内容正文:
iomedical inspirations from undersea microbes. D. Significant breakthroughs of human development. 29. It can be inferred from the text that marine microbes _. A. develop adaptability even in tough conditions. B. merely enhance our understanding of diseases. C. lead to progress in tools to test stable enzymes. D. present us with treatment for common cancers. 30. What do Virginia Edgcomb's words in the last two paragraphs suggest? A. More awareness of microbes will benefit humans. B. The deep sea microbes may help us with desert issues. C. Researchers' future task is to record medical treatment. D. We should explore more habitats to free us from microbes. 31. What is a suitable title for the text? A. Chemical weapons against viruses. B. Finding answers in the deep ocean. C. A look back at research in microbes. D. Future ways to upgrade human DNA. D OpenAI's automated AI-powered chatbot ChatGPT has taken the internet by storm, but not without creating a few issues on the way. With writers, marketers, and seemingly everyone else in between using ChatGPT to generate content, companies worldwide are staring down a tsunami of AI-generated content, With issues of safety and stolen contents constantly swirling around ChatGPT and its output, OpenAI has now released GPT-Classifier, a tool designed to detect whether the text you're reading was generated by ChatGPT or one of its other GPT tools. GPT-Classifier attempts to figure out if a given piece of text was human-written or the work of an Al-generator. While ChatGPT and other GPT models are trained extensively on all manners of text input, the GPT-Classifier tool is fine-tuned on a dataset of pairs of human-written text and AI-written text on the same topic. In other words, the GPT-Classifier attempts to compare similarities between known human text and known AI text to find inconsistency that reveal the source writer. While the idea of easily spotting AI-generated text will be music to the ears of editors and educators, Op