Unit 3 Exploring the Unknown Further Exploration 导学案-2023-2024学年高中英语上外版（2020）选择性必修第三册

上外版 高一年级 选择性必修三 第三单元 第 7 课时 学案（学生版） I. Group Discussion ( Possible questions to dis cuss: 1. Which mystery are you interested in most? 2. Within this mystery, what are the poss ible theories and explanations? 3. Within these theories and explanations, which one do you disagree most? 4. Why do you disagree this theo ry? What’s your evidence? ) The mystery: Theory (Explanation)1: Theory (Explanation)2: Theory (Explanation)3: …… I have doubts about Theory : Evidence: II. Peer Evaluation 2CU3 Peer Evaluation Form Score Content（25’） Organization（20’） Expression（20’） Communication aids (PPT or visual aids)（15’） Teamwork（20’） Sum Excellent [20—25](25’) [16—20](20’) [12—15](15’) l Informative and accurate l Conducting a well-designed survey l Deep and detailed analysis of data l Well organized l All information is presented in logical, interesting sequence l Correct pronunciation and grammar l Acceptable speed and acceptable voice l Without prompt l Proper body languages l Eye contact with audience l Proper use of visual aids and good layout of pictures l Appropriate font for audience l Clear labour division l Good cooperation with each other Good [15—19](25’) [12—15](20’) [9—11](15’) l Informative but with a few minor errors l Conducting a survey l general analysis of data l Generally organized l Most information is presented in logical sequence l Some mistakes in pronunciation or grammar while presenting l A little bit fast or slow speed l A little bit loud or low voice l Presenting with some prompt sometimes l Some body languages and some eye contact with audience l Hardly any visual aids l Appropriate font for audience l Relatively clear division of labour l Slight errors between team members Needs improvement [0—14](25’) [0—11](20’) [0—8](15’) l Inaccurate or irrelevant l Plain description with no survey or data l Poorly organized l There is no apparent logical sequence in the presentation l Many mistakes in pronunciation or grammar while presenting l Fast or slow speed l Too loud or low voice l Presenting with prompt always l Few body languages and little eye contact with audience l No or irrelevant visual aids l Too much information l Font is too small to be easily seen l Not clear division of labour l Many errors between team members Scores Group1 Group2 Group3 Group4 Group5 Group6 Group7 Group8 Group9 Group10 2CU3 Peer Comments Group Key information Shining Points Areas for improvement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2CU3 Self-assessment Presentation Checklist Item Absolutely yes! to some extent yes Not at all. Did I fulfill my part of job? Did the final presentation live up to my expectation? Was I satisfied with my performance? Did I use anything learned from the textbook? Was this activity useful to me? Did I like this learning activity? Self-reflection Consider: I was satisfied/not satisfied with my presentation because … In the process of preparation, I was in charge of… What I’ve learned from the process is that … Something needs to be improved such as … I can do better by … Next time I should pay attention to … 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$ 上外版 高一年级 选择性必修三 第三单元 第 7 课时 学案（教师版） I. Group Discussion ( Possible questions to dis cuss: 1. Which mystery are you interested in most? 2. Within this mystery, what are the poss ible theories and explanations? 3. Within these theories and explanations, which one do you disagree most? 4. Why do you disagree this theo ry? What’s your evidence? ) ( The mystery: Who built Stonehenge? Theory (Explanation)1: Ancient village rs Theory (Explanation)2: Druis, the Celtic Priest Theory (Explanation)3: Aliens …… I have doubts about Theory 2 : Druis, the Celtic Priest Evidence: According to the investigation of the ston es, human remains, potteries, and deer horns, it was found that even the latest monuments in Stonehenge was built 4000 years ago. However, historians estimated that Druis arrived in England approximately 2000 years ago. The building time doesn ’ t fit Druis ’ arrival t ime. Therefore, it seemed impossible for Druis to build Stonehenge . ) II. Peer Evaluation 2CU3 Peer Evaluation Form Score Content（25’） Organization（20’） Expression（20’） Communication aids (PPT or visual aids)（15’） Teamwork（20’） Sum Excellent [20—25](25’) [16—20](20’) [12—15](15’) l Informative and accurate l Conducting a well-designed survey l Deep and detailed analysis of data l Well organized l All information is presented in logical, interesting sequence l Correct pronunciation and grammar l Acceptable speed and acceptable voice l Without prompt l Proper body languages l Eye contact with audience l Proper use of visual aids and good layout of pictures l Appropriate font for audience l Clear labour division l Good cooperation with each other Good [15—19](25’) [12—15](20’) [9—11](15’) l Informative but with a few minor errors l Conducting a survey l general analysis of data l Generally organized l Most information is presented in logical sequence l Some mistakes in pronunciation or grammar while presenting l A little bit fast or slow speed l A little bit loud or low voice l Presenting with some prompt sometimes l Some body languages and some eye contact with audience l Hardly any visual aids l Appropriate font for audience l Relatively clear division of labour l Slight errors between team members Needs improvement [0—14](25’) [0—11](20’) [0—8](15’) l Inaccurate or irrelevant l Plain description with no survey or data l Poorly organized l There is no apparent logical sequence in the presentation l Many mistakes in pronunciation or grammar while presenting l Fast or slow speed l Too loud or low voice l Presenting with prompt always l Few body languages and little eye contact with audience l No or irrelevant visual aids l Too much information l Font is too small to be easily seen l Not clear division of labour l Many errors between team members Scores Group1 Group2 Group3 Group4 Group5 Group6 Group7 Group8 Group9 Group10 2CU3 Peer Comments Group Key information Shining Points Areas for improvement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 学科网（北京）股份有限公司 $$