内容正文:
押新高考卷第32—35题
阅读理解D篇 议论文
议论文
议论文是一种剖析事物、论述事理、发表意见、提出主张的文体。文章通常由论点、论据、论证三部分构成,作者通过摆事实、讲道理、辨是非等方法,来论证某种观点正确与否,肯定或否定某种主张。
【考情分析】
议论文涉及的论题具有生活化的特征,与社会生活密切相关。从命题上看,议论文阅读理解以考查细节理解和推理判断为主,但不排除对观点态度的考查。考生在平时的阅读训练中要阅读一定数量的议论文,以了解和掌握议论文的结构和行文特征。
一、文体特点与阅读策略
1. 语言与结构特点
议论文应该观点明确、论据充分、语言精练、论证合理、有严密的逻辑性。议论文通常采用三段论式的结构,即“提出问题(引论)—分析问题(本论)—解决问题(结论)”。由此可见,要理解议论文有两个关键点,一是要弄清文章的论点是什么、采用了哪些论据、如何论证;二是要理清其基本结构——三段论式结构。
2. 答题误区
议论文阅读理解题易错点往往在于事实与观点的区分以及观点本身。解题时,一要弄清哪些是所引述的事实,哪些是作者的观点以及引述中不同人物的观点;二要弄清作者真正的观点是什么,既要考虑全文,又要重视结论部分,谨防将文章中引述的某人的观点和作者的观点混为一谈。
在阅读解题时,应该从结构和内容两方面同时入手,先通读全文,再区分事实和观点。通常来说,议论文会采用三段论式结构。首段会通过一个故事或对某种现象的描述来引入话题,明确论点;接下来是文章的主体部分,会用两个或两个以上的段落引用事实和理论论据进行论证,常用的论证方法有举例、引用和对比,这一部分要注意作者所选用的论据,它们往往与细节理解题的考查点相对应,同时还要留意论证的方法;文章的最后一段是结论部分,要弄清作者最后得出了什么结论。在通读全文并了解文章的结构和内容后再阅读试题,到文章中去找相对应的信息,比如事实、观点、作者真正的意图和结论等。
【2020·全国新课标I】
Returning to a book you’ve read many times can feel like drinks with an old friend. There’s a welcome familiarity—but also sometimes a slight suspicion that time has changed you both, and thus the relationship. But books don’t change, people do. And that’s what makes the act of rereading so rich and transformative.
The beauty of rereading lies in the idea that our bond with the work is based on our present mental register. It’s true, the older I get, the more I feel time has wings. But with reading, it’s all about the present. It’s about the now and what one contributes to the now, because reading is a give and take between author and reader. Each has to pull their own weight.
There are three books I reread annually. The first, which I take to reading every spring, is Ernest Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast. Published in 1964, it’s his classic memoir of 1920s Paris. The language is almost intoxicating (令人陶醉的), an aging writer looking back on an ambitious yet simpler time. Another is Annie Dillard’s Holy the Firm, her poetic 1975 ramble (随笔) about everything and nothing. The third book is Julio Cortázar’s Save Twilight: Selected Poems, because poetry. And because C