理解题。根据第一段中的“I didn't like the ending,’I said to my favorite college
professor""I had just finished reading The Mill on the Floss""Prof.Gracie...think about it beyond whether
I liked it or not..”可知,作者刚读完《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》,她告诉教授自己不喜欢这部小说的结尾,
而教授让作者抛开个人喜好,好好思考一下这部小说。由此可知,作者去找Gracie教授是为了讨论
一部小说。故选A。
2.C推理判断题。根据第二段中的“From then on,if I wanted to read an ending guaranteed to be
happy...historical fiction.”可知,从那时起,如果作者想读到幸福的结局,她就会选一部爱情小说。如
果想要一个猜不到的结局,她会选择悬疑小说。如果想要大概猜到故事的发展,她会选择历史小说。
由此可推知,每一种文学类型都有其独特的结尾,故选C。
3.B推理判断题。根据第三段中的“You have to balance creating an ending...one that fits what''s
right for the characters.”可知,结局不能是凭空而来的,它需要适合角色。也就是说,好的结尾要符合
故事的发展,故选B。
4B写作目的题。倒数第二段的首句提到这就是为什么本期《作者文摘》旨在帮助你弄清楚如
何为你正在写的任何一种文本写出最好的结局。接着作者以Peter Mountford和Elizabeth Sims为例
说明本期《作者文摘》具体会介绍哪些技巧。由此可知,作者提及Peter Mountford和Elizabeth Sims
是为了强调这期杂志的主题,故选B。
Passage 4
【语篇解读】本文是一篇说明文。《阅读艺术:书籍爱好者的艺术》让我们看到了超越文化与
时间的共同人性。网络化的生活中,电子书的推广并不能取代印刷书的使用,阅读印刷书仍然是完全
私人的活动。
l.A文章出处题。根据全文内容尤其是第一段第一句“Reading Art:.Art for Book Lovers is a
celebration...three hundred artworks from museums around the world”可知,《阅读艺术:书籍爱好者的
艺术》这本书里展示了来自世界各地博物馆的近300件艺术品,本文主要是对该书内容的介绍。故可
以推知,本文最有可能摘自书的序言。
2.C细节理解题。根据第二段第一句和第二句中的“We see scenes of children learning to read at
home or at school..the generations”可知,被选中的艺术品强调的是图书和阅读,故C项正确。
独家授权权必究
色学科网书城画
品牌书店·知名教辅·正版资源
b.ZxXk.com○
您身边的互联网+教辅专家
3.A词义猜测题。根据第二段尾句“These scenes may have been painted hundreds of years ago,but
they record moments we can all relate to”中的but表达的语境可知,这些场景可能是数百年前绘制的,
但它们记录了我们都能理解的时刻。故画线词意为“理解”,A项正确。
4.A推理判断题。根据本文尾句“And in contrast to our increasingly networked lives.offers the
chance of a wholly private,‘off-line'activity”可知,在我们日益网络化的生活中,我们所消费的信息
被监控和跟踪,与之相反,印刷书仍然提供了一个完全私人的、“离线”活动的机会。该句强调了印
刷书的价值,据此可知,作者提及电子书旨在说明印刷书并未完全过时,故A项正确。
Passage 5
【语篇解读】本文是一篇说明文。英国的一些烹饪类电视节目使更多的英国人改变饮食习惯
并爱上烹饪。
l.A细节理解题。根据第一段的“But is British food really so uninteresting?Even though Britain
has a reputation for less-than-impressive cuisine”可知,英国的食物通常被认为是简单的、不吸引人的。
故选A。
2D推理判断题。根据第二段最后一句It seems that TV programmes have helped change what
people think about cooking”可知,英国的烹饪类电视节目对观众影响很大,改变了他们对烹饪的看法。
故选D。authoritative“权威性的”;creative“富有创意的”;profitable“有利可图的”:influential
“有很大影响的”。
3.D细节理解题。根据第三段第二句“Almost one third say they now use a wider variety of
ingredients(配料)than they used to”可知,近三分之一的人表示他们现在使用的配料比以前更丰富了,
故选D。
4.B推理判断题。根据最后一段最后一句“With an increasing number of male chefs on TV,it'sno
longer‘uncool'for boys to like cooking”可知,随着越来越多的男厨师出现在电视上,男孩喜欢,烹饪
不再是“不酷”的事了。因此可推断,接下来作者可能会介绍一些电视节目中的男厨师。故选B。
Passage 6
【语篇解读】本文是一篇说明文。本文重点介绍了哲学著作《苏格拉底快车》,该书语言幽默,
陈述直白,却能让读者深刻思考日常生活中的欲望、孤独等哲学问题。
l.C细节理解题。根据第一段的“an uncle gave me a copy of Jostein Gaarder's Sophie's World”
和第一段尾句“It spoke to me and brought me into a world of philosophy(哲学)”可知,Jostein Gaarder
的《苏菲的世界》把作者带进了一个哲学的世界。故Jostein Gaarder为作者打开了哲学大门
2.D推理判断题。通读第四段,特别是该段尾句“This,more than a book about understanding
philosophy,is a book about learning to use philosophy to improve a life”可知,在列举了几位伟大的
哲学家后,作者指出,这不仅仅是一本关于理解哲学的书,更是一本关于学习如何运用哲学来改善生
活的书。据此可以推知,作者列举几位伟大的哲学家是为了帮助读者更好地理解Weiner的这本书。
独家授权侵权必究
色学科网书城国
品牌书店·知名教辅·正版资源
b.ZxXk.com○
您身边的互联网+教辅专家
3.B细节理解题。根据最后一段的“The Socrates Express is a fun,sharp book that draws readers in
with its apparent simplicity and gradually pulls them in deeper thoughts on desire,loneliness,and aging"
知,《苏格拉底快车》是一本有趣而尖锐的书,它因显而易见的简单而吸引读者,并逐渐将他们带入对
欲望、孤独和衰老的更深层次的思考。结合常识可以推知,《苏格拉底快车》的思想可以用于日常生
活中,故B项正确。
4.D观点态度题。根据第五段的“he does so with plenty of humor”可知,该书充满了幽默;根据
尾段第一句“The Socrates Expre,ss is a fun,sharp book that draws readers in with its apparent simplicity
and gradually pulls them in deeper thoughts on desire,loneliness,and aging”可知,《苏格拉底快车》因显
而易见的简单而吸引读者,并逐渐将他们带入对欲望、孤独和衰老的更深层次的思考。据此可以推知,
Weiner的书幽默且易懂,故D项正确。
Passage 7
【语篇解读】本文是一篇夹叙夹议文。文章介绍了不同身份的人们对于悉尼发展过程中现代
化与传统文化之间冲突的看法。
l.C主旨大意题。根据第一段“Sometime in the early 196Os,a significant thing happened in
Sydney,Australia.The city discovered its harbor.(20世纪60年代初,澳大利亚悉尼发生了一件大事。这
座城市发现了它的港口。)”和“But it is the harbor that makes the city.(但是是港口造就了这座城市。
)”可知,本段主要介绍悉尼发展的关键是港口。故选C。
2.D细节理解题。根据第二段“Andrew Reynolds,a cheerful fellow in his early3Os,pilots Sydney
ferryboats for a living.”、第三段“I'll miss these old boats.”和第五段“Catamarans are faster,but they're
not so elegant,.and they're not fun to pilot..”可知,渡轮领航员Andrew Reynolds喜欢老式渡船。故选D。
3.A推理判断题。根据倒数第三段“Shirley Fitzgerald,the city's official historian,told me that in
its rush to modernity in the 1970s,Sydney swept aside much of its past,including many of its finest
buildings.(悉尼的官方历史学家Shirley Fitzgerald告诉我,在20世纪70年代奔向现代化的过程中,悉
尼将它的大部分过去抛诸脑后,包括许多最漂亮的建筑。)”可推知,Shirley Fitzgerald认为悉尼匆忙
奔向现代化,正在失去它的传统。故选A。
4.A推理判断题。根据倒数第二段“On the other hand,being young and old at the same time has
its attractions.I considered this when I met a thoughtful young businessman named Anthony.(另一方面,既
年轻又古老也有它的魅力。当我遇到一位深思熟虑的年轻商人Anthony时,我考虑到了这一点。)”
以及最后一段“He is right(他说得没错)”可推知,作者赞同Anthony的观,点,认为一座城市可以既年
轻又古老。故选A。
独家授权侵叔必究。
色学科网书城画
品牌书店·知名教辅·正版资源
b.ZxXk.com○
您身边的互联网+教辅专家
◆独家授权食权必究·